Cyril Ramaphosa vs John Steenhuisen: Who's RIGHT over Andrew Whitfield axing?
President Cyril Ramaphosa has spoken out following his decision to remove Deputy Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Andrew Whitfield, from his position.
Whitfield's removal – which was done in terms of section 93 (1) of the Constitution – was announced on Thursday.
In a statement on Friday, President Cyril Ramaphosa said although it was not common practice for the President of the Republic of South Africa to provide reasons for either appointment or dismissals; 'several unfortunate statements and outright distortions by a number of people' have made it necessary to do so.
'Mr Whitfield was removed as a Deputy Minister because he undertook an international visit without the permission of the President. His travel to the United States was a clear violation of the rules and established practices governing the conduct of Members of the Executive.
'This requirement is known to all Ministers and Deputy Ministers. These rules and established practices were expressly communicated to all members of the Executive during the induction sessions at the commencement of the 7th administration,' he said.
The President said the rules and practices 'were repeated in Cabinet in March this year by me as President'.
'All international travel by members of the executive must always be undertaken with the express permission of the President. This practice is rigorously observed and adhered to by all members of the Executive. However, Mr Whitfield deliberately chose to violate this rule and practice,' President Ramaphosa said.
The President confirmed that prior to Whitfield's removal, he spoke to Democratic Alliance (DA) and fellow Government of National Unity (GNU) party leader, John Steenhuisen about his removal and 'I expect him to present to me for approval a replacement for Mr Whitfield from his party as the DA is entitled to a Deputy Minister as agreed'.
'In that discussion, Mr Steenhuisen informed me that Mr Whitfield had been expecting that he may be dismissed on the grounds that he had undertaken an international trip without the President's permission.
'This expectation, along with a perfunctory letter of apology that Mr Whitfield wrote to me following his travel to the USA without the required permission, indicated that he was aware that his actions had violated the rules and established practices governing the conduct of Members of the Executive,' he said.
The President emphasised that previous Presidents had undertaken to remove ministers and deputy ministers before.
'During my discussion with Mr Steenhuisen, he asked me if there was precedent for the action that I intended to take in relation to Mr Whitfield. I informed him that there was indeed prior precedent.
'I told him that in 1995, President Nelson Mandela dismissed the late Deputy Minister Madikizela-Mandela and that in 2007 President Thabo Mbeki dismissed then Deputy Minister Nosizwe Madlala-Routledge on the grounds of undertaking international travel without permission.
'Given all these circumstances, there is consequently no reasonable grounds for Mr Steenhuisen and the Democratic Alliance to issue ultimatums and threats when the President exercises his constitutional prerogative and responsibility. Nor are there any grounds to try link this with matters that have no bearing on the conduct of the former Deputy Minister,' he said.
The President emphasised that there is 'no basis' to suggest that the former Deputy Minister's removal is 'related to any other reason than his failure to receive permission to travel and adhere to the rules and established practices expected of members of the Executive'.
'While Mr Steenhuisen asked that he be allowed to brief the Democratic Alliance Federal Executive prior to the removal letter being delivered to Mr Whitfield, this would have had no bearing on my decision. It is the responsibility and the prerogative of the President to determine the timing and manner of the appointment and removal of Members of the Executive.
'I am amazed at Mr Steenhuisen's intemperate reaction to the removal of Mr Whitfield. He knows very well that the blatant disregard of the rules and practices that govern the international travel of members of the executive is a serious violation that should not be permitted,' President Ramaphosa said.
The President reminded that it remains the Constitutional prerogative of the President to appoint or remove Ministers and Deputy Ministers.
'It is unprecedented in the history of our democracy that the exercise by the President of his constitutional prerogative and responsibility with respect to a clear violation of rules and established practices governing the conduct of Members of the Executive has met with such irresponsible and unjustifiable threats and ultimatums from a member of the executive.
