Dutch car-sharing firm plugs into Renault EVs with V2G technology
The Netherlands is an early adopter of V2G technology due to ambitious plans to electrify its transport and heating systems while also moving to renewables. Japan's Nissan has also recently supplied dozens of V2G-enabled Leaf and Ariya models to France and Spain.
MyWheels said 500 of Renault's V2G-compatible cars, including its electric R5, will be on the road by next year. When not driving, the cars will be plugged into We Drive Solar's bidirectional chargers and the scheme's operators will be paid for electricity absorbed and sold to the grid.
Grids have become increasingly unstable with growing electrification and as more intermittent renewable energy is fed into the system.
'Our research shows vehicle-to-grid technology could allow the growing electric vehicle fleet to become a significant asset to the grid, with vast storage potential locked up in electric vehicles,' said Madeleine Brolly, advanced transport analyst at Bloomberg New Energy Finance.
A key challenge ahead will be standardisation across manufacturers, which will be needed for it to be adopted at scale, she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Trump tariffs take a $1bn bite out of GM earnings; shares fall
General Motors' second quarter earnings took a $1.1bn (R19,305,825,000) hit from tariffs, but the carmaker beat analyst expectations for the period, supported by strong sales of its core petrol trucks and SUVs. The largest US carmaker by sales said it expects the tariff impact to worsen in the third quarter and stuck to a previous estimate that trade headwinds threaten to hit the bottom line by $4bn (R70,198,998,400) to $5bn (R87,748,748,000). GM said it could take steps to mitigate at least 30% of the impact. Shares fell about 6% in early trading. The carmaker's revenue in the quarter ended June 30 fell nearly 2% to about $47bn (R824,838,231,200) from a year ago. Its quarterly adjusted earnings per share fell to $2.53 (R44.40) compared with $3.06 (R53,71) a year earlier. Analysts on average expected adjusted profit of $2.44 (R42,82) per share, according to data compiled by LSEG. GM's adjusted earnings before interest and taxes was among corporations that revised annual guidance due to the impact from US President Donald Trump's tariffs, lowering it to an annual adjusted core profit of between $10bn (R175,501,993,000) and $12.5bn (R219,377,491,250). The company on Tuesday stood by the forecast. Beyond tariffs, GM's underlying business in the quarter was solid. Sales in the US market – its main profit centre – rose 7%, while the company continued to command strong pricing on its pickup trucks and SUVs. GM swung back to a small profit in China, after losing money there a year before. Analysts said GM may need to cut investment in future projects or find other ways to trim spending to offset the effect of tariffs. Jeep-maker Stellantis on Monday warned tariffs would significantly affect results in the second half of 2025, and said tariffs cost it about €300m (R6,177,180,000) in the first half of the year. Shares of rival Ford Motor and US-traded shares of Stellantis fell about 1% on Tuesday morning. The carmaker took steps in recent months to bolster its combustion-engine operations through increased investment in its US factory base, calling into question its goal of ending the production of petrol-powered cars and trucks by 2035. GM announced in June it would invest $4bn at three US facilities in Michigan, Kansas and Tennessee, including a plan to move production of the Cadillac Escalade and increase output of its two big pickup trucks. It added production of its previously Mexico-produced Chevy Blazer to the Tennessee plant. The carmaker imports about half the vehicles it sells in the US, mainly from Mexico and South Korea. Crosstown rival Ford produces about 80% of its US-sold vehicles domestically. Car companies are increasingly shifting their focus to bolstering the core lineup of petrol trucks and SUVs as the growth rate of EV sales has slowed. Demand for battery-powered models has slowed after rapid growth earlier this decade. The trend is intensified by the pending disappearance of government support for the battery-powered models. Sweeping tax and budget legislation approved by the US Congress will eliminate $7,500 (R131,658) tax credits for buying or leasing new electric vehicles and a $4,000 (R70,217) used-EV credit at the end of September.
TimesLIVE
3 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Shares in Japanese, South Korean carmakers jump on Tokyo trade deal
Shares of Japanese and South Korean carmakers surged on Wednesday after US President Donald Trump announced a trade deal with Tokyo that sources said would include reducing a tariff on Japanese car imports to 15%, a move that stoked optimism about a similar deal for Seoul. Shares of Toyota, the world's top carmaker by sales, jumped 13% while rival Honda advanced more than 9%. The lower tariff, from 25%, would ease the pain for Japan's most important industry in its most crucial market. South Korean carmakers gained on hopes Seoul would clinch a similar deal. Hyundai Motor and Kia rose more than 6%. The agreement with Japan, the world's fourth-largest economy and a pivotal US ally in Asia, is the most significant among several trade deals struck by the White House ahead of an August 1 deadline when higher levies are due to kick in. While Trump did not give details on the car portion of the deal in a post on his Truth Social platform, industry and government officials briefed on the agreement said it lowers the tariff to 15% from 25% on cars, which account for more than a quarter of Japan's exports to the US. However, it is unlikely to be all smooth sailing for Asian carmakers. Tariffs from Canada and Mexico remain in place at 25%. Mexico in particular is a key production hub for Japanese carmakers, including Nissan, and also home to a Kia factory. Nissan shares were up almost 9%.
