Caroline Darian, the Daughter of Gisèle Pelicot, Is Fighting for Survivors Everywhere
But then, Paul got a phone call from Darian's mother, Gisèle Pelicot. She had something to tell him about her husband, Darian's father, Dominique.
'My mother called Paul. Not me,' writers Darian in her memoir, I'll Never Call Him Dad Again, which was released in the US last month. 'She couldn't bring herself to tell any of her children. But she knew she could count on Paul. She knew he could take it, no matter how bad the news.'
The news would not only change Darian's family forever, but the entire world. As she would soon learn, Dominique was discovered to have been drugging her mother for years, and then inviting men to come rape her in her sleep. Once her husband and the men accused of raping her went to trial, Gisèle Pelicot took the extraordinary step of waiving her right to anonymity, so that the names and faces of the accused would also be public. As she memorably stated, in words that would become a rallying cry: 'Shame must change sides.'
But while the Pelicot trial—which resulted in 51 men being convicted including Dominique— became an international symbol of the fight against rape culture worldwide, for Darian it was a gutting and life-altering personal tragedy. I'll Never Call Him Dad Again is a diaristic examination of the months following Dominique's arrest, with Darian sharing her raw feelings, emotions, and experiences on the page.
Now an activist with her own organization fighting for victims of chemical-induced rape, Darian is also seeking to prove in court that she was another of Dominque's victims, filing a legal complaint last month (Dominique has denied sexually assaulting his daughter). And six months on from the watershed trial, she is seeking to shed a light on not just her family's story, but the scourge of sexual abuse worldwide, which often doesn't see the light.
'To me, it's not only about one woman, you know what I mean?' Darian, who uses a pen name for her writing, tells Glamour via Zoom. 'There are so many victims who have suffered from sexual abuse, and it's not only about one hero, it's about many heroes that we have to support…I don't want to forget about the others. There are so many women, even children, who are really alone and sometimes abandoned by their own family. We have to become aware of that.'
Darian spoke with Glamour about her activism during and since the trial, her fight for justice, and what US readers can do to further the message.
: Your book was recently released in the US, what has it been like to share your story with an entirely new audience?
Caroline Darian: It's amazing to me. Now this book is traveling all around the world. I think it's useful, at least at the moment we're living. I know that in the US it's not that easy, when it comes to all of these DEI topics and so on. So I guess it's useful for the audience and the American citizens, to better understand what's happening over here in Europe.
It's a particularly poignant time for your story to be shared here. I was struck by how open and raw you are in describing the experience. Why did you decide to write about it?
Well, to me, talking, writing, and sharing is therapeutic. When I discovered the violence of the facts, all those facts that came out, it was kind of an emergency. I just needed to write it down to put a little bit of a distance also just to metabolize all of this stuff. I just wanted to be authentic and true to myself, because it's a big part of me that I have lost in the end.
Was there any part of you that wanted to hold back in sharing the harder moments?
I just knew that I had to write, without any anticipation. To be honest with you, I said to myself, I'm going to save at least one woman on Earth. But I didn't really know that this book would be a bestseller in France. I'm a simple woman. I'm working. I have a normal life. I'm trying to get a normal life. But I know that writing probably saved me.
You write about how you processed the events not just as a daughter, but how you helped your young son, Tom, through it as well. How is he doing now?
He is good, he is almost 11 now. I think he's a little bit more mature than probably some other children his age. I think it's a part of his family history, his legacy, but it's not limited or restricted to this.
I really loved how you discussed figuring out as a mother how to help your child through such a trauma, and how the two of you worked together to find a therapist for him. It is a great example of parenting.
I think it came naturally. I mean, it was so difficult, and we knew that we needed some help because we are not therapists, and I was so shocked and impacted that I knew that I wasn't able to help him.
What about the rest of your family? How have you been doing since the trial concluded in December?
I don't want to lie. It is still really painful. It's really difficult for us as children…so our life, we are never the same.
You recently released a second book in France, covering the trial and its aftermath, right?
Yes. It's really different from the first one. The first one was a bit intimate writing as a diary, and the second one, once again, came out naturally because I started during this trial. I just wanted to raise some different stuff. The behind the scenes, this trial, which was covered by all the media across the world, but in the end, what happened inside of us, within our family during this trial. Once again, I wanted to share this part of me because in the end, to me, it's not over. This ride is over, but for me, it's not the end of the story. It's a never-ending story.
You also filed a against Dominique in March, accusing him of drugging and sexually abusing you. Can you tell us about it?
