Bangladesh opens trial of deposed ex-PM Sheikh Hasina
The Dhaka-based International Crimes Tribunal directed investigators to produce Hasina, a former home minister and a former police chief before the court on June 16.
Hasina has been in exile in India since August 5, 2024, while former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan is missing and possibly also in India.
Former police chief Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun has been arrested.
Bangladesh sent a formal request to India to extradite Hasina in December.
State-run Bangladesh Television broadcast the court proceedings live on Sunday.
Hasina and her Awami League party had earlier criticised the tribunal and its prosecution team for their connection with political parties, especially with the Jamaat-e-Islami party.
The tribunal's investigators have brought five allegations of crimes against humanity against Hasina and the two others during the mass uprising in July-August.
According to the charges, Hasina was directly responsible for ordering all state forces, her Awami League party and its associates to carry out actions that led to mass killings, injuries, targeted violence against women and children, the incineration of bodies and denial of medical treatment to the wounded.
The charges describe Hasina as the "mastermind, conductor, and superior commander" of the atrocities.
Three days after Hasina's ouster, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus took over as the nation's interim leader.
In February, the UN human rights office estimated up to 1400 people may have been killed in Bangladesh over three weeks in the crackdown on the student-led protests against Hasina, who ruled the country for 15 years.
The tribunal was established by Hasina in 2009 to investigate and try crimes involving Bangladesh's independence war in 1971.
The tribunal under Hasina tried politicians, mostly from the Jamaat-e-Islami party, for their actions during the nine-month war against Pakistan.
Aided by India, Bangladesh gained independence from Pakistan under the leadership of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, Hasina's father and the country's first leader.
A tribunal established to try Bangladesh's ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina has begun proceedings by accepting charges of crimes against humanity filed against her in connection with a mass uprising in which hundreds of students were killed.
The Dhaka-based International Crimes Tribunal directed investigators to produce Hasina, a former home minister and a former police chief before the court on June 16.
Hasina has been in exile in India since August 5, 2024, while former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan is missing and possibly also in India.
Former police chief Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun has been arrested.
Bangladesh sent a formal request to India to extradite Hasina in December.
State-run Bangladesh Television broadcast the court proceedings live on Sunday.
Hasina and her Awami League party had earlier criticised the tribunal and its prosecution team for their connection with political parties, especially with the Jamaat-e-Islami party.
The tribunal's investigators have brought five allegations of crimes against humanity against Hasina and the two others during the mass uprising in July-August.
According to the charges, Hasina was directly responsible for ordering all state forces, her Awami League party and its associates to carry out actions that led to mass killings, injuries, targeted violence against women and children, the incineration of bodies and denial of medical treatment to the wounded.
The charges describe Hasina as the "mastermind, conductor, and superior commander" of the atrocities.
Three days after Hasina's ouster, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus took over as the nation's interim leader.
In February, the UN human rights office estimated up to 1400 people may have been killed in Bangladesh over three weeks in the crackdown on the student-led protests against Hasina, who ruled the country for 15 years.
The tribunal was established by Hasina in 2009 to investigate and try crimes involving Bangladesh's independence war in 1971.
The tribunal under Hasina tried politicians, mostly from the Jamaat-e-Islami party, for their actions during the nine-month war against Pakistan.
Aided by India, Bangladesh gained independence from Pakistan under the leadership of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, Hasina's father and the country's first leader.
A tribunal established to try Bangladesh's ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina has begun proceedings by accepting charges of crimes against humanity filed against her in connection with a mass uprising in which hundreds of students were killed.
The Dhaka-based International Crimes Tribunal directed investigators to produce Hasina, a former home minister and a former police chief before the court on June 16.
Hasina has been in exile in India since August 5, 2024, while former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan is missing and possibly also in India.
Former police chief Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun has been arrested.
Bangladesh sent a formal request to India to extradite Hasina in December.
State-run Bangladesh Television broadcast the court proceedings live on Sunday.
Hasina and her Awami League party had earlier criticised the tribunal and its prosecution team for their connection with political parties, especially with the Jamaat-e-Islami party.
The tribunal's investigators have brought five allegations of crimes against humanity against Hasina and the two others during the mass uprising in July-August.
