logo
Is today's AI boom bigger than the dotcom bubble?

Is today's AI boom bigger than the dotcom bubble?

Reuters2 days ago
ORLANDO, Florida, July 22 (Reuters) - Wall Street's concentration in the red-hot tech sector is, by some measures, greater than it has ever been, eclipsing levels hit during the 1990s dotcom bubble. But does this mean history is bound to repeat itself?
The growing concentration in U.S. equities instantly brings to mind the internet and communications frenzy of the late 1990s. The tech-heavy Nasdaq peaked in March 2000 before cratering 65% over the following 12 months. And it didn't revisit its previous high for 14 years.
It seems unlikely that we'll see a repeat of this today, right? Maybe.
The market's reaction function appears to be different from what it was during the dotcom boom and bust. Just look at the current rebound from its post-'Liberation Day' tariff slump in early April – one of the fastest on record – or its rally during the pandemic.
But despite all of these differences, there are also some worrying parallels. Investors would do well to keep both in mind.
The most obvious similarity between these two periods is the concentration of tech and related industries in U.S. equity markets. The broad tech sector now accounts for 34% of the S&P 500's market cap, according to some data, exceeding the previous record of 33% set in March 2000.
Of the top 10 companies by market capitalization today, eight are tech or communications behemoths. They include the so-called 'Magnificent 7' – Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab, Amazon (AMZN.O), opens new tab, Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab, Meta (META.O), opens new tab, Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab, Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab and Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab – as well as Berkshire Hathaway (BRKa.N), opens new tab and JPMorgan (JPM.N), opens new tab.
By contrast, only five of the 10 biggest companies in 1999 were tech firms. The other five were General Electric (GE.N), opens new tab, Citi, Exxon (XOM.N), opens new tab, Walmart (WMT.N), opens new tab, and Home Depot (HD.N), opens new tab.
On top of that, the top 10 companies' footprint in the S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab today is much larger than it was back then. The combined market cap of the top 10 today is almost $22 trillion, or 40% of the index's total, significantly higher than the comparable 25% in 1999.
This all reflects the fact that technology plays a much bigger role in the U.S. economy today than it did around the turn of the millennium.
By some measures, the current tech boom, driven in part by enthusiasm for artificial intelligence, is more extreme than the IT bubble of the late 1990s.
As Torsten Slok, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, points out, the 12-month forward earnings valuation of today's top 10 stocks in the S&P 500 is higher than it was 25 years ago.
However, it's worth remembering that the dotcom bubble was characterized by a frenzy of public offerings and a raft of companies with shares valued at triple-digit multiples of future earnings. That's not the case today.
While the S&P tech sector is trading at 29.5 times forward earnings today, which is high by historical standards, this is nowhere near the peak of almost 50 times recorded in 2000. Similarly, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq are currently trading around 22 and 28.5 times forward earnings, compared with the dotcom peaks of 24.5 and over 70 times, respectively.
With all that being said, a meaningful, prolonged market correction cannot be ruled out, especially if AI-driven growth isn't delivered as quickly as investors expect.
AI, the new driver of technological development, will require vast capital outlays, especially on data centers, which may mean that earnings and share price growth in tech could slow in the short run.
According to Morgan Stanley, the transformative potential of generative AI will require roughly $2.9 trillion of global data center spending through 2028, comprising $1.6 trillion on hardware like chips and servers and $1.3 trillion on infrastructure.
That means investment needs of over $900 billion in 2028, they reckon. For context, combined capital expenditure by all S&P 500 companies last year was around $950 billion.
Wall Street analysts are well aware of these figures, which suggests that at least some percentage of these huge sums should be factored into current share prices and expected earnings, but what if the benefits of AI take longer to deliver? Or what if an upstart (remember China's DeepSeek) dramatically shifts growth expectations for a major component of the index, like $4-trillion chipmaker Nvidia?
Of course, technology is so fundamental to today's society and economy that it's difficult to imagine its market footprint shrinking too much, for too long, as this raises the inevitable question of where investor capital would go. It's therefore reasonable to question whether a tech crash today would take well over a decade to recover from.
But, on the other hand, it's that type of thinking that has gotten investors into trouble before.
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump to visit Fed headquarters as White House ramps up pressure on Powell
Trump to visit Fed headquarters as White House ramps up pressure on Powell

