logo
Texas man indicted for fatally shooting Afghan refugee who had helped US troops defuse bombs

Texas man indicted for fatally shooting Afghan refugee who had helped US troops defuse bombs

Independent21 hours ago
The brother of an Afghan refugee who helped U.S. forces defuse bombs during the war in Afghanistan expressed frustration Thursday that it took more than three months for the Texas man accused of fatally shooting his sibling over a parking dispute to be indicted in the case.
When Abdul Rahman Waziri, 31, was shot while getting his mail at his Houston apartment complex on April 27, police knew who the alleged shooter was as the man had identified himself to officers at the scene, according to authorities. Katia Trevon Bougere, 31, told officers 'he and Waziri were arguing over parking,' police said.
'After consulting with the Harris County District Attorney's Office, the male was released and the investigation continued,' Houston police said in a statement a day after the shooting.
On June 17, police said the case would be referred to a grand jury. Bougere was indicted on Monday on a murder charge. Bougere was not arrested after his murder indictment but issued a summons to appear in court on Aug. 5.
Abdullah Khan, Waziri's older brother, said he and his family were upset that months had passed without any developments in the case.
'It was heartbreaking … it was really hopeless. I couldn't imagine if someone is killing someone senselessly. And then the person walking free for months and months. It's just terrible,' Khan, 36, told The Associated Press during a phone interview.
Waziri and his brother had worked for the Afghan National Mine Reduction Group, a highly trained unit that cleared improvised explosive devices and mines for U.S. Army Special Forces and Afghan commandos.
A group of Green Berets who had worked with the National Mine Reduction Group had sent a letter in May to Harris County District Attorney Sean Teare asking for action in the case. A Change.org petition by the 1208 Foundation that asked for the alleged shooter to be charged has received more than 86,000 signatures. The foundation provides aid to Afghans who worked with U.S. Special Forces to clear explosives.
The Harris County District Attorney's Office declined to comment on the case.
'As the case is pending, it's not our office's policy to discuss facts related to the investigation,' spokesperson Courtney Fischer said in an email.
Court records did not list an attorney for Bougere. He did not immediately reply to an email seeking comment.
Omar Khawaja, an attorney for Waziri's family, said Bougere has claimed that he shot Waziri in self-defense.
Waziri 'was known as a gentle giant ... not someone who is going to lose his cool over a dispute in a parking lot,' Khawaja said.
Khan said his brother had parked his car in front of the mailboxes at his apartment complex and was getting his mail when he was confronted by Bougere.
A witness who saw the physical confrontation between Waziri and Bougere indicated Waziri was not the aggressor and had raised his hands and told Bougere, 'Don't shoot,' Khan said.
Khan had worked with the National Mine Reduction Group from 2008 until coming to the U.S. in 2020. Waziri worked for the unit from 2016 until U.S. troops withdrew from Afghanistan in August 2021.
Khan settled in Tampa, Florida. Waziri lived with his brother before coming to Houston about two years ago. Khan said his brother had planned to return to Tampa with his wife and two daughters after his apartment lease in Houston had ended.
'When he came and we were feeling safe, we were like, 'Oh, thank God. We got out of Afghanistan and no more gunfire, no more bombs.' But unfortunately for my brother, it happened to him,' Khan said.
___
Follow Juan A. Lozano: https://twitter.com/juanlozano70
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla ordered by Florida jury to pay $329 million in fatal Autopilot crash
Tesla ordered by Florida jury to pay $329 million in fatal Autopilot crash

Reuters

time27 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Tesla ordered by Florida jury to pay $329 million in fatal Autopilot crash

Aug 1 (Reuters) - A Florida jury on Friday found Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab liable in the 2019 fatal crash of an Autopilot-equipped Model S and ordered Elon Musk's automaker to pay $329 million to the family of a deceased woman and an injured survivor. Jurors in Miami federal court ordered Tesla to pay $129 million in compensatory damages and $200 million in punitive damages to the estate of Naibel Benavides Leon and to her former boyfriend Dillon Angulo. Lawyers for the plaintiffs said the trial was the first involving the wrongful death of a third party resulting from Autopilot. The plaintiffs had sought $345 million. Tesla has faced many similar lawsuits over its vehicles' self-driving capabilities, but they have been resolved or dismissed without getting to trial. A judge rejected Tesla's efforts to dismiss the case earlier in the summer, and experts said this may encourage other litigants against the EV maker. 'I think it's a big deal," said Alex Lemann, a professor at Marquette University Law School, who said this may make future settlements more expensive for Tesla. "This is the first time that Tesla has been hit with a judgment in one of the many, many fatalities that have happened as a result of its auto-pilot technology." Friday's verdict could impede efforts by Musk, the world's richest person, to convince investors that Tesla can become a leader in so-called autonomous driving for private vehicles as well as robotaxis it plans to start producing next year. Shares fell 1.8% on Friday. Tesla plans to appeal, according to published reports. The Austin, Texas-based company and its lawyers did not immediately respond to several requests for comment. The trial concerned an April 25, 2019 incident where George McGee drove his 2019 Model S at about 62 mph (100 kph) through an intersection into the victims' parked Chevrolet Tahoe as they were standing beside it on a shoulder. McGee had reached down to pick up a cellphone he dropped on his car's floorboard and allegedly received no alerts as he ran a stop sign and stop light before hitting the victims' SUV. "We have a driver who was acting less than perfectly, and yet the jury still found Tesla contributed to the crash," said Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and expert in autonomous technology. "The only way the jury could have possibly ruled against Tesla was by finding a defect with the Autopilot software. That's a big deal." Benavides Leon was allegedly thrown 75 feet to her death, while Angulo suffered serious injuries. "Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans," Brett Schreiber, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said in a statement. "Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries," he added. Last month, Tesla posted its biggest quarterly sales decline in more than a decade, and profit fell short of Wall Street forecasts.