According to the charges, Hasina was directly responsible for ordering all state forces, her Awami League party and its associates to carry out actions that led to mass killings, injuries, targeted violence against women and children, the incineration of bodies and denial of medical treatment to the wounded.
The charges describe Hasina as the "mastermind, conductor, and superior commander" of the atrocities.
Three days after Hasina's ouster, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus took over as the nation's interim leader.
In February, the UN human rights office estimated up to 1400 people may have been killed in Bangladesh over three weeks in the crackdown on the student-led protests against Hasina, who ruled the country for 15 years.
The tribunal was established by Hasina in 2009 to investigate and try crimes involving Bangladesh's independence war in 1971.
The tribunal under Hasina tried politicians, mostly from the Jamaat-e-Islami party, for their actions during the nine-month war against Pakistan.
Aided by India, Bangladesh gained independence from Pakistan under the leadership of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, Hasina's father and the country's first leader.
A tribunal established to try Bangladesh's ousted prime minister Sheikh Hasina has begun proceedings by accepting charges of crimes against humanity filed against her in connection with a mass uprising in which hundreds of students were killed.
The Dhaka-based International Crimes Tribunal directed investigators to produce Hasina, a former home minister and a former police chief before the court on June 16.
Hasina has been in exile in India since August 5, 2024, while former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan is missing and possibly also in India.
Former police chief Chowdhury Abdullah Al Mamun has been arrested.
Bangladesh sent a formal request to India to extradite Hasina in December.
State-run Bangladesh Television broadcast the court proceedings live on Sunday.
Hasina and her Awami League party had earlier criticised the tribunal and its prosecution team for their connection with political parties, especially with the Jamaat-e-Islami party.
The tribunal's investigators have brought five allegations of crimes against humanity against Hasina and the two others during the mass uprising in July-August.
According to the charges, Hasina was directly responsible for ordering all state forces, her Awami League party and its associates to carry out actions that led to mass killings, injuries, targeted violence against women and children, the incineration of bodies and denial of medical treatment to the wounded.
The charges describe Hasina as the "mastermind, conductor, and superior commander" of the atrocities.
Three days after Hasina's ouster, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus took over as the nation's interim leader.
In February, the UN human rights office estimated up to 1400 people may have been killed in Bangladesh over three weeks in the crackdown on the student-led protests against Hasina, who ruled the country for 15 years.
The tribunal was established by Hasina in 2009 to investigate and try crimes involving Bangladesh's independence war in 1971.
The tribunal under Hasina tried politicians, mostly from the Jamaat-e-Islami party, for their actions during the nine-month war against Pakistan.
Aided by India, Bangladesh gained independence from Pakistan under the leadership of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, Hasina's father and the country's first leader.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Cambodia says it will nominate Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for helping end border conflict with Thailand
Cambodia's deputy prime minister says the country will nominate Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize after he helped secure a ceasefire with Thailand after days of deadly skirmishes. At least 43 people have been killed in the intense clashes, which lasted five days and displaced more than 300,000 people on both sides of the border in the worst violence between the neighbouring countries in more than a decade. Sun Chanthol thanks the US president for bringing peace and said he deserved to be nominated for the prize. "We acknowledge his great efforts for peace," Mr Chanthol said. The Nobel Peace Prize is the highest-profile international award given to an individual or organisation deemed to have done the most to "advance fellowship between nations". Cambodia said it would recommend Mr Trump for the award, after he made a phone call that reportedly broke a deadlock between Phnom Penh and Bangkok at the weekend. Reuters spoke to four sources from both countries to ascertain what secured the ceasefire that stopped the conflict. When Mr Trump called Thai Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai on Saturday, two days after fighting erupted along a 200-km-long stretch of the border, Bangkok had not responded to mediation offers from Malaysia and China, said a Thai government source with direct knowledge. Thailand said it preferred bilateral negotiations. On Sunday, a day