Ten-minute NHS cancer test to be offered to Brits in high street pharmacies – are you eligible?
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
AN NHS 'sponge-on-a-string' cancer test will be rolled out in high street pharmacies for the first time.
Taking just ten minutes, the test will help spot oesophageal cancer in its early stages.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
8
A new test to spot oesophageal cancer will be rolled out in pharmacies early next year
Credit: LIAM CURTIN WWW.LIAMJCURTIN.COM
8
It involves swallowing a pill on a thread to test the food pipe for cancerous cells
Credit: LIAM CURTIN WWW.LIAMJCURTIN.COM
8
NHSE says it will help spot the 'brutal' cancer earlier
Credit: LIAM CURTIN WWW.LIAMJCURTIN.COM
Dozens of Boots pharmacies in England will test patients who regularly use over-the-counter medications to ease heartburn or acid reflux.
The 'heartburn health checks' will be trialled from early next year, NHS England announced.
The sponge test can help spot if heartburn is a sign of a more serious problem called Barrett's oesophagus, a precursor to oesophageal cancer.
The test involves patients swallowing a small pill on a thread, which expands into a penny-sized sponge when it reaches the stomach.
After a few minutes, it's safely pulled out to collect cells from the lining of the oesophagus, which are tested for pre-cancerous changes in the lab.
Cells lining the food pipe are normally flat, but they become more like the column-shaped cells in the lining of the stomach and bowel when Barrett's oesophagus develops.
If pre-cancerous cells are found, people can have the cells removed through endoscopy or a procedure known as radiofrequency ablation.
The sponge test is already used in hospitals and community diagnostic centres in place of invasive endoscopies - where a thin, flexible tube with a camera is inserted into the oesophagus.
The NHS is now trialling rollout in dozens of Boots pharmacies in the hopes of making early diagnosis more convenient and accessible to patients.
Patients can choose to be tested for the cancer while they shop, NHSE suggested, after pharmacists approach patients who often buy heartburn or acid reflux medications but haven't come forward to their GP.
Check your risk of one of the most common cancers in the UK with a simple 45-second test
Around 1,500 people in London and the East Midlands will be offered the test in a pharmacy or be referred to a clinic in their area.
Health officials say offering the test in pharmacies could help shift care from hospitals to the community - a major tenet of the Government's 10-Year Health Plan published earlier this month.
Prof Peter Johnson, NHS national cancer director said: "This new pilot brings a convenient test to where people shop, making it easier than ever for patients to check signs and symptoms that might be worrying them.
"For the majority of people with persistent reflux, these quick and easy heartburn health checks will provide peace of mind that you aren't at increased risk of cancer.
"For those who do find out they have Barret's oesophagus, regular follow-up checks will be put in place so any further cell changes can be spotted early.'
Minister for public health and prevention Ashley Dalton, added: "With more than 8,000 people diagnosed with late-stage oesophageal cancer each year, being able to spot the warning signs using a 10-minute test in a local pharmacy — before cancer has even taken hold — will be a game-changer."
The pilot will run for two years, followed by an independent evaluation that will decide whether to make the test more widely available.
The test is made by diagnostics company Cyted Health.
The warning signs of oesophageal cancer
OESOPHAGEAL cancer is a cancer of the food pipe.
It affects 9,400 people in the UK every year, and most people are over the age of 60.
Smoking increases your risk of the disease, as does being overweight, drinking alcohol and having conditions like Barrett's oesophagus, where the cells lining your oesophagus have become abnormal.
Only 12 per cent of patients survive for 10 or more years after being diagnosed.
There are around 8,000 oesophageal cancer deaths in the UK every year - or 22 every day.
Early diagnosis is key, so recognising the symptoms is vital. The most common include: Difficulty swallowing
Unexplained weight loss
Indigestion or heartburn that doesn't go away
Pain in the throat or behind the breastbone
But some people also experience a cough, hoarseness, dark poo, tiredness and food coming back up after swallowing.
Source: Cancer Research UK
8
The pill remains intact until it reaches the stomach
Credit: LIAM CURTIN WWW.LIAMJCURTIN.COM
8
There, it will expand into a penny-sized sponge
Credit: LIAM CURTIN WWW.LIAMJCURTIN.COM
8
The sponge will pick up cells as it's pulled out after a few minutes
Credit: LIAM CURTIN WWW.LIAMJCURTIN.COM
Can heartburn be a sign of cancer?
Acid reflux affects around two in ten people, so it's pretty common.
It can be brought on by spicy and fatty foods, coffee and booze, as well as smoking and some medicines.
It's also more common if you're overweight, stressed or anxious, or pregnant.
Persistent symptoms can be a sign of the pre-cancerous Barrett's oesophagus.
Eddie, 77, from Suffolk credits the sponge on a string test with potentially saving his life after suffering from heartburn for most of his life.
8
Eddie's cancer was picked up with the sponge-on-a-thread test
Credit: NHSE
'It used to wake me up at night, but I always thought it was just one of those things," he said.
"To think that something as simple as swallowing a capsule could uncover a hidden risk is truly remarkable.
"I am now able to get targeted treatment to stop my condition progressing to cancer, rather than finding out when it's too late.
