Farmers ‘live in fear of the tax implications of RZLT'
The Irish Farmers' Association (IFA) Farm Business Committee chair Bill O'Keeffe said farmers who have made a submission to dezone their lands must now make a return to Revenue on or before Friday, May 23 to avail of an exemption from RZLT in 2025.
This can be done by any individual by submitting a return on the RZLT portal through the Revenue online resources: myAccount or Revenue Online Service (ROS).
The advice from the IFA for those who are not familiar with these online portals to engage professional accountancy services to make this return.
RZLT
All farmers who made submissions to local authorities in the February-March window should have received an acknowledgement of this by April 30.
This acknowledgement must be included as part of the RZLT return to Revenue where a farmer is seeking an exemption from the 3% RZLT tax in 2025.
'IFA lobbied for a permanent exemption for actively farmed land throughout 2024. The exemption announced in the Budget 25 speech is unsatisfactory as it only covers this year,' O'Keeffe said.
'The process places undue obligations on many hundreds of affected farmers who may have lands zoned without their knowledge.
'They are now under the scope of this unfair taxation and there were several hoops to jump through to avail of this one-year tax exemption,' he said.
Exemption
The IFA Farm Business chair said that a one-year exemption from RZLT is not a solution.
'All actively farmed lands must be removed from the scope of RZLT permanently.
'The leaders of the three largest political parties – Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and Sinn Féin – gave a commitment to the IFA in advance of last year's general election that they would remove actively farmed land from RZLT, but we have yet to see delivery on this commitment by the current government,' O'Keeffe said.
The IFA committee chair called on the Minister for Finance, Pascal Donohoe and the Minister for Housing, James Browne to recognise that the current approach is not the correct instrument to encourage greater delivery of housing.
He said that the stated aim of RZLT was to encourage housing development, but the RZLT is doing the exact opposite.
'Affected farmers live in fear of the tax implications of RZLT and its introduction has not increased interest from potential buyers to purchasing zoned land in many cases.
'Housing developers, AHBs (approved housing bodies) and financial lenders all recognise the RZLT liability associated with purchasing zoned land.
'They are standing back from purchasing zoned land in many cases, until the many other obstacles that are restricting housing development – finance, pre-planning investigations, labour and materials – are in place,' he said.
O'Keeffe said that the IFA and farmers understand the need for more houses, but RZLT is not the instrument that will solve the current deficit.
'There are many other barriers to the supply of new housing that the government needs to address.
'IFA will continue this campaign to have all farmland permanently excluded from the scope of RZLT,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 days ago
- Irish Times
Revenue says it backs Scarp process amid criticism of opt-out mechanism
Revenue has reiterated its support for the Small Company Administrative Rescue Process (Scarp) process and said its recently criticised opt-out mechanism was 'reserved strictly for cases involving non‑compliance, audits, or ongoing tax appeals". This comes following an analysis of the Scarp regime published by Azets Ireland, formerly Baker Tilly Ireland, on Tuesday. The analysis found that some 1,314 jobs have been saved through the process since 2021 but recommended the Government consider removing a Revenue opt-out from the scheme. The Scarp process, which has been used in the past year to aide companies such as Waterford's Blackwater Distillery and Scrumdiddly's , is a rescue mechanism for smaller Irish businesses. In effect, an examinership-light process. Established in December 2021, it is designed to facilitate simplified out-of-court debt restructuring for small businesses deemed to be viable at a lower cost and with less bureaucracy than the more familiar examinership scheme. READ MORE Under its present construction, Revenue can exclude tax debts from the scheme if it has concerns about the company, if it has a history of noncompliance. Azets said the Government should consider removing this opt-out at the start of the process, which it said was deterring some businesses from applying for the scheme. 'Notwithstanding the Revenue's positive engagement with the scheme, the ability to opt out is a deterrent to some business owners considering the process,' said Dessie Morrow, partner in advisory and restructuring at Azets Ireland. In a statement on Friday, Revenue said it 'remains a committed participant in the Scarp process'. 'Our opt‑out right is reserved strictly for cases involving non‑compliance, audits, or ongoing tax appeals,' Revenue said. Revenue clarified that it only exercises its opt-out right in two situations. Firstly, in cases in which it cannot quantify the company's debt due to; outstanding returns or other relevant information, an ongoing audit or intervention; or an active tax appeal. Or in cases in which company or its directors have a track record of poor compliance. Since the introduction of the process, of the 99 Scarp applications that have been made, Revenue exercised its op-out right in 19 cases. Revenue referred to commentary noting the opt-out mechanism could deter companies from entering the process but said the only reason a director might be discouraged by the opt-out would be the anticipation of legitimate concerns. 'Businesses that act early, engage openly, and address compliance issues will continue to find Revenue a willing and constructive partner in achieving a successful rescue,' it said.