after his initial call, Mr Trump said that Thailand and Cambodia had agreed to meet to work out a ceasefire, and that Washington would not move ahead with tariff negotiations with both until the conflict had ended. The source said as the Thai and Cambodian foreign ministries started talking, following Mr Trump's call, Bangkok set out its terms: the meeting must be between the two prime ministers and at a neutral location. On Monday, the peace deal was announced in Malaysia, with Cambodia's Prime Minister Hun Manet standing alongside Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and Thai Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai. Pakistan said in June that it would recommend Mr Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his work in helping to resolve a conflict with India, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said last month he had nominated the US president for the award. Reuters/ABC
News.com.au
10 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Total ban': State's big move on e-bikes
One state government is mulling over a total ban on e-scooters and e-bikes, as concerns grow over the use of the dangerous and largely unregulated vehicles. Transport Minister Brent Mickelberg has said the Queensland government is prepared to make some big changes to how e-bikes are regulated amid a current review. It is a move other states could quickly follow. Mickelberg has indicated his Liberal government might not shy away from a total ban of the bikes amid 'widespread community concern' in regard to the rules and risk of e-bikes, e-scooters and other e-mobility vehicles. 'I'm prepared to look at any solutions that are going to address safety,' Mr Mickelberg told the ABC. 'The reality is they do have benefit in our community, but there's also situations right now where the risk does not justify their use.' TRAGIC DEATHS Mickelberg said he understood there was a desire within the community that e-devices needed to be better regulated and that the laws governing their use need to be better thought out. A Queensland government inquiry into the use of e-bikes was announced in May with a final report due in March next year. The news of the chance of a total ban on e-bikes comes less than a month after a 14-year-old boy died in an e-bike accident in Sydney early last month. Mohammed Mahid Younes was killed when he crashed while riding his new e-bike in the southern Sydney suburb of Arncliffe. The tragic accident was a stark reminder of the dangers of e-bikes. 'I know my son is kind of a statistic at the moment,' Mohammed's mother Joanne Younes told The Saturday Telegraph. 'But if it can teach other children safety and to be aware (that would help). Although my son was doing all the right things at that time, things can happen when you least expect it.' In October last year, a nine-year old boy died after a car ploughed into his family while they were out riding their e-bikes on the Gold Coast. And last month, a 79-year-old e-bike rider died after she collided with a car on Bribie Island. While the dangers of e-bikes to pedestrians are also a major concern, as shown by the manslaughter charges against a 17-year-old in Perth who was charged after allegedly hitting and killing a nurse in the WA capital's north last month. A NATIONAL EMERGENCY The prevalence of e-bike injuries have become a national emergency as illustrated by skyrocketing admission statistics from the country's hospitals. In February, a report revealed that E-bike and e-scooter injuries have risen a whopping 300 per cent at a major Australian children's hospital, as the troubling toll the trendy riders are having on under 18s is revealed. Injuries at The Children's Hospital at Westmead in Sydney's west skyrocketed on the back of the increasingly widespread use of e-transport by kids, The Daily Telegraph reported. According to the report, hospitalisations of children at the medical facility due to accidents on e-bikes or e-scooters for children jumped from six in 2023 to 24 last year. The majority of incidents involved riders hitting stationary cars or being hit by moving vehicles. 'NO RULES, NO REGULATIONS' Swinburne Professor of Future Urban Mobility Hussein Dia said at the time he wanted to know 'why' kids are using these motorised modes of transport with seemingly no rules or regulations in place. 'The increase from six children hospitalised in 2023 to 24 children hospitalised in 2024 in Western Sydney is alarming,' Mr Dia said. 'In other states where regulations have been put in place around shared e-scooters and e-bikes, it is illegal for children under the age of 16 to be riding them in public areas.' 'These are not toys – with an electric motor they can go very fast. Some of the devices on sale for private use can travel at speeds up to 45 kilometres per hour. 'With commercial schemes, there are regulations around maximum speeds at which they can travel (e.g. 20 km/h), the mandatory use of helmets, and where they can be driven. Mickelberg said that riders were simply ignoring rules that had been laid out and that the inquiry would follow other avenues of concern including the risk of fire.
