China trade spat undermines Trump's ‘max pressure' Iran campaign: Bousso
Since taking office in January, Trump has ratcheted up pressure on Iran in a bid to stop it from obtaining a nuclear weapon, an ambition it denies harbouring. Washington has sought to drive Tehran's oil exports down to zero, cutting off a major source of revenue for the Islamic Republic.
That's a tall order. The United States and the European Union have for years targeted Iran's oil exports with limited success. The OPEC member's oil production rose to 4.6 million barrels per day in 2023, the highest since 2018, according to the Energy Institute's Statistical Review of World Energy, opens new tab.
But Trump is clearly willing to up the ante. He recently threatened to bomb Iran and impose secondary tariffs on buyers of its oil if Tehran does not agree to a nuclear deal.
The U.S. administration also issued a string of sanctions against Chinese entities involved in crude trading and, for the first time, targeted Chinese "teapot" refineries – small, independent plants – that process Iranian crude.
Beijing accounted for at least 77% of Iran's roughly 1.6 million bpd of exported crude in 2024, according to analytics firm Kpler. The value of Iran's crude sales to China is not officially disclosed, but a Reuters calculation puts the trade at nearly $29 billion last year, assuming a 20% discount to the Brent crude prices to include costs of logistics.
Washington thus clearly understands that any effort to choke off Iran's oil exports will have to involve persuading, or coercing, China to halt the oil trade.
But doing this will be much more challenging now, given the rapid deterioration in relations between the two trading partners. They have exchanged tit-for-tat tariffs over the past few weeks, culminating in Trump's announcement on Wednesday that he would raise tariffs on Beijing to an eye-popping 125%, dwarfing China's newly announced 84% tariff on U.S. goods.
So what could Trump try to do?
While China officially does not import any crude oil from Iran, its independent teapot refineries have for years circumvented international sanctions on Iranian oil exports and shipping using an opaque web of shell companies and tankers.
So, in theory, more of these small refineries could be targeted. But as the recent U.S. sanctions on Shandong Shouguang Luqing Petrochemical Co., Ltd have shown, such actions are likely to have a limited impact since many of these China-based plants' operations are domestic.
Secondary sanctions on Iranian crude are also unlikely to faze China, considering the extraordinarily high tariff barriers Trump has already erected. Once a country is facing tariffs exceeding 100%, the threat of additional penalties has little bite.
If Washington is incapable of limiting Iran's oil revenue by a meaningful amount, then it is fair to assume that the key lever in Trump's "maximum pressure" campaign won't be financial.
That doesn't necessarily mean Trump will pursue a military conflict with the Islamic Republic, though the administration has taken several actions – including moving six B-2 heavy bombers to the Indian Ocean – which appear designed to signal that the threat is real.
But the Republican president this week also made a surprise announcement that the United States and Iran were poised to begin direct talks. Iran's foreign minister later said the discussions in Oman would be indirect.
Either way, tensions between Washington and Tehran continue to rise, and this could ultimately give Chinese President Xi Jinping leverage in his own battle with Trump.
He could use Iran's dependence on China as a bargaining chip in any future negotiations with the U.S. about defusing their trade tussle, as it is unlikely that Trump would want to pursue a trade war and an actual war simultaneously.
** The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. **
Want to receive my column in your inbox every Thursday, along with additional energy insights and trending stories? Sign up for my Power Up newsletter here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
30 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Trump seeks to pressure trading partners to make deals before tariffs deadline
The Trump administration is stepping up pressure on trading partners to make new deals before a Wednesday deadline, with plans for the US to start sending letters warning countries that higher tariffs could begin on August 1. That furthers the uncertainty for businesses, consumers and America's trading partners, and questions remain about which countries will be notified, whether anything will change in the days ahead and whether President Donald Trump will once more delay imposing the rates. Mr Trump and his top trade advisers say he could extend the time for deal-making but they insist the administration is applying maximum pressure on other nations. Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, told CBS's Face The Nation on Sunday that Mr Trump would decide when it was time to give up on negotiations. 'The United States is always willing to talk to everybody about everything,' Mr Hassett said. 'There are deadlines, and there are things that are close, so maybe things will push back past the deadline or maybe they won't. In the end the president is going to make that judgment.' Stephen Miran, the chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, likewise said countries negotiating in good faith and making concessions could 'sort of, get the date rolled'. The steeper tariffs that Mr Trump announced on April 2 threatened to overhaul the global economy and lead to broader trade wars. A week later, after the financial markets had panicked, his administration suspended for 90 days most of the higher taxes on imports just as they were to take effect. The negotiating window until July 9 has led to announced deals only with the United Kingdom and Vietnam. Mr Trump imposed elevated tariff rates on dozens of nations that run meaningful trade surpluses with the US, and a 10% baseline tax on imports from all countries in response to what he called an economic emergency. There are separate 50% tariffs on steel and aluminium and a 25% tariff on vehicles. Since April, few foreign governments have set new trade terms with Washington as the Republican president demanded. Mr Trump told reporters on Friday that his administration might be sending out letters as early as Saturday to countries spelling out their tariff rates if they did not reach a deal, but that the US would not start collecting those taxes until August 1. On Sunday, he said he would send out letters starting Monday — 'could be 12, could be 15' — to foreign governments reflecting planned tariffs for each. 'We've made deals also,' Mr Trump told reporters before heading back to the White House from his home in New Jersey. 'So we'll get to have a combination of letters, and some deals have been made.' He and his advisers have declined to say which countries would receive the letters. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent rejected the idea that August 1 was a new deadline and declined to say what might happen on Wednesday. 'We'll see,' Mr Bessent said on CNN's State Of The Union. 'I'm not going to give away the playbook.' He said the US was 'close to several deals' and predicted several big announcements over the next few days. He gave no details. 'I think we're going to see a lot of deals very quickly,' Mr Bessent said.
