
Trump's ex-national security adviser grilled about collecting eye-popping salary despite Signal chat leak 'failure'
The former national security adviser has been embattled ever since he inadvertently added a journalist to a chat on the instant messaging app Signal, which contained discussions of the administration's war plans in Yemen.
Three prominent Democrats - Chris Coons of Delaware, Tim Kaine of Virginia and Corey Booker of New Jersey - grilled Waltz over the NSC's usage of the Signal messaging app.
They also hammered him for never taking personal responsibility for 'leaking' what Democrats characterized as 'sensitive information.'
Booker refused to support Waltz' nomination, because he has been troubled by his 'failure to just stand up and take accountability for mistakes' that Waltz made, and that 'all Americans know that' he made.
Coons also raised similar concerns, noting that to him, 'it doesn't seem ... that the administration has taken any action to make sure this doesn't happen again.'
'There's been no consequences, and yet the president continues to denounce those who leak information. We both know Signal is not a secure way to convey classified information,' Coons added.
'I was hoping to hear from you that you had some sense of regret over sharing what was very sensitive, timely information about a military strike on a commercially available app,' Coons concluded.
Waltz fired back, saying Signal was an approved form of communication for high-level officials such as himself due to its end-to-end encryption. He also noted that 'no classified information was shared' despite the leak.
Kaine also pressed Waltz on the Signal leak, adding that there were two ongoing investigations within the Department of Defense (DOD) aimed at figuring out if sensitive information was shared. Waltz responded to Kaine by noting that he couldn't comment on ongoing investigations.
Waltz reportedly resigned from the role of national security advisor back in May after the leak of the Signal chat.
Responding to a line of questioning from Nevada Senator Jacky Rosen about still being on the White House payroll despite not being NSC advisor, Waltz confirmed that he was 'not fired' and decried any reporting to the contrary as 'fake news.'
In the latest list of White House salaries which is up to date as of July 1st, Walz was still on the White House payroll.
He was still being paid at his previous salary of $195,000 a year.
An anonymous White House official reportedly noted to The Hill that Waltz stayed on to 'ensure a smooth and successful transition given the extreme importance of the role of NSA.'
Back in May, the Daily Mail reported that Waltz, a former Green Beret, was canned from his position as head of the National Security Council (NSC), and then selected for the role of ambassador to the United Nations in a 'massive downgrade move to save face', according to one Trump insider.
A Trump insider also noted at the time that Waltz's 'days were numbered' after he accidentally included the editor of The Atlantic in a Signal chat coordinating military bombings in Yemen, in the scandal that became known as 'Signalgate.'
Waltz suffered public humiliation from the scandal especially after his embarrassing Fox News interview in which he tried to to explain the mistake.
It also damaged his reputation in the West Wing.
Waltz took responsibility for the mistake, but struggled to explain how Goldberg's number was in his phone to begin with, even as he stressed that he had never spoken to him before.
'Well, if you have somebody else's contact and then it, and then somehow it gets sucked in,' he said to Fox News host Laura Ingraham.
Trump gave Waltz a less than enthusiastic endorsement in an interview with The Atlantic last week.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump says he ‘doesn't understand' interest in ‘boring' Epstein case
Donald Trump has said he does not understand why people are interested in the "boring" crimes of Jeffrey Epstein. Speaking to reporters on 15 July after disembarking Air Force One, the US president questioned the fascination with the case, claiming all credible information has already been given. He added that he believes "only pretty bad people, including fake news," want to keep the case going. Trump's comments follow the White House 's declaration that no Epstein client list exists and that his death was ruled a suicide. Watch the video in full above.


