
Cost of Dublin metro not be clear until 'some time in 2027'
The director of the project to build a rail link between Swords and the city centre also said that that if planning is granted by the end of the summer, construction could begin in 2027. However, he said he will need to convince international construction firms that Ireland is serious about the project.
Sean Sweeney, who was appointed Project Director of MetroLink last year, said he is still aiming to deliver a metro to the capital by 2035, but that date could be delayed as there is a likelihood of judicial reviews.
He also said that that while he does not know what the National Development Plan (NDP) will outline for the project, there have been positive signals and he believes he has the political support from Government.
It is more than 1,000 days since An Comisiún Pleanála began considering whether to give the green light to the latest plans for a metro in Dublin, after Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TFI) applied for the Railway Order in November 2022.
The project was first mooted in the year 2000, but it was shelved during the financial crisis.
An oral hearing of the proposals and public submissions was held last February and lasted a number of weeks.
Decision expected by end of summer
The Planning Authority is expected to issue its decision by the end of the summer and MetroLink has planned a number of events to try and attract international construction firms to bid for the project.
If the decision arrives when expected, a tender process could get underway in the first quarter of 2026.
Dr Sweeney has refused to speculate on what the cost of the project will be, but said that construction inflation means it will be higher than the figure of €9.5 billion which was projected in 2021.
He said his team are taking the price tag "very, very seriously" and will deliver an estimated cost to Government by the end of the year, but until the tenders are received in 2027, the real price tag for the project will not be known.
"I'm not very keen to speculate until we've done the work because there's a lot of work to be done," he said.
"We're hoping within the next two to three months to have a new number to advise Government.
"But you don't have to be a rocket scientist to realise it's five years since the last number, there's been a lot of inflation and movement since then, so that the number is going to go up.
"We are hoping to start the major procurement at the end of the first quarter next year.
"Those procurements can take a year and a half, so some time in 2027 we're hoping to have firm prices back from the bidders for the major pieces of work.
"That's really the first time we have clarity about cost. Because until now, they're just estimates being done by consultants giving us advice. They're not the builder.
"The build process will run for at least five years," he added.
"There are a range of events that could result in the builder claiming for extra money, and that will inevitably flow through.
"We can't see over the horizon as to what some of those things things might be.
"So all we would say is, once we get the prices from the tenders, that's the first time we've got real clarity about where we might like to go.
"We are hoping that there's not much movement after that, but that's just conjecture."
Concern construction firms will bid for a cancelled project
Dr Sweeney said construction could begin in 2027.
He said his main concern is that international construction firms will bid for the project which has been cancelled.
Dr Sweeney added that he will need to convince them that Ireland is serious about building a metro.
"Our biggest risk at the moment is that the international construction market doesn't turn up," he said.
"This project has been cancelled before.
"I travel around Europe a lot, I talk to a lot of people and the standard response is, 'We love Ireland, we love the Irish, but we really don't know what you're doing, and we don't know whether you're serious'."
Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan previously voiced his objection to the plan for a terminus for the MetroLink at Charlemont in his constituency of Ranelagh in South Dublin but Dr Sweeney said he believes that the project has the political support needed from Government.
He said the Taoiseach, Tánaiste and Minister for Transport are due to take part in the international events to promote the project in the autumn that will take place in London, Paris, Vienna, Milan and Istanbul.
Dr Sweeney said their presence along with MetroLink's inclusion in the National Development Plan will help him persuade construction firms to take on the project, despite the competitive international market for such work.
"There's not that many builders who can build metros," he said.
"There's very few major constructors that can build at that level, and they're all really busy.
"There are metros being built all around the world.
"There's La grande Paris, which is €50 billion, there's numerous projects in Asia, so the major constructors can choose their projects now.
"All I would say is, once we get opened, everyone will love it, and they will know that the pain was worthwhile."
"MetroLink is one of the big ones on the globe at the moment, but no one should think it's the biggest, there are bigger projects.
"So we're sort of trying to position ourselves as a big, but very attractive project for these builders to look at."
The Minister for Transport said he is considering a scheme to give partial refunds to unsuccessful bidders in an effort to get this long awaited project finally on track.
Darragh O'Brien said: "A design and tender fee scheme would see a certain capped percentage of bid costs reimbursed to unsuccessful compliant bids.
"It is important to note that as part of any agreed design and tender fee scheme the taxpayer will benefit not just through increasing the competitiveness of the overall process but also through ownership of the intellectual property of any work undertaken during the tendering process relating to MetroLink, which will then be of value when finalising the ultimate contracts and undertaking the actual works."
