One of Europe's cheapest holiday destinations to enter the Eurozone next year – here's what it means for your trip
A NEW country is set to join the eurozone next year - and it might not be good new for Brits.
The European Commission has given Bulgaria the green light to join the eurozone next year.
3
Bulgaria joined the European Union back in 2007 and it will become the 21st country to adopt the euro on January 1, 2026.
This means Brits will eventually have to use up any of their old currency, which is the Bulgarian lev.
However, once the euro is in place in Bulgaria - it will be easier for Brits to use up leftover change from a previous trips to other euro-accepting countries.
According to Eamonn Turley, a financial specialist at Multi Quote Time: "Currently, Brits travelling to Bulgaria are required to exchange their pounds sterling for Bulgarian levs, which typically involves fees and exchange rates that can add uncertainty and cost to their holiday plans.
"Once Bulgaria adopts the euro, British travellers will have the convenience of spending the same currency that they would if they were travelling to most other popular European destinations like Spain, France, or Italy.
"The majority of Britons spend debit or credit cards when abroad, and with the euro, there is less foreign transaction fees or dynamic currency conversion fees, which can be hidden and bring added cost."
Currently for each pound Brits can get 2.32 levs, but each pound will give Brits €1.19 - meaning that Brits get more levs for their money than euros.
Eamonn also explained how Bulgaria has traditionally had a lower living standard that other Western European countries.
This means that tourists have often flocked there for the country's cheap holidays.
"When other Eastern European countries like Estonia and Lithuania joined the Eurozone, there was a bit of price inflation that came with the stronger currency and greater economic integration," added Eamonn.
Trade Sunny Beach in Bulgaria for a little-known spot praised by locals
"Britons may find that while currency exchange hassles disappear, the prices of meals, hotels, and services may gradually rise."
However, there are also positives to the news as he says that stronger economic stability can lead to "improved transport links, more quality hotels, and improved tourist facilities, making Bulgaria an even more competitive holiday destination".
He finished by saying: "From my financial perspective, this integration within the eurozone will render Bulgaria a more desirable destination for British tourists wanting convenience and safety with their spending, with perhaps the medium to long-term gain of enhanced tourism service and infrastructure."
However, many Bulgarians remain skeptical and fear a rise in prices during the switch - which has happened in other countries that joined over the past decade.
Croatia adopted the euro on January 1, 2023, becoming the 20th member state of the eurozone.
The country was considered relatively cheap but has become more expensive over the past two decades.
3
According to a European Central Bank blog: "the impact of the euro changeover on consumer prices in Croatia has so far been relatively small".
It added: "Continued monitoring is essential.
"Croatia's experience is an important lesson for other EU Member States adopting the euro, as it confirms that the economic costs arising from the effect of the changeover on inflation are limited and of a one-off nature."
The same could be seen with Bulgaria's transition.
There are also several reasons why Brits should swap Spanish holidays for five destinations in stunning European country – with cheap pints & flights.
Plus, inside bargain holiday hotspot with cheap booze and wild sex games that's Europe's new party central for Brits.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Charity donors' anger over 'tip traps' on fundraising websites
Three in four adults are 'frustrated' with the 'tip trap' set by some fundraising websites, fresh research reveals. Some 76 per cent of those polled by advisory firm Strand Partners are annoyed at the way tips are collected on online fundraising platforms and are calling for the Government to tackle the practice. Fundraising websites act as a middleman between charities or fundraisers and donors, making donations to good causes simple. But many now automatically add a 'tip' on to the donation amount, which goes straight to the platform – and not the charitable cause. It's catching out many generous donors, who end up frustrated after unintentionally paying the automatic charges. When a donor reaches the checkout stage of the fundraising platform, the tip is shown on a sliding scale, which is automatically set at 17 per cent on popular website JustGiving. This means on a £50 donation, an £8.50 fee is automatically added. Donors can change or opt out of these tips, which go directly to the platforms, but only if they spot them – and work out how to reduce them to £0. There are two higher options – at 19 and 20 per cent – and two lower options – 12.5 and 15 per cent. However, the sliding scale doesn't allow donors to reduce the tip to £0, as they must instead manually enter this by clicking an 'enter custom amount' button. Almost two thirds of Britons want it to be easier to remove tip options when donating online, Strand Partners found. Scores of annoyed users have vented their frustration on social media and review websites. One user says 'any tip should be opt in, not opt out', while another says they were 'disgusted' to find a donation had been automatically added. One review of JustGiving says: 'What an insult. I did not want to leave them a tip.' If you leave an unintended tip, you can ask the fundraising platform you used if you can get a refund. It's not just donors who are feeling frustrated. The research comes as MPs are piling pressure on the Government about the sliding tipping scales. Cross-party MPs including Annaliese Dodds, MP for Oxford , and Saqib Bhatti, MP for Meriden and Solihull East, have recently pushed the Government on its plans to take any action on the sliding tipping scales. One of these MPs, Jo Platt, MP for Leigh and Atherton – and a member of the Culture Media and Sport Committee – says: 'Fundraising platforms play an important role in facilitating giving. But concealed tipping options and hidden charges are unnecessarily diverting money away from charities and misleading donors.' The tip system means websites don't levy a platform fee on donations to charities or personal fundraisers anymore in order to run their service. Instead, it is these tips which now pay for the running of the platforms. The UK Fundraising Regulator has long maintained the importance of transparency in online donations. In April, it updated its Code Of Fundraising Practice to specify that all voluntary tips must be clearly presented and on equal footing to free donation options. This is due to take effect in November. A JustGiving spokesman says: 'In order for us to continue to support fundraisers, it is essential that we operate as a for-profit organisation. In recent years we have seen growth in the volume of donations which in turn has naturally increased our profitability. 'Following consultation with some of the UK's leading charities, in 2019 we moved to a voluntary contribution model, so that as much money as possible could go directly to charities and good causes. This is now standard practice across the industry. 'Today, anyone using our platform has the option to leave a tip on top of their donation to support the running of JustGiving and this is not compulsory. 'When people do choose to add a tip, this goes towards investing in and maintaining the technology that helps our site continue to securely raise funds on a global scale, 24/7.'
Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour prepared to approve BP takeover by Shell
The Government would be prepared to approve a takeover of BP by its larger rival Shell rather than allow it to fall into overseas hands. The informal guidance in Whitehall was provided before last week's reports that Shell was in early-stage talks about a possible takeover of its weaker competitor. Shell issued a statement to the stock exchange saying that no such talks were taking place. Under Britain's strict takeover rules, it is not permitted to make an offer for six months. It would require BP to invite Shell into the process should there be a bid from other sources. City investment bankers have been floating the idea of a Shell-BP deal to create a London-based European oil champion on the scale of the American behemoths for some months. Such a transaction would inevitably require scrutiny by anti-trust authorities on both sides of the Atlantic. Shell chief executive Wael Sawan publicly has made it clear that his target is to keep returning funds to shareholders through dividends and buybacks, which have been running at £3 billion a quarter. A takeover of BP is seen at Anglo-Dutch Shell headquarters as a distraction from its core mission. Nevertheless, the company felt it necessary to take informal soundings with Ministers and officials, should the opportunity to become involved with BP arise. Shell's last major UK takeover came when it bought BG Group, once the exploration arm of British Gas, for £46 billion a decade ago. Shell, with a stock market value of £150 billion, has accelerated away from BP in recent years. With a valuation of less than half that, BP would be easy pickings for most of the big oil firms. Investor interest in big oil has increased since Donald Trump returned to the White House with his 'drill, baby, drill' mantra. The open hostility of Keir Starmer's Government to fossil fuels has also softened in recent weeks. The 12-day war between Israel and Iran has been a sharp reminder of how important oil and gas is to the UK's energy and national security. BP's low valuation of £58.8 billion makes it an attractive takeover proposition for its rivals. It has been beset by problems in the boardroom, in Russia and in the newly named Gulf of America. It carries net debt of £20 billion on its balance sheet. BP is seeking to refocus on oil and gas exploration and production after flirting with becoming a carbon-zero energy group under Bernard Looney, who left under a cloud in 2023. Current chief executive Murray Auchincloss has set a challenging target to reduce net debt to £14 billion by 2027. It is also under pressure from activist investor Elliott Capital Management to improve early returns even if it means cutting back on capital investment. However, it is not clear that the big American oil companies would be interested in buying BP. Exxon Mobil is very focused on the Americas, having struck black gold in the Guyana basin. It is also deeply involved in drilling, fracking and extraction of natural gas in the Permian Basin in Texas and New Mexico with its $64 billion (£47 billion) takeover of Pioneer Natural Resources. Rival Chevron also has been doubling down on domestic development and is pursuing a $50 billion takeover of Hess Corporation, although this has been bogged down in an arbitration process. As the former Anglo-Persian oil company founded in 1909, BP has a long history of global exploration and good relations with the British Government. It has lost none of its adventurous nature and has been developing new production and markets in Azerbaijan, India and Indonesia and is a big investor in Iraqi production. The Government will fear for the fate of such a vital flag-flier for Britain at home and abroad, and for the risk to jobs, exports and oil trading should it fall into overseas hands. A loss of its London stock exchange quotation would be a devastating blow to the UK. Some City advisers have been alerted that their services will be needed should, for any reason, the current six-month cooling-off period on a Shell-BP transaction be interrupted.