BreakingNews.ie
14 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Ghislaine Maxwell could use ‘government misconduct' to challenge imprisonment
The family of disgraced British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell has said new evidence such as 'government misconduct' could be used to challenge her imprisonment. The 63-year-old was found guilty in December 2021 of luring young girls to massage rooms for paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein to molest between 1994 and 2004. Advertisement She was sentenced to 20 years in prison at the federal court in the southern district of New York (SDNY) in June 2022. The US government has faced a backlash from president Donald Trump's support base following words from attorney general Pam Bondi that there was no evidence Epstein had a 'client list'. Donald Trump's US government has faced a backlash from his support base (PA) Maxwell's family have frequently claimed she 'did not receive a fair trial', but legal appeals against her sex trafficking convictions have been rejected by the courts. Judges previously dismissed her lawyers' arguments that she 'should never have been prosecuted' because of a 'weird' agreement drafted more than 15 years ago – concluding that the Florida agreement 'does not bind' the United States Attorney's Office for the SDNY. Advertisement The US justice department has reportedly written to the Supreme Court to ask a judge to further deny Maxwell's appeal against her convictions. During her three-week trial in 2021, jurors heard prosecutors describe Maxwell as 'dangerous', and were told details of how she helped entice vulnerable teenagers to Epstein's various properties for him to sexually abuse. In a statement, the disgraced socialite's family said: 'Our sister Ghislaine did not receive a fair trial. 'Her legal team continues to fight her case in the courts and will file its reply in short order to the government's opposition in the US Supreme Court. Advertisement 'If necessary, in due course they will also file a writ of habeas corpus in the US district court, SDNY. 'This allows her to challenge her imprisonment on the basis of new evidence such as government misconduct that would have likely changed the trial's outcome.' Ghislaine Maxwell with Jeffrey Epstein (US Department of Justice/PA) The statement continued: 'Following the government's response, David Oscar Markus, counsel of record for our sister in her petition to the United States Supreme Court, had this comment: 'I'd be surprised if President Trump knew his lawyers were asking the Supreme Court to let the Government break a deal. 'He's the ultimate dealmaker and I'm sure he'd agree that when the United States gives its word, it should keep it. Advertisement 'With all the talk about who's being prosecuted and who isn't, it's especially unfair that Ghislaine Maxwell remains in prison based on a promise the US government made and broke.' World Trump defends Bondi amid uproar over Jeffrey Epste... Read More 'These are sentiments with which we profoundly concur.' Epstein was found dead in his cell at a federal jail in Manhattan in August 2019 while he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges. The death was ruled a suicide. Advertisement


The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Donald Trump dismisses inquiry into Jeffrey Epstein as ‘boring'
Donald Trump has dismissed a secretive inquiry into the sex offender Jeffrey Epstein as 'boring' and of interest only to 'bad people', but said he backed the release of any 'credible' files, as he sought to stamp out a conspiracy-fuelled uproar among his supporters. The US president is facing a political crisis within his usually loyal Republican 'Make America Great Again' (Maga) base over suspicion that the administration is hiding details of Epstein's crimes to protect the rich elite he associated with, which included Trump. One of the most dramatic theories circulating among supporters is that Epstein – who killed himself in 2019 while in federal custody – was murdered by powerful figures to cover up their roles in his sex crimes against children. 'I don't understand why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody,' Trump told reporters on Tuesday night when asked why his supporters are so interested in the case. 'It's pretty boring stuff. It's sordid, but it's boring, and I don't understand why it keeps going. 'I think really only pretty bad people, including fake news, want to keep something like that going,' he added. 'But credible information, let them give it. Anything that is credible, I would say, let them have it.' During his election campaigns, Trump fuelled multiple conspiracies by his Maga movement, including that the country is controlled by shadowy 'deep state' elites. This has caused deep paranoia among his base, who are now, unusually, questioning their leader over the Epstein controversy. Last week, the justice department and the FBI announced that a review of the case files had confirmed that Epstein had killed himself, and there was no list of his clients to be made public. Conservative allies of the president have focused their anger on the attorney general, Pam Bondi, who was leading the case, as she had previously said Epstein's client list was 'sitting on my desk right now to review'. Several other high-profile conservatives have called for Trump to make public everything known about Epstein. Even his daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, a Fox News host, has been critical, saying: 'I do think that there needs to be more transparency on this.' On Tuesday, Mike Johnson, the speaker of the House, called for the Justice Department to make the document public, breaking with Trump in a rare moment of friction between the allies. 'It's a very delicate subject, but we should put everything out there and let the people decide it,' Johnson told Benny Johnson, a rightwing podcaster, in an interview released on Tuesday. 'I agree with the sentiment that we need to put it out there.'