'Let it be clear that the President shall not yield to threats and ultimatums, especially coming from members of the Executive that he has the prerogative to appoint in accordance with the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa,' President Cyril Ramaphosa said.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
3 hours ago
- The Herald
Ramaphosa cancels his trip to Spain in case DA decides to leave GNU
President Cyril Ramaphosa has cancelled his planned trip to Spain at the eleventh hour in anticipation of a major announcement by GNU partner the DA as the fallout over his axing of deputy minister Andrew Whitfield heightens. TimesLIVE understands that Ramaphosa has decided to stay in the country in case the DA decides to leave the government of national unity (GNU) on Saturday. The DA is said to be considering exiting the one-year-old coalition after Ramaphosa this week fired the party's deputy minister of trade and industry Whitfield without consultation. The blue party's federal executive is meeting on Saturday to decide the way forward after giving Ramaphosa 48 hours on Thursday to also fire ministers implicated in corruption, state capture and other forms of wrongdoing. Ramaphosa said he decided to axe Whitfield after he undertook a trip to the U.S at the height of the diplomatic tensions earlier this year without his authorisation. Whitfield argued he had asked Ramaphosa for permission to travel and decided to go after not getting a response after 10 days. The DA has taken a dim view of Ramaphosa's actions and has given him until 3pm on Saturday to reverse his decision to fire Whitfield. The DA said it would consider its continued participation in the GNU should he not reverse this decision. The DA believes Ramaphosa has been ill-treating the party by taking decisions without proper consultations including the signing of several laws. So aggrieved is the DA over its treatment that the party even voted against the proposed budget to hike VAT - a move that has created even further tensions in the GNU. Sources with intimate knowledge say Ramaphosa, who was expected to travel to Spain on Friday evening on a commercial flight, decided to miss the trip in case the DA's federal executive meeting on Saturday morning decides to leave the GNU. 'The president said he is not going any more, just in case the DA does funny things like leaving the GNU,' said a senior government insider. Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya on Saturday morning confirmed Ramaphosa had cancelled his trip. He said Ramaphosa's decision was informed by the possibility of the DA exiting the GNU. 'Indeed, the president has cancelled his trip to Spain to keep a close eye on developments at home ,' said Magwenya. The DA is expected to hold a press briefing at 3pm to inform the nation what it will be doing going forward after Ramaphosa said he would not meet the party's 48-hour deadline. TimesLIVE
The South African
6 hours ago
- The South African
Cyril Ramaphosa vs John Steenhuisen: Who's RIGHT over Andrew Whitfield axing?
President Cyril Ramaphosa has spoken out following his decision to remove Deputy Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Andrew Whitfield, from his position. Whitfield's removal – which was done in terms of section 93 (1) of the Constitution – was announced on Thursday. In a statement on Friday, President Cyril Ramaphosa said although it was not common practice for the President of the Republic of South Africa to provide reasons for either appointment or dismissals; 'several unfortunate statements and outright distortions by a number of people' have made it necessary to do so. 'Mr Whitfield was removed as a Deputy Minister because he undertook an international visit without the permission of the President. His travel to the United States was a clear violation of the rules and established practices governing the conduct of Members of the Executive. 'This requirement is known to all Ministers and Deputy Ministers. These rules and established practices were expressly communicated to all members of the Executive during the induction sessions at the commencement of the 7th administration,' he said. The President said the rules and practices 'were repeated in Cabinet in March this year by me as President'. 'All international travel by members of the executive must always be undertaken with the express permission of the President. This practice is rigorously observed and adhered to by all members of the Executive. However, Mr Whitfield deliberately chose to violate this rule and practice,' President Ramaphosa said. The President confirmed that prior to Whitfield's removal, he spoke to Democratic Alliance (DA) and fellow Government of National Unity (GNU) party leader, John Steenhuisen about his removal and 'I expect him to present to me for approval a replacement for Mr Whitfield from his party as the DA is entitled to a Deputy Minister as agreed'. 'In that discussion, Mr Steenhuisen informed me that Mr Whitfield had been expecting that he may be dismissed on the grounds that he had undertaken an international trip without the President's permission. 'This expectation, along with a perfunctory letter of apology that Mr Whitfield wrote to me following his travel to the USA without the required permission, indicated that he was aware that his actions had violated the rules and established practices governing the conduct of Members of the Executive,' he said. The President emphasised that previous Presidents had undertaken to remove ministers and deputy ministers before. 'During my discussion with Mr Steenhuisen, he asked me if there was precedent for the action that I intended to take in relation to Mr Whitfield. I informed him that there was indeed prior precedent. 'I told him that in 1995, President Nelson Mandela dismissed the late Deputy Minister Madikizela-Mandela and that in 2007 President Thabo Mbeki dismissed then Deputy Minister Nosizwe Madlala-Routledge on the grounds of undertaking international travel without permission. 