ORC moving to system where no votes are ‘wasted'
The councillors last year approved the shift from first past the post, bringing it in line with the Dunedin City Council, the only one of Otago's five territorial authorities to use the electoral system where voters rank their preferred candidates.
University of Otago political science professor Janine Hayward said Dunedin had been using the system for several years with little difficulty.
"I do think it's a great idea to give voters a little bit more confidence in how straightforward it is."
Under STV, voters rank their preferred candidates from best to last, with "1" being the highest ranking, also known as first preference.
Once the votes are collated, they go through a process called an iteration, where there is a quota each candidate has to reach in order to be elected. Anyone who reaches that quota is declared elected.
"The least popular candidate drops out of the race and their votes are redistributed to the next preference of the people who voted for them.
"If the person who got elected, or the people who got elected, had surplus votes, then those votes are redistributed as well. So what the STV process is ensuring is that there are no votes that are wasted."
Prof Hayward urged people to be careful, if they particularly did not want a candidate to sneak in on redistributed votes.
"Put simply, if you don't like the candidate, don't rank them.
"After first past the post (FPP), there was a tendency among some people to rank every single candidate on the ballot sheet, but really that's unnecessary."
STV avoided the premise of a "wasted vote", Prof Hayward said.
"Votes get wasted in two ways.
"When you're voting for multiple people, they get wasted because too many people vote for somebody, and they get more votes than they needed to get elected, or people vote for somebody who's really unpopular and was never going to get elected.
"So the point about the transferring of the single transferable vote is to keep as many voter preferences alive, basically, as possible until the number of candidates required meet that quota that they're aiming for."
It was also a good indication of the "depth" of someone's voter support, she said.
"When you're doing something like electing Otago Regional Council, it's likely to see somebody or a couple of people elected on first preferences.
"But having a large vote in your first preferences doesn't necessarily mean that you have enough support across the whole community to get elected, and I think that's the point about single transferable vote.
"It really tests, beyond the first vote, whether somebody has the breadth and depth of support that they need to get elected."
Council elections take place from September 9 to October 11.
matthew.littlewood@odt.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
19 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to the Editor: water, pennies and crocodiles
Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including the future of water in Dunedin, pensioners pinching pennies, and continuing to feed the crocodile. Surrey St residents keen to understand issues Disbelief at the comments made by Dunedin City Council's general manager Three Waters and transition David Ward that our residents' claims contained "a spectacular amount of misinformation and falsehood" (ODT, 1.7.25). After demanding that he and his support act get up here to see the problems after the 2024 flood he didn't even know the full history of Surrey St flooding being new to the job! I'd like to know what falsehoods and misinformation. Some of us have probably read more engineering reports, cost analysis and expert engineering opinions spanning 20 or more years regarding the Surrey St issue and the South Dunedin-wide problem than he's had time to locate. And just so we ratepayers and residents know he's speaking the truth we'd like to see the detailed engineering plans for the piping network upgrades and pumping station improvements plus the complete costings of the engineering works he stated. Or are they still in the pipeline as usual? Surrey St Flood Action Group Response from David Ward: Thank you for the chance to clarify my comments. The Otago Daily Time s originally asked us to respond to a series of comments from residents that were worse than those eventually published. All the claims were false, which is why I responded as firmly as I did. The ODT then thankfully decided not to publish the worst of the comments, but I was not given the chance to modify my response, which was presented in full and out of context. For the record, the problems in Surrey Str are caused by a known bottleneck in our wastewater system, and we have never denied this. We feel for the residents there, and we have taken interim steps to protect their homes (such as the installation of non-return values, and pipe replacements elsewhere that ease pressure on the network including in Surrey St) while continuing to work hard to progress a permanent solution. The issues involved are complex and the potential solutions expensive, requiring changes that affect our wider network, but we expect to be in a position to provide more information later this year. Future Dunedin's full-page advertisement ( ODT , 11.6.25) includes in its "Policy Positioning" that "Future Dunedin will advocate for immediate action to protect $10b of assets at risk from flooding in South Dunedin." In simple terms, that's equivalent to 10,000 x $1 million assets. Given that 900 South Dunedin properties were flooded in the last severe flooding incident, is Future Dunedin able to share with the voting public how the figure of $10 billion was arrived at? Andrew Simms responds: Two options presented by the South Dunedin Futures Programme describe the widespread retreat from large tracts of