Superbugs could kill millions more and cost $2tn a year by 2050, models show
A UK government-funded study shows that without concerted action, increased rates of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) could lead to global annual GDP losses of $1.7tn over the next quarter of a century.
The research, by the Center for Global Development thinktank, found the US, UK and EU economies would be among the hardest hit, prompting accusations that recent swingeing aid cuts are self-defeating.
On Thursday, the UK government announced it was axing funding for the Fleming fund, which combats AMR in low- and middle-income countries, as part of wider aid cuts. The Trump administration has confirmed $9bn in cuts to its foreign aid budget, while a number of European countries have also reduced spending on overseas aid.
Anthony McDonnell, the lead author and the research and a policy fellow at the Center for Global Development, said: 'When we conducted our research on the economic impacts of antimicrobial resistance, it was anticipated that resistance rates would continue to follow historical trends.
'However, the sudden cuts to Official Development Assistance by the US, which has cut its aid spend by roughly 80%; the UK, which has announced aid cuts from 0.5% to 0.3% of gross national income; and substantial reductions by France, Germany, and others, could drive up resistance rates in line with the most pessimistic scenario in our research.
'Even countries that have been successful in keeping AMR rates under control cannot afford to be complacent. Unless AMR programmes are protected from aid cuts, resistance rates across the world will likely increase at a rate in line with the worst-affected countries.
'This would result in millions more people dying worldwide, including across G7 nations. Investing in treatment for bacterial infections now will save lives and deliver billions in long-term economic returns.'
The research calculated the economic and health burden of antibiotic resistance for 122 countries and forecast that in that in this most pessimistic scenario, by 2050, GDP losses in China could reach just under $722bn a year, the US $295.7bn, the EU $187bn, Japan $65.7bn and the UK $58.6bn.
According to the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), deaths from AMR are expected to increase 60% by 2050, with 1.34 million people in the US and 184,000 in the UK alone predicted to die each year from antibiotic resistant bugs, while numbers of those becoming seriously ill from drug-resistant bacteria are also expected to jump.
Superbugs increase the number of hospital admissions and lead to longer and more intensive hospital stays, costlier second-line treatments and more complex care, meaning resistant infections are roughly twice as expensive to treat as those for which antibiotics are effective.
The study estimates global health costs of treating AMR could increase by just under $176bn a year, while in the UK, they would rise from $900m to $3.7bn and in the US from $15.5bn to just under $57bn.
Higher rates of resistant bugs would also shrink the UK, EU and US workforces by 0.8%, 0.6% and 0.4% respectively, the study found.
But if countries invest more in tackling superbugs – increasing access to new antibiotics and high-quality treatment of these infections – the US economy would grow $156.2bn a year and the UK $12bn (£9.3bn) by 2050.
Responding to the findings, Dr Mohsen Naghavi, a professor of health metrics at IHME, said: 'Today the threat of AMR is increasing, and without immediate action from all stakeholders the medicines we have access to now could stop working, potentially causing a simple infection to become deadly.'
That would involve policy changes from the US, European and UK governments, the development of new drugs and ensuring everyone understood that antibiotics were ineffective against viruses, he added.
A UK government spokesperson said: 'Our 10-year health plan recognises antimicrobial resistance (AMR) as a major threat and commits to urgently tackle its spread, including through new vaccines.
'We have made important progress - reducing antibiotic use in meat and pioneering a world-first subscription model to incentivise the development of new treatments. We also continue to work closely with international partners to influence global efforts to limit the spread of AMR.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
19 minutes ago
- The Sun
Wes Streeting offers resident doctors better work perks in last-gasp bid to avoid strikes
WES Streeting has offered greater work perks to junior doctors in a last-gasp bid to avert damaging NHS strikes - but is holding firm on pay. The Health Secretary wrote to the British Medical Association yesterday urging them to call off walkouts due to start Friday. 2 A quarter of a million appointments could be impacted if militant union bosses refuse to cancel their five days of industrial action. While their eye-watering 29 per cent pay demands have been rebuffed - along with any salary increase - The Sun understands concessions have been made on working conditions. It involves limiting the costs borne by resident doctors at work, with reports many were having to buy some their own hospital kit. Improvements to resident doctors' training rotations and faster career progression are also on the table - but wiping parts of their student debt has been ruled out. A source close to the dispute last night said the talks were 'finely balanced' and that negotiations would go down to the wire. The BMA is expected to respond to Mr Streeting's latest olive branch today. Analysis by the Policy Exchange think tank found that the five days of industrial action threatened by the BMA could reduce inpatient activity for the month of July by 4.5 per cent and outpatient activity by 8.7 per cent. The strikes would threaten Sir Keir Starmer's target of 65 per cent of patient treatment plans being completed within 18 weeks from next Spring. Meanwhile, the cost of paying consultants to cover resident doctor rotas could hit £87.46m. Resident doctors are clinging to demands for a 29 per cent pay rise, with the BMA having amassed a £1m war chest ahead of Friday's action. It comes despite the NHS staff having already received a staggering 22 per cent hike last year. Tory Shadow Business Secretary Andrew Griffith blasted: 'Labour has bent over backwards for the unions every chance they have got with no-strings-attached pay rises. 'It is no surprise they are now running riot. They are out of control. 'Thanks to Labour's weakness, we are now facing a summer of discontent.' Ex-Tory Leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith added: 'The unions are Labour's paymasters at the end of the day. 'They're getting their payback by being allowed to run riot.' 2
