Poultry Monitoring Systems Market Analysis and Forecast to 2030 by Region, Technology, Application, and Product Type with Profiles of Key Market Players
Dublin, July 08, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Poultry Monitoring System Global Market Insights 2025, Analysis and Forecast to 2030, by Market Participants, Regions, Technology, Application, Product Type" has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.
The global market for poultry monitoring systems is projected to hit between USD 0.8 to 1.2 billion by 2025, expanding at a compound annual growth rate of 6% to 7% from 2025 through 2030. This surge is attributed to the integration of smart farming technologies and the worldwide expansion of poultry operations.
The poultry industry, thriving on the pillars of increasing global meat and egg demand, propels the adoption of these smart systems to cater to sustainable and disease-preventive farming practices. Growth is further propelled by advancements in IoT and sensor technology, coupled with regulatory frameworks promoting animal welfare.
Regional Analysis
North America: Holding 25-30% market share with a 5-6% growth rate, this region is driven by advanced broiler systems, with the U.S. spearheading automation and Canada advancing layer monitoring.
Europe: With a 25-30% market share and a 6-7% growth rate, strong demand in the Netherlands and Germany drives growth, backed by high egg production and stringent welfare norms.
Asia Pacific: Comprising 30-35% of the market with a 7-8% growth rate, China and India's rapid poultry sector advancements and governmental mechanization initiatives fuel market dynamics.
Rest of the World: Holding 10-15% market share, growing at 6-7%, with Brazil leading through its dominant broiler export market and an increasing adoption of smart farming technologies.
Application Analysis
Broiler chicken breeding is experiencing a 6-7% growth as it meets escalating meat production needs, with a focus on systems that optimize feed efficiency. Conversely, layer breeding grows moderately at 5-6%, driven by egg production needs, and trends toward enhanced environment and alarm systems to maintain optimal laying conditions and health standards.
Product Type Analysis
Poultry feed monitoring systems see a 6-7% growth trend, favored for its capability to track feed consumption and curb waste, particularly in broiler farms. Environment monitoring systems grow at 5-6%, prized for their essential role in regulating critical parameters like temperature and humidity, bolstered by IoT-enabled solutions in layer operations. Alarm monitoring systems expand at 6-7%, cherished for providing real-time alerts on health concerns or system failures, crucial for biosecure, large-scale farms.
Key Market Players Profiled
Aranet: Specializes in wireless, IoT-based environmental control systems.
Big Dutchman: Renowned for comprehensive automation solutions across global farms.
Weltech Monitoring System: Known for precision in feed and environment monitoring.
Cumberland Poultry: Delivers robust, automation-compatible monitoring designs.
TROTEC: Offers cost-effective environment systems, focusing on small to medium farms.
Fancom BV: Providers of comprehensive, data-driven solutions in Europe.
Hotraco Agri: Practical, scalable designs for global operations.
Maximus Solution: Specializes in real-time, biosecure systems for North America and Asia.
MTech Systems: Offers software-driven, analytics-focused monitoring tools.
NybSys: Stands out for simple, affordable solutions, aimed at the Asia Pacific.
Roxell: Provides high-efficiency, automated monitoring systems.
SKOV: Precision-engineered systems with a focus on sustainability.
Stienen BE: Known for durable, smart environmental systems.
Merger and Acquisition News
Day-Lee Foods (NH Foods) Acquires U.S. Poultry Processor LJD Holdings Group (Date: April 2024): The acquisition, enhancing Day-Lee's poultry production and integration of monitoring systems, boosts North America's market presence, focusing on efficiency and biosecurity.
Porter's Five Forces Analysis
The threat of new entrants remains moderate due to the need for IoT and sensor technology expertise, though niche players may emerge. Substitutes are minimal; manual monitoring is impractical for large scales. Buyer power remains medium, dictated by price and feature negotiations, but the reliance on smart systems builds customer loyalty. Supplier power is moderate, with widely available sensors and software components, though advanced tech limits alternatives. Competition is intense, with firms distinguishing themselves through automation and biosecurity advancements.
Market Opportunities and Challenges
Opportunities: The surge in global poultry production catalyzes demand for monitoring systems, with innovations in IoT and sensors enhancing efficiency. Government backing in Asia Pacific and Europe stimulates smart farming adoption.