Disruption during construction will be significant
Dr Sweeney, who delivered a rail project in his native New Zealand before coming here said that that disruption during the construction of the Metro will be significant but that the impact will be forgotten about as soon as the service is up and running.
"We're going to be building stations through the middle of Dublin and for health and safety reasons they're going to have to be secured," he said.
"There'll be hoarding that are placed at the edges of the boundaries of the sites that will constrict footpaths.
"It'll constrict roads and people who have properties on those footpaths and roads will notice a difference.
"If you're a shopkeeper there, you'll notice less foot traffic. You'll notice noise and disruption.
"There's no way around that. We'll be doing the best we can, but you can't build a metro like this without there being some disruption."
"Dublin is growing and this is about supporting its growth."
Dr Sweeney added: "All I would say is, once we get opened, everyone will love it, and they will know that the pain was worthwhile."
"I've been through this in Auckland. It is a challenge.
"A lot of trucks in the streets, lot of equipment, material being taken to and from the sites. If you're driving around those areas, you will be disrupted as well, and we can't avoid that."
He also rejected suggestions that Dublin does not need a metro because it is currently possible to travel from the city centre to the airport by bus or car in less than half an hour.
"Dublin's total transport system is under huge pressure," he said.
"The Port Tunnel, buses, the Luas, the Dart, they're all at or near capacity at various times of the day.
"This is actually about just providing more capacity into a growing city, it's not replacing any of them.
"Nothing will get you from the airport to the Central Buisness District quicker than a metro and we'll do 20,000 people an hour.
"Nothing can do that. Dublin is growing and this is about supporting its growth."
However, economist Colm McCarthy said a full cost benefit analysis of the project needs to be carried out before the Government commits to funding MetroLink.
"To date there hasn't been a proper, full cost benefit study on the Metro, believe it or not," he said.
"All there is, is a study that was commissioned by the project promotors, not a proper study done by the Department of Public Expenditure.
"So I think it's premature to be committing that amount of money. It will leave less room for all sorts of other projects which may well have higher benefits."
"The public spending code said that after the project promoters have outlined what they want to do, which they've done, then there should be an independent study done at central Government level.
"Remarkably this has not been done with one of the biggest projects ever proposed in this country.
"The Government seems to have backed away from the public spending code.
"They're all delivery, delivery, delivery, just get a shovel in the ground. And this is far too big for that."
MetroLink plans to run along an 18.8km route, mostly underground from Swords north of Dublin Airport to Ranelagh in south Dublin serving 16 stops in a number of suburbs including Ballymun and Glasnevin.
Driverless trains will run every 90 seconds, which can carry 20,000 passengers in each direction every hour or 53 million passenger journeys a year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Government unveils plan to tackle insurance costs
A new plan from the Government is aiming to tackle rising insurance premiums, with plans for a transparency code and measures to boost competitiveness. The Action Plan for Insurance Reform contains 26 actions across the Departments of Finance , Justice, and Enterprise, and has identified 10 priorities that will have the biggest impact on insurance affordability, transparency and availability. It builds on the measures announced in 2020, and will cover up to 2029. Amont the six key themes of the plan are transparency, competitiveness, fraud and innovation. The Department of Finance is set to work with the insurance sector to bring in a Transparency Code, while there are also plans to strengthen the powers and remit of the Injuries Resolution Board. Tougher penalties for insurance fraud are also being considered, and measures to reduce the number of uninsured drivers are being examined. READ MORE The plan comes barely a fortnight after Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan has bowed to pressure on a plan by the Judicial Council to hike personal injury award guidelines by almost 17 per cent, confirming that he will not ask the Oireachtas to rubber stamp the judiciary's proposed tweak to payouts. 'In a rapidly changing global environment, we must place an unrelenting focus on enhancing our competitiveness and controlling the controllables. This means ensuring the cost of doing business is not prohibitive for our SMEs,' said Tánaiste Simon Harris. 'It is vital that Ireland does what it can to support businesses to thrive. This new Action Plan builds on the strong insurance reforms to-date which have led to improvements in transparency and have seen personal injury awards reduce. By Government working together, we can deliver tangible progress in this next phase of insurance reform so that the benefits are felt by both businesses and consumers.' The insurance industry broadly welcomed the plan, with Brokers Ireland calling it 'a meaningful opportunity to build a more affordable, transparent, and competitive insurance market in Ireland.' 'The IRB has a critical role to play in lowering the cost of insurance and improving the speed and fairness of outcomes,' said Hazel Rock, head of insurance services at the group. 'Making its awards binding in more cases and encouraging default mediation would represent a step change in how injury claims are managed in Ireland,' she added. The Alliance for Insurance Reform meanwhile urged immediate reductions in premiums across the board. 'Policyholders should not have to wait a day longer to see meaningful and sustained reductions in their premiums and any attempt to use today's action plan as reason not to pass on existing savings, must be pushed back strongly against by government,' it said in a statement.


