As Raajneeti turns 15 today, director Prakash Jha confirms Raajneeti 2 is in the works, script and cast being finalised!
Speaking to us as the film achieves the 15-year milestone, Prakash confirms that a sequel to Raajneeti is in the works. 'Raajneeti (politics) ki yatra toh anvarat (constant) hai, chalti hi rehti hai! There's always been a plan for Raajneeti 2. While there is nothing concrete in terms of casting and shooting yet, I am currently working on it,' says the director.
The film's pre-production went on for a year. 'We cast 8,000 actors for an authentic crowd scene, which was quite a task,' says Prakash.
Sharing how he managed to put such a big star cast together, he adds, 'The good thing about casting was that whoever we approached, liked the script and came on board. They felt challenged to perform well. People say it was a commercial success. For me, Damul (1984), Mritudand (1997), Gangajal (2003), Apaharan (2005) or Satyagraha (2013) are just films. But, it feels nice when people talk about them.'
The movie had a hit soundtrack, featuring four composers — late Aadesh Shrivastava, Pritam, Shantanu Moitra and Wayne Sharpe, with lyrics penned by Gulzar, Irshad Kamil, Sameer and Swanand Kirkire.
Prakash shares that Aadesh came up with the song Mora Piya Mose Bolat Naahin 'much earlier' during a creative sitting and it perfectly fit the situation in the film. He adds, 'He sang it beautifully, too.'
Singer Kavita Seth, who also sang the song, says, 'I took extra time to prepare the song, as the situation was intense. It is one of my biggest hits till date. It's a part of my set list at all the concerts along with Ek Tara (Wake Up Sid).' Bheegi Se also became a big hit.
Separate helicopters were needed for different characters. So, to save the cost, one helicopter was painted in two colours on either sides. It was shot from different angles for different scenes.
Katrina Kaif, Ranbir Kapoor and Arjun Rampal became friends during the film's shoot. They would often be seen together playing cricket and savouring delicacies together. They named the trio BhoPALS.
The film's assistant director Ritam Srivastava, director of OTT series like Rafuchakkar (2023) and Raktanchal (2020), tells us, 'Ranbir Kapoor was very excited when he shared the screen with Manoj Bajpayee. It was also the first time that Ranbir used a pistol in a scene.'
Manoj's chase sequence was shot over three days at multiple locations in Bhopal. Ritam shares: 'While doing the chase, Ajay Devgn jokingly said: 'Teen din ho gaye seene mein goli lagey, ab to marr jaao'.'
In 2016, Prakash Jha authored book Raajneeti - the Film and Beyond which has lot about the making of the film. Katrina, who was seen in a saree in most parts of the film, was apparently not sure about her look. The book mentions: She would ask the Director of Photography Sachin Krishn, 'Will I look beautiful?'. He would say, 'You would look real'.
For authenticity, Prakash Jha refused 'good quality' flags for the shoot just a day before filming. So, 12,000 party flags were printed with cheap material, shabby printing and cheap technology, and were aged.
Costume designer Priyanka Mundada used 40,000 metres to dress 8,000 cast members. Tea was used to age the dresses. To accommodate them, hotels, guest houses and lodges were booked in Bhopal. Extra bathrooms were constructed for junior artistes. Caterers were called from Mumbai.