The Advertiser
15 hours ago
- The Advertiser
I worked in childcare, and these are the red flags parents can spot
I was horrified and shocked to read that an early childhood educator, Joshua Brown, had been charged with more than 70 offences against children aged between five months and two years old. My first thought, as a previous trainee doing work experience in childcare centres in Sydney, was how could an educator get away with this and go unnoticed? Over a few days, I read more and reflected on my own experiences. I realised, actually it could be quite easy. My experience is certainly not comprehensive - I completed 240 unpaid hours (about 30 days) in baby and toddler rooms across two centres. But, just from that, I can identify some measures which may help keep children safe. There are also some red flags parents and carers can keep in mind when choosing a centre for their children. The early childhood education workforce is highly casualised. Centres may have full-time educators as room leaders or managers, but rely on agency staff to fill in gaps rather than hire above ratios. There is a massive shortage of educators, probably because it is low-paid and emotionally exhausting work. The teachers I worked with often spoke about leaving to "work private" - as a nanny - or retraining. I have not been in the sector for years, but constantly receive texts, emails and calls from recruiters. (Brown is said to have worked at 11 centres from 2024 until he was charged in May 2025). Having more permanent staff is better for children who can develop attachments and be cared for by people who know them and their idiosyncrasies. More importantly, centre managers and educators get to know each other, develop and understand child safe policies and may be better at picking up on suspicious behaviour. To be clear, trusted people do abuse children. We know that perpetrators will groom parents and communities, earning the trust to get away with abuse. Convicted paedophile and Brisbane educator Ashley Paul Griffith was invited into his victims' homes. I am just suggesting that a casualised workforce is not an environment that prioritises child safety. Permanent and experienced staff may be more likely to question unsafe practices, raise concerns about another educator's unusual behaviour or notice a child is acting out of character. It is easier to track offenders. If you notice lots of unfamiliar faces at pick-up or drop-off, I would start asking questions. More than once, I found myself alone with kids in a room out of sight of educators while working as a trainee at one centre. There was a small room off the main area with dress-up clothes and books, and the toddlers liked to drag me in there. Sometimes they would even shut the door behind them. This is obviously a massive red flag. Children should be well supervised, ideally not left alone with only one educator. Sydney-based educator Nick Stephens told Triple J: "Anyone that works as a quality service has that question ... how was a male allowed one-on-one with a child for an extended period? "Ratios need to change. The more adults you have in a room working with children, the less likely something like this can happen." An open-plan environment increases visibility. Children are very small, so the furniture and walls should be smaller. It might not smell great, but nappy changes can be done in the public space. Toilets (for children, not staff), don't need doors, or frankly even walls. Big glass windows that let you see inside and out are great. Can children (and educators) hide under forts or tunnels, or behind playground equipment? There are some practicalities that are hard to address. Babies will probably need a quiet and dark room to sleep (and they need their sleep). You cannot have two teachers leave seven children to put one baby down. Perhaps we can consider CCTV in areas like this, or even the entire premises. There are issues around the privacy of children and staff, but when weighing it against child safety, I think it is worth discussing. Many parents feel guilty enough for leaving their children in care, but in a modern world, it is a necessary sacrifice to keep a roof over their heads. Research also shows disadvantaged children benefit from being in high-quality childcare (but poor quality care leads to deficits in language and cognitive function). I encourage parents to ask questions like: How often are strangers looking after my baby? Are there any places for a predator to, literally, hide? But if you don't like the answer, there may not be much you can do. Finding another centre can actually be impossible in some areas, and good ones often have long waitlists. Nannies, au pairs and babysitters are expensive and subject to far less supervision or scrutiny than educators in a centre. READ MORE: The sickening thing is that predators will find a way to abuse children, including in front of others. The Canberra Rape Crisis Centre reports that one in three girls and one in five boys are sexually abused, yet most cases do not occur in educational settings. Perpetrators are fathers, step-fathers, uncles, grandfathers, brothers, cousins and friends of the family. Those calling for male educators to be banned should perhaps also consider banning parents, especially fathers, from caring for their own children. If a predator cannot work in a childcare centre, they will find another way. UNSW research from 2023 found one in six Australian men have sexual feelings towards children, and one in 10 have offended. Banning phones might prevent an abuser from recording and sharing their abuse, but it will not stop them from doing it. Protecting your child can feel almost impossible right now; and that is because if it takes a village to raise a