Reuters

time7 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump to visit Fed headquarters as White House ramps up pressure on Powell

July 24 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump will visit the Federal Reserve's headquarters in Washington on Thursday as tensions escalate between the administration and the independent overseer of the nation's monetary policy. The rare presidential visit to the Fed is happening less than a week before the central bank's 19 policymakers gather for a two-day rate-setting meeting. They are widely expected to leave the Fed's benchmark interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range where it has been since December, as they wait to see how the economy performs in the face of the administration's tariffs and other economic policies. Trump has repeatedly demanded that Fed Chair Jerome Powell slash U.S. interest rates and has frequently raised the possibility of firing him, though the president has said he does not intend to do so. On Tuesday, Trump called the Fed chief a "numbskull." In a post on his Truth Social media site, Trump said on Thursday that Powell would be present during the visit. Powell typically spends the Thursday afternoon before a rate-setting meeting doing back-to-back calls with Fed bank presidents as part of his preparations for the session. Powell, who was elevated by Trump to the top Fed job in 2018 and then reappointed by former President Joe Biden four years later, last met with Trump in March when the Republican president summoned him to the White House to press him to lower rates. The White House announced the visit late on Wednesday. "The Fed is working with the White House to accommodate their visit," a spokesperson for the U.S. central bank said. It is taking place as Trump battles to deflect attention from a political crisis over his administration's refusal to release files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, reversing a campaign promise. Epstein died in 2019. White House officials have ramped up Trump's pressure campaign on Powell in recent weeks, accusing the Fed of mismanaging the $2.5 billion renovation of two historic buildings in Washington and suggesting poor oversight and potential fraud. White House budget director Russell Vought has pegged the cost overrun at "$700 million and counting," and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent called for an extensive review of the Fed's non-monetary policy operations, citing operating losses at the central bank as a reason to question its spending on the renovation. Those losses stem from the mechanics of managing the Fed's policy rate to fight inflation, which include paying banks to park cash at the central bank. The Fed reported a comprehensive net loss of $114.6 billion in 2023 and $77.5 billion in 2024, a reversal from years of big profits it turned over to the Treasury when interest rates - and inflation - were low. The Fed, in letters to Vought and lawmakers backed up by documents posted on its website, says the project - the first full rehab of its two buildings in Washington since they were built nearly a century ago - ran into unexpected challenges including toxic materials abatement and higher-than-estimated materials and labor costs. Ahead of Trump's visit, Fed staff escorted a small group of reporters around the construction sites. They wove around cement mixers and construction machines, and spoke over the sound of drills, banging, and saws. Fed staff pointed out security features, including blast-resistant windows, that they said were a significant driver of costs in addition to tariffs and escalations in material and labor costs. The renovation project started in mid-2022 and is on track to be completed by 2027, with the move-in planned for March, 2028. A visit to the roof of the Eccles Building - a point of particular scrutiny by White House critics that the renovations were ostentatious - revealed an impressive view of the Lincoln Memorial and the National Mall, the pool report said. Staff explained that rooftop seating, although inexpensive, had been removed because of the appearance of it being an amenity and was one of only two deviations from the original plan. The other was the scrapping of a couple of planned fountains. The White House's deputy chief of staff, James Blair, said this week that administration officials would be visiting the Fed on Thursday. Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott, a Republican who sent Powell a letter, opens new tab on Wednesday asking a series of questions about the cost and other details of the renovation as well as Powell's own statements about it, is part of the visit as well. Market reaction to Trump's visit was subdued. The yield on benchmark 10-year Treasury bonds ticked higher after data showed new jobless claims dropped in the most recent week, signaling a stable labor market not in need of support from a Fed rate cut. Stocks on Wall Street were trading mostly higher. Trump's criticism of Powell and flirtation with firing him have previously upset financial markets and threatened a key underpinning of the global financial system - that central banks are independent and free from political meddling. His visit contrasts with a handful of other documented presidential visits to the Fed. Then-President Franklin Delano Roosevelt visited the central bank in 1937 to dedicate the newly-built headquarters that is one of the two Fed buildings now being renovated. Most recently, former President George W. Bush went to the Fed in 2006 to attend the swearing-in of Ben Bernanke as Fed chief. "I think it's important that he send a signal that he really isn't happy with how things are going at the Fed," said Senator Cynthia Lummis, a Republican member of the Senate Banking Committee. She said the visit was a "good decision" by Trump. Senator Mike Rounds, another Republican who sits on the Senate Banking Committee, said on Thursday he also saw no problem with Trump's visit, though he added that Powell's independence as Fed chief is "critical for the markets. I think he's done a good job of that." "I think the more information the president can glean from this, probably the better off we are in terms of resolving any issues that are outstanding," Rounds said, noting that Powell had indicated "that they have had a significant amount of money, just in terms of foundation work and so forth, that was not anticipated to begin with." Former Fed chiefs Janet Yellen and Bernanke this week wrote an opinion piece in the New York Times warning that the public's belief that the U.S. central bank is willing to make hard decisions based on data and independent of politics "is an important national asset. It is hard to acquire and easy to lose." Economic experts widely agree. "As we've seen through the disinflation process that has been taking place over the last few years, the credibility of central banks around the world has been instrumental in anchoring inflation expectations and in bringing down inflation across many countries in the world," International Monetary Fund spokesperson Julie Kozack said on Thursday. "And it is also important that independence, of course, must coexist with clear accountability to the public."

