New report details state's response to human trafficking through victims' eyes
The report is a first of its kind for the state because it is fully curated through the eyes of the human trafficking victims.
DCF to close Harwinton group home following investigation into sexual assault, trafficking allegations
The report was led by Connecticut Children's Alliance Executive Director Krystal Rich and Hartford State's Attorney Sharmese Walcott. Both Rich and Walcott serve as co-chairs on the taskforce. The report used data from 49 victim case studies. Each of the victims range in ages from 12 to 50 years old.
The taskforce was created in 2021 and since, the team has been working to spearhead human trafficking across Connecticut and ensure better recovery for the victims.
Rich told News 8, as part of the team's effort to build a survivor centered system, they orchestrated a journey mapping report, which 'is a visual tool used to understand and document the steps, experiences and interactions a person or group goes through within a system.'
This gives a first-hand perspective of the steps in place throughout each tier of the state's recovery system through the eyes of the victim.
The report revealed critical gaps that need additional attention and improvement moving forward.
The first key challenge identified is decentralized oversight.
'There's no one who looks at the whole statewide system and holds people accountable and makes sure there's a continuum of care,' Rich said.
The taskforce hopes to address the decentralized oversight by improving the current fragmented oversight and limited collaboration.
The final report outlines seven key challenges in Connecticut's trafficking response, including:
Decentralized Oversight: The absence of a clear statewide system or agency-led governance for human trafficking response results in fragmented oversight and limited collaboration.
Varied Systems & Processes: Significant inconsistencies in intake, screening, and referral processes across different agencies and organizations, including varying definitions of human trafficking.
Inconsistency in Data Collection & Sharing: The lack of standardized data collection and limited data-sharing impedes efficient service delivery and a comprehensive understanding of the issue.
Policy & Legislative Gaps: Deficiencies in state human trafficking-specific laws, statutes, and policies, partly due to the lack of centralized response.
No Formal Adult Victim Response: While child victims have dedicated resources to use, there is no formal process to support adult trafficking.
Resource & Funding Constraints: The need for more resources, evidence-based training, and specialized services, particularly housing, often exceeds available funding.
Limited Focus on Labor Trafficking: Current efforts predominantly focus on sex trafficking, with limited attention to the unique needs of labor trafficking victims.
Read the full report here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to WTNH.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ellis George LLP: CA Court of Appeal Upholds $5 Million Jury Verdict Against Bristol-Meyers-Squibb-owned Impact Biomedicines
Original verdict in Dr. James Brewer's fraud case reinstated by California Court of Appeal SAN DIEGO, July 21, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Ellis George LLP announced that The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, has reversed a trial court order that reduced a jury verdict against Impact Biomedicines and instead reinstated the original $5,020,000 award. Impact Biomedicines, a division of Bristol-Meyers-Squibb, and Impact Biomedicine's founder and owner, Dr. John Hood, must pay San Diego physician and Alzheimer's researcher James Brewer M.D., Ph.D., more than $1 million in compensatory damages and $4 million in punitive damages in a fraudulent concealment case filed in 2019. Dr. Brewer, chair of the neurology department at UC San Diego, was represented by Christopher W. Arledge and Courtney L. Mitchell, both of Ellis George LLP, and Peter Afrasiabi of One LLP. At trial in the San Diego County Superior Court, a 12-member jury awarded Dr. Brewer more than $5 million, finding that Impact Biomedicines and Dr. Hood had defrauded Dr. Brewer as part of Impact Biomedicines' effort to end an FDA-mandated clinical hold and get Impact Biomedicines' experimental cancer drug approved. The jury accepted Dr. Brewer's argument that Impact Biomedicines and Dr. Hood had misled the FDA about the work Dr. Brewer had done for them and the conclusions he had reached and then concealed its false statements to the FDA from Dr. Brewer. Later, the trial court agreed that Dr. Brewer had proven his fraud case but reduced the damages number significantly. At the time, Mr. Arledge said he disagreed with the court's decision to reduce the damages and predicted that the trial court's order would be reversed on appeal. Today it was. According to the Court of Appeal's opinion, "We conclude that substantial evidence supports the jury's findings on liability and damages, and the jury's award of punitive damages was not constitutionally excessive…" "This was a hard-fought win against a very well-funded opponent and one of the largest, most-prestigious law firms in the country. Now a jury, a trial court, and an appellate court have all agreed that Dr. Brewer proved his fraud claim, and we're grateful to the Court of Appeal for recognizing that the trial court's reduction in Dr. Brewer's damages was a legal error," said Mr. Arledge. "This is an important win for Dr. Brewer and for patients who must be able to rely on the FDA drug-approval process." Impact Biomedicines was represented by Colleen C. Smith, John T. Ryan, Andrew R. Gray, and Melissa Arbus Sherry, all of Latham & Watkins. James Brewer v Impact Biomedicines, et al. Superior Court No. 37-2019-00067876-CU-CO-CTL About Ellis George LLP Ellis George LLP is an elite litigation and trial firm based in Los Angeles and with offices in San Francisco and New York. Whether plaintiff or defendant, individual, Fortune 500 corporation or entrepreneur, clients call upon Ellis George when seeking litigation counsel of the highest quality, creativity, dedication, and ethics. Visit View source version on Contacts Media Contact:Jim Goldman, GoldmanMediaGroup, for Ellis George LLPinfo@ 408-427-4349
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A Teen Sent Home for Refusing to Take Out Trash at McDonald's Complained to Mom. Then Her Manager Shot Mom: Cops
