How Tahawwur Rana helped identify key targets of 26/11 attack: ‘Lashkar functioned more as spy network'
Sources in the Mumbai Police crime branch told NDTV that during the interrogation, Rana shared how he helped David Coleman Headley, the mastermind of the attacks, identify key targets of attack.
In April this year, the US extradited 'convicted terrorist' Tahawwur Hussain Rana, a Canadian citizen and native of Pakistan, to stand trial in India on 10 criminal charges stemming from his alleged role in the 2008 terrorist attacks in Mumbai.
According to NDTV sources, Rana said that he completed an MBBS course in 1986 from the Army Medical College in Pakistan's Rawalpindi and was commissioned as a Captain doctor in the Pakistani Army in Quetta.
He was posted in sensitive regions such as Sindh, Balochistan, Bahawalpur, and Siachen-Balotra, the report added.
During the time in Siachen, Rana reportedly developed pulmonary edema, which led to his absence from duty. He was then declared a deserter. 'Pulmonary edema' is an abnormal condition that causes a fluid buildup in the lungs.
Rana had earlier said that he had agreed to be part of the terror plot because David Headley had assured that he would help clean Rana's records.
Rana further informed that Headley had attended three Lashkar-e-Taiba training camps between 2003 and 2004. The terrorists quoted Headley as telling him that Lashkar functioned more as a spy network than an ideological outfit, NDTV reported.
Rana had reportedly visited India in November 2008, days before the terror attack. He had stayed at a hotel in Mumbai's Powai on the 20th and 21st. Just before the strike, he left for Beijing via Dubai.
According to a 405-page supplementary chargesheet filed by the crime branch in 2023, Rana helped Headley collect information about crowded locations like Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus.
As many as 14 witnesses confirmed his role.
Rana blamed the Indian Embassy when asked about forged Indian documents that aided the terrorists, NDTV reported.
The investigation, however, revealed that Rana helped Headley enter India using false documents.
Rana reportedly admitted to knowing Pakistani officials Sajid Mir, Abdul Rehman Pasha, and Major Iqbal, all accused of planning the attacks.
He is learned to have actively coordinated with Lashkar-e-Taiba and the Pakistani spy agency ISI.
Between November 26 and 29, 2008, 10 LeT terrorists carried out a series of 12 coordinated shooting and bombing attacks in Mumbai.
'They infiltrated the city by sea and then broke into teams, dispersing to multiple locations,' the White House said earlier.
Attackers at a train station fired guns and threw grenades into crowds. Attackers at two restaurants shot indiscriminately at patrons. Attackers at the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel gunned people down and detonated explosives. They also shot and killed people at a Jewish community center.
After the attacks were complete, Rana allegedly told Headley that the Indians 'deserved it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Reuters X account restored in India after suspension over legal demand
HighlightsThe Reuters News account on the social media platform X was restored in India on Sunday after being suspended due to a legal demand, with the platform indicating compliance with local laws. The Indian government's Press Information Bureau clarified that no agency had requested the withholding of the Reuters account and that officials were collaborating with X to resolve the issue. The 2000 Information Technology Act allows government officials to demand the removal of content deemed to violate local laws, which has led to ongoing tensions between X and the Indian government over content removal requests. The Reuters News account on X was restored in India on Sunday, a day after the social media platform suspended it, citing a legal demand. "At this time, we are no longer withholding access in INDIA to your account," X said in an email to the Reuters social media team, without elaborating. Representatives for X, Reuters and the Indian government did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the restoration of the account. Earlier on Sunday, a spokesperson for the Indian government's Press Information Bureau told Reuters that no Indian government agency had required withholding the Reuters handle, adding that officials were working with X to resolve the problem. A Reuters spokesperson had said the agency was working with X to resolve this matter and get the Reuters account reinstated in India as soon as possible. Reuters World, another X account operated by the news agency which was blocked in India, was also restored late Sunday night. The main Reuters account, which has more than 25 million followers globally, had been blocked in India since Saturday night. A notice told X users that "@Reuters has been withheld in IN (India) in response to a legal demand". In an email to the Reuters social media team on May 16, X said: "It is our policy to notify account holders if we receive a legal request from an authorized entity (such as