Canterbury Launches Ambitious Aerospace Strategy
Developed by the Canterbury Aerospace Leadership Group – a coalition of leaders from the aerospace industry, tertiary institutions, and public agencies – the Strategy outlines a bold vision for Canterbury to become a global aerospace leader by 2035. With a focus on innovation, sustainability, workforce development, and collaboration, it sets a clear path to transform the sector into a $1 billion contributor to the regional economy.
'This Strategy is a uniting document that reflects the extraordinary potential of our region,' says Ali Adams, CEO of ChristchurchNZ and Chair of the Canterbury Aerospace Leadership Group. 'It showcases how Canterbury can lead the way in solving global challenges through aerospace – from climate monitoring to sustainable propulsion – while creating high-value jobs and driving innovation that benefits our people and our planet.'
The Strategy builds on Canterbury's unique geographical advantages, established infrastructure, and active ecosystem of aerospace firms – from satellite technology and advanced aviation to autonomous systems and green fuels.
Mark Rocket, CEO of Kea Aerospace and a member of the Leadership Group, says the sector has huge momentum. 'We're standing on the launchpad of something extraordinary. With this Strategy, we are saying to the world: Canterbury is open for aerospace innovation. This is a region where bold ideas take flight – supported by a community that's collaborative, future-focused, and committed to making a global impact.'
A vision for 2035
The Strategy sets out ambitious targets for the next decade, including:
• Growing the sector to more than $1 billion in economic impact regionally • Supporting more than 1,500 FTE jobs in aerospace across Canterbury
• Achieving net-zero emissions for 50% of aerospace companies
• Reaching 20% Māori and Pacific Peoples workforce representation
• Positioning Canterbury as a hub for world-leading R&D and global investment
'By 2035, aerospace will be a cornerstone of Canterbury's prosperity,' says Adams. 'But this isn't just about growth – it's about building a future that's inclusive, sustainable, and driven by innovation.'
ABOUT CHRISTCHURCHNZ:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Pacific-Māori marriages lead new identity wave
By Aui'a Vaimaila Leatinu'u , PMN Gerardine Clifford-Lidstone Photo: Supplied Pacific people who marry outside their heritage often choose Māori partners, according to a Ministry for Pacific Peoples (MPP) investigation into this increasingly shared identity among these populations. According to MPP's ongoing Insights Briefing , which aims to deepen the understanding of Māori and Pacific identity, there are around 90,000 people who identify as both Māori and Pacific in Aotearoa. "We also found that when Pacific people marry outside of [their culture], they will marry a Māori first," Gerardine Clifford-Lidstone, the Secretary for Pacific Peoples at MPP, told Khalia Strong on Pacific Mornings . "While we're different, there's also a lot of similarities. What I've found, as I've gone around talking to various iwi leaders, is that…we want these populations to be counted. "There are so many that have said, 'my moko [grandchild] is part Tongan, part Māori, and they speak both Māori and Tongan'. Others say, 'I know someone in my whānau, who's part Cook Island, part Māori, and they want to learn their Cook Island whakapapa' because they've been raised entirely with a Māori worldview." Clifford-Lidstone emphasised the significance of understanding these identities, saying that by 2043, nearly 40 per cent of New Zealand's population will identify as Māori or Pacific, which will impact workforce demographics, cultural experiences, language, and genealogical ties moving forward. "It's been a really fun and insightful process to participate in. The consultation's open for one more week, 9 July. I really encourage people who identify as both Māori and Pacific to participate." The MPP is facing nearly $36 million in funding reductions under Budget 2025, following a previous cut of $26m. Despite this, key policy priorities have been retained, with some new initiatives introduced. For example, the Tauola Business Fund ended and the Tupu Aotearoa employment programme scaled back, while funding for the Pacific Business Trust and Pacific Business Village continues. Despite a tighter budget, Clifford-Lidstone says major initiatives continue, including the Pacific Languages Strategy, Toloa STEM scholarships, and Pacific Media Innovation funding. "Then we've got our housing initiatives. So, the building of affordable homes, a programme as part of that called Our Whare Our Fale, which is looking at 300 homes in Porirua. Then the Financial Capability Programme. You may have seen in Budget 2025 some new money for Pacific Wardens," she says. "These really wonderful mātua and volunteers from our community who support the work of a range of agencies, particularly police, engaging with the community and ensuring that we are in a safe environment. We've still got a lot of work underway there on top of our policy programme." On the legacy Dawn Raids programme, she says the funding will remain until the 2026 to 2027 period, with the Vaka of Stories project helping to capture community narratives. Clifford-Lidstone adds that they have two years to complete specific deliverables, some of which have already been completed. She acknowledges the concerns around the planned cancellation of the nationwide Census survey, emphasising the importance of evidence-based data for delivering targeted services. Clifford-Lidstone says the Pacific community's pace of growth and change is rapid. "Our data and insights team have a formal agreement with Statistics New Zealand to work together on census planning and data standards. So, we're going to be working really closely with them to keep an eye on that particular issue. "We do want our communities to be accurately reflected and to be participating. That participation will change a little bit given that it's on admin data, we need the quality of that admin data to be good. So, that's a role that we will be playing." -This article was first published by PMN .