Powys County Times
30 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
‘Discussions continue' over US steel tariffs deal ahead of deadline, says No 10
Downing Street would not say whether the Government was confident that a deal to eliminate American tariffs on UK steel would be struck as Donald Trump's deadline looms. The US president has said he plans to start implementing tariffs on the US's trade partners on July 9. The UK has already managed to negotiate a deal with the US which eliminates the threat of tariffs to British car and aeroplane manufacturers. But a reprieve for the steel industry is yet to be finalised, leaving open the threat that the current 25% tariff rate could rise to 50% after the July 9 deadline. Mr Trump is reportedly stepping up pressure on countries who could soon be subject to the tariffs, urging them to negotiate trade deals with the US. But amid signs of confusion within the US administration, trade secretary Howard Lutnick has suggested America's trade partners will see the levies begin on August 9, after receiving a letter outlining them on July 9. Asked if the Government was confident a deal would be reached on UK steel, a No 10 spokesman said: 'Our work with the US continues to get this deal implemented as soon as possible. 'That will remove the 25% tariff on UK steel and aluminium, making us the only country in the world to have tariffs removed on these products. 'The US agreed to remove tariffs on these products as part of our agreement on May 8. It reiterated that again at the G7 last month. The discussions continue, and will continue to do so.' Pressed again whether ministers were confident British producers would not be hit by the 50% tariff, the Downing Street spokesman said: 'As I say, discussions continue. 'We have very close engagement with the US, and the US has been clear that it wants to keep talking to us to get the best deal for businesses and consumers on both sides.'
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump just swung at Putin's war machine. He missed
The United States is launching a trade war against BRICS. In a Truth Social post, President Donald Trump declared 'Any country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10 per cent tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy'. While financial markets were breathing a sigh of relief about the postponement of new tariffs from July 9 to August 1, these threats triggered yet more turmoil. If Trump proceeds with new tariffs against BRICS countries, the consequences for US trade policy and global influence could be profound, and not in the positive way that Trump envisions. For starters, new tariffs on BRICS members and partners will not severely weaken the economies of Russia and Iran. An escalation of US-China trade tensions benefits Russia, as it can readily supplant American supplies of oil, liquefied natural gas and coal to China. As Russia-China trade volumes reached $244.8 billion and Russia-India trade reached $70.6 billion, the Russian economy can lean on intra-BRICS trade to fill supply chain gaps. Higher prices on goods supplied by BRICS members and partners will merely accelerate Russia's domestic production targets. President Vladimir Putin has urged Russia to reduce its GDP share allotted to imports to 17 per cent by 2030 and higher costs of foreign goods will give the upper hand to domestic producers of manufactured goods. While Trump's outrage towards BRICS is partially related with its solidarity with Iran against American and Israeli attacks, these new tariffs will have a negligible impact on the Iranian economy. If anything, they could convince Russia and China to deepen their economic ties with Iran and give new momentum to India's May 2024 deal to operate the Iranian port of Chabahar. The impulsive imposition of tariffs on BRICS members and partners will also undo positive steps towards a de-escalation of trade tensions between the US and China. Due to the London and Geneva agreements, the US has agreed to ease restrictions on aircraft engine, semiconductor design software and ethane exports to China. In exchange, China has taken steps towards easing non-tariff barriers on rare earth supplies. These new tariffs could not only stall further trade talks but reignite the industrial supply chain bottlenecks that were ebbed through months of tireless negotiations. Aside from upending the US's bilateral trade ties with key partners, the new tariffs do even more lasting damage to its global image. BRICS countries are expanding the Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA) which will allow them to borrow funds in local currencies instead of the US dollar. Russia's Transfer of Financial Messages (SPFS) and China's Cross-border Interbank Payment System (CIPS) are incrementally diluting SWIFT dominance. These new tariffs will intensify discussions about de-dollarisation as Global South countries seek to insulate themselves from US trade barriers and sanctions. They will also fuel Chinese President Xi Jinping's crusade against 'unilateral bullying' which aims to form an anti-tariff coalition consisting of EU member states, Middle East regional powers and emerging African economies. Instead of being a show of strength that reinforces US hegemony against the Chinese challenge, Trump's tariffs could give Beijing an intended gift. The US's trade war against BRICS is understandable given its frustrations with the anti-Western policies of its member states. Succumbing to those frustrations with impulsive tariffs could do the US more harm than good.