child, it takes a village to protect them. This was originally published on Substack. I was horrified and shocked to read that an early childhood educator, Joshua Brown, had been charged with more than 70 offences against children aged between five months and two years old. My first thought, as a previous trainee doing work experience in childcare centres in Sydney, was how could an educator get away with this and go unnoticed? Over a few days, I read more and reflected on my own experiences. I realised, actually it could be quite easy. My experience is certainly not comprehensive - I completed 240 unpaid hours (about 30 days) in baby and toddler rooms across two centres. But, just from that, I can identify some measures which may help keep children safe. There are also some red flags parents and carers can keep in mind when choosing a centre for their children. The early childhood education workforce is highly casualised. Centres may have full-time educators as room leaders or managers, but rely on agency staff to fill in gaps rather than hire above ratios. There is a massive shortage of educators, probably because it is low-paid and emotionally exhausting work. The teachers I worked with often spoke about leaving to "work private" - as a nanny - or retraining. I have not been in the sector for years, but constantly receive texts, emails and calls from recruiters. (Brown is said to have worked at 11 centres from 2024 until he was charged in May 2025). Having more permanent staff is better for children who can develop attachments and be cared for by people who know them and their idiosyncrasies. More importantly, centre managers and educators get to know each other, develop and understand child safe policies and may be better at picking up on suspicious behaviour. To be clear, trusted people do abuse children. We know that perpetrators will groom parents and communities, earning the trust to get away with abuse. Convicted paedophile and Brisbane educator Ashley Paul Griffith was invited into his victims' homes. I am just suggesting that a casualised workforce is not an environment that prioritises child safety. Permanent and experienced staff may be more likely to question unsafe practices, raise concerns about another educator's unusual behaviour or notice a child is acting out of character. It is easier to track offenders. If you notice lots of unfamiliar faces at pick-up or drop-off, I would start asking questions. More than once, I found myself alone with kids in a room out of sight of educators while working as a trainee at one centre. There was a small room off the main area with dress-up clothes and books, and the toddlers liked to drag me in there. Sometimes they would even shut the door behind them. This is obviously a massive red flag. Children should be well supervised, ideally not left alone with only one educator. Sydney-based educator Nick Stephens told Triple J: "Anyone that works as a quality service has that question ... how was a male allowed one-on-one with a child for an extended period? "Ratios need to change. The more adults you have in a room working with children, the less likely something like this can happen." An open-plan environment increases visibility. Children are very small, so the furniture and walls should be smaller. It might not smell great, but nappy changes can be done in the public space. Toilets (for children, not staff), don't need doors, or frankly even walls. Big glass windows that let you see inside and out are great. Can children (and educators) hide under forts or tunnels, or behind playground equipment? There are some practicalities that are hard to address. Babies will probably need a quiet and dark room to sleep (and they need their sleep). You cannot have two teachers leave seven children to put one baby down. Perhaps we can consider CCTV in areas like this, or even the entire premises. There are issues around the privacy of children and staff, but when weighing it against child safety, I think it is worth discussing. Many parents feel guilty enough for leaving their children in care, but in a modern world, it is a necessary sacrifice to keep a roof over their heads. Research also shows disadvantaged children benefit from being in high-quality childcare (but poor quality care leads to deficits in language and cognitive function). I encourage parents to ask questions like: How often are strangers looking after my baby? Are there any places for a predator to, literally, hide? But if you don't like the answer, there may not be much you can do. Finding another centre can actually be impossible in some areas, and good ones often have long waitlists. Nannies, au pairs and babysitters are expensive and subject to far less supervision or scrutiny than educators in a centre. READ MORE: The sickening thing is that predators will find a way to abuse children, including in front of others. The Canberra Rape Crisis Centre reports that one in three girls and one in five boys are sexually abused, yet most cases do not occur in educational settings. Perpetrators are fathers, step-fathers, uncles, grandfathers, brothers, cousins and friends of the family. Those calling for male educators to be banned should perhaps also consider banning parents, especially fathers, from caring for their own children. If a predator cannot work in a childcare centre, they will find another way. UNSW research from 2023 found one in six Australian men have sexual feelings towards children, and one in 10 have offended. Banning phones might prevent an abuser from recording and sharing their abuse, but it will not stop them from doing it. Protecting your child can feel almost impossible right now; and that is because if it takes a village to raise a child, it takes a village to