New feature of Brazil's Pix system to draw $30 billion in e-commerce payments
Launched in late 2020, Pix, an online instant payment system designed by Brazil's central bank, has become Brazilians' favorite way to pay, surpassing credit and debit cards and nearly killing the use of cash.
It currently handles over 2 trillion reais ($338 billion) in transactions per month.
In June, the central bank is expected to launch "Pix Automatico," a feature to automate payment of recurring bills such as utilities and streaming services.
"Pix Automatico should be really relevant," said Ebanx vice president of product Eduardo de Abreu, arguing key online segments such as software as a service and streaming services heavily rely on recurring revenues.
Although Abreu sees credit cards as the main rival of Pix Automatico in the e-commerce segment, he projected most of the growth of the new feature in its first two years of operation should come from new customers who are currently shut out from the market by either not having a card or not having enough credit.
Pix Automatico's total payments processed could be much higher than Ebanx's estimate, as the latest estimate focuses just on the e-commerce sector.
Currently, recurring bills in Brazil are paid using bank invoices and automatic debiting, which require firms to partner with a variety of banks to handle their clients' charges. Pix Automatico, on the other hand, will require vendors to partner with just one financial company.
Still, Moody's Ratings senior analyst Alexandre Albuquerque said lenders will likely not be threatened by Pix Automatico, as their revenues are diversified and they have client benefits such as cashback on credit-card payments.
($1 = 5.9109 reais)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
Turkey inflation falls to 33.52% in July, below forecast
ISTANBUL, Aug 4 (Reuters) - Turkish annual consumer price inflation dipped more than expected to 33.52% in July, opens new tab, official data showed on Monday, sustaining a downward trend despite strong rises in housing and education sector prices. Month-on-month, opens new tab, inflation was 2.06%, the Turkish Statistical Institute said, below forecasts. In June, CPI inflation was 1.37% monthly and 35.05% annually. In a Reuters poll, the monthly inflation rate was expected to be 2.4% in July, with the annual rate seen at 34.05%. On July 24, the central bank cut its policy rate by 300 basis points and relaunched an easing cycle, while saying that leading indicators suggest a temporary rise in monthly inflation in July due to month-specific factors. A mid-year hike in fuel and tobacco prices as well as a rise in natural gas prices had been expected to drive monthly inflation. Transport prices rose 2.89% month-on-month and alcoholic drinks and tobacco prices rose 5.69%. Housing prices were up 5.78%. The domestic producer price index rose 1.73% month-on-month in July for an annual rise of 24.19%, the data showed. Inflation is seen dropping to 29.75% at the end of this year according to the poll median, higher than the central bank forecast of 24%. Economy officials say they are confident that inflation to fall to between 24-29% central bank forecast range at the end of the year.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Brexit's parallels with Trump tariffs tell a tale
LONDON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - In figuring out why the U.S. tariff shock hasn't sent the economy or financial world into a tailspin, Britain's exit from the European Union trade bloc provides something of a playbook - and without a particularly happy ending. Aside from vast differences in economic scale and global reach, the two episodes bear some comparison in how they upended years of deeply integrated free trade and possibly in how business, the economy at large and financial markets reacted. The 2016 Brexit referendum and Trump's tariffs this year were each widely billed as economic shocks that would send the financial world into paroxysms. They didn't, at least not at the outset. To be sure, both were followed by dramatic downward lurches in the two countries' respective currencies. But, to some extent, the steep drop in sterling after the referendum vote and the dollar's plunge on President Donald Trump's tariff plan this year helped offset some of the wider impact - at least on stock markets that are loaded with global firms with outsized foreign revenue. More broadly, however, the difficulty in isolating their immediate net impact means no "big bang" economic crisis unfolds to prove critics right - even if their enduring legacy turns out to be a slow burn of economic potential and lost output, often obscured by multiple other crosswinds. In Britain's case, the seismic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic distorted any attempt to easily assess Brexit when it actually happened. Tortuous negotiations with the EU meant the UK's departure eventually occurred on the eve of the health crisis in 2020 and the new trade rules did not come into force until a year later. But in the four years between the referendum surprise and the pandemic, the UK economy never entered a recession nor recorded a negative quarterly GDP print - confounding pro-EU supporters at the time and bolstering the Brexit lobby. Emerging from the twin hits, however, the economy has almost flatlined since. FTSE 100 stocks, helped by the weaker pound, kept pace with the S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab and world indexes for about a year after the referendum before chronic underperformance set in. Since 2018, the UK market has lagged MSCI's all-country index by some 35%. What's more, it's taken more than eight years for the pound's effective exchange rate to recover its pre-referendum levels. Few mainstream economists now doubt that Brexit has taken a serious toll on the UK economy - even if blame for that gets sprayed in multiple directions - and oceans of ink have been spilled trying to disentangle the precise impacts. One academic study, opens new tab by a number of Bank of England economists earlier this year concluded that uncertainty following the referendum resulted in little change in goods exports and imports before the exit was finalized. But after the new rules hit, UK imports fell 3% and overall exports fell 6.4%, largely because of the 13% hit in exports to the EU. While this slump seems relatively modest compared to the official forecasts of the longer-term hit, opens new tab, the pain has been borne disproportionately by small businesses. Additionally, these findings exclude the Brexit hit to services and London's finance sector, which registered a much bigger economic dent. And the cumulative damage to London and the service sector, opens new tab over the next 10 years continues to worry the City. The U.S. tariff story is of a completely different order, of course, as it will reverberate across the world economy. But there are some parallels, not least in certain aspects of the market reactions and the initial resilience. Economists estimate that the tariffs could lop anywhere from 0.5% to 1.0% off U.S. GDP over time. That's a $150-$300 billion hit, which, though painful, would not be an instant crisis for an economy that's growing at a roughly 2% annualized rate, where imported goods represent just 11% of GDP and where tech and AI trends are generating considerable tailwinds. But as former White House economic adviser Jason Furman pointed out in a New York Times essay last week, the tariff damage is likely not a one-off hit. The loss of 0.5% of GDP, he argued, is "the equivalent of every household in America taking around $1,000 and lighting it on fire - then doing it again every year. Forever." In the end, the main point of the British comparison is to show how extreme partisan arguments on the pros or cons of such giant economic policy changes don't necessarily get resolved cleanly in adaptive, hardy and hyper-complex modern economies. The upshot is there's rarely a big crash to prove a point. And that in itself is unnerving if politically-motivated policies then appear workable on the surface and resist instant pushback - only to act as a drain on the economy over a protracted period. Many observers reasonably argue that sovereign democratic politics should always trump economic conventions and even directions. But do people eventually notice when it goes wrong? The latest YouGov opinion poll, opens new tab shows 56% of Britons now think it was wrong to leave the EU - some nine years after their narrow vote to leave. The jury on Trump's tariffs is still out. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters -- Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn. Plus, sign up for my weekday newsletter, Morning Bid U.S.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
India's JSW Steel, Japan's JFE to invest $669 million to boost cold rolled grain-oriented electrical steel output
Aug 4 (Reuters) - India's JSW Steel ( opens new tab and Japan's JFE Steel will invest 58.45 billion rupees ($669 million) to expand production capacity of cold rolled grain-oriented electrical steel across two Indian plants to 350,000 tons per annum, JSW Steel said on Monday. ($1 = 87.4070 Indian rupees)