Harvey Willgoose death 'no less tragic' if teen cleared of murder
Harvey Willgoose death 'no less tragic' if teen cleared of murder

BBC News

time28 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Harvey Willgoose death 'no less tragic' if teen cleared of murder

The death of a 15-year-old schoolboy is not "any less tragic or pointless" if the pupil who stabbed him is cleared of murder, a jury has been told. Harvey Willgoose died after he was attacked during his lunch break at All Saints Catholic High School in Sheffield on 3 February.A fellow student, who is also 15, is on trial at Sheffield Crown Court after admitting manslaughter but denying barrister, Gul Nawaz Hussain KC, told jurors on Friday that if they cleared his client of murder, "it doesn't mean Harvey's death is any less tragic or pointless". Mr Hussain said: "A loved son has lost his life, a family have been deprived of him. A family mourns him."Another boy of a similar age had admitted his fault and, whatever happens, will pay the price for it."The defendant has accepted responsibility for what he has done. He needs to pay a price, but that price must be a just one."He told the jury that a not guilty verdict to murder would be the just decision in this case, according to the evidence. 'Final straw' The barrister told the court the defendant had a "horrific home life" and suffered a "background of bullying".He said "all that was what came together" when he encountered Harvey and this was the "final straw".Mr Hussain added that his client had reason to fear he told the jury he wanted to make it "very, very, clear" that he was not "maligning Harvey or dishonouring his memory".He said: "We are not saying that Harvey was all bad or the defendant was all good. Nothing of the sort."He discussed evidence of Harvey's "association with football hooliganism", with one school record describing him as "extremely aggressive and threatening" and a social care record saying he "threatened aggression".A range of interactions have been described between the defendant and Harvey that morning, and Mr Hussain said: "The defendant wanted to avoid Harvey. He did not want trouble."However he described how, in a lesson just before the incident, Harvey had mocked the defendant and been aggressive towards the CCTV footage of the stabbing, Mr Hussain said it could be seen that Harvey was the "first one to make it physical".The barrister said his client thought it was an aggressive approach from Harvey and the fact that he stabbed him so hard, breaking one of his ribs and piercing his heart, was further evidence that he "lost control".He added his client was "so scared of being hurt, so frightened, so devoid of calm, that that boy had never ever felt this way in his life before".The barrister also pointed to how his client was heard to to say "you know I can't control it" by a teacher seconds after stabbing Hussain told the jury this was the "best piece of evidence that you all have as to why (the defendant) did what he did".He concluded his closing speech to the jury on Friday morning and the judge, Mrs Justice Ellenbogen, began summing up the evidence. Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North

Arkansas police say suspect admitted killing couple hiking with daughters
Arkansas police say suspect admitted killing couple hiking with daughters

The Guardian

time29 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Arkansas police say suspect admitted killing couple hiking with daughters

Arkansas authorities say a 28-year-old schoolteacher has admitted he killed a couple who were hiking with their two young daughters at a state park, and he has been charged with capital murder in what investigators are portraying as a 'random' attack. Clinton, 43, and Cristen Brink, 41, were found dead on Saturday on a walking trail at Devil's Den state park. Their daughters, seven and nine, were not hurt and are being cared for by family members, authorities have said. State police arrested Andrew McGann on Thursday after a five-day search and a flood of tips. He was captured in Springdale, a city about 30 miles (50km) north of Devil's Den. McGann 'did indicate that he committed the murders', Maj Stacie Rhoads, commander of the state police's criminal investigation division, said at a news conference. 'I would call it an admission.' Police said they matched McGann's DNA to blood found at the crime scene. Arkansas state police colonel Mike Hagar said investigators were trying to determine a motive for the attack but have no reason to believe McGann knew the couple or their children. 'In my 27 years that I've been with the state police, this is probably one of the most heinous that we've had, especially the aspect of just how random it was,' Rhoads said. McGann has been charged with two counts of capital murder. He made his first appearance on Friday before an Arkansas judge, who ordered McGann to be held in jail without bond, assigned him a public defender, and scheduled his arraignment for 25 August. Local prosecutor Brandon Carter indicated the state would give a jury the option to sentence McGann to the death penalty. The Brinks had just moved from South Dakota to the small city of Prairie Grove in north-west Arkansas. Their water had been connected less than two weeks ago, Prairie Grove mayor David Faulk said. Clinton Brink had been scheduled to start a job as a milk delivery driver Monday in the nearby Fayetteville area, according to Hiland Dairy, his employer. Cristen Brink had been licensed as a nurse in Montana and South Dakota before moving to Arkansas. Officials said Clinton Brink was stabbed first, then Cristen Brink ushered her children to safety before returning to help her husband. She was also stabbed to death. Authorities have not said if the girls witnessed their parents being killed. The Brink family said the couple died 'heroes protecting their little girls'. The Springdale public school district in north-west Arkansas said it had hired McGann for the upcoming year but that he had not yet had contact with families or students. He has active teaching licenses with no infractions or suspensions in Arkansas, Texas and Oklahoma, according to government certification websites.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store