protect them. This was originally published on Substack. I was horrified and shocked to read that an early childhood educator, Joshua Brown, had been charged with more than 70 offences against children aged between five months and two years old. My first thought, as a previous trainee doing work experience in childcare centres in Sydney, was how could an educator get away with this and go unnoticed? Over a few days, I read more and reflected on my own experiences. I realised, actually it could be quite easy. My experience is certainly not comprehensive - I completed 240 unpaid hours (about 30 days) in baby and toddler rooms across two centres. But, just from that, I can identify some measures which may help keep children safe. There are also some red flags parents and carers can keep in mind when choosing a centre for their children. The early childhood education workforce is highly casualised. Centres may have full-time educators as room leaders or managers, but rely on agency staff to fill in gaps rather than hire above ratios. There is a massive shortage of educators, probably because it is low-paid and emotionally exhausting work. The teachers I worked with often spoke about leaving to "work private" - as a nanny - or retraining. I have not been in the sector for years, but constantly receive texts, emails and calls from recruiters. (Brown is said to have worked at 11 centres from 2024 until he was charged in May 2025). Having more permanent staff is better for children who can develop attachments and be cared for by people who know them and their idiosyncrasies. More importantly, centre managers and educators get to know each other, develop and understand child safe policies and may be better at picking up on suspicious behaviour. To be clear, trusted people do abuse children. We know that perpetrators will groom parents and communities, earning the trust to get away with abuse. Convicted paedophile and Brisbane educator Ashley Paul Griffith was invited into his victims' homes. I am just suggesting that a casualised workforce is not an environment that prioritises child safety. Permanent and experienced staff may be more likely to question unsafe practices, raise concerns about another educator's unusual behaviour or notice a child is acting out of character. It is easier to track offenders. If you notice lots of unfamiliar faces at pick-up or drop-off, I would start asking questions. More than once, I found myself alone with kids in a room out of sight of educators while working as a trainee at one centre. There was a small room off the main area with dress-up clothes and books, and the toddlers liked to drag me in there. Sometimes they would even shut the door behind them. This is obviously a massive red flag. Children should be well supervised, ideally not left alone with only one educator. Sydney-based educator Nick Stephens told Triple J: "Anyone that works as a quality service has that question ... how was a male allowed one-on-one with a child for an extended period? "Ratios need to change. The more adults you have in a room working with children, the less likely something like this can happen." An open-plan environment increases visibility. Children are very small, so the furniture and walls should be smaller. It might not smell great, but nappy changes can be done in the public space. Toilets (for children, not staff), don't need doors, or frankly even walls. Big glass windows that let you see inside and out are great. Can children (and educators) hide under forts or tunnels, or behind playground equipment? There are some practicalities that are hard to address. Babies will probably need a quiet and dark room to sleep (and they need their sleep). You cannot have two teachers leave seven children to put one baby down. Perhaps we can consider CCTV in areas like this, or even the entire premises. There are issues around the privacy of children and staff, but when weighing it against child safety, I think it is worth discussing. Many parents feel guilty enough for leaving their children in care, but in a modern world, it is a necessary sacrifice to keep a roof over their heads. Research also shows disadvantaged children benefit from being in high-quality childcare (but poor quality care leads to deficits in language and cognitive function). I encourage parents to ask questions like: How often are strangers looking after my baby? Are there any places for a predator to, literally, hide? But if you don't like the answer, there may not be much you can do. Finding another centre can actually be impossible in some areas, and good ones often have long waitlists. Nannies, au pairs and babysitters are expensive and subject to far less supervision or scrutiny than educators in a centre. READ MORE: The sickening thing is that predators will find a way to abuse children, including in front of others. The Canberra Rape Crisis Centre reports that one in three girls and one in five boys are sexually abused, yet most cases do not occur in educational settings. Perpetrators are fathers, step-fathers, uncles, grandfathers, brothers, cousins and friends of the family. Those calling for male educators to be banned should perhaps also consider banning parents, especially fathers, from caring for their own children. If a predator cannot work in a childcare centre, they will find another way. UNSW research from 2023 found one in six Australian men have sexual feelings towards children, and one in 10 have offended. Banning phones might prevent an abuser from recording and sharing their abuse, but it will not stop them from doing it. Protecting your child can feel almost impossible right now; and that is because if it takes a village to raise a child, it takes a village to protect them. This was originally published on Substack. I was horrified and shocked to read that an early childhood educator, Joshua Brown, had been charged with more than 70 offences against children aged between five months and two years old. My first thought, as a previous trainee doing work experience in childcare centres in Sydney, was how could an educator get away with this and go unnoticed? Over a few days, I read more and reflected on my own experiences. I realised, actually it could be quite easy. My experience is certainly not comprehensive - I completed 240 unpaid hours (about 30 days) in baby and toddler rooms across two centres. But, just from that, I can identify some measures which may help keep children safe. There are also some red flags parents and carers can keep in mind when choosing a centre for their children. The early childhood education workforce is highly casualised. Centres may have full-time educators as room leaders or managers, but rely on agency staff to fill in gaps rather than hire above ratios. There is a massive shortage of educators, probably because it is low-paid and emotionally exhausting work. The teachers I worked with often spoke about leaving to "work private" - as a nanny - or retraining. I have not been in the sector for years, but constantly receive texts, emails and calls from recruiters. (Brown is said to have worked at 11 centres from 2024 until he was charged in May 2025). Having more permanent staff is better for children who can develop attachments and be cared for by people who know them and their idiosyncrasies. More importantly, centre managers and educators get to know each other, develop and understand child safe policies and may be better at picking up on suspicious behaviour. To be clear, trusted people do abuse children. We know that perpetrators will groom parents and communities, earning the trust to get away with abuse. Convicted paedophile and Brisbane educator Ashley Paul Griffith was invited into his victims' homes. I am just suggesting that a casualised workforce is not an environment that prioritises child safety. Permanent and experienced staff may be more likely to question unsafe practices, raise concerns about another educator's unusual behaviour or notice a child is acting out of character. It is easier to track offenders. If you notice lots of unfamiliar faces at pick-up or drop-off, I would start asking questions. More than once, I found myself alone with kids in a room out of sight of educators while working as a trainee at one centre. There was a small room off the main area with dress-up clothes and books, and the toddlers liked to drag me in there. Sometimes they would even shut the door behind them. This is obviously a massive red flag. Children should be well supervised, ideally not left alone with only one educator. Sydney-based educator Nick Stephens told Triple J: "Anyone that works as a quality service has that question ... how was a male allowed one-on-one with a child for an extended period? "Ratios need to change. The more adults you have in a room working with children, the less likely something like this can happen." An open-plan environment increases visibility. Children are very small, so the furniture and walls should be smaller. It might not smell great, but nappy changes can be done in the public space. Toilets (for children, not staff), don't need doors, or frankly even walls. Big glass windows that let you see inside and out are great. Can children (and educators) hide under forts or tunnels, or behind playground equipment? There are some practicalities that are hard to address. Babies will probably need a quiet and dark room to sleep (and they need their sleep). You cannot have two teachers leave seven children to put one baby down. Perhaps we can consider CCTV in areas like this, or even the entire premises. There are issues around the privacy of children and staff, but when weighing it against child safety, I think it is worth discussing. Many parents feel guilty enough for leaving their children in care, but in a modern world, it is a necessary sacrifice to keep a roof over their heads. Research also shows disadvantaged children benefit from being in high-quality childcare (but poor quality care leads to deficits in language and cognitive function). I encourage parents to ask questions like: How often are strangers looking after my baby? Are there any places for a predator to, literally, hide? But if you don't like the answer, there may not be much you can do. Finding another centre can actually be impossible in some areas, and good ones often have long waitlists. Nannies, au pairs and babysitters are expensive and subject to far less supervision or scrutiny than educators in a centre. READ MORE: The sickening thing is that predators will find a way to abuse children, including in front of others. The Canberra Rape Crisis Centre reports that one in three girls and one in five boys are sexually abused, yet most cases do not occur in educational settings. Perpetrators are fathers, step-fathers, uncles, grandfathers, brothers, cousins and friends of the family. Those calling for male educators to be banned should perhaps also consider banning parents, especially fathers, from caring for their own children. If a predator cannot work in a childcare centre, they will find another way. UNSW research from 2023 found one in six Australian men have sexual feelings towards children, and one in 10 have offended. Banning phones might prevent an abuser from recording and sharing their abuse, but it will not stop them from doing it. Protecting your child can feel almost impossible right now; and that is because if it takes a village to raise a child, it takes a village to protect them. This was originally published on Substack.