A McDonald's manager from Illinois is facing a weapons charge after allegedly shooting the mother of one of her employees. Kathy Bledsoe, 44, was working as manager at a Belleville outpost of the fast food chain on July 16, and at one point in the afternoon instructed a juvenile female to take out the trash, according to the Belleville Police Department. When the teen refused, Bledsoe claimed to police she instructed the girl to clock out for the day. At that point the teen contacted her mother, Tynika R. McKinzie, "who responded to the store with another juvenile female," according to a news release, after which a "verbal disturbance ensued." At some point, McKinzie allegedly made her way behind the counter of the restaurant and to Bledsoe's office. Once there, she allegedly "battered Bledsoe in the face and head" until the manager pulled out a gun and allegedly shot the woman in the leg, according to police. Bledsoe was arrested by police and charged with one count of aggravated unlawful use of a weapon. McKinzie was taken to the hospital to be treated for her injuries and was charged with one count each of aggravated battery and mob action. "It is unfortunate that this incident occurred. It seems individuals are quick to resort to violence to resolve disputes without consideration of the impact their actions have on the community as a whole," Chief of Police Matthew Eiskant said in a statement. "This was an unnecessary incident that could have been mitigated without punches being thrown or a gun being used." Bledsoe and McKinzie did not respond to requests for comment. Read the original article on People
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas A&M's ICE Reporting Email Ignites Controversy
(Texas Scorecard) – Texas A&M is facing criticism after an internal email by the university provost and executive vice president asked staff, faculty, and graduate students to contact university police if they see a 'federal law enforcement officer on campus.' On July 17 at 12:38 pm, Provost and Executive Vice President Alan Sams sent an email to Texas A&M faculty, staff, and graduate students titled 'Correcting Misinformation Regarding Immigration Enforcement Activity.' Hours after Sams sent this email, it was widely reported on social media. Sams wrote that he was sending this communication to 'address concerns related to immigration enforcement and the university,' and that 'your safety, well-being and privacy are of the utmost importance.' In the email, Sams warned faculty, staff, and graduate students against 'sharing partial or inaccurate information about individual situations.' Sams provided a list of five points for readers. These include a reminder that TAMU 'does not proactively share information with immigration' outside of the law or a court order, and that support and resources are available on campus for international students, staff, and faculty. Sams also asked that faculty, staff, and graduate students 'immediately contact' university police if they 'encounter a federal law enforcement officer on campus' or 'see something suspicious,' which has sparked criticism on social media. He promised to distribute 'guidance' detailing 'how to handle interactions with federal law enforcement, including immigration enforcement, if they come on university property.' Sams' recent email differs in tone from earlier communications to faculty, staff, and graduate students. On June 6, after Texas agreed to end in-state tuition for illegal alien students, Sams wrote that 'we are working with The Texas A&M University System' as it worked with all its subsidiaries 'to gather information needed to develop an appropriate plan to implement the requirements' regarding tuition for 'undocumented students.' On June 4, the Trump administration's Department of Justice sued Texas for providing in-state tuition to illegal aliens. In coordination with Attorney General Ken Paxton, just hours later that same day, the state settled and ended the discounted tuition for illegals. More state-level action followed. In a letter to colleges and universities later that month, Wynn Rosser, commissioner of the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, stated that illegal alien students in Texas will need to pay out-of-state tuition by the fall semester. Rosser wrote that colleges and universities 'must assess the population of students who have established eligibility for Texas resident tuition … who are not lawfully present and will therefore need to be reclassified as non-residents and charged non-resident tuition.' The above actions reportedly triggered fear within some sectors at Texas A&M. In the June 6 email, Sams addressed President Trump's June 4 proclamation banning entry to America for citizens from 12 nations and elevated visa restrictions for another seven. 'We are ensuring international scholars and students are aware and have access to accurate information,' Sams wrote. On July 11, Sams wrote a follow-up on the situation. He stated that based on 'guidance' from the Higher Education Coordinating Board and the Texas A&M University System, 'we are fully implementing the requirements of the court's order for students beginning this fall.' He added that TAMU was 'in direct contact' with 'potentially affected students' who need to confirm if they're eligible for in-state tuition or must pay the non-resident rate. Texas Scorecard received these communications from an internal source. Public criticism of TAMU by state officials followed the exposure of the July 17 email. 'Why the hell is @tamu encouraging students to report ICE agents to the police… and treating 'gender identity' as if Biden's Title IX rule was still in effect!?!' posted State Rep. Brian Harrison (R–Midlothian). 'Texas A&M has been led by progressive leftists for too long, and my office will be demanding answers.' 'It's dangerous and inexcusable that university leaders are encouraging faculty and students to report ICE agents instead of criminals,' posted Republican Texas Railroad Commissioner and candidate for State Comptroller Christi Craddick. 'If ICE is on campus, I'm assuming they are there to enforce the law and stop threats to public safety. Sadly, many of the victims of criminal illegal aliens have been young people. I want our college & university campuses and all our communities to be safe.' Others on social media expressed similar thoughts. 'Whoever is running Texas A&M now needs to be fired. Promoting stupid and perverse stuff is not our heritage,' posted Russel Brown on X. 'My husband and I are both alumni of Texas A&M. We actually met in College Station. My father, my sister, and my brother all attended A&M too,' posted user @JennyPsalms121 on X. 'My son is a senior in high school this year. He is graduating with honors. He will not be going to A&M as it's not the same school as we attended.' Texas A&M did not respond to Texas Scorecard's request for comment before publication. Glenn Hegar, chancellor of the Texas A&M University System—which oversees all A&M campuses—released a statement emphasizing that university police will always cooperate with federal, state, and local law enforcement. Solve the daily Crossword