law enforcement or a government agency) to remove content from their account." "In order to comply with X obligations under India's local laws, we have withheld your X account in India under the country's Information Technology Act, 2000; the content remains available elsewhere". Reuters could not ascertain if the May 16 email was linked to Saturday's account suspension nor could it determine what specific content the demand referred to, why its removal was sought or the entity that had lodged the complaint. While the email did not specify which entity had made the request or what content they sought to remove, it said X had been advised that in such cases, a user could contact the secretary of India's Information and Broadcasting Ministry. The secretary, Sanjay Jaju, did not respond to requests seeking comment. The 2000 law allows designated government officials to demand the takedown of content from social media platforms they deem to violate local laws, including on the grounds of national security or if a post threatens public order. X has long been at odds with India's government over content-removal requests. In March, the company sued the federal government over a new government website the company says expands takedown powers to "countless" government officials. The case is continuing. India has said X wrongly labelled an official website a "censorship portal", as the website only allows tech companies to be notified about harmful online content.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
31 minutes ago
- First Post
Pakistan's dirty Kargil skeletons tumble out, Asim Munir pays tribute to soldier disowned in 1999
Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir paid a tribute to a soldier, whose body the country once refused to accept during the Kargil War. Here's a story of Captain Karnal Sher Khan. read more Pakistan's newly appointed Field Marshal and Army Chief Asim Munir on Saturday paid a 'heartfelt tribute' to Captain Karnal Sher Khan on the occasion of his 26th 'martyrdom' anniversary. However, it is learnt that Khan was the same soldier whose body Pakistan refused to accept when it was found on Tiger Hill in the Dras sub-sector during the Kargil War. Munir, along with other senior Pakistani officers, paid tribute to the fallen soldier for what Islamabad described as his unwavering courage and patriotism during the 1999 Kargil War. According to the press release issued by the Indian Embassy in Washington, DC, back on July 15, 1999, Karnal Sher was one of the two soldiers whose bodies Pakistan adamantly refused to accept. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD At that time, this was seen as Pakistan's way to evade acknowledging the involvement of the Pakistan army regulars in the misadventure in Kargil. The country vehemently denied Khan's identification by India through correspondence found on him, stirring major controversy amid the war. It is pertinent to note that this was not the first time Captain Karnal Sher was honoured in Pakistan. Interestingly, he is still the sole recipient of the Nishan-i-Haider award from the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. In 2020, while Pakistan celebrated the 55th Defence Day, a massive procession was taken out to honour the Pakistani captain. Since then, he has often been referred to as a 'Kargil Hero'. What was India's take on the matter? According to the press release by the Indian consulate in Washington, in July 1999, the Indian authorities found the bodies of two Pakistani soldiers on the Indian side of the Line of Control in Kargil. As per the statement, the body belonged to Capt. Imtiaz Malik of the 165th Mortar Regiment and Capt. Karnal Sher of 12 Northern Light Infantry. The Indian Army took possession of the bodies, and on July 12, they conveyed the development to the government of Pakistan. 'We informed the Pakistani authorities that we would like to hand over the bodies to them. We did not receive any response,' the statement reads. After the notification was sent to the Pakistani government, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) approached the Government of India on July 13. In its letter, ICRC maintained that Pakistan had requested them to contact India for the handing over of the bodies of the two officers. However, in that letter, the names of the two officers were not mentioned. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India then provided ICRC with this information, along with the photographs of the bodies and copies of correspondence found on the two soldiers. The Pakistani government later conveyed through 'ICRC that the material we had furnished was 'insufficient' to establish the identities of the officers, and that they would like the bodies to be handed over and taken to Islamabad for verification.' 'It is clear that this was again an attempt to obscure and evade the fact that these were bodies of officers of the Pakistan Army involved in the Kargil operation,' the embassy said in the statement. In response to this, India offered that it would be willing to receive a Pakistani representative and even the family members of the soldiers to visit the country and identify the bodies. India pointed out that it would have been unprecedented and unheard of for bodies to be sent abroad before their nationality and military identity are determined. 'If Pakistan doubts them, it is for their representatives to come and see the bodies. We have not yet received a response from Pakistan through the ICRC,' the embassy said at that time. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD So, how were the bodies handed over to them? Tired of Pakistan's refusal, India eventually set a deadline of July 15 for Pakistan to claim the bodies of the soldiers. 'The Government of India had conveyed to the ICRC that, because of the weather conditions, the condition of bodies is deteriorating and the ICRC should come back with the response from Pakistan by 1100 hrs. IST on July 15,' the statement from the Indian side read. Eventually, the Pakistani authorities conceded and accepted the bodies of the army personnel. On July 17, the two bodies, draped in the green Pakistani flag, were handed over to an official of the International Committee of the Red Cross at the army base hospital in New Delhi. The Red Cross official named Dennis Allistone checked the bodies and documents of the two soldiers before taking them to the Palam airport. Both soldiers were eventually flown to Karachi. The two soldiers received full military honours from the Rajputana Rifles. How an officer in India helped Captain Karnal Sher in receiving Nishan-e-Haider While Pakistan initially abandoned Captain Karnal Sher, it was Indian Army officer, Brigadier M.P.S. Bajwa (now retired), who honoured the soldier in his way. Bajwa, who was commanding the 192 Mountain Brigade at that time, was so impressed by the Pakistani soldier's valour that he wrote a citation for him and placed it in his pocket while handing over the body, which eventually led to his recognition. Before Captain Karnal's body was dispatched to Delhi, Bajwa informed his General Officer Commanding of Khan's bravery and expressed the desire to write a small citation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'A piece of paper with a handwritten citation was placed in his pocket. Initially, Pakistan refused to take his body, saying that their soldiers had never fought, but later the body was accepted,' Bajwa told The Print in 2019. 'It was heartening news that he was awarded the Nishan-e-Haider. I received a letter of thanks to the Indian Army from his father," he added.
NDTV
31 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Why Are You In My Country?" American's Racist Rant Against Indian Man Sparks Outrage
A video has surfaced on social media, capturing a disturbing instance of racial profiling and discrimination against an Indian-origin man. In the clip, the American approaches the man, who is of Indian descent, and demands to know why he's in "his country." The American expresses hostility, stating that there are too many Indians in "white countries" and that Americans are fed up with the situation. He tells the Indian-origin man to return to India, showcasing a xenophobic and racist attitude. The Indian man, visibly confused, chooses not to engage with the aggressive individual. "Why are you in my country? I don't like you guys here. There are too many of you guys here. Indians! You guys are flooding all the white countries. I am tired of it. Americans are sick of this sh**. I want you to go back to India," he says. "Tired of this fu**** brown people invading the country. fu**** bullshit," the American says, contunuing his rant. Watch the video here: Anti Christian behaviors — Abrahamic Lincoln (@AbrahamicLs) July 6, 2025 The video has sparked massive outrage, with many condemning the American man's behaviour as unacceptable and discriminatory. Some have called for action against the individual, while others have highlighted the need for greater awareness and understanding between cultures. One user wrote, "Nothing, they're just intimidated by Indians! They know how talented, capable, and progressive we are. It only shows their insecurities. They see us as a threat." Another commented, "Who are you to ask him to leave the USA? Who gave you the permission? He is an American. He is successful, but you are not, so it's not his problem. Who told u that USa is a white country? USA belongs to non-Christian, non white, red INDIANS." A third said, "If all migrants leave America today, the country wouldn't even exist anymore, and the land would go back to the native people." A fourth added, "You do know that white people are not originally from America, right?" This incident is part of a growing trend of hate crimes and xenophobic attacks against Indians and other minorities in Western countries. Indian Americans often face discrimination in various domains like the workplace, housing, education, and public spaces, often tied to skin colour, religion, or cultural stereotypes. While they are among the most educated and affluent ethnic groups in the US, with over 4.2 million people of Indian origin, discrimination remains a significant issue.