land in South Dunedin including housing areas, industrial and retail areas. Homes, factories, supermarkets and car dealerships gone. Various reports estimate the value of this land and the assets upon it at between $7 billion and $10 billion. The social cost of displacing 15,000 people is perhaps far greater. South Dunedin is an essential part of Dunedin and much of the function of South Dunedin cannot be replaced. The effective defence of South Dunedin can be achieved for a fraction of its value. Pennies are only pinched because they have to be I noted the article on "penny pinching pensioners'' (ODT , 2.7.25) doing so because they have to, to ensure they can pay their power bills. I'm in my 70s and live in a small flat on the hill. Like most flats in Dunedin it can be "cool" in winter. My power bill is between $90- $100-plus every month. What! I hear you say, how lucky is he. But take into account there is no hot water charge in that and no heating charge in that (when I did use a heater I couldn't afford to pay that bill every month.) So basically I am being charged for light bulbs (have energy saving ones), cooking a meal and time on my laptop (no TV). The "small user" rate has gone and I am told by my power company to expect more rises in costs. Watching successive governments and their approaches to ever rising costs in everything we need to use to survive there appears to be little interest in actually doing anything. Big businesses like power companies seem to hold sway over all aspects of power generation, not the government. The tail has wagged the dog for too long. It is time for "open slather" to be applied to alternative power sources i.e. wind farms, solar farms, tide-generated energy, geothermal, biomass energy. We all see massive innovations in energy production overseas but here, well, let's wait and see. We have lost our innovative No 8 wire mentality that said "rip into it and get it done" and it's been replaced by apathy based on the fact no government and especially no power company is ever going to act in the best interests of their consumers. A sad indictment that we have allowed this to happen and I believe many pensioners will agree with me. Keeping on feeding the crocodile Gerrard Eckhoff (Letters, 3.7.25) is a regular letter writer and contributor to the ODT . Most of us know pretty much where he is coming from. His latest letter can probably be described as pushback against pushback against a recent tirade opposing capital gains tax, such as "stupid" left-wing "do-gooders" keep agitating for. In doing so he has, in my opinion, shot himself in the foot. It demonstrates how shallow this analysis really is. The astronomical increases in monetary asset values over five decades really bells the cat. Is he really suggesting that this mostly reflects increases in real wealth and productive capacity? Rather it is mostly asset inflation – unearned income (although not, apparently, according to our current prime minister). I would prefer to call it "fake wealth". I'm inclined to agree with Mr Eckhoff that capital gains tax (or a wealth tax) would probably not fix the problem. It is the result of too much easy money for non-productive purposes. For example, if I want to borrow for some relatively risky enterprise I would probably be hit for about 2 percentage points more, than if I was leveraging the (fake) equity in my house to buy a relatively riskless investment property. The deregulated financial system just keeps on feeding the crocodile. And by the way, we all know that the world is not particularly fair. Those camped on the Oval in tents or sleeping in cars certainly do. Whether it is meant to be is another matter. But at the very least we expect those who are handsomely rewarded to do something to justify it. Abridged — Ed. Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
No go on Oamaru-Dunedin bus link
Hopes of Oamaru getting a direct bus service to Dunedin have been dashed for now, after the Otago Regional Council last week discarded proposals to establish a link. Waitaki District Mayor Gary Kircher had lobbied strongly for the regional council to provide a bus service to Oamaru during its recent annual plan submissions but said he recognised the challenges of funding it. "There's a lot of calls from other areas wanting to expand their services. For us, obviously, it's about starting a service and it's really difficult if the co-funder, (Waka Kotahi) NZTA, doesn't have the money there. "Fundamentally, that's the issue and it's something that the government has to address because it's causing issues not just with public transport, but with projects everywhere. "It would just be too expensive if ORC paid for the whole thing themselves without the co-funding. It would just be too costly on our ratepayers." Mr Kircher had also submitted to the regional council about providing a connecter service between central Oamaru and the North End. He told the Oamaru Mail that was a service that would need to be funded by ORC, not the district council. "Again, it would come at a cost and public transport doesn't cover its costs, unfortunately. So, there has to be some other money coming from somewhere and with all of the pressure on rates, that'd be a difficult thing for the [district] council to be able to underwrite. It is a regional council responsibility." Mr Kircher said he was meeting with regional council representatives and would be talking about what other opportunities there might be to "make something happen". ORC chairwoman Gretchen Robertson said the council remained committed to connecting Oamaru. "Some regional upgrades will not happen due to co-funding gaps but we're committed to finding ways to improve connectivity options for Ōamaru, Balclutha and Central Otago." "The transport planning team will