logo
South Africa needs Scorpions 2.0 and a capable National Prosecuting Authority

South Africa needs Scorpions 2.0 and a capable National Prosecuting Authority

Daily Maverick16 hours ago
The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has made notable strides in the recovery of money lost by the state in organised crime and corruption cases. Yet convictions and prosecutions of State Capture cases are still amiss.
This constitutional crisis obliterates any prospect of economic growth. A report by Investec found that crime and widespread government corruption significantly contributed to South Africa's downward economic spiral. According to the report, had we kept up with the growth rates of similar countries, South Africa's economy would have been 37% bigger than it is today.
Crime and corruption must be successfully prosecuted to lift South Africans out of poverty and squalor. A strong criminal justice system is a prerequisite to restoring the rule of law, strengthening democratic institutions and growing the economy.
The NPA's turnaround strategies aimed at restoring the destruction caused by the Jacob Zuma administration have fallen short. The prosecuting authority is collapsing in front of our eyes.
A lack of experienced prosecutors, limited capacity and chronic underfunding have led to failures in prosecuting both complex cases and everyday crimes.
An institutional overhaul is required to address the scourge of crime and secure the independence of prosecutions, and this can only be achieved through amending the Constitution.
South Africa needs an independent Anti-Corruption Commission tasked with investigating and prosecuting serious corruption and high-level organised crime. Additionally, we require a capable NPA free from political interference. This two-pronged approach combines the long-term solution of the Anti-Corruption Commission with ensuring the independence of the NPA in the short term.
A truly independent NPA
The first step is the development of a Private Members Bill to address the lack of independence of the NPA, shield it from political interference and ensure that the subjugation of the NPA never occurs again. This Bill is currently in development.
The Bill will have the NPA report directly to Parliament and remove the President's ability to appoint or remove the national and deputy directors. This power will be couched in Parliament and require a special majority to effect any removal. It will further detach the minister of justice's final authority over the NPA.
National directors have been fired for prosecuting cases of politically connected persons in the past. Advocate Vusi Pikoli's removal is a prime example of such political influence. The amendment will also give the NPA the power to determine its own budgetary needs, subject to parliamentary approval.
The NPA can neither be rebuilt nor have its prosecutorial capacity increased without additional funds. The NPA's budget is currently determined by the minister of justice, who, like her predecessors, has failed to advocate for better funding despite the NPA's pleas.
Increased funding will allow for the employment and training of future prosecutors and better equip junior prosecutors with skills and experience, thus restoring the NPA's capacity incrementally. This Bill presents short-term wins that would substantially assist the NPA.
The responsibility for investigating and prosecuting serious corruption and high-level organised crime must be transferred to a specialised Chapter 9 body in the long term. This will free up the NPA to tackle its huge caseloads of everyday crime.
This is the second prong, aimed at a long-term solution to dealing with State Capture and high-level organised crime.
The Scorpions 2.0 as a long-term solution
The Anti-Corruption Commission Bill was introduced early this year and is now being considered by Parliament. The Bill creates a Chapter 9 institution that specialises in the investigation and prosecution of serious corruption and high-level organised crime.
Such complex cases require a great deal of resources for successful prosecutions – resources that the NPA does not have. The role of the institution will be akin to that of the original Scorpions and allow for prosecutor-led investigations and security of tenure.
The Directorate of Special Operations – the 'Scorpions' – was a specialised NPA unit tasked with investigating and prosecuting corruption and organised crime. Because it was part of the NPA and under the authority of the minister, politicians under investigation were able to have the unit disbanded.
Previous Chief Justice Raymond Zondo has aptly described the disbandment as 'the worst decision ever'.
Although replaced by the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (the Hawks), falling within the authority of the minister of police, the Hawks themselves have been exposed to political meddling and influence.
Recently, in an attempt to appear hard on corruption, a new Investigating Directorate on corruption was established within the NPA, this time, without the power to investigate, and failing to insulate the unit from political meddling. Institutional problems within the NPA cannot be solved with slapdash legislation.
No anti-corruption unit can be under the yoke of the people it is tasked with investigating – it must be unequivocally independent from political influence. The Anti-Corruption Commission Bill will create a stand-alone body free from political control and put an end to the looting of state coffers.
The Anti-Corruption Commission Bill ('Scorpions 2.0') runs parallel to a constitutional amendment that ensures the commission's full independence. This amendment will make it impossible for implicated and connected persons to have a say in leadership changes at the commission. The leaders of the Scorpions 2.0 will answer directly to Parliament, thereby protecting the security of tenure of those in charge.
The amendment will further secure a fixed-percentage budget allocation for the commission. No longer will the prosecution of corruption be hamstrung by politicians closing the purse.
These measures ensure that the Anti-Corruption Commission will be immune to any form of political pressure and can focus solely on investigating and prosecuting crimes of corruption.
A specialist unit will finally allow the prosecution of State Capture cases and other instances of corruption. It will further empower the NPA to prosecute 'ordinary' crimes with greater success. South Africans deserve to live in a safe environment where perpetrators of crimes like rape, murder and robbery are put behind bars effectively.
Conclusion
The effective prosecution of crime creates a safer society and leads to increased investment, economic growth and job creation. With unemployment at about 40%, the importance of economic growth in South Africa need not be elaborated.
It is inexcusable that the National Prosecuting Authority has been allowed to fall into disrepair and reach a point of collapse, yet it can still be saved.
In the darkest of times, our country has shown that it can come back from the brink. These bills will restore our prosecutorial institutions and deserve the full support of South Africans. The amendments they propose will fight crime, put an end to corruption and save our country. DM
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