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
The new changes to the infected blood compensation scheme that will benefit victims
Victims of the infected blood scandal will see new changes made to the compensation scheme, officials have announced. It follows a heavily critical report on the way people were being compensated. Earlier this month, the Infected Blood Inquiry made a series of recommendations to improve compensation for people who were both infected with contaminated blood and people affected as a result. Responding to the report, the government said that it was immediately accepting a number of the recommendations and will consult on others. It is not rejecting any of the recommendations. And the Infected Blood Compensation Authority (IBCA) announced it will accept all recommendations relating to the compensation authority. Earlier this month, the probe into the scandal said victims had been 'harmed further' by failures in the compensation scheme. And the process has begun to create a 'long overdue' memorial for thousands of victims of the scandal, dubbed the worst treatment disaster in the history of the NHS. Sir Brian Langstaff, chairman of the inquiry, said the number of people who have been compensated to date is 'profoundly unsatisfactory' as he called for 'faster and fairer' compensation for victims. He said all victims should be able to register for compensation and should not have to wait to be called forward to start their claim. The IBCA confirmed it will create a registration process. The Government has also accepted a number of recommendations including: Affected people 's claims will not 'die with them' and their payments will be passed on to their estates; People infected with HIV before 1982 will be compensated – they were previously ineligible; The requirement for people with hepatitis to provide a date of diagnosis will be abolished. Meanwhile, it said it will consult on a number of issues including: how the scheme recognises the impact of interferon treatment for hepatitis which has been linked to severe side effects; how the scheme recognises severe psychological harm; and it will also consult on the scope of how victims of unethical research are to be compensated. Elsewhere, the Government announced further interim payments to the estates of people who have died. And it also confirmed that Clive Smith, president of the Haemophilia Society, will be the chairman of the Infected Blood Memorial Committee. Mr Smith will lead the work to create a national memorial to the victims of the scandal and will 'support memorials in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland'. Cabinet Office Minister Nick Thomas-Symonds said: 'When I appeared before the inquiry in May, I said that I would take a constructive approach and, carefully, consider the issues that had been put to me. 'I have concentrated on removing barriers to quicker compensation, working with IBCA, and am determined to deliver improvements based on this new report. 'Our focus as we move forward must be working together to not only deliver justice to all those impacted, but also to restore trust in the state to people who have been let down too many times.' In a statement to the Commons, Mr Thomas-Symonds told MPs he would go further than the inquiry's recommendation on affected states. He said: 'The inquiry recommended that where someone who would be an eligible affected person sadly died or dies between the 21 of May 2024 and 31 of December 2029, their claim will not die with them, but becomes part of the estate. 'I'm actually going to extend that by a further two years to the 31st of December 2031.' David Foley, chief executive of IBCA, added: 'The community is at the heart of everything we do. We can only grow the service, and implement these new recommendations by listening to and acting on the views of the community. 'Some of the recommendations will take longer to implement, which we know may cause frustration and upset for some in the community. 'We will always act with transparency. That is why I can confirm that we will create a registration process, so that the community can tell us that they intend to make a claim. 'We will also develop the service for all groups, paying the first claims before the end of 2025. And we will improve transparency by sharing more of our processes, documents, data and plans on our website.' Incoming memorial committee chairman Mr Smith said: 'A memorial to the thousands who have died from the contaminated blood scandal is long overdue. 'It is a great privilege to be asked to lead this important work on behalf of the community. 'I look forward to working with the whole community across the UK on building an appropriate memorial to those we have lost and to act as a lasting memorial to the nation of what can happen when patient safety is not prioritised.' More than 30,000 people in the UK were infected with HIV and hepatitis C after they were given contaminated blood and blood products between the 1970s and early 1990s. More than 3,000 people have died as a result, and survivors are living with lifelong health implications. The Infected Blood Inquiry published its main report on the scandal in May last year, and a compensation scheme was announced a day later. But in the same week a general election was called and officials from the IBCA have described how in the early days of the organisation it consisted of two men, a laptop and a phone. Some £11.8 billion has been allocated to compensate victims, administered by the IBCA. As of July 15, 587 people have had their compensation paid totalling more than £400 million.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Cardiff GP felt she had to work through cancer scare