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
On The Up: Young Hawke's Bay entrepreneur's korowai reach international markets
A young Hawke's Bay business owner's traditional and handmade Māori cloaks are flying off the shelves of her Hastings store to the four corners of the world. When Kataraina Morrell finished at Flaxmere College, she decided to follow her childhood dream of becoming a teacher and obtained her early childhood
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Opinion: regressive Super step
The debate over raising the New Zealand Superannuation (NZ Super) age has sparked widespread concern and for good reason. While proponents argue it's necessary for fiscal sustainability, evidence shows such a move would be deeply unfair and regressive, disproportionately harming vulnerable communities. This concern has been expressed to me by constituents in South Dunedin, Green Island and in Mosgiel, where a large portion of the population includes retirees and workers from physically demanding industries. Raising the superannuation age would have a particularly harsh impact. Economist Craig Renney highlights the human cost behind the numbers. Raising the super age to 67 would mainly benefit wealthier, predominantly Pākehā New Zealanders, who hold the largest KiwiSaver balances and accumulated wealth. In contrast, Māori, Pasifika, and those in physically demanding, lower-paid jobs — with fewer savings— would suffer the most. The disparity is stark: a Pākehā male might lose about 15% of expected superannuation, but a Māori male, facing shorter life expectancy, could lose 25%. This is not just a financial issue but one of equity and social justice, as raising the retirement age would worsen inequalities by penalising those who have worked hardest and lived shortest. Much of the talk about NZ Super's "unaffordability" is overstated. Treasury data shows we currently spend about 4.4% of GDP on superannuation, much less than countries like Germany (10%), France (13.4%), or the OECD average (7.7%). Even with an ageing population, projections suggest only a modest increase of about 1% of GDP by 2050. This indicates no fiscal crisis demanding drastic cuts or raising the super age. Instead, it reflects a manageable cost aligned with the commitment to dignified retirements for all New Zealanders. NZ Super is more than a payment; it's a social insurance policy preserving dignity and choice for seniors. While means-testing might seem appealing, it introduces inefficiencies and administrative burdens, especially as seniors' needs grow more complex. Universal superannuation effectively addresses rising pensioner poverty, soaring housing costs and the reality that many seniors rent or struggle with energy bills. Targeted support risks missing those in need or arriving too late. Te Pāti Māori's call to lower the super age for Māori reflects real disparities in life expectancy and work conditions. Although Labour opposes different super ages by ethnicity, raising the age would disproportionately harm Māori and Pasifika communities. Acknowledging these disparities is essential to crafting policies that reduce inequality. Raising NZ Super's age is a regressive policy that would deepen inequality and hurt the most vulnerable. As a society, we must decide whether to support seniors who have contributed throughout their lives or penalise them for circumstances beyond their control. This debate must ensure NZ Super remains a cornerstone of social justice.
