logo
Economics or convenience: Debate simmers over opening day of Pa.'s rifle deer season

Economics or convenience: Debate simmers over opening day of Pa.'s rifle deer season

Yahoo24-02-2025
A white-tailed deer buck. (Pennsylvania Game Commission)
The first Monday after Thanksgiving for decades was treated as an unofficial holiday in Pennsylvania, as hunters took to the fields and woods for the first day of deer rifle season.
Schools would close and rural communities would see an influx of orange-clad men, women and children in their restaurants, convenience stores and other businesses in the weekend leading up to opening day.
But for the last six seasons, opening day has been held on a Saturday — a move that remains fiercely debated amongst the commonwealth's hunters.
'This is a decision that has undoubtedly sparked passionate debate, but it's also a decision that prioritizes participation, accessibility and the long term sustainability of hunting in the commonwealth,' said Steve Smith, executive director of the Pennsylvania Game Commission, during a meeting earlier this month of the House Game and Fisheries committee.
In 2019, the Pennsylvania Game Commission voted 5-3 to move the opening day to the first Saturday after Thanksgiving.
Smith said the tradition of the Monday opening day 'thrived' for years, but cited a decline in the number of hunters over decades as a reason to move the opening day. He said a 'lack of free time' was the biggest reason for the decline.
'In the years since then, younger hunters in particular have benefited from this change,' Smith said. He added that the move to a Saturday makes it easier for hunters to participate because they don't have to take paid leave for missing work on a Monday.
In 2021, a survey conducted on behalf of the Game Commission showed 60% of hunters supported starting the season on a Saturday, while 27% opposed, and 13% had no preference. Smith described the results as a significant shift compared to previous years' surveys, before the change was made.
'The Saturday opener is more than a scheduling change. It's a commitment to Pennsylvania's hunters, wildlife and the future of conservation,' he said.
But, not everyone on hand at the state House Game and Fisheries Committee hearing saw it that way. Some said they would like to return to a Monday start date.
Jim Daley, who served as a board member on the state Game Commission until 2019, said he suggested the change to Saturday, citing concerns about the decline in the number of hunters in Pennsylvania. But he noted that, during the 2019 public comment period, 82% of the 1,152 responses opposed the proposed change.
Following the move, Daley said there have been 'a lot of economic losses for rural and retail establishments,' citing the day being on the holiday weekend just after Thanksgiving. He said it disproportionately impacted older hunters and people who enjoy the Monday tradition.
Daley said the five commissioners who voted for the switch 'ignored' the concerns raised during the public comment period and it has had an 'adverse social and economic' impact. He also claimed the survey Smith cited disproportionately sampled hunters 45 and younger.
Randy Santucci, southwest regional director for the Unified Sportsmen of Pennsylvania, also told lawmakers he still doesn't like the move.
'How bad of an idea is it to put the most participated deer season opening day smack dab in the middle of the most traveled family holiday of the year?' Santucci asked.
Opponents, like Santucci, also read recent letters from members of chambers of commerce from across the state, highlighting claims that it