logo
Unfriending India? Trump's 25% tariffs on India deal a body blow to major sectors—and raise costs for US consumers

Unfriending India? Trump's 25% tariffs on India deal a body blow to major sectors—and raise costs for US consumers

Time of India3 days ago
Live Events
ET Online
In an 'unfriendly' turn of events, US President Donald Trump on Wednesday imposed a 25% tariff on goods imported from India, along with an additional penalty for buying oil from Russia. Effective August 1, this imposition is expected to adversely impact some of the major employment-generating sectors, which were optimistic for a more balanced tariff regime with the US.The latest move by Trump is likely to have a significant impact on several sectors, including textiles, gems and jewellery, seafood, agricultural products, leather, and electronics. 'Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the world, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers of any country,' Trump stated in a post on the social media platform Truth Social, while also noting India has always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia.Trump previously labelled India as the 'Tariff King,' an unfair allegation, according to experts and industry players, as he overlooks high duties imposed by the US on varied items. As per data by the World Trade Organisation (WTO), the US levies duties as high as 350% on beverages and tobacco, 200% on dairy products, and 132% on fruits and vegetables, among others.The recent announcement—by no means an expected one—has dealt a severe blow to various industries that rely on the US as a key market, raising concern about their survival again.Look at the textiles sector, for instance, which is predominantly comprised of MSMEs that make up nearly 80% of it. Before the recent India-UK FTA, the sector faced stiff competition from countries like Bangladesh. The FTA, by removing the duty disadvantage of 10-12%, provided the much-needed boost to the sector. However, just when the sector was beginning to find its footing, tariffs imposed by the US, a key market for Indian exporters, have once again threatened to hinder its growth.'This shift in the US market is certainly a challenge, especially for companies working on tight margins. The impact on MSMEs could be more pronounced, as many smaller players rely heavily on US orders and may face greater strain. We have started looking closely at markets in Latin America. These are new regions for us, and while there are challenges, much depends on how we shape our business approach and respond to the way global trade is changing,' Suketu Shah, CEO of Vishal Fabrics, says.In fact, the impact has already started playing out on the ground. Vikas Singh, Director of the Home Textile Exporters' Welfare Association (HEWA), details how buyers have started putting new orders on hold. 'Even previously confirmed dispatches already manufactured and ready for shipment are being held back by the buyers. Many have now started demanding a flat 10% to 15% discount on these consignments. Moreover, the tariff advantage between India and China has also narrowed significantly, 25% on Indian goods versus 30% on Chinese goods. As a result, the short-term advantage that India previously enjoyed has effectively disappeared,' he states.Things are looking no better for the gems and jewellery industry, which has been reeling under pressure from the Russia-Ukraine and Israel wars, resulting in a significant decline in business. Jayanti Savaliya, Regional Chairman, Gems and Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC), states that out of $33 billion in exports, the US market makes up $9 billion, representing 28% of the total.However, he adds that the US will also face the impact of such a measure. 'It will be expensive for US consumers, so they are at a losing proposition as well with this announcement. We are also the biggest supplier to the US. In the case of India, we expect a drop in export numbers in the times ahead. We will need to consciously look at new markets to counter this scenario,' he emphasises.The gem & jewellery industry had tried to absorb the 10% tariffs that had come in, however the present tariffs of 25% is a steep percentage for them to digest, he says.Affirming such sentiments, experts in sectors such as leather say that such measures are not sustainable in the long term. 