Cross-country collaboration was done to create 'international, yet Indian music'. New York-based musician Wayne Sharpe, who also composed the score of the film, created western melodies and then recorded with Indian sounds. He recorded melodies in his studio in the US, the orchestra was recorded in Prague, Czech Republic, while the Indian instruments were recorded in Mumbai.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
Polyandry in Himachal Pradesh: A closer look at the Hatti community's cultural shift
The recent jodidaran, or jajda — a fraternal polyandrous marriage between one woman and two Hatti brothers in the Trans-Giri region of Himachal Pradesh — has caused quite a stir, as the country is moving towards uniformity in its legal framework for marriage, divorce, adoption, and inheritance. This uniformity is sought to be imposed on its diverse people through a Uniform Civil Code (UCC). The reality that remote, isolated communities enjoy conjugal choice, whereas urban residents must register their marriages and live-in relationships, should not be lost sight of. As someone who has conducted years of fieldwork in these mountain regions, this case seems to be an aberration. What has astonished me is the zeal with which the marriage, consummated by three educated and well-placed individuals, has been publicised with a widely circulated press release and a wedding photoshoot in the forest. Usually, such practices are kept under wraps and, therefore, there is a need to unpack what is at work here. Polyandrous marriage is referred to in the hills as pandav vivah — most hill people consider the Pandavas as their ancestors. In the Mahabharata, Draupadi was the prize won in an archery contest and was pledged to five brothers. Polyandrous marriage, now surviving in these parts only in the region between the rivers Sutlej and Yamuna, has long been a subject of discussion. Anthropologist D N Majumdar's book, Himalayan Polyandry (1962), and his student Y S Parmar's (long-time chief minister of Himachal Pradesh) popular text Polyandry in the Himalayas, focused on it. Early anthropologists offered various functional explanations for polyandrous marriages that included the scarcity of arable land in the upper reaches, combined with difficulty in dividing property among multiple heirs. These alliances were also a measure of population control since joint families tend to have fewer children, and a practice dictated by the need for a larger pool of labour in a tough terrain where multiple occupations such as agriculture and pastoralism needed to be practised within one family unit. These explanations have been critiqued, justifiably so, because they insist upon ascribing reason to a social practice. In her foreword to Parmar's book, Indira Gandhi wrote, 'Polyandry is a subject of much ill-informed comment. Dr Parmar has rightly pointed out that there is usually some economic reason for a social custom and that without a change in economic motivation, no material and permanent change is possible. By putting it in its proper historical and economic context, the author gives us a deeper understanding of the manner in which societies evolve institutions to enable them to deal with the basic problems of living and surviving. Such comprehension is essential to overcome prejudice and attitudes of condescension.' Though the comment reflects empathy for social realities in difficult terrains, it also belies the thinking amongst the political class ruling from Delhi that the advent of modernity, arriving through scientific, economic and educational progress, would gradually bring about change in social behaviour, integrating these groups into the mainstream. Keeping this linear and simplistic view of modernity in mind, some social groups in the Himalayas — like the Jaunsaris of Uttarakhand — were granted Scheduled Tribe (ST) status in 1967 on the basis of their differentiated social customs, among which polyandry was prominent. This was notwithstanding the fact that these communities were caste Hindu and only marginally diverged from the mainstream. Many years later, as late as 2022-23, the Hattis from neighbouring Himachal Pradesh also managed to acquire tribal status. Mapping the social trajectory of the Jaunsari community yields some interesting insights. But before that, we must understand the social structure in these mountains. The Himalayas, due to their terrain, allow for only small settlements and family units. These settlements, before Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand became states, were ruled by thakurais, jocularly referred to by some scholars as 'very little kingdoms'. Therefore, in these mountain regions, Rajputs — the thakur — are at the pinnacle of the social order. They are the landowners, which, in the present context, translates into being owners of lucrative apple orchards. The ST status is granted to social groups that fulfil certain conditions such as 'primitive' traits, geographical isolation, distinct culture, shyness and economic backwardness. Today, these areas are overrun by tourists, there is road and mobile connectivity, education and apple wealth. While post-Independence, the Jaunsaris were indeed afflicted by