A GP has said she kept on working through a cancer scare because otherwise her patients wouldn't have been seen due to staffing issues made worse by Emily Jones isn't alone feeling under pressure, as a colleague at their south Wales surgery worries she'll make a mistake because she's seeing more patients than the recommended daily safe limit due to financial doctors claim these issues are made worse by an "outdated" health funding model which doesn't take into account how sick or poor a surgery's catchment UK government has said it is reviewing the formula while the Welsh Parliament is looking at it as part of its inquiry into the future of GPs. "It puts the pressure on that I shouldn't be getting sick," Dr Jones 37-year-old had nipped away from her practice to get an issue checked out and her doctor found a potentially cancerous lump in her abdomen."My GP said that I should be going straight to the hospital," she recalled."But I couldn't because I was the only doctor here, I couldn't shut the surgery."It was very stressful that afternoon trying to just keep going. I was in pain but there wasn't really any other option."Dr Jones has said there wasn't enough staff to cover her that day because of a funding formula for GP surgeries in Wales and England that some say is no longer fit for more doctors were in the following day, Dr Jones was able to attend the hospital appointment when the lump was found not to be has also felt awful being off to attend emergency hospital appointments and to have major operations because it put a strain on her surgery in Cardiff."I hear quite a lot you don't think about doctors getting sick, but I try to remind my patients that we're all human," added Dr Jones, a GP for eight years. Whitchurch Road Surgery in the Heath area of the city currently has about 80 appointments a day for the approximate 8,000 patients on their list and have an estimated four-week wait for routine appointments. The surgery has said some staff are doing overtime every day to see as many patients as quickly as possible."You have patient after patient coming in and the first five minutes is spent apologising for the fact they can't get an appointment," said Dr Rebecca 44-year-old has said that she could see 30 patients in a morning, which is beyond the safe daily limit of 25 suggested by the British Medical Association (BMA). The BMA has said some GPs are seeing as many as 40 patients in a day due to an increased workload as some surgeries claim they can't afford more doctors. "Every single day you worry you're going to make a mistake," added Dr Towner."There's more risk with seeing patient after patient and less time to think. We're firefighting and it's exhausting."She has admitted the situation can be "demoralising" and doctors she knows have considered quitting multiple times. "I can't imagine doing anything else other than being a GP, but it's hard to see how we can carry on as it is at the moment," added Dr at Whitchurch Road Surgery have put a cap on extra work "when possible" and claim a lack of funding because of the way the NHS pays GP surgeries means they have been unable to pay the same wages as other say that means they're unable to hire new staff which has added to their workload and subsequently increased appointment wait time for patients. The surgery's own practice manager said he continued to work during his treatment for stage three oesophageal cancer in an attempt to lessen the impact on patients."I think things will get worse before they get better," said Gareth Lucocq, 47."We have lots of doctors qualifying in autumn and unfortunately there are no jobs for them because practices can't afford their wages." GPs in Wales and England are mainly paid using a formula introduced in 2004, based on factors like how old and ill their patients are likely to be. Campaigners have said data the Carr-Hill Formula uses is more than 25 years old and GP practices in towns and cities tend to lose complain the formula is not based on current data so when the NHS allocates cash, it doesn't take into account whether the GP surgery serves a particularly sick or deprived Wales research shows that if Whitchurch Road Surgery was paid per patient, rather than using the Carr-Hill formula, it would receive an extra quarter of a million pounds a on this measurement, the biggest shortfall faced by any GP surgery in Wales would be just under £445,000."There is systematically worse access to general practice in poorer parts of the country," said Dr Becks Fisher of the Nuffield Trust, who did a study on GP funding formula in England."People who live in poorer parts of the country consistently have lower satisfaction with GP services and report more difficulty in accessing them."GP practices in the Cardiff and Vale health board are the worst affected by the formula in Wales and almost half of Welsh surgeries claim they're allocated less cash than they say they need."If you're hundreds of thousands of pounds worse off, it doesn't matter how hard you work," said Dr Matthew Jones, who works at another surgery in Heath. "The formula just doesn't work. It doesn't accurately represent what your GP workload is and the figures and data they're using are from 1998 to 2001."The General Practitioners Committee, the body that represents UK GPs, believes there is a need to review the formula in Wales."General practice is facing a crisis in Wales," said Dr Gareth Oelmann, the BMA's Welsh committee Royal College of General Practitioners has welcomed the "long overdue" UK government review into how funds are dished out to GP surgeries."A patient's postcode and where they live should not determine the level of NHS care they receive," it said in a statement."It can't be right that people in deprived communities – who often have more complex health needs and would likely benefit from health interventions most - are less likely to receive it, because their GPs' time is spread even more thinly."In Wales, the Senedd's Health and Social Care Committee is holding an inquiry into the future of GPs including its funding model and current financial pressures."Various elements of the GP contract, including funding formulas, will be considered as part of annual contract negotiations between Welsh government, NHS Wales and the General Practitioner's Committee," the Welsh government said in a statement.
