
Netanyahu accuses Israel's opposition of fuelling ‘anarchy'
Addressing the opposition during a speech in parliament on Wednesday, Netanyahu said, 'You recycle the same worn-out and ridiculous slogans about 'the end of democracy'. Well, once and for all: Democracy is not in danger, it is the power of the bureaucrats that is in danger.'
'Perhaps you could stop putting spanners in the works of the government in the middle of a war? Perhaps you could stop fuelling the sedition, hatred and anarchy in the streets?' he added.
Thousands of Israelis have taken part in several days of antigovernment protests, accusing Netanyahu of undermining democracy by removing Ronen Bar, the head of the Shin Bet internal security agency and resuming strikes in Gaza without any regard for captives held in the besieged enclave.
Netanyahu is locked in a battle with the Shin Bet chief, who is running a bribery investigation into the prime minister's office, citing a lack of 'trust'. The two men have been at loggerheads, fuelled by bitter recriminations over the failure to prevent the Hamas-led October 7, 2023, attacks on southern Israel.
The demonstrations, which erupted last week, have been organised by a broad coalition of anti-Netanyahu groups who say the Israeli leader is trying to stay in power at any cost.
The Supreme Court froze Bar's dismissal after several appeals were filed, including by opposition leader Yair Lapid's centre-right Yesh Atid party.
The opposition's appeal highlighted what critics see as the two main reasons Netanyahu moved against Bar.
The first was his criticism of the government over the security failure that allowed Hamas's October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, the deadliest day in the country's history.
The second was what the opposition appeal said was a Shin Bet investigation into Netanyahu's close associates on suspicion of receiving money linked to Qatar.
Netanyahu's office has dismissed the accusations as 'fake news'.
Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid called for a 'revolt' against the government of Netanyahu if it refused to accept verdicts issued by the country's Supreme Court.
'A government that doesn't obey the court is a criminal government that should not be obeyed,' Lapid told local radio 103FM.
'If the government does not comply with the Supreme Court, we must shut down the country, and that would be the end of everything.'
Israel's cabinet also passed a vote of no confidence on Sunday against the country's attorney general, Baharav-Miara, the first step in a process to dismiss her.
Netanyahu's office pointed to 'significant and prolonged differences between the government and the government's legal adviser,' a key part of the attorney general's job.
Following the Supreme Court's initial ruling in the Bar case, Baharav-Miara said Netanyahu could not name a new internal security chief and was 'prohibited to take any action that harms' his position.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Qatar Tribune
an hour ago
- Qatar Tribune
Five countries complete 90 aid airdrops over Gaza
France, Germany, Jordan, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates have dropped another 90 aid packages over Gaza from aircraft after coordinating with the Israeli military. As the UN and international aid organisations continue to be sidelined from delivering aid to Palestinians by Israel, the Israeli army claimed in a short statement that the air drops are part of its 'series of actions to improve the humanitarian response in the Gaza Strip'. The UN, major international humanitarian NGOs and Palestinians themselves say that aid airdrops are ineffective, dangerous and humiliating for starving people. Several people have been injured by aid parcels falling from the sky already since this new round of airdrops began, and, earlier this week, we brought you testimony from a Palestinian journalist who said that people were forced to pick through rice mixed with sand after it was airdropped on the ground. (Agencies)


Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Hamas denies it expressed willingness to disarm, slams Witkoff's Gaza trip
Hamas has denied claims it expressed a willingness to disarm during Gaza ceasefire negotiations with Israel, stressing that it has 'national and legal' rights to confront the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory. In a statement on Saturday, the Palestinian group rejected recent remarks purportedly made by United States President Donald Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, during a meeting with relatives of Israeli captives held in Gaza. Citing a recording of the talks, Israeli news outlet Haaretz reported that the US envoy told the families that Hamas said it was 'prepared to be demilitarised'. But Hamas said in its statement that the group's right to resistance 'cannot be relinquished until our full national rights are restored, foremost among them the establishment of a fully sovereign, independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital'. Witkoff met the Israeli captives' families in Tel Aviv on Saturday, one day after he visited a US and Israeli-backed aid distribution site run by the controversial GHF in Gaza. More than 1,300 Palestinians have been killed trying to get food at GHF-run sites since the group began operating in the bombarded Palestinian enclave in May, the United Nations said earlier this week. Hamas had earlier slammed Witkoff's visit as a 'staged show' aimed at misleading the public about the situation in Gaza, where Israel's blockade has spurred a starvation crisis and fuelled global condemnation. But the Trump administration has stood firmly behind GHF despite the killings and growing global criticism of the group's operations in Gaza. In June, Washington announced that it approved $30m to support GHF. Witkoff's comments on disarmament come amid a widening international push to recognise a Palestinian state amid the scenes of starvation in Gaza. The United Kingdom announced at a two-day United Nations conference in New York this week that it may follow France in recognising a Palestinian state in September. Echoing an earlier statement by UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Foreign Secretary David Lammy said London would proceed with recognition if Israel did not meet certain conditions, including implementing a ceasefire in Gaza. The UN meeting also saw 17 countries, plus the European Union and the Arab League, back a seven-page text on reviving a two-state solution to the conflict. The text called on Hamas to 'end its rule in Gaza and hand over its weapons to the Palestinian Authority, with international engagement and support, in line with the objective of a sovereign and independent Palestinian State'.


Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
Why has Washington sanctioned the Palestinian leadership?
US accuses Palestine Liberation Organization and Palestinian Authority of undermining prospects for peace. The Trump administration has sanctioned members of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the Palestinian Authority (PA), accusing them of undermining peace efforts. The move comes as more Western governments are openly criticising Israel, calling on the country to end the war on Gaza and move towards a two-state solution. More countries have also announced their intention to recognise Palestinian statehood under certain conditions, including the disarmament of Hamas and PA reform. So what's behind the US sanctions? Are they a bargaining chip to further peace talks, or a sign of more hurdles ahead? Presenter: Adrian Finighan Guests: Xavier Abu Eid – Former adviser to the Palestine Liberation Organization Eli Clifton – Senior adviser at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft Firas El Echi – Journalist and host of the Here's Why podcast