'The US simply cannot manufacture labour-intensive consumer goods like footwear domestically at competitive costs. Any tariff increase is ultimately a burden on their own consumers,' says Puran Dawar, Regional Chairman of the Council for Leather Exports (CLE), expressing optimism that the matter will be resolved diplomatically in due course.The USA is the largest importer of leather and leather products from India. In FY24 (April-December), it accounted for 21.82% of India's total leather exports. During FY25 (April-December), the total export of leather products to the USA was valued at Rs 6,870 crore ($795.55 million), an increase of 16.30% year-on-year.In the case of electronics, Abhishek Malik, Executive Director, Calcom Vision Ltd, says that the 25% tariff on Indian-manufactured goods by the US introduces new variables for exporters, particularly in sectors such as electronics where supply chains are globally integrated. 'These measures may lead to increased cost structures and could influence future investment decisions and planning. As trade dynamics evolve, companies may look to adapt by enhancing R&D, improving quality benchmarks, and developing more integrated manufacturing capabilities to remain aligned with global market expectations,' he says. When asked how much cost pressure these additional levies may put on their electronic products, Malik puts the figure at over 25%.The value of India's electronic exports to the US is roughly between $12 billion and $13 billion.For the renewable energy segment, while the tariffs may not directly target components, the ripple effects—currency volatility, tighter capital flows, and rising input costs—can impact project bankability and investor confidence. "For the Renewable Sector, operating on thin margins and long horizons, these indirect pressures can affect both pace and scale," Neerav Nanavaty, CEO, BluPine Energy says.The industry is of the view that these tariffs shows the urgency for India to build greater strategic resilience in its manufacturing sectors. Prashant Mathur, CEO, Saatvik Green Energy, says that the for the solar industry, this serves as a critical reminder to deepen domestic value chains while expanding into diversified export markets across Europe, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia.Similarly, Akshay Hiranandani, CEO, Serentica Renewables highlights that while these tariffs pose challenges for Indian manufacturers by reducing export opportunities and potential profits, this has the potential to benefit India's domestic market.In April-October FY25, India exported $711.95 million worth of PV cells with 96% of the shipments going to the US.Shrimp exporters are feeling the pinch of the announcement as well. In FY24, India exported 297,571 million tonnes (MT) of frozen shrimp valued at $4.8 billion to the US, according to the Marine Products Export Development Authority (MPEDA). Divya Kumar Gulati, Chairman at Compound Livestock Feed Manufacturers Association (CLFMA) of India, says the recent imposition of US tariffs on seafood products and agricultural products like shrimp, GM corn, soybean, and more is a significant setback for India's exports since that has emerged as a key livelihood generator across coastal and rural areas. 'The shrimp export industry, a major foreign exchange earner, will be particularly impacted, disrupting the supply chain and putting pressure on farm gate prices. This will ripple through to farmers' incomes and employment, especially in rural areas,' she states.Gulati urges the government to respond with timely interventions—exploring new export destinations, simplifying compliance frameworks, and investing in infrastructure and logistics to enhance global competitiveness. 'We are committed to supporting the sector through policy advocacy, technological innovation, skill development, and market diversification in the Indian livestock and aquaculture sectors,' she adds.For now, everyone is in wait-and-watch mode. India Inc. remains both hopeful and cautious about the future, given the numerous policy overhauls that occurred during Trump's presidency.Illustrations by Garima Bora.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Joe Root press conference : On Mohammed Siraj fake anger, why he punched his bat, update on Woakes
Joe Root press conference : On Mohammed Siraj fake anger, why he punched his bat, update on Woakes