poverty and remoteness, for the Hatti, none of the boxes could have been ticked, except the practice of polyandry. Hence the need for its active promotion and foregrounding. While tribal status is granted to promote egalitarianism, in these regions, it has ended up doing exactly the opposite. The privileged Rajputs among these groups, while bearing their tribal status as a badge of honour, have effectively leveraged it towards upward social mobility. Job reservations have helped establish a Rajput politico-social hegemony, a creamy layer that effectively keeps the downtrodden within the Hatti and the Jaunsari — the lower-caste Bhadhoi and the Kolta — from ascending the social ladder. A community like the Jaunsaris, given the status of a tribe as early as 1967, have still not been able to grant lower castes and women access to the shrines of their deities. In fact, the lower-caste bajgis, the drummer-bards of the devi-devtas, who perform enforced ritual duties at temples, and also walk with the deity palanquins in extreme conditions across mountain ridges playing the instruments, still cannot enter the shrines of the deities they worship. The status of women, especially from the lower castes, is even worse. Therefore, being tribal for these groups is a transactional strategy for upward mobility. In that sense, for the Hatti, recent entrants to the tribal 'game', it becomes imperative for the community to publicise polyandrous marriage, in order to emphasise their otherness. While a progressive state in a country as vast as India must allow its citizens a diversity of forms of social living, including choices of conjugality, it must also look back and assess what its social engineering has achieved. The writer is an anthropologist, author and activist based in the Himalayas
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Vijay Deverakonda's Kingdom mints over Rs 1 crore in advance booking for premiere shows in North America; Stakes high after spate of flops
Vijay Deverakonda's Kingdom is generating buzz in North America. The film has already earned over $135,500 from 220 locations. Advance sales are promising, reaching $145,000. Telugu cinema's popularity in the USA is growing. Kingdom is crucial for Vijay Deverakonda after recent box office disappointments. Ranbir Kapoor, and Suriya have contributed voiceovers. Gowtam Tinnanuri, known for Jersey, directs the film. Vijay Deverakonda 's much-anticipated action drama Kingdom is showing promising signs at the North American box office even before its theatrical debut. With five days to go for premieres, the film has already grossed over US $135,500 from 220 locations and has sold more than 7000 tickets just in the United States of America alone. The total premiere advance sales across North America currently stand at US $ 145,000 ( Rs 1.25 crore) , with more locations and shows expected to open soon. Over the past few years Telugu Cinema has made the North America circuit as one of it's strongholds thanks to films like Baahubali series, Kalki 2898 AD, Pushpa franchise , RRR and Salaar: Part 1- Ceasefire . This has been possible thanks to growing Telugu speaking population in the USA, in fact Telugu has become the 11th most spoken language in the country. This early traction signals a positive start for Kingdom, which could prove crucial for Vijay Deverakonda's career trajectory after a series of underwhelming performances at the box office. His last few films—including the pan-India venture Liger, romantic drama Khushi, and The Family Star—failed to connect with audiences and critics alike. Kingdom, therefore, is being viewed as a very important project for the actor, who once enjoyed massive youth appeal following hits like Arjun Reddy and Geetha Govindam. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play this game for 1 minute and see why everyone is addicted. Undo Trade analysts are optimistic that Kingdom could cross the $500K mark in premiere sales by the time the first show begins. For the film Vijay has roped in big names to the film a huge push, the voiceover in Hindi has been done by Ranbir Kapoor , while in Telugu it is by and in Tamil it is done by Suriya . The film has been directed by Gowtam Tinnanuri who is known for making heart wrenching films like Jersey with Nani.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
17 hours ago
- Business Standard
'Western vs Indian': Differing management approaches reflect cultural roots
Western management abhors ambiguity. Indians tolerate and thrive in it R Gopalakrishnan Mumbai Listen to This Article Several Indian thinkers (me included) place an emphasis on an 'Indian' way as compared to a 'Western' way of management. They refer to Swami Vivekananda or the Mahabharata to draw lessons. Is this relevant or valid? There is some degree of validity, but only some, particularly in the equilibrium between efficiency and effectiveness. Our assumptions about life and work are shaped by deep and unmanifest influences of culture, for example, deference to power, authority, and age, as seen in Indian business leaders genuflecting before ministers and bureaucrats. When I saw North Atlantic Treaty Organization chief Mark Rutte, a blunt Dutchman,