'Given all these circumstances, there is consequently no reasonable grounds for Mr Steenhuisen and the Democratic Alliance to issue ultimatums and threats when the President exercises his constitutional prerogative and responsibility. Nor are there any grounds to try link this with matters that have no bearing on the conduct of the former Deputy Minister,' he said. The President emphasised that there is 'no basis' to suggest that the former Deputy Minister's removal is 'related to any other reason than his failure to receive permission to travel and adhere to the rules and established practices expected of members of the Executive'. 'While Mr Steenhuisen asked that he be allowed to brief the Democratic Alliance Federal Executive prior to the removal letter being delivered to Mr Whitfield, this would have had no bearing on my decision. It is the responsibility and the prerogative of the President to determine the timing and manner of the appointment and removal of Members of the Executive. 'I am amazed at Mr Steenhuisen's intemperate reaction to the removal of Mr Whitfield. He knows very well that the blatant disregard of the rules and practices that govern the international travel of members of the executive is a serious violation that should not be permitted,' President Ramaphosa said. The President reminded that it remains the Constitutional prerogative of the President to appoint or remove Ministers and Deputy Ministers. 'It is unprecedented in the history of our democracy that the exercise by the President of his constitutional prerogative and responsibility with respect to a clear violation of rules and established practices governing the conduct of Members of the Executive has met with such irresponsible and unjustifiable threats and ultimatums from a member of the executive. 'Let it be clear that the President shall not yield to threats and ultimatums, especially coming from members of the Executive that he has the prerogative to appoint in accordance with the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa,' President Cyril Ramaphosa said. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The Citizen
7 hours ago
- The Citizen
Ramaphosa's spokesperson defends SA's ICJ case against Israel
"Israeli soldiers have deliberately shot at unarmed Palestinians seeking aid in Gaza". President Cyril Ramaphosa's spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya, has defended South Africa's International Court of Justice (ICJ) case against Israel after an attack on a school in Gaza. Charred remains of Palestinian women and children were pulled from under the rubble in Gaza on Friday after the Israeli army bombed the Osama Bin Zaid School, packed with displaced families. Israel attack A series of Israeli airstrikes and artillery attacks across the Gaza Strip on Friday killed at least 78 Palestinians, including 12 aid seekers, as Israel's war on the besieged enclave continues unabated. At least eight people were killed when an Israeli airstrike hit on the Osama Bin Zaid school, which had been sheltering displaced families in the Saftawi area of northern Gaza's Jabalia. A fire broke out inside a classroom following the strike, triggering panic among those inside. The strike has once again raised alarm over the targeting of civilian shelters. ALSO READ: Israel accused of starving Gaza 'by design' — South Africa addresses ICJ SA ICJ case Magwenya dismissed those who questioned why South Africa had taken Israel to the ICJ after the attack on the school.. 'And then the temerity of those telling us we shouldn't have launched a case at the ICJ. Silence and inaction are not options. May their souls rest in peace'. And then the temerity of those telling us we shouldn't have launched a case at the ICJ. Silence and inaction are not options. May their souls rest in peace. — Vincent Magwenya 🇿🇦 (@SpokespersonRSA) June 27, 2025 In its initial application, South Africa submitted an 84-page application at the ICJ on 29 December 2023, pleading with the court to find Israel guilty of suspected genocide and order it to, among other things, halt its invasion in Gaza. Israel defiant Since launching the case at the ICJ, South Africa has approached the court four times, requesting interim measures to halt Israel's attacks on the occupied territory. Despite three orders being granted in South Africa's favour, they have had little to no impact on all forms of Israel's attacks on Palestinian life, essential services and the need for humanitarian aid. ALSO READ: SA won't drop ICJ case against Israel, even if Trump waives restrictions – Dirco Israeli soldiers 'ordered' to shoot Meanwhile, Israeli soldiers have deliberately shot at unarmed Palestinians seeking aid in Gaza after being 'ordered' to do so by their commanders, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reports. Israel ordered an investigation into possible war crimes over the allegations by some soldiers that it revealed on Friday, Haaretz said. At least 549 Palestinians have been killed and 4,066 injured while waiting for food aid distributed at sites run by the Israeli-and United States-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), the Gaza Government Media Office said on Thursday, Al Jazeera reported. 'Killing field' According to the Haaretz report, which quoted unnamed Israeli soldiers, troops were told to fire at the crowds of Palestinians and use unnecessary lethal force against people who appeared to pose no threat. 'We fired machineguns from tanks and threw grenades,' one soldier told Haaretz. 'There was one incident where a group of civilians was hit while advancing under the cover of fog.' In another instance, a soldier said that where they were stationed in Gaza, between 'one and five people were killed every day'. 'It's a killing field,' that soldier said. Israel responds The Israeli army 'strongly rejected' the accusations in the report, according to a military statement published on Telegram. 'Any allegation of a deviation from the law or [military] directives will be thoroughly examined, and further action will be taken as necessary. The allegations of deliberate fire toward civilians presented in the article are not recognized in the field,' it said. ALSO READ: SA among 38 countries to present at ICJ hearings on Israel's actions