Challenges: High initial investment costs deter smallholder farmers. Disease outbreaks, such as avian influenza, disrupt operations, complicating demand. The technical complexity necessitates training and support for traditional farmers.
Growth Trend Analysis
FAO and OECD projections foresee global poultry meat production exceeding 141.3 million metric tons (MT) in 2024, with substantial growth of nearly 160 million MT over the next decade, driven by rising protein demand in regions like Asia Pacific and Latin America. This trend fuels the demand for poultry monitoring systems, particularly feed and environment types, optimizing broiler farm efficiency. In Canada, BCSPCA data spotlights 107.9 million broiler chickens raised annually, signaling a move toward modernized farming using monitoring systems.
Despite challenges from the H5N1 avian influenza outbreak, affecting numerous farms worldwide and prompting temporary reductions in system demand during culls, recovery measures boost the adoption of alarm and environment systems from firms like SKOV and Fancom BV. These systems reinforce biosecurity, ensuring resilient future farm operations, particularly in Asia Pacific, where demand persists amid adversity. While H5N1 influences short-term dynamics, long-term trends lean towards smart, resilient farming technologies.
For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/2xyg8b
About ResearchAndMarkets.comResearchAndMarkets.com is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.
CONTACT: CONTACT: ResearchAndMarkets.com Laura Wood,Senior Press Manager press@researchandmarkets.com For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 minutes ago
- Forbes
GE's 400% Breakup Return Is A Wake-Up Call For Every CEO
NEW YORK, NEW YORK - SEPTEMBER 06: CEO of GE and CEO of GE Aerospace, Larry Culp, speaks onstage ... More during GE The Lean Mindset: The Pursuit Of Progress Event at Chelsea Industrial on September 06, 2023 in New York City. (Photo by Ilya S. Savenok/Getty Images for GE) There was a time when GE symbolized everything wrong with corporate bloat. I wrote about it in 2019, covering the damage done by Welch's financial engineering, Immelt's empire-building, and the pension time bomb that dragged the company into long-term decline. It became a cautionary tale for investors who confused brand power with balance sheet strength. The GE breakup is now a success story that everyone, particularly CEOs, should be aware of. What followed would have been unthinkable at the time. GE has now delivered a 400 percent return to shareholders through one of the most effective corporate breakups in recent history. This was not a lucky outcome. It was a structural reset. Larry Culp did not save GE by patching it up. He saved it by dismantling what no longer worked and letting the market revalue the parts. The result is not just a comeback story. It is a signal to every CEO sitting on underperforming assets that the path to value is already in plain sight. The GE Breakup Blueprint Culp did what many before him were unwilling to do. He separated GE into three focused businesses: aviation, healthcare, and energy. It was a structural necessity. Each business had a distinct capital profile, a different growth outlook, and a unique investor base. For years they had been buried inside a complex, legacy-driven machine that masked their true value. The aerospace unit became GE Aerospace, a pure-play with visibility, margins, and scale. GE Healthcare stepped into a sector where clarity and comparables drive multiples. GE Vernova, the energy unit, aligned with the market's demand for clean transition and infrastructure exposure. These were not spinoffs in name alone. Each company now controls its own cost base, strategy, and capital allocation decisions. That separation of function is exactly what the market needed. It created three investable stories, not one misunderstood puzzle. This is why The Edge focuses on these types of situations, not just valuation screens. A business is only as valuable as its structure allows it to be. When that structure is misaligned, price alone tells you nothing. GE's transformation is proof that when incentives and operations are realigned, the value follows quickly. GE Vs S&P Post Spinoff The Market's Reaction To The GE Breakup Once the separation plan was set in motion, the market responded with precision. Investors didn't need another narrative. They needed clarity. With each division operating independently, the ability to assign real multiples returned. GE Aerospace quickly established itself as a dominant player in a post-COVID aviation cycle. GE Vernova captured attention as a levered play on energy transition and grid modernization. GE Healthcare stepped into its own, attracting sector-focused capital that once ignored the parent entirely. What resulted was a strong re-rating. The market priced the businesses as they were, not as they had been hidden inside a tangled conglomerate. I called this early in my 2024 Forbes piece on GE's revival, when the breakup began to gain traction with