Cape Town Lawyer Gary Trappler convicted for slashing tyres in alleged racially motivated attack on neighbour
Image: File
A Cape Town lawyer has been found guilty of malicious damage to his neighbour's property.
Prominent attorney Gary Trappler was convicted this week in the Cape Town Magistrate's Court.
Trapper was found guilty of slashing the tyres of his former neighbour Thandi Mgwaba.
The incident took place in Sydney Road, Toronga Mansions in Green Point in 2020.
Mgwaba said at the time that Trappler's actions were racially motivated because she was a black woman, and Trappler told her children that he did not want black people living there.
Leader of the ANC in the Western Cape and Parliamentary constituency head for Cape Central and the Atlantic Seaboard, Khalid Sayed, welcomed the conviction.
'Ms Mgwaba, a Black woman and grandmother, was subjected to a deeply traumatic and targeted act of aggression in 2020 when Trappler slashed her car tyres, made threatening remarks, and asserted that Black people did not belong in the neighbourhood,' he said.
'Initially, the case was dismissed despite the existence of CCTV footage showing Trappler approaching the car multiple times and crouching by the tyres before they visibly deflated. Public outcry resulted in the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) reviewing the case and making a decision, based on the CCTV evidence, to reinstate the charges,' Sayed said.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
He further called for action to be taken against the SAPS and NPA for refusing and denying Mgwaba justice.
The ANC has further called for a blacklisting of Trappler in the legal fraternity.
Sayed said the party commended Magistrate Stephen Bengequla for his clear and principled ruling, and noted his decision to refer the matter to the Equality Court to determine whether the crime was racially motivated. He said they believe this is a necessary and just step.
'This case highlights not only the persistence of racism in our communities, but also the need for vigilance in how our justice system responds to such incidents. Ms Mgwaba's courage in speaking out and the community's insistence that the case be taken seriously must be acknowledged. The ANC remains committed to fighting racism in all its forms and to ensuring that victims of racially motivated acts receive the justice they deserve,' Sayed said.
The Western Cape spokesperson for the NPA, Eric Ntabazalila, confirmed the conviction.
He told IOL the matter against Trappler has been postponed until August 8, 2025, for sentencing.
robin.francke@iol.co.za
IOL
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
16 minutes ago
- The South African
ANC praises Ramaphosa's decision to place Mchunu on leave
The African National Congress (ANC) has welcomed President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to place Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on special leave, describing it as a bold and responsible step in response to serious allegations. Speaking with SABC News , ANC spokesperson Mahlengi Bhengu-Motsiri said the party believes the decision will allow for a credible investigation into claims made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. 'We are confident this will take us to the root of the matter. The process must help determine whether South Africans are truly safe and if law enforcement institutions are upholding their constitutional duties,' she said. 'Placing Minister Mchunu on a leave of absence is an important and responsible decision,' she added. President Cyril Ramaphosa addressed the nation on Sunday night, 13 July 2025. Following explosive allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. Last week, Commissioner Mkhwanazi accused Minister Mchunu and Deputy National Police Commissioner Lieutenant General Shadrack Sibiya of interfering in police operations. He claimed they orchestrated the disbandment of the Political Killings Task Team. The unit had investigated over 600 politically motivated murders and secured more than 100 convictions. Mkhwanazi said neither the national nor provincial commissioners approved the unit's disbandment. He argued that the move disrupted crucial investigations into political violence and organised crime. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
South Africa needs Scorpions 2.0 and a capable National Prosecuting Authority
The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has made notable strides in the recovery of money lost by the state in organised crime and corruption cases. Yet convictions and prosecutions of State Capture cases are still amiss. This constitutional crisis obliterates any prospect of economic growth. A report by Investec found that crime and widespread government corruption significantly contributed to South Africa's downward economic spiral. According to the report, had we kept up with the growth rates of similar countries, South Africa's economy would have been 37% bigger than it is today. Crime and corruption must be successfully prosecuted to lift South Africans out of poverty and squalor. A strong criminal justice system is a prerequisite to restoring the rule of law, strengthening democratic institutions and growing the economy. The NPA's turnaround strategies aimed at restoring the destruction caused by the Jacob Zuma administration have fallen short. The prosecuting authority is collapsing in front of our eyes. A lack of experienced prosecutors, limited capacity and chronic underfunding have led to failures in prosecuting both complex cases and everyday crimes. An institutional overhaul is required to address the scourge of crime and secure the independence of prosecutions, and this can only be achieved through amending the Constitution. South Africa needs an independent Anti-Corruption Commission tasked with investigating and prosecuting serious corruption and high-level organised crime. Additionally, we require a capable NPA free from political interference. This two-pronged approach combines the long-term solution of the Anti-Corruption Commission with ensuring the independence of the NPA in the short term. A truly independent NPA The first step is the development of a Private Members Bill to address the lack of independence of the NPA, shield it from political interference and ensure that the subjugation of the NPA never occurs again. This Bill is currently in development. The Bill will have the NPA report directly to Parliament and remove the President's ability to appoint or remove the national and deputy directors. This power will be couched in Parliament and require a special majority to effect any removal. It will further detach the minister of justice's final authority over the NPA. National directors have been fired for prosecuting cases of politically connected persons in the past. Advocate Vusi Pikoli's removal is a prime example of such political influence. The amendment will also give the NPA the power to determine its own budgetary needs, subject to parliamentary approval. The NPA can neither be rebuilt nor have its prosecutorial capacity increased without additional funds. The NPA's budget is currently determined by the minister of justice, who, like her predecessors, has failed to advocate for better funding despite the NPA's pleas. Increased funding will allow for the employment and training of future prosecutors and better equip junior prosecutors with skills and experience, thus restoring the NPA's capacity incrementally. This Bill presents short-term wins that would substantially assist the NPA. The responsibility for investigating and prosecuting serious corruption and high-level organised crime must be transferred to a specialised Chapter 9 body in the long term. This will free up the NPA to tackle its huge caseloads of everyday crime. This is the second prong, aimed at a long-term solution to dealing with State Capture and high-level organised crime. The Scorpions 2.0 as a long-term solution The Anti-Corruption Commission Bill was introduced early this year and is now being considered by Parliament. The Bill creates a Chapter 9 institution that specialises in the investigation and prosecution of serious corruption and high-level organised crime. Such complex cases require a great deal of resources for successful prosecutions – resources that the NPA does not have. The role of the institution will be akin to that of the original Scorpions and allow for prosecutor-led investigations and security of tenure. The Directorate of Special Operations – the 'Scorpions' – was a specialised NPA unit tasked with investigating and prosecuting corruption and organised crime. Because it was part of the NPA and under the authority of the minister, politicians under investigation were able to have the unit disbanded. Previous Chief Justice Raymond Zondo has aptly described the disbandment as 'the worst decision ever'. Although replaced by the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (the Hawks), falling within the authority of the minister of police, the Hawks themselves have been exposed to political meddling and influence. Recently, in an attempt to appear hard on corruption, a new Investigating Directorate on corruption was established within the NPA, this time, without the power to investigate, and failing to insulate the unit from political meddling. Institutional problems within the NPA cannot be solved with slapdash legislation. No anti-corruption unit can be under the yoke of the people it is tasked with investigating – it must be unequivocally independent from political influence. The Anti-Corruption Commission Bill will create a stand-alone body free from political control and put an end to the looting of state coffers. The Anti-Corruption Commission Bill ('Scorpions 2.0') runs parallel to a constitutional amendment that ensures the commission's full independence. This amendment will make it impossible for implicated and connected persons to have a say in leadership changes at the commission. The leaders of the Scorpions 2.0 will answer directly to Parliament, thereby protecting the security of tenure of those in charge. The amendment will further secure a fixed-percentage budget allocation for the commission. No longer will the prosecution of corruption be hamstrung by politicians closing the purse. These measures ensure that the Anti-Corruption Commission will be immune to any form of political pressure and can focus solely on investigating and prosecuting crimes of corruption. A specialist unit will finally allow the prosecution of State Capture cases and other instances of corruption. It will further empower the NPA to prosecute 'ordinary' crimes with greater success. South Africans deserve to live in a safe environment where perpetrators of crimes like rape, murder and robbery are put behind bars effectively. Conclusion The effective prosecution of crime creates a safer society and leads to increased investment, economic growth and job creation. With unemployment at about 40%, the importance of economic growth in South Africa need not be elaborated. It is inexcusable that the National Prosecuting Authority has been allowed to fall into disrepair and reach a point of collapse, yet it can still be saved. In the darkest of times, our country has shown that it can come back from the brink. These bills will restore our prosecutorial institutions and deserve the full support of South Africans. The amendments they propose will fight crime, put an end to corruption and save our country. DM
Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
NPA seeks clarity on Omotoso acquittal, defence objects to ‘fishing expedition'
As the State moves to appeal the acquittal of controversial pastor Timothy Omotoso, his legal team has accused the National Prosecuting Authority of abusing court processes by seeking clarification that they argue is aimed at retrospectively revising the judgment. As the State prepares to appeal the acquittal of Nigerian televangelist Timothy Omotoso, his defence counsel has branded their first step as a 'fishing expedition' and an attempt to have the judgment amended in favour of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). The NPA brought an application before the Gqeberha Division of the High Court for Judge Irma Schoeman to provide 'clarification' of the judgment that saw Omotoso acquitted on multiple charges of sexual assault and human trafficking. The application, brought before court on Monday, 14 July 2025, did not single out specific aspects of the judgment, but rather sought clarity on the factual findings of Judge Schoeman's entire judgment. This flies in the face of normal procedure as the prosecution has yet to provide its 'legal question' — the specific aspects of the judgment it does not agree with and believes another court might make a different ruling on. Senior State prosecutor Apla Bodlani SC indicated to the court that the State already had a strong basis for its appeal, but sought a better explanation from Judge Schoeman to 'satisfy [themselves] that [their] approach would be sustainable'. Omotoso and his co-accused, Lusanda Sulani and Zukiswa Sitho, were not in court as their presence was not required for these proceedings. South African immigration authorities served the controversial pastor with a five-year ban from the country as he was flying out of OR Tambo International Airport in May. Omotoso's legal counsel Peter Daubermann called the State's application a 'retrospective fishing expedition' and an abuse of court processes in an attempt for the judge to revise her ruling. He said there was no legal mechanism that allowed for this course of action and accused the State of trying to 'reverse engineer a factual foundation' that would provide it with reasons to appeal. Omotoso, Sulani and Sitho were the subjects of an eight-year trial in which they were accused of multiple counts of sexual assault and human trafficking by members of Omotoso's Jesus Dominion International church. The trial was marred by controversy around the NPA's conduct, and in April Judge Schoeman acquitted them on all the charges. Judge Schoeman in her ruling cited flaws in the prosecution's case, including almost no cross-examination challenging the versions of the accused as well as a lack of corroborating evidence led by the State. Following his acquittal Omotoso embarked on a 'New Dawn crusade' in East London. But on the second last day of the April crusade he was arrested on immigration charges at a church where he was meant to preach. He was then declared a prohibited person. That status, however, stemmed not from the criminal proceedings, but from allegations that he had used fraudulent documentation to enter South Africa. During court proceedings on Monday, Daubermann further argued that Judge Schoeman was ' functus officio ', meaning she had completed her duties with regard to this matter. He said her judgment was final and she 'was not unclear or ambiguous'. 'If this application is entertained it will set a precedent, and an accused will never know if a judgment is final or not,' Daubermann said. Bodlani maintained that the intention of the application was not for Judge Schoeman to alter or supplement her judgment. He reiterated that after studying the judgment, the State was still unclear on what the factual findings were, and for it to better prepare their appeal, it required Judge Schoeman to provide clarity on her findings. The judge said she would need time to consider the opposing arguments, and that the judgment would be delivered on 22 July 2025. DM