Irish Times
3 days ago
- Irish Times
Ireland's corporate tax receipts hit €156bn
The State's corporate tax boom has generated €156 billion in just 10 years, figures from the Department of Finance show. Despite various international clampdowns, including changes to US tax law and the introduction of a 15 per cent minimum tax rate, receipts from the business tax here have ballooned by more than 300 per cent in the past decade, rising from €6.9 billion in 2015 to €28 billion last year. The €156 billion total includes €11 billion from last year's Apple tax ruling . The Republic has, ironically, benefited from a global crackdown on corporate tax avoidance with several US multinationals including Apple, Google and Microsoft, shifting more profits to units in the Republic and away from offshore locations such as the Cayman Islands. READ MORE Despite the ongoing uncertainty around US tariffs, Department of Finance officials expect corporate tax revenue to increase again this year to approximately €30 billion. The Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (Ifac) is also predicting receipts to rise by a further €5 billion from 2026 onwards as additional revenue from the new minimum tax rate of 15 per cent flows into the exchequer. Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe noted in recent days that approximately €16 billion of these excess receipts will have been saved in the State's two sovereign wealth funds by the end of 2025. The Juggle: the issues facing women with young children when balancing childcare and their careers Listen | 44:30 But Ifac has criticised the Government for allowing day-to-day spending to increase too quickly and for not saving more of these tax receipts. 'If you exclude excess corporation tax, the Government is spending more than it is collecting in revenue,' said Ifac chief economist Niall Conroy. 'This comes at a time when the economy is performing well, with record-high levels of employment,' he said. 'Introducing the two savings funds is an important and welcome step,' Mr Conroy said. 'However, the Government should be saving more into these funds when it is receiving huge amounts of corporation tax revenue and the economy is strong,' he said. 'By saving more now, we would be better placed to deal with future challenges such as an ageing population and climate change,' he added.
Irish Times
4 days ago
- Irish Times
Department of Public Expenditure faces ‘embarrassing' €700,000 Revenue bill after payroll errors
The Department of Public Expenditure is facing having to pay about €700,000 in interest to the Revenue Commissioners over delays and inaccuracies in its tax deductions. Members of the Dáil Public Accounts Committee queried whether the issue was 'embarrassing' for the department which oversees public-sector efficiency. The secretary general of the department, David Moloney, told the committee on Thursday that there had been significant errors and he was not happy about the situation. The issue relates to deductions from the retirement benefits of former public service staff with high-value pensions worth more than €2 million. In such cases the tax is paid by the pension administrator, who recoups the money by reducing the benefits over a 20-year period. The committee heard that a review of about 20 cases by the Comptroller and Auditor General , Seamus McCarthy, between 2015 and 2023 found that while deductions had, correctly, been made from the pensions, in only six instances had the money actually been paid over to the Revenue. READ MORE Deductions worth about €2.3 million had remained on the books of the department. A subsequent Revenue sample audit this year identified other issues regarding taxation of high-value pensions. Bernie Kelly, chief executive of the National Shared Service Office, said a review had identified 23 cases where chargeable excess tax (CET) had not been calculated correctly, of which 19 had been validated. She said this had generated a liability of €1.4 million. Ms Kelly told Fine Gael TD James Geoghegan that about €230,000 in interest payments would be triggered on foot of the liability in the case where the CET had been incorrectly calculated. The department had earlier told the committee that more than €468,744 in interest payments had been paid in relation to the earlier cases where the tax had been correctly calculated but the money was not passed on the Revenue. Mr Moloney said it would be a matter for the Revenue Commissioners as to whether further penalties would be applied in addition to the interest. Mr Geoghegan asked Mr Moloney whether this was 'embarrassing' for the Department of Public Expenditure to have to make interest payments to the Revenue Commissioners for the late payment of taxes when it held other departments to account over their spending. Mr Moloney said he was not happy about the situation and that his department strived to pay people correctly.