Time of India

time18 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Joe Root press conference : On Mohammed Siraj fake anger, why he punched his bat, update on Woakes

Trump Breaks Silence on India & Russia's Oil 'Breakup' | 'New Delhi May Stop…' 'I heard India may stop buying Russian oil,' said US President Donald Trump, calling it a 'good step.' But reports say Indian refiners are still sourcing discounted Russian crude. As U.S. pressure mounts, New Delhi defends its ties with Moscow as 'steady and time-tested,' while balancing key strategic relations with Washington. Will India bow to American pressure or stick with its long-time energy partner? 29.0K views | 1 day ago

Nepal, China steel may face duty evasion probe
Nepal, China steel may face duty evasion probe

Time of India

time18 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Nepal, China steel may face duty evasion probe

The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence may investigate steel imports from Nepal and China. This action aims to shield the Indian steel industry from substandard products. Nepal has become a major steel exporter to India. Concerns arise about Chinese steel being routed through Nepal. Some Chinese companies are allegedly falsifying quality compliance documents. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence could initiate a probe into steel imports from Nepal and China, a move aimed at protecting the domestic industry from cheap, substandard imports, said people familiar with the comes after Nepal emerged as one of the top three steel exporters to India despite the absence of significant manufacturing facilities, they said."In some instances, a Nepal-based company was exporting steel many times over its nameplate capacity," an official told ET on condition of triggered apprehensions of Chinese steel being routed through Nepal, as alleged by the Indian has unilateral duty-free access to the Indian market, allowing its exporters to send steel products to India without paying any duty. On the contrary, direct exports from China attract at least 12% safeguard share in India's finished steel imports during the first three months of this financial year averaged 15.93%, making the neighbouring country the third largest steel exporter to India during this another instance, China's Shangyang Steel wrote to India's Directorate General of Foreign Trade alleging that other Chinese companies were falsifying documents affirming quality compliance. Shangyang Steel holds a certificate issued by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS)."The company alleged that other Chinese companies were misrepresenting the BIS certificate issued to Shangyang Steel and lying while exporting to India," the official month, the steel ministry issued a clarification saying that not only are finished and semi-finished steel imports required to adhere to quality control orders (QCOs) but also the raw material used as input needs to comply with the quality also found that some Indian importers with a BIS certificate were importing substandard steel products from China or Nepal and doing just cosmetic value addition to them."The QCO norms require importers not only to comply with the coating part for which it has certification, but also to ensure that the base material also sticks to quality norms," the official said.A BIS certificate is enforced through QCO, which the government order mainly affects the traders who act as middlemen in importing steel without adding any value to the steel. "MSMEs (micro, small and medium enterprises) are not affected by this order; it hurts the middle parties, and they are the ones who are creating a furore over this," the official added.

Trump repeats claim he ended India-Pakistan conflict through trade
Trump repeats claim he ended India-Pakistan conflict through trade

Business Standard

time18 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Trump repeats claim he ended India-Pakistan conflict through trade

US President Donald Trump on Sunday yet again took credit for stopping conflicts around the world, including the recent one between India and Pakistan. Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a full and immediate ceasefire after a long night of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim on several occasions. Trump's latest claim comes days after White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump should be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for ending several conflicts around the world including the one between India and Pakistan. On Sunday, in a post on Truth Social, Trump slammed radio host and author Charlamagne Tha God, and said he (God) knows nothing about him or what he has done, like just ending 5 Wars, including a 31 year bloodbath between Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, where Seven Million people have died, and there was no end in sight. He didn't know that, or India and Pakistan or, wiping out Iran's nuclear capabilities, or closing the horrendous open Border, or creating the greatest economy, Trump said. Just a day earlier, Trump said in an interview on Newsmax that he has settled a lot of wars. You take a look at what's happened just over the last little while. We've settled a lot of, a lot of very beautiful wars have been settled One of the wars India, Pakistan, nuclear, Trump said adding that he settled conflict between Thailand and Cambodia as well as Congo and Rwanda. I settled that up. And I settled it up with trade. I settled a lot of them with trade. I said listen, you guys are going to fight. You can fight all you want. I mean, just fight your hearts out. But we're not doing a trade deal'. All of a sudden they end up not doing a war. I settled a lot of wars. I think I settled averaging about a war a month. But, you know, we're saving millions of lives, he said. Trump on Wednesday announced the imposition of a 25 per cent tariff on all goods coming from India starting August 1, plus an unspecified penalty for buying Russian crude oil and military equipment. The tariff for Pakistan was 19 per cent, lower than the 29 per cent announced by Trump in April. In fact, Trump on Wednesday also announced sealing a trade deal with Pakistan and said that Washington will work with Islamabad to develop what he described as the South Asian nation's massive oil reserves. At a White House press briefing on Thursday, Leavitt said that Trump has now ended conflicts between Thailand and Cambodia, Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo and Egypt and Ethiopia. She said that the president has brokered, on average, about one peace deal or ceasefire per month during his six months in office. It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, she said. Since May 10, Trump has repeated his claim nearly 30 times that he helped settle the tensions between India and Pakistan and that he told the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours that America will do a lot of trade with them if they stopped the conflict. Prime Minister Narendra Modi said in Parliament this week that no leader of any country asked India to stop Operation Sindoor launched by India in retaliation after the April 22 terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam that killed 26 people. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Wednesday categorically said there was no third-party intervention in bringing about a ceasefire with Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, asserting that the halting of the military action was also not linked to trade as claimed by Trump. Intervening in the special discussion on Operation Sindoor in the Rajya Sabha, Jaishankar said Prime Minister Modi and Trump did not have any phone calls between April 22, when the Pahalgam terror attack took place, and June 16.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store