"This never would have been caught if it wasn't for capsule sponge testing.
"This test gave me peace of mind and access to early treatment and could mean the difference between life and death for so many others.'
'Brutal disease'
There are almost 10,000 patients diagnosed with oesophageal cancer in the UK each year, but 80 per cent are diagnosed at a late stage.
Only 20 per cent of patients survive the year, so the key to saving lives is early diagnosis.
Cancer of the oesophagus is more common in older people and men. Smoking, drinking alcohol and obesity can increase that risk.
Mimi McCord, founder and chairman of Heartburn Cancer UK said: "Oesophageal cancer can be a brutal disease.
"It hides in plain sight and when it takes hold, it doesn't hang around before it kills.
"Catching it early - or when it's a pre-cancerous condition – is the best chance people have of survival.
"People who regularly self-medicate often fall below the radar of the GP system.
"Lives will be saved by more people being made aware of the signs and symptoms to look out for and having quick, simple and easily accessible tests in pharmacies."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Three former bosses at hospital where Lucy Letby worked are arrested for gross negligence manslaughter
Three former bosses at the hospital where Lucy Letby murdered babies have been arrested on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter, Cheshire Police announced today. The senior executives, who worked at the Countess of Chester Hospital during the neo-natal nurse's killing spree, were quizzed by detectives yesterday after being invited to attend separate police stations across Cheshire. They have since been bailed pending further enquiries. Their arrests form part of Cheshire Constabulary's ongoing inquiry into corporate manslaughter at the NHS Trust, where Letby murdered seven premature infants and harmed seven more between June 2015 and June 2016. In March, Detective Superintendent Paul Hughes, confirmed the corporate manslaughter investigation, codenamed Operation Duet, had been widened to include 'the grossly negligent action or inaction of individuals.' He said 'those identified as suspects had been notified' but refused to confirm any names. The Mail is aware of the identities of those arrested but is not naming individuals. Letby, 35, is serving 15 whole-life orders after being found guilty of murdering seven infants and attempting to murder seven others, with two attempts on one of her victims, at the hospital's neo-natal unit. She has twice had applications to challenge her convictions rejected by the Court of Appeal. The Trial of Lucy Letby: The Inquiry Listen and follow on Spotify and Apple Podcasts now. According to an independent report, leaked to the Mail's Trial+ podcast, in March, babies' lives could have been saved if hospital bosses had acted sooner to remove Lucy Letby from working. The report, commissioned by the Countess after Letby was first arrested, in July 2018, found managers were 'inexperienced' and missed 14 opportunities to suspend the nurse because they became 'blinkered' to the possibility she was responsible. Instead of alerting the police, they commissioned a series of ineffectual external investigations, which failed to get to the bottom of why babies were unexpectedly collapsing and dying, the document said. Executives also 'ostracised' and 'bullied' doctors when they continued to raise concerns and demand police be called in, the report, carried out by independent healthcare consultancy Facere Melius, which has been blocked from publication, concluded. Although the report does not specifically reveal which babies might have lived, it makes clear that, by February 2016, at least two senior executives at the hospital knew about the link between Letby and the infant deaths. She tried to kill four children, Babies K, L, M and N, and murdered two triplet brothers, Babies O and P, before being removed from frontline nursing in July that year. 'Earlier action potentially would have reduced the number of baby deaths,' the report said. 'Had different decisions been made the spike in baby deaths would have been picked up sooner internally and externally, and potentially, lives could have been saved.' At the recent public inquiry, which is investigating Letby's crimes, senior management at the hospital faced serious criticism over their handling of the spike in deaths. In their closing speeches, in March, lawyers for the infants' families, accused executives of orchestrating a cover up to protect the reputation of the hospital, lying to the families and bullying the consultants who tried to raise the alarm. Peter Skelton KC, who represents seven of Letby's victims, said they displayed 'a form of individual and corporate self-protection that should have no place in the NHS.' Kate Blackwell KC, for the senior executives, said in her closing remarks that they now accepted they should have called in police sooner, but the barrister insisted it was never expressed to them in 'stark' terms that Letby was causing deliberate harm before June 2016 – when she attacked and murdered Babies O and P and was finally moved from frontline nursing into an administrative role. Ms Blackwell said managers accepted they had failed to follow safeguarding policies, made mistakes in their communication with the babies' parents and that there was a breakdown in their relationship with the paediatricians, who should have been better supported. But she insisted all their decisions were taken 'in good faith' and they 'vociferously denied' claims they deliberately and knowingly 'harboured' a murderer or put the hospital's reputation before the safety of babies in their care. 'The senior managers have emphatically refuted the proposition that either their own reputation or that of the Trust was prioritised over safety,' she added. In law, an individual can be found guilty of gross negligence manslaughter if they negligently breach the duty of care they owe the person who died and it was 'reasonably foreseeable' that such a breach gave rise to a 'serious and obvious risk of death.' The circumstances of the breach also have to be 'truly exceptionally bad and so reprehensible' that it amounts to gross negligence. Neonatologist Professor Neena Modi, Letby's barrister Mark McDonald, Sir David Davis MP and retired medic Dr Shoo Lee, during a press conference to announce 'new medical evidence' which they say casts doubts on her convictions Mr Hughes, senior investigating officer for Operation Duet, said: 'As part of our ongoing enquiries, on Monday 30th June three individuals who were part of the senior leadership team at the Countess of Chester Hospital in 2015-2016, were arrested on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter. 