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
JEFF PRESTRIDGE: Self-interest of firms trying to get cash Isas axed
Savers are being shafted – and with the Chancellor's wish to turn us into a nation of investors (irrespective of risk and appropriateness), I fear the shafting is far from over. Especially given the eagerness of some financial groups to pour petrol on the savings pyre with self-interested calls for the savings cult to be abandoned in order to save the UK stock market. Twaddle of the highest order. Savers are suffering enough already. Latest figures from HMRC indicate they will pay £6 billion in tax on the interest they earn on accounts with banks and building societies in the current tax year – that's nearly four and a half times what they paid in the tax year ending April 5, 2022. This massive tax grab is a result of higher interest rates for most of the time since 2021. It also stems from a freezing of the annual personal savings allowance at £1,000 for basic rate taxpayers (£500 for higher rate taxpayers) since 2016. Yet Rachel from Accounts isn't finished yet. As regular readers of Wealth will know, she is lining up another attack on savers – this time, on those who use Isas to protect cash from the taxman. Although the Chancellor has yet to confirm details, the consensus view is that while the annual allowance will remain at £20,000, cash Isas will be capped at £4,000. All part of Reeves's plan to get the nation investing and fuelling economic growth. I am a big believer in the financial empowerment that long-term investing can bring. Yet, equally, I can acknowledge that there are millions of people – young and old – who don't want to take risks with the money they put aside for the future. On Friday I spoke to readers Carol Peacock and her husband Grant, who are concerned about a cash Isa crackdown. Retired and living in Cheshire, they have no wish to risk their financial security by investing. 'Why on earth would we take a gamble with our wealth at our time in life,' asks Carol. 'We want security as we enjoy our twilight years.' Carol and Grant use Isas to protect savings from tax, and say that if the cash allowance is reduced to £4,000 they will look to shove more money into Premium Bonds and maybe buy bullion coins (capital gains tax free) from The Royal Mint. 'Experts say a lower cash allowance would nudge more people into investing,' says Carol. 'But nothing will nudge us.' As for IG's call, as part of its 'save our stock market' campaign, to end all new cash Isa openings on the pretext that such accounts hinder rather than help people build wealth, Carol is left speechless. I'm not, so I will speak for Carol and millions like her. IG makes money from people taking short-term bets on the direction of markets. Such spread betting is a form of leveraged gambling where investors can end up losing a lot more than they originally bet. So for IG to present itself as a backer of long-term investing is as ridiculous as its desire to see cash Isas bashed on the head. Chancellor, ignore IG's twaddle. And hands off the Peacocks' cash Isas. Indeed, hands off ALL our cash Isas. Brace for yet MORE bank branch closures very soon A further round of bank branch closures is imminent, according to my sources close to the industry. If correct, the closures will leave yet more communities without a bank, inconveniencing those customers (both personal and business) who prefer face-to-face to online banking. Although the axing of branches is unstoppable, it is time for the regulator to look at the quality of the alternative high street services which the banks are usually obliged to fund when towns are left bankless. These services come in the form of banking hubs. These are high street branches, usually managed by the Post Office, and are funded by the banks through an organisation called Cash Access UK. Currently they provide basic banking services to both personal and business customers, with representatives from the main high street banks on hand one day a week for anyone seeking a one-on-one meeting. The Government wants at least 350 hubs up and running by 2029, and it is likely to be granted its wish as the big banks' branch closure programmes ramp up. This autumn, hub numbers should top 200. Yet in their current form they are too low grade. As Derek French, the former head of the Campaign For Community Banking Services, keeps reminding me, hubs should be more about personal service than mere access to cash. For hubs to really work, the bank representatives should be empowered to provide a broader range of services. For example, helping customers deal with the complexities of sorting out probate following the loss of a parent. Or being allowed to process the application for a new bank account. I also don't understand why hubs aren't routinely open on Saturdays to help those who are too tied up with work during the week to get to one. While the banks are reluctant to give hubs a refresh, it should be the minimum 'price' they pay for turning many high streets into banking deserts. I am told the Financial Conduct Authority is currently looking at requiring the banks to widen their hub services. I trust it follows through with decisive regulatory action. Hubs must be allowed to flourish – and not held back by cost-conscious bankers. If you have an opinion on hubs – favourable or otherwise – do let me know. Remembering passionate pension campaigner Jacquie Many people now retired owe their financial security in part to the campaigning zeal of the Pensions Action Group (PAG) during the early 2000s. Without this group's dogged determination to ensure workers should not lose their accrued (defined benefit) pension when their employer folded, we would not have in place today the Pension Protection Fund (PPF). A £32 billion scheme that pays (or will pay) the pensions of 292,000 workers whose employer went bust. A key supporter of PAG was Jacquie Humphrey, from Hemel Hempstead in Hertfordshire, who regularly demonstrated alongside husband Peter for pensions justice. Peter's future works pension was decimated when his employer, Dexion, folded – and like hundreds of others he (and Jacquie) refused to take it lying down. Jacquie was passionate, articulate, plain speaking and was great fun to be with, whether on PAG marches or at all-night vigils outside 10 Downing Street. Sadly, she died a few days ago – 11 weeks after the death of her beloved Peter. What a duo. Those with former work pensions now looked after by the PPF have a lot to thank them for.