eNCA journalists reflect on chaos, looting & reporting from the frontlines
eNCA journalists reflect on chaos, looting & reporting from the frontlines

eNCA

timean hour ago

  • eNCA

eNCA journalists reflect on chaos, looting & reporting from the frontlines

The July Unrest occurred in KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng, from 9 to 18 July 2021. The protests were sparked by the arrest and incarceration of former President Jacob Zuma. The protests quickly escalated resulting in looting, rioting, rise in racial tensions, damage to property, violence and the deaths of more than 350 people. It is estimated that the July unrest also caused more than R50 billion in damage to the South African economy. eNCA Senior Reporter Dasen Thathiah and eNCA Camera Operator Nkanyiso Mdlalose were there, reporting from the frontlines. In the video below, they both reflect on the life-changing experience four years on. A Reporter's Reflection of The July 2021 Unrest – Four Years On By Dasen Thathiah The term "unrest" is such a misnomer. Sure, for anyone who wasn't there, it works. A public disturbance? Riots? Maybe a failed insurrection? For those of us who lived through it - on the frontlines - it was a catastrophic nightmare. The first eight days overflowed with anxiety, fear, sadness, anger, trepidation. The recipe for a lifetime of unspoken trauma. The province that raised us was set alight. Its infrastructure abused, the fragile economy gang-raped. People who lived alongside me mutated into savages. Others became statistics, no longer referred to by name, but only as a collective. "More than 350 died," we say. Yet the ones who orchestrated it are most likely still alive and well. But we don't just grieve for the departed. We mourn the jobs lost, the livelihoods shattered, the businesses buried. About ten percent of the murders took place in a north Durban township. The nature of the violence birthed the term "Phoenix Massacre." Its impact pushed race relations decades back. A minority of barbarians in a usually warm, close-knit community turned on their long-time neighbours in the most brutal way. Both "sides" paid with their loved ones, casualties of a racial war. This wasn't just a story to us. It was our lived experience. We saw the bodies strewn across the roadway. We know the helplessness of not being able to save the ones taking their last breaths. We felt the racism directed at us. And propagandists capitalised on the confusion that reigned. People who look like me wanted someone to blame for the backlash stemming from the actions of a small group of racist murderers. So, one propagandist offered me to them as a virtual sacrifice on Facebook. It worked. I was labelled a traitor, threatened, ostracised, blamed and even became the subject of a campaign led by some to get me fired. Just for telling the truth; for standing up when it was easier to sit down. A few days later, another propagandist on Twitter (X) doctored a video clip to create a new narrative. "Journalist by day, vigilante killing black people at night," they said. So, while the city burned around me, I had my own fires to extinguish. Fake news threatened to reduce my career to ashes. I was fortunate to navigate this space with a colleague who I regard as a dear friend; a brother. Together, Nkanyiso and I - a pair that had seen the ugliest side of people during the unrest - helped each other stay true to our beliefs. Armed with an eNCA camera and a microphone, we showed you not just the bad, but the inspirational. We listened as the voices of good South Africans grew loud enough to eventually overpower the evil ones. We introduced you to the community heroes, who outnumbered the racist vigilantes. We held the government to account for its failures. Simply put, we followed the truth even when the path was deserted. Four years later, we reflect on an unbelievable time that should never be forgotten. It should serve as a reminder of exactly what we are not as South Africans.