institutions. Barron's followed with a lead feature quoting my assessment of Culp's plan. The message was the same: the market doesn't reward some fantastic ideas (this can be the major problem with turnarounds); it rewards a laid-out, quantifiable structure. Once that changed, so did the stock. The 400 percent return was the consequence, not the goal. What set the GE breakup in motion wasn't a new product or a market shift. It was leadership. Larry Culp saw what his predecessors refused to acknowledge. GE didn't need to be fixed. It needed to be stripped back. For decades, successive CEOs measured success by size—more divisions, more deals, more complexity. Culp reversed that thinking and proved that focus, not scale, is what drives shareholder return. Under Welch and Immelt, GE had become a monument to corporate ego. Diversification was seen as strength, even as the market lost the ability to value the parts. Culp understood that investors don't want a riddle. They want clean stories, clear numbers, and defined upside. This same leadership vacuum now exists at Boeing. I laid that out earlier this year in a piece calling for a rockstar CEO to take the reins. The lesson applies across sectors. If leadership isn't aligned with structure, value will stay hidden. The GE breakup worked because someone was finally willing to make hard decisions. GEV Vs S&P Post Spinoff Why Most CEOs Still Resist The GE Breakup Playbook Despite the success of the GE breakup, most CEOs still avoid this path. Not because it lacks merit, but because it requires a level of self-awareness that many don't possess. Breaking up a business means admitting that the structure you built no longer serves shareholders. That's a hard pill to swallow for executives whose careers were spent expanding, acquiring, and defending size as a strategy. The diversification myth still holds power. It gives the illusion of stability while masking underperformance. The market doesn't want blended results. It wants exposure to what works, without the drag of what doesn't. The real reason more companies don't follow GE's lead is simple. Change threatens control. A breakup reduces influence, reshapes org charts, and opens management to scrutiny. So instead of running toward structural change, most CEOs run from it. That choice may protect their tenure, but it leaves shareholder value locked in the shadows. The Investor's Edge The GE breakup reminds us where real alpha lives. It is not found in low multiples or discounted cash flows alone. It is found in structure, timing, and the presence of a catalyst. A cheap stock without change is just a value trap and I always speak about cheap stocks becoming cheaper. A misunderstood business in the middle of a structural shift? That's an opportunity. This is what I wrote about in Price Catalysts: 'Value without a trigger is just dead money.' The market doesn't reward potential. It rewards movement. That's why the GE story mattered. The setup was there for years—misunderstood assets, bloated overhead, misaligned capital. But only when the structure changed did the return appear. At The Edge, this is where we focus. We don't chase momentum or screen for what's cheap. We look for businesses on the verge of transformation. Spin-offs. Restructurings. Activist pressure. Forced selling. These are not stories. They're setups. GE wasn't a surprise to those watching the structural pressure build. It was a long-awaited release of value the market had simply stopped believing in until it couldn't ignore it anymore. GEHC Vs S&P Post Spinoff The GE Playbook Is Public The GE breakup is no longer a case study. It's a playbook. Every CEO and board now has a real-world example of what happens when structural change meets disciplined leadership. Mediocre boards can't pretend anymore. You don't need a new product, a market shift, or the perfect macro backdrop. You need a willingness to rethink what you've built and the courage to unlock what's already there. The same logic applies to other conglomerates hiding value. Boeing still carries too much weight from its disjointed divisions. Johnson & Johnson took a step in the right direction but stopped short of full separation. Consumer giants with sleepy product lines and overgrown portfolios are no different. You don't need new tech. You need new thinking. The GE breakup didn't invent value. It revealed it. And it showed that the fastest way to deliver shareholder returns is often the hardest, changing the very structure that once defined you. Act Before The Market Forces You GE waited until it had no choice. Most companies do. But the GE breakup shows what happens when the right leadership acts before the market demands it. The value was always there. Value release sometimes needs a catalyst. If you're running a company sitting on undervalued assets, you have a decision to make. Wait until you're forced into action or lead the revaluation yourself. Because if you don't unlock the value, someone else will. And when they do, it won't be on your terms. The playbook is open. Time is not on your side.