McGraw Hill valued at $3.25 billion as shares open flat in underwhelming debut
McGraw Hill valued at $3.25 billion as shares open flat in underwhelming debut

Reuters

time10 minutes ago

  • Reuters

McGraw Hill valued at $3.25 billion as shares open flat in underwhelming debut

July 24 (Reuters) - U.S. publisher McGraw Hill (MH.N), opens new tab was valued at $3.25 billion as its shares opened at par in their New York debut on Thursday, hinting at a mixed response from investors in an otherwise upbeat IPO market. IPO market activity has rebounded strongly following a significant setback earlier in the year caused by tariff tensions, although investors have remained selective in their investment choices. Advent-backed consumer insights company NIQ Global's (NIQ.N), opens new tab shares dipped 3.6% in their NYSE debut on Wednesday, while a bunch of others are choosing to stay private to bypass the market uncertainty. "As a resilient company, all of those macro factors are really interesting to see, but they have no bearing on our company. We know the time is right for us now," McGraw Hill's CEO Simon Allen said. Meanwhile, investors lapped up digital bank Chime (CHYM.O), opens new tab and stablecoin issuer Circle's (CRCL.N), opens new tab shares on their respective first trading days, marking blowout debuts for both. McGraw Hill's shares opened at $17 apiece, at par with its IPO price of $17. The Platinum Equity-backed company priced its shares below its targeted range of $19 to $22 on Wednesday to raise $414.63 million by selling 24.39 million shares in its IPO. McGraw-Hill Education was spun off from McGraw-Hill Companies in 2013 and sold to private equity giant Apollo Global Management for $2.5 billion in a take-private deal, while the remaining firm became McGraw Hill Financial Inc., later rebranded as S&P Global. Apollo tried to relist McGraw in 2015, but the plan was shelved. Billionaire Tom Gores' private equity firm Platinum Equity acquired McGraw for $4.5 billion in 2021. McGraw Hill is one of the most recognized names in the publishing industry, with 99% of U.S. public K-12 districts and 82% of U.S. higher education institutions using its products, according to company filings.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store