Daily Maverick
17 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Israel's striking economic boom is fuelled by war and built on injustice
Here's a grim reality: if you had invested in the Israeli stock index on October 7, 2023 — the day of Hamas' deadly attack on Israel — you would now be enjoying the best financial return of any major equity market in the world. Since then, as Israel has systematically flattened Gaza in a devastating campaign that has killed tens of thousands — if not hundreds of thousands — of civilians and displaced millions, openly committing gross human rights violations in the process, the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange has soared. By July 2025 the index was up almost 80% in dollar terms, buoyed by both domestic retail investors and foreign capital. Yet this is not an anomaly — it is a feature of the system. As UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese outlines in her brave report 'From Economy of Occupation to Economy of Genocide', Israel's economy is not just surviving amid conflict — it is thriving because of it. The rampage unleashed by Netanyahu's government has been good for business in Israel. The occupation of Palestinian territory is deeply interwoven with corporate interests. Illegal settlements fuel a real estate boom. Military technologies developed through decades of occupation and surveillance are exported globally. Profits are being made from the devastation of Gaza. Those same ruins now promise lucrative reconstruction contracts, once the forced removal of Palestinians is complete. Meanwhile, little appears in the mainstream financial media critical of this brutal Military/Tech/Industrial complex. Instead, commentators like Ruchir Sharma in the Financial Times marvel at its 'economic miracle', and firmly state that Israel is 'winning', while pointing out its scale of research and development spending and rate of productivity growth. On such metrics, of course, they are right. Israel ranks third for companies in the field of generative AI. Its productivity growth outpaces most other developed economies. GDP per capita has tripled since 2000, surpassing $55,000 (about R956,000) — more than Germany and approaching that of the US. But there are two problems with this reading. First, stock markets are never gauges of justice or legitimacy; they are short-term estimates of future profit streams, regardless of what odious activities occur or the context from which those may be generated. The TA-125 index is small, concentrated and heavily skewed to bank, insurance and finance stocks that have benefited from wartime interest rates and a hot domestic tech economy. Other large components are tech AI company Nova, as well as the now infamous Elbit Systems, which manufactures the attack drones, tanks and bulldozers that have flattened Gaza. Narrow bull market It looks like a narrow bull market, and not a more sustainable grind ever higher. The Tel Aviv outperformance may well not last. Israel's bond markets are already flashing warning signs. Credit rating agencies Moody's, S&P and Fitch downgraded its credit rating in 2024, and all have the sovereign on negative outlooks. But there is a second, and more fundamental issue with this reading that a strong stock market and resilient economy in some way means that Israel is 'winning'. As Albanese points out, Israeli economic statistics cannot be seen independently of the violence that underpins them. The same state that supports world-leading tech innovation is also engaged in systematic and unrelenting human rights abuses, from collective punishment in Gaza to apartheid in the West Bank. The same government celebrating a record number of initial public offerings is also facing allegations of genocide at the International Court of Justice. Israel's economic success story is not despite its militaristic belligerence. It is, in many cases, because of it. These contradictions play out, on a structural level, across the country's riven political economy. Israel today is not simply a divided society — it is increasingly an incoherent, socially unsustainable one. Five elections between 2018 and 2022 have failed to resolve deep tensions between dwindling numbers of largely tech sector secular liberals, ultra-Orthodox Jews who refuse to participate in military service, Zionist nationalists of the ilk of Netanyahu, and systemically marginalised Arabs. The mainstream of Israeli political consensus has therefore moved sharply towards the extreme right. Polls now show that a growing majority of Israeli Jews oppose the formation of a Palestinian state and support the expulsion of Palestinians altogether, both from occupied territories in the West Bank and Gaza, and the deportation of Arab-Israeli citizens. This is not a fringe view, it is increasingly the political centre. For decades the idea of a two-state solution served as a way of resolving the contradiction of a supposedly law-abiding democracy committing illiberal, illegal acts. It was a kind of diplomatic placeholder; while never realised, the illusion at least maintained hope and a semblance of legitimacy. That fantasy has evaporated. The West Bank has been Balkanised and largely annexed through settlements. Gaza has been levelled. Mass starvation has been inflicted; food and humanitarian aid have been instrumentalised as weapons of war. The dream of peaceful cohabitation has been buried beneath bulldozed homes and schools, and the growing sense that Jewish sovereignty is equivalent to Palestinian erasure. No return to the 'old' Israel Many in the international community lay the blame squarely on Benjamin Netanyahu. But like Trump in the US, Netanyahu is not the root of the problem. He is a product of the system. He reflects, rather than drives, the will of a large segment of Israeli society. His eventual departure, whenever that may be, will not reverse the current trajectory. There will be no return to the 'old' Israel that liberals nostalgically evoke. That there is widespread anger at Netanyahu in Israel is true. That those angry at Netanyahu want his successor to seek a Palestinian state, or even Palestinian rights, is false. What does the future Israel look like? How will Israel's future be affected by its genocidal actions and the inevitable demolition of its incontestable morality, derived from its birth in the ashes of the Holocaust? Israel's founding promise was born out of unimaginable trauma. For much of the international community, especially those Europeans living in the shadow of a genocide, the state was a moral necessity. But that moral obligation cannot exist alongside the permanent subjugation and expulsion of other people. Israel cannot be both a rogue Jewish supremacist oppressor and a democracy. Its political leadership and citizenry must choose which one it will be. One potentially viable future is where land is shared, in some way — either through two states, one state, or a type of confederation — and in which equal rights are guaranteed for all who live between the Jordan river and the Mediterranean. But that future is not currently on offer, and there is little pressure — either domestically or internationally — to force the issue. Absent that, Israel will drift toward a full-fledged apartheid state, increasingly authoritarian at home and in the Middle East, and increasingly isolated abroad. That the markets are still bullish, and the economy resilient, should not give us cause to reassess. History is full of states, like apartheid South Africa, that prospered economically while being corrupted morally. None endured indefinitely. DM