Irish Post
an hour ago
- Irish Post
IFAC criticises Ireland's budget plans
IRELAND'S budget plans have drawn criticism from the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (IFAC), which says the government is risking economic instability by ignoring basic principles of sound fiscal policy. In its assessment of the newly released Summer Economic Statement (SES), the independent watchdog warned that the government's intention to reduce the size of the 2026 budget package if global trade conditions deteriorate is a serious misstep. IFAC argues this approach runs counter to standard economic advice, which calls for countercyclical policy: increasing support when the economy is weak and scaling back when it is strong. 'This is exactly the opposite of standard economic advice,' the Council said, warning that the government's strategy could leave the public finances dangerously exposed. The criticism has been echoed by Barra Roantree, assistant professor of economics at Trinity College Dublin, who compared the current strategy to the fiscally reckless policies of the early 2000s. 'Committing to ramp up current expenditure if the good times continue, but row back if things get worse, is precisely the sort of pro-cyclical policy that the current minister for finance has himself said we should avoid,' he said. Roantree warned that this policy risks stoking inflation and could leave Ireland vulnerable to sudden declines in corporation tax receipts. If that happens, the government may be forced to abandon capital investment projects, even if they are already promised. Originally, the government planned to increase spending by €3bn in 2025. That figure has now been revised up by €3.3bn, bringing total expenditure to €108.7bn. But IFAC says that even this may underestimate how much the state will actually spend. Based on spending patterns from the first half of the year, the Council believes current expenditure could end up around €1bn higher than reported. The Council also warned that this year's overspending is likely to spill into 2026. 'This all points to poor planning and budgeting,' it said. Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe has also announced a €1.5bn tax package for the upcoming budget, including a controversial proposal to cut the VAT rate for the hospitality sector from 13.5% to 9%. Roantree described the cut as 'an expensive and economically illiterate policy' that will limit the government's flexibility going forward. Despite a strong economy, the government is forecasting a deficit of nearly €11bn next year, which equates to 3.2% of Gross National Income (GNI) once windfall corporation tax revenues are taken out. IFAC has repeatedly criticised the lack of a long-term fiscal framework and says the government still hasn't defined a sustainable pace of net spending growth. One of the few areas where the Council was more positive was the National Development Plan, which it said has 'ambitious targets' that, if executed properly, could help address Ireland's infrastructure deficits. Of the 88 large-scale projects originally scheduled for completion between 2020 and 2025, just 77 are now expected to finish on time. See More: Economy, IFAC, Infrastructure, NDP, SES


Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Government may delay hospitality Vat cut to mid-2026 amid budget tradeoffs
The Government is considering whether to delay a Vat rate cut for the hospitality sector until July 2026. Signals from within Government suggest there may be a delay to the rate cut, rather than introducing it at the beginning of next year. One senior Government source said delaying the Vat reduction from 13.5% to 9% was 'strongly mooted' ahead of the Summer Economic Statement. Given finance minister Paschal Donohoe's estimate that the rate cut would cost between €950m and €1bn per year, there would be significant extra funds available for other tax cuts in October's budget. The overall tax package in the October 7 budget is €1.5bn, with concerns raised earlier this week that workers could lose out due to the high cost of the VAT cut. On Tuesday, Mr Donohoe warned that if VAT cuts were introduced for the hospitality sector, there would be 'tradeoffs' and 'consequences.' While the cuts may be delayed, sources in Fine Gael said no decisions have been made ahead of the budget, with 'various options' still on the table. One Fine Gael minister said the rate cuts should be implemented on January 1, alongside other tax measures. This comes as Fianna Fáil junior minister Niall Collins pushed back on the proposal to cut VAT rates across the board, saying he would prefer targeted measures for businesses. Mr Collins questioned whether consumers would benefit from the cut, noting they did not during the previous Government's VAT reduction during the covid-19 pandemic. Speaking to RTÉ Radio, Mr Collins said the Vat cut was not a 'done deal' and that the Government is still going through the budgetary process. 'I think that we have to have targeted interventions in a number of sectors. I do recognise that the hospitality sector is under pressure, that there are some jobs within the hospitality sector that are under pressure and we need to support,' Mr Collins said. 'I would like to see more targeted measures.' He added that an 'across the board' VAT cut would not be targeted. Read More EU agrees €93bn worth of counter tariffs against the US if trade talks fail