DA claims President Ramaphosa misled the public on Mcebisi Jonas's US visa rejection
DA claims President Ramaphosa misled the public on Mcebisi Jonas's US visa rejection

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

DA claims President Ramaphosa misled the public on Mcebisi Jonas's US visa rejection

Mcebisi Jonas, MTN chairman, was appointed by President Cyril Ramaphosa as the country's Special Envoy to the US. Image: Supplied The Democratic Alliance (DA) has alleged that President Cyril Ramaphosa's special envoy to the United States, Mcebisi Jonas, was rejected by Washington in May 2025. Jonas was appointed by Ramaphosa to the role of special envoy after the expulsion of former ambassador Ebrahim Rasool from Washington earlier this year, following Rasool's incendiary comments labelling US President Donald Trump a leader of a global white supremacist movement. The DA claims that Jonas's application for a diplomatic visa was denied, with the US formally communicating to the Presidency that Jonas was not recognised as the country's official representative. Despite these revelations, Ramaphosa has remained publicly silent, leading the DA to accuse the administration of misleading the public regarding Jonas's position and suitability. "Despite being fully aware that Jonas had been denied a diplomatic visa by the US and would not be formally received, President Ramaphosa doubled down on national TV, declaring Mcebisi Jonas is still my North American envoy and has done good work. "...When confronted with the DA's announcement that it would submit a Promotion of Access to Information (PAIA) request detailing Jonas' official engagements over the past 90 days, instead of coming clean with the truth, Presidential spokesperson Vincent Magwenya lashed out on social media, accusing the DA of 'encroaching' on the President's powers. "The Presidency owes South Africans a full and honest explanation as to how it can justify having doubled down on the appointment of a rapporteur whose credentials have been officially rejected by the host government,'' said the DA. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Jonas was notably absent during the high-profile meeting between Ramaphosa and Trump in May. In response, the presidency released a statement that aimed to clarify his absence, affirming that both Jonas's visa and credentials were indeed valid. However, speculation regarding Jonas's absence arose after reports suggested that the Trump administration raised concerns over past remarks he made, in which he reportedly labelled Trump 'a racist, a homophobe, and a narcissistic right-winger.' The DA added that with no recognised representative currently championing South African interests in the US, the economy stands to lose billions of rands when the tariffs come into effect. "The DA will be writing to the Speaker of Parliament to request an urgent parliamentary briefing from the Presidency on the failed Jonas appointment. The DA will take all necessary steps to demand the immediate appointment of a credible envoy, capable of repairing the immense damage that has now been done," said the party. IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel

Labour law expert challenges Police Minister Mchunu's paid leave
Labour law expert challenges Police Minister Mchunu's paid leave

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

Labour law expert challenges Police Minister Mchunu's paid leave

A labour law expert says Police Minister Senzo Mchunu's paid leave may be unconstitutional and may constitute a wasteful expenditure. Image: Jacques Naude / Independent Newspapers A labour law expert, Advocate Bo Dlamini, said President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to place the embattled Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on paid leave may be unconstitutional and wasteful. The expert was weighing in on a continued public debate on whether the president did not violate the Constitution when giving a minister a leave of absence instead of a suspension. Dlamini said since ministers are not appointed under Public Service Act, it is unclear where the president based his decision to give Mchunu a leave of absence, saying it was even worse that the leave may take up to a year, which is unusual for ministers and it can constitute a wasteful expenditure. He further stated that although ministers' appointments are not regulated by labour laws, the president, in a supervisor-subordinate relationship, could have suspended the minister instead of granting him a leave. 'Ramaphosa was supposed to suspend Mr Mchunu and appoint an independent tribunal to investigate the two violations of the Constitution within three months and make a report with recommendations,' said Dlamini. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ He said Mchunu may have violated Section 207 of the Constitution, which deals with roles of the National Commissioners and Provincial Commissioners in controlling and managing the SAPS, adding that this clause clearly forbids Mchunu from disbanding the political task team unit which could have been done by the National Police Commissioner, Lieutenant-General Fannie Masemola. Dlamini further stated that there is another piece of prima facie evidence that Mchunu lied in Parliament by stating that he didn't know Brown Mogotsi, but later on admitted knowing only as a "comrade". On a possible wasteful expenditure, Dlamini said another minister should have been appointed to act in Mchunu's place to protect taxpayers' money instead of appointing a new acting minister, Firoz Cachalia, who will enjoy added benefits while Mchunu enjoys the same perks sitting at home. With the Police Ministry already bloated with two deputy ministers and costing taxpayers millions of rand in salaries and ministerial perks, there has been a public outcry over the president's decision to place Mchunu on a long paid leave and appointing acting Minister outside the Cabinet. This means taxpayers will foot the bill for four political heads of one department. Opposition parties also questioned the president's decision to appoint commissions instead of utilising the existing crime fighting state institutions such as the Special Investigations Unit. Addressing the nation on Sunday, the president defended his decision to appoint a non-Cabinet member to act by quoting Section 91(3)(c) of the Constitution, which allows the president to appoint not more than two ministers outside the National Assembly. However, the same Section is silent on appointing acting minister outside the National Assembly. Deputy ministers could not also be appointed to act since they are not part of the Cabinet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store