be investigating the cost and viability of connecting Oamaru to the existing Dunedin services, which currently terminate at Palmerston," she told the Oamaru Mail. "There are a range of ways to do this — through traditional public transport, or community-based transport services. "The investigative work the team will undertake will look at a range of options, including ones based on co-funding and ones not reliant on co-funding. Any decisions on funding additional services will be subject to future decisions through annual plans or long-term plans." Transport Minister Chris Bishop said public transport was funded from both public and private revenue sources, noting government funding for public transport in Otago has increased from $90 million to $125m. "Private share refers to the proportion of funding that comes from private sources, including fares paid by passengers, advertising on buses, bus stops, trains, train stations, as well as other commercial opportunities like renting or leasing commercial space," he said. "The Government Policy Statement on land transport 2024 (GPS 2024) sets the expectation that there will be increases in private share revenue to support the growing operational costs for public transport, as well as to reduce the burden on ratepayers and taxpayers. "Under the previous government the private share revenue dropped as low as 10%, meaning far more of the costs had to be covered by taxpayers and ratepayers. "To reach agreement on targets, NZTA asked PTAs (public transport authorities) to show they had considered methods appropriate to each region that did not drive adverse outcomes such as patronage decline. Actions considered include reviews of fare policy, regular fare increases and third-party revenue sources. As a result, targets for the next three years have now been agreed. "NZTA is committed to working with Public Transport Authorities to ensure a reliable and resilient public transport system for everyone. Increasing the private share of public transport expenditure can help contribute to this goal and I expect PTAs to continue working collaboratively with NZTA." ORC rates to increase 5.5% overall With the adoption of the annual plan, ORC rates will increase 5.5% overall in the year ahead. For most in the Waitaki district, it means regional rates will rise 1.72% to $263.93 a year. However, for Waitaki residents in the Palmerston area, the rate rise is more, up 6.18% to $381.33 a year. This is because Palmerston residents have an ORC-funded bus service to Dunedin. However, they will also have to pay increased fares for that bus. From late September, adult fares will rise from $2 to $2.50 (with a Bee card). Children will also have to pay, following another decision ORC councillors made last week, to reintroduce a $1.50 fare for 5 to 18-year-olds.
Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
ORC moving to system where no votes are ‘wasted'
An elections law specialist is urging people not to be too daunted by the Otago Regional Council's decision to switch to a single transferable vote (STV) system for this year's council elections. The councillors last year approved the shift from first past the post, bringing it in line with the Dunedin City Council, the only one of Otago's five territorial authorities to use the electoral system where voters rank their preferred candidates. University of Otago political science professor Janine Hayward said Dunedin had been using the system for several years with little difficulty. "I do think it's a great idea to give voters a little bit more confidence in how straightforward it is." Under STV, voters rank their preferred candidates from best to last, with "1" being the highest ranking, also known as first preference. Once the votes are collated, they go through a process called an iteration, where there is a quota each candidate has to reach in order to be elected. Anyone who reaches that quota is declared elected. "The least popular candidate drops out of the race and their votes are redistributed to the next preference of the people who voted for them. "If the person who got elected, or the people who got elected, had surplus votes, then those votes are redistributed as well. So what the STV process is ensuring is that there are no votes that are wasted." Prof Hayward urged people to be careful, if they particularly did not want a candidate to sneak in on redistributed votes. "Put simply, if you don't like the candidate, don't rank them. "After first past the post (FPP), there was a tendency among some people to rank every single candidate on the ballot sheet, but really that's unnecessary." STV avoided the premise of a "wasted vote", Prof Hayward said. "Votes get wasted in two ways. "When you're voting for multiple people, they get wasted because too many people vote for somebody, and they get more votes than they needed to get elected, or people vote for somebody who's really unpopular and was never going to get elected. "So the point about the transferring of the single transferable vote is to keep as many voter preferences alive, basically, as possible until the number of candidates required meet that quota that they're aiming for." It was also a good indication of the "depth" of someone's voter support, she said. "When you're doing something like electing Otago Regional Council, it's likely to see somebody or a couple of people elected on first preferences. "But having a large vote in your first preferences doesn't necessarily mean that you have enough support across the whole community to get elected, and I think that's the point about single transferable vote. "It really tests, beyond the first vote, whether somebody has the breadth and depth of support that they need to get elected." Council elections take place from September 9 to October 11.