'All three have subsequently been bailed pending further enquiries. 'Both the corporate manslaughter and gross negligence manslaughter elements of the investigation are continuing and there are no set timescales for these.' He added that today's development does 'not impact on the convictions of Lucy Letby for multiple offences of murder and attempted murder.' 'Our investigation into the deaths and non-fatal collapses of babies at the neo-natal units of both the Countess of Chester Hospital and the Liverpool Women's Hospital between the period of 2012 to 2016 is also ongoing.' Letby, of Hereford, has always maintained she is innocent and in April her new defence team submitted evidence from a panel of international experts to the Criminal Cases Review Commission, the organisation that examines miscarriages of justice, in a bid to have her convictions overturned. The experts claim no murders took place and instead assert that the babies died or collapsed because of natural causes or poor care. Following the announcement of the arrests, Mark McDonald, Letby's new defence barrister, called for another inquiry into the 'failings of the neonatal and paediatric medical care unit at the Countess of Chester Hospital.' 'Yet another press release from the police at a very sensitive time when the CCRC are looking at the case of Lucy Letby,' Mr McDonald said. 'Despite this the concerns many have raised will not go away, and we will continue to publicly discuss them. 'The reality is that 26 internationally renowned experts have looked at this case and the lead expert has concluded that no crime was committed, no babies were murdered. What is needed is a proper and full public inquiry into the failings of the neonatal and paediatric medical care unit at the Countess of Chester hospital.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Doctors' strike could break the NHS, claims Streeting
Resident doctors have announced a five-day strike commencing on 25 July, following a ballot by the British Medical Association. The industrial action is in pursuit of a 29 per cent pay rise, which doctors claim is necessary to address pay erosion since 2008-09, after rejecting a 5.4 per cent offer. The strike is expected to result in the cancellation of tens of thousands of operations and appointments, further impacting NHS waiting lists. Health Secretary Wes Streeting has urged doctors to call off the strikes, warning that the NHS recovery is 'hanging by a thread' and accusing the BMA of threatening it. Health leaders have criticised the short notice of the strike, deeming it unfair to patients, while the BMA stated they had 'no choice' but to strike due to the government's stance on pay.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Doctors need to work with the NHS, not against it
Resident doctors have a strong case for a generous pay rise. Their average pay has fallen by one-fifth since 2008, taking inflation into account, even after last year's 5.4 per cent rise. But to demand a 29 per cent increase, and to rush into a strike ballot to support it, is a counterproductive and damaging tactic. Last year, they secured a better deal than most public-sector workers, and there were no strings attached requiring more efficient working practices. They should believe Wes Streeting when he tells them: 'You will not find another health and social care secretary as sympathetic to resident [formerly junior] doctors as me.' Mr Streeting secured a funding settlement for the NHS over the next four years that is generous compared with other departments. But a real-terms increase of 3 per cent a year is only around the long-run historical average. It is half the rate achieved in the New Labour years. So there is no scope for utopian pay settlements (such as the excessively generous GP contracts negotiated in Tony Blair's time). If the British Medical Association, the doctors' trade union, really wanted to promote the interest of its members, it would work with Mr Streeting to plot a gradual real increase in doctors' pay over the next few years allied to a plan to modernise the NHS and increase health service productivity. Instead, it is seeking to repel public opinion with the threat of another round of strikes in pursuit of a pay claim that most reasonable people regard as pie in the sky. Already public opinion is narrowly opposed to doctors being allowed to go on strike at all (opposed by 49 per cent to 44 per cent, according to YouGov), but the one thing that will ensure that the doctors lack public support is the demand for such an unrealistic increase. Of course, it is only the opening bid in a negotiation – but this is a negotiation with public opinion as much as it is with Mr Streeting. The BMA is pleased, as militant trade unions usually are, with the 'resounding majority' in favour of strike action in its ballot: 90 per cent certainly looks like an impressive mandate. But the turnout for that ballot was only 55 per cent, which means that just fewer than half of those eligible to vote supported strikes – a less than 'resounding' margin. This is not how the allocation of resources in a public health service should be decided. The idea that one NHS interest group should use its old-fashioned, Seventies-style industrial muscle to secure a larger share of a limited budget is one that belongs in the past. The very idea of the NHS is in danger. Years of Conservative underfunding have weakened it to the point that many younger people have become used to paying for private GPs and minor procedures. If the waiting lists left over from the coronavirus cannot be cleared, support for the idea of social insurance systems such as those formerly advocated by Nigel Farage will grow. Perhaps they should. Continental Europe seems to do well enough without a universal tax-funded model such as the NHS. But that is not what the BMA purports to believe. It believes in an NHS free at the point of need. And if its members believe that too, they should drop the threat of strikes and work with Mr Streeting to modernise the NHS and make it work.