I had decided to wait until the end of [my mother's] trial to press charges against Dominique for the real fact that I know it happened for me. I was [drugged], probably for sexual assault. There's pictures of me. There are some serious facts that weren't really investigated by the French police. So with my new lawyer, now we're still waiting for the public prosecutors to give me an answer. I don't know if they're going to help reopen the file, or if they're going to do some more investigating. I'm just waiting.
One of the most poignant parts of the book for me was your honest discussion of how your family weathered these events, because they weren't always linear and were incredibly hard to navigate. Have you heard from others who experienced family trauma and related to your story?
I received so many. So many people who went through this kind of trauma and traumatic symptoms. A lot of women, I must say that many are women, even if they are not the only victims in France and in Europe…I've heard so many different stories, and most of the time it's someone coming from the inside, from home, from their family, from their even colleagues or even a parent. So, it's really scary.
You founded an organization, # or 'Don't Put Me Under,' to raise awareness and fight against the scourge of drug-induced rape and sexual assault. What work has the group been doing lately?
We're really driving awareness. We are developing some different kinds of content for training all the health professionals, but we are also helping some victims. I did a partnership with a health structure in France led by a pharmacist, and we are closely working together with a platform where all the victims can have a call and get an interview to talk with some trained people, because it's really specific when you're talking with those kinds of victims.
I'm closely working also with politicians. We're currently working on a governmental mission, and the report is going to be sent out to our ministry on May 12th with clear recommendations and guidelines for really improving the support of the victims in France. We're working on the legal stuff, social stuff, but also health. For instance, to make toxicological analysis even more accessible in France, because it's really expensive.
Your mother's case was a watershed moment in France. Do you feel like it and the work you are doing has made the government more receptive to implementing some of these protections? How has it changed the culture?
Back in 2020, no one talked about chemical submission. When I started to investigate these cases in France, I really discovered that it was really under the carpet. Health professionals were aware of it, but no one from the public opinion, no one. Now it's probably something that is even more well known, of course, from this trial, but also with the first book and all the work that we've been doing since.
I think there's something changing about the notion of consent in France. But I think there's also a real awareness that it is everywhere. Everywhere. I thought that we had an ordinary family coming from the middle class with no big issue, and it happened inside of our own family. It also happens at a political level. Look at the [Harvey] Weinstein affair. Seriously, it's everywhere in every level of our society.
What do you think are the main, actionable lessons readers can learn from your story?
I just want to bear in mind one thing. We all know someone around us who has lived through sexual abuse, and we all have to listen. I think all the victims need to get listened to, believed, and believed and supported. And that's why it's quite a universal story, because I think all the people realize that they know someone. They know someone from their different kind of sphere who lived through that kind of situation.
One important thing to me is that I really want to encourage all the people who will be able to read the book to encourage them to talk. Talk to their family and friends. I think we have to be open-minded.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
Originally Appeared on Glamour
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
25-07-2025
- Hamilton Spectator
Law experts, observers raise questions as Ontario adds virtual courtroom restrictions
Ontario's lower courts are introducing restrictions on who can attend proceedings virtually after what they describe as an escalation of interruptions, a move that law experts and observers say raises questions about transparency. The Ontario Court of Justice released a new policy last week that would stop observers from accessing court proceedings online unless they receive authorization from the judge or justice of peace overseeing the case. Those interested in attending court cases are encouraged to show up in person, the policy says. It does not apply to proceedings at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. The lower court attributes the move to a rise in deliberate disruptions of court proceedings referred to as 'Zoom bombings,' which is when participants disturb a virtual call with inappropriate content or messages. 'These disruptions are an impermissible attack on the integrity of the justice system and the administration of justice,' an interim policy notice said, adding that they often cause delays and can have negative effects for participants, court staff and jurists. Boris Bytensky, president of the Criminal Lawyers' Association, says changes to the observer policy were needed because of the 'despicable acts of disruption' caused by certain attendees in virtual courts. 'This is the only way to ensure that proceedings that are conducted by Zoom and bring the significant benefits to the system and to the parties that virtual proceedings offer are free from any unacceptable interference,' Bytensky said in an emailed statement. But some experts warn that the policy could be a step back when it comes to openness. Virtual court hearings on Zoom were first adopted in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic so court processes could continue amid government-mandated physical distancing rules. The continued use of videoconferencing technology in courtrooms since then has created a level of access people now expect, complicating the decision to change the policy, said Teresa Scassa, law professor at the University of Ottawa. 'At this point, the meaning of open courts or what is an open court has changed, and now you're taking away something that's there,' she said in an interview. While the new policy says physical attendance is still on the table, that is not an option for everyone, Scassa said. People with disabilities, those who don't drive and anyone who lives far away from courts do not always have the option to attend in person, she said. 'I have some sympathy for the challenges the courts are dealing with. But I do have some questions about whether the route that they've chosen is really the route that best respects the open court principles,' said Scassa. A small number of court proceedings only take place virtually. To observe these cases, the court says people need to request permission by emailing the court's communications officer — the same contact that media use to request access to virtual proceedings. Scassa said she has questions about how judges will decide who should and shouldn't get access: 'Does everybody get permission? Who gets denied permission? Is there some hierarchy?' The Ontario Court of Justice did not respond to a request for more information about the authorization process before deadline. Avid court observer Jenny Pelland said the court's new policy isn't surprising, as they've witnessed Zoom bombings many times over the past few years, especially in high-profile cases. 'I've seen some where it's been very graphic,' Pelland said in an interview, adding that the disruptions often display violent or pornographic content. Since the observer policy was announced, Pelland said courts have already been applying the rules differently, with some posting notices in the Zoom waiting room that public access is banned and others allowing access but requiring attendees to provide their full legal name or have their camera turned off. Such differences are not novel, with Pelland saying they've noticed limitations on access even in cases when they reached out to a judge or court clerk for permission in advance. 'For some courts in Ottawa, it's been almost impossible to log in for the past few months,' Pelland said. 'Some judges don't allow observers at all and it's not something new.' Alyssa King, associate professor of law at Queen's University, said understaffing is already a concern in Ontario courts, and adding more administrative burden for judges will cause inconsistencies in the way policies are applied across the province. 'It's not because anybody is acting in bad faith or trying to prevent the public from accessing the court,' she said. 'But they are people with a big workload and sometimes very high stress decisions that they need to make quickly … so any time you add to what they have to do administratively, that's tough.' A different process is still followed to allow access to virtual courts for victims and complainants. The court says they should get in touch with their local Crown attorney's office or victim witness assistance program. Jasminder Sekhon, director of community engagement, EDI and policy at Victim Services Toronto, said the court should consider updating its policies on that process to make sure it is more accessible and survivor-informed. 'Not just the victims should be able to apply, but also people should be able to apply on their behalf,' Sekhon said, adding that people who support survivors should also be considered to receive virtual access. For Linda McCurdy, a criminal defence lawyer based in Windsor, Ont., adding an extra step to prevent disruptions is a good way to preserve the integrity of the courts. 'I barely notice people in the court, but you really notice people on Zoom when they're doing stuff,' said McCurdy, adding that people tend to forget about formalities when calling in from their own homes. 'If you want to come and watch the proceedings, come to the court, come sit in the court. That's the way it's always been.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 25, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
NBC News
25-07-2025
- NBC News
Live updates: DOJ to continue interview with Epstein partner Ghislaine Maxwell; Trump heads to Scotland
The Justice Department is seeking the release of grand jury transcripts from the Jeffrey Epstein case. President Donald Trump visits the Federal Reserve in Washington, D.C., on Thursday. Julia Demaree Nikhinson / AP Updated July 25, 2025, 7:20 AM EDT It was late afternoon on the last Friday in June, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Mike Gordon was in his office in Tampa, Florida, interviewing a victim for an upcoming trial via Zoom. Alongside a special agent, Gordon was preparing the victim to be a witness in a Justice Department case against a lawyer who the Justice Department alleged had been scamming clients. There was a knock at the door, Gordon later told NBC News, and he didn't answer; at the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Middle District of Florida, there was a culture of not just popping in when the door is closed. But the door popped open, and there stood the office manager, ashen-faced. The office manager is in charge of security, and Gordon thought for a moment that something might have happened to his family. Gordon muted the Zoom call, and the office manager handed him a piece of paper. It was a one-page letter signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi. He'd been terminated from federal service. 'No explanation. No advance warning. No description of what the cause was,' Gordon said in an interview. 'Now, I knew why. I knew it had to be my Jan. 6 work.' Gordon had been senior trial counsel in the Capitol Siege Section of the U.S. Attorney's Office in Washington, which prosecuted alleged rioters involved in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. His title reflected some of the high-profile cases he'd taken on during the Jan. 6 investigation and the role he played in helping other federal prosecutors. At the time of his firing, Gordon had long been working on other cases back home in Florida. He had recently been assigned to co-lead a case against two people accused of stealing more than $100 million from a medical trust for people with disabilities, as well as injured workers and retirees. Just two days before he was fired, he'd received an 'outstanding' rating on his performance review. Now, along with two other recently fired Justice Department employees, Gordon is pushing back, suing the Trump administration late Thursday over their dismissals. The suit argues that the normal procedures federal employees are expected to go through to address their grievances — the Merit Systems Protection Board — are fundamentally broken because of the Trump administration's actions. Read the full story here. Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., today announced an immigration bill that would broaden pathways to obtain legal status and citizenship for longtime residents of the U.S, including Dreamers, highly skilled workers and asylum seekers. The bill, called the Renewing Immigration Provisions of the Immigration Act of 1929, would make immigrants who have been living in the United States continuously for at least seven years eligible for permanent legal status. This would update an existing statute that was last amended in 1986, which set the cut off date for eligibility at 1972. It would also provide a pathway for Dreamers, asylum-seekers and high-skilled workers with H-1B Visas to obtain green cards. Padilla first introduced the bill in 2022 but it never got passed the Judiciary committee. A version was introduced in the House by Rep. Zoe Lofgren and similarly languished in committee. Both versions will be reintroduced on Monday, Padilla said. 'We believe this is the first step,' he said, adding that changing public opinion is the key ingredient this time. According to a recent Gallup poll, 79% of Americans say immigration is a good thing compared to 64% in 2024. Support for allowing undocumented immigrants to become U.S. citizens has increased to 78% compared to 70% last year. 'What we're seeing in practice is not what people signed up for,' he said of Trump's immigration directives. 'The overreach, how extreme and cruel the administration has become about immigration enforcement, has shifted public opinion about Donald Trump and his policies.' Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said last night that he plans to continue his conversation with Epstein's longtime accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell today. The two spoke for several hours yesterday as the administration seeks to probe Maxwell for additional information about Epstein's case. Attorney General Pam Bondi chose Blanche to speak with Maxwell in an attempt to 'pursue justice' after a decision by the Justice Department to no longer release information from the federal investigation into Epstein roiled Trump's base. 'President Trump has told us to release all credible evidence. If Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say,' Bondi said this week on X.
New York Post
25-07-2025
- New York Post
New Jersey meeting to decide host of fall election debate stalled by ‘Zoom bomb' flashing racist, antisemitic, pornographic material
A meeting between a New Jersey election committee and multiple venues vying to host the gubernatorial and lieutenant governor debates in the fall was halted after a mystery guest dropped a 'Zoom bomb' including racist, antisemitic and pornographic materials. The New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission held a virtual meeting with nine sponsors to narrow down the host for the gubernatorial general election debates and a singular discussion between the lieutenant governor candidates in the fall. The beginning of the meeting was largely uninterrupted as the ELEC members explained the process and agenda. Advertisement 3 The New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission's meeting held to decide the host of this fall's election debates was spoiled by a troll. AP The first presentation went off without a hitch. The second, led by WABC-TV New York/WPVI-TV Philadelphia/Rutgers Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, was plagued with inexplicable noises including alarms, ringtones and explosions, POLITICO reported. Advertisement The moderators interrupted to try and patch the source of the interruption and instructed anyone with their microphone still on to mute themselves. The grating noises stopped for a moment until one of the hopeful sponsors started to speak again. A series of pornographic images, including one with a Swastika, started to flash across the screen. At the same time, the audio fizzled into a recording of a song that repeated the N-word, according to the outlet. The chaos ensued for just a minute before the meeting was promptly shut down. Advertisement 3 The Zoom bomber flooded the meeting with antisemitic pornographic materials and audio of someone singing the N-word repeatedly. AP ELEC Chair Thomas Prol reached out to the offices of the governor and state attorney general to investigate the 'shocking breach of public trust,' he wrote on LinkedIn. 'They have put their top investigators on the hack that occurred. On behalf of my fellow commissioners and myself, I say this to those responsible: You will not disrupt democracy in New Jersey. We will find you and prosecute you,' Prol wrote. 'My office is aware of the disruption of today's virtual meeting of the Election Law Enforcement Commission, and the incident is being investigated by the Division of Criminal Justice. We will not tolerate any attempts to interfere with our democratic process,' Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin added in a statement obtained by The Post. Advertisement 3 The state's Attorney General's Office is investigating the Zoom bombing. Getty Images The commission rescheduled the selection process for next Tuesday with additional 'safeguards in place,' Prol added. Zoom bombing was a phenomenon bred from the COVID-19 pandemic as people across the world suddenly relied on the virtual communication platform to work and go to school. In February 2021, a squadron of Zoom bombers took aim at a New York City Council meeting and flooded the call with a mountain of lewd NSFW smut, including videos of people in the middle of having sex. Other trolls crashed a virtual AA meeting, taunting the recovering addicts by saying 'Alcohol is soooo good.'