Bloomberg
2 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Fed Is Set for Contentious Debate as Investors Eye Fall Rate Cut
By and Catarina Saraiva Save Federal Reserve officials are determined to hold interest rates steady a little while longer, though an increasingly contentious debate at this week's policy meeting may bolster expectations for rate cuts in the fall. Fed Chair Jerome Powell is under intense pressure from President Donald Trump and his allies to reduce borrowing costs, and may face multiple dissents this week from officials who want to provide support to a slowing labor market.
Forbes
2 minutes ago
- Forbes
New Technical Jewelry Symposium To Premiere At Vicenzaoro Jewelry Fair
The Science of jewelry making and adornment will be part of the September Vicenzaoro jewelry fair For the first time in its 70-year history, the Vicenzaoro jewelry trade fair will host an adjacent gathering dedicated to metallurgy and jewelry manufacturing processes. Called the Vicenza Symposium, it will be held September 2 -4 Vicenza, Italy, prior to Vicenzaoro on September 5 -7. Both events are B2B focused, open only to the jewelry trade. The Vicenza Symposium is modeled after the Santa Fe Symposium with the objective of advancing jewelry making technology, the science of adornment if you will. The three-day event is modeled after the Santa Fe Symposium, founded in 1987 by Eddie Bell, the retired CEO of Rio Grande, an Albuquerque, N.M., company the manufactures, markets and sells jewelry-making supplies. He held his last symposium in 2022 following his retirement. By this time, it was the world's most important event on the technology and science of metallurgy and jewelry making, attracting professionals from around the world. This new event is an attempt to maintain the community that Bell established. In fact, Bell was named honorary president and will deliver opening remarks. There will be 21 white papers delivered during the three-day event on artificial intelligence, 3D printing and other highly technical topics. Presentations will range from 'Gold in the Age of SLM-CNC Interface,' and 'Cracks, pores and other defects in jewellery – their causes and their prevention' to 'Potential of Pt-and-pd-based Bulk Metallic Glasses for Jewellery applications.' It is fitting that it's established the Italian gold jewelry center of Vicenza, known as much for the technology of goldsmithing and jewelry making as well as it is for manufacturing jewels in the tradition of Italian design and style. FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder Familiar Names at Vicenzaoro When Vicenzaoro opens September 5 at the IEG's Expo Centre, it will once again be a showplace for internationally known Italian jewelry brands such as Roberto Coin, Annamaria Cammilli, Damiani, Nanis, Fope and Crivelli. The revival of the historic Marina B jewelry brand will also be a focus of the show. The fair attracts important jewelers from Europe and other parts of the world as well including Schreiner Fine Jewellery from Germany, Fabergé from the UK, Etho Maria from Greece, Carrera Y Carrera from Spain, and Statement Paris and D1928 from France. Outside Europe, the Australian pearl jewelry company, Autore, will present its new high jewelry and fine jewelry designs. One of the returning features of Vicenzaoro is 'The Design Room,' for independent high-end designers. This is one of the very few international venues where these designers can have a proper place to show their creations as most international jewelry shows focus on large manufacturers. These designers reinterpret jewelry with unique and exclusive creations. Among the best-known names are Alessio Boschi, whose creations combine culture, history and architecture; Mike Joseph, who focuses of geometric design studded with diamonds; Antonini Milano for lovers of pure yet structured lines; and Karen Suen who combines modern glam with classic jewelry techniques. In addition, there's 'The 8' project, a creation of Boschi, fellow jewelry designers Alessia Crivelli and Luca Daverio, and the goldsmith foundation, Mani Intelligenti. The project promotes new Italian and international jewelry talents. There's also a specific space for the watchmaking brands and accessories, a growing sector of the trade fair with more than 40 exhibitors. All totaled the September Vicenzaoro jewelry trade fair is expected to attract more than 450 buyers from 60 countries who will view the products and services of approximately 1,200 exhibitors from 35 countries. In its 70th year, Vicenzaoro claims to be the world's longest-running jewelry trade event. Vicenzaoro is held twice each year. Following the September show the next fair will be held January 16 – 20, 2026. Vicenzaoro and the Vicenza Symposium is owned and operated by the Italian Exhibition Group (IEG), an international trade show company based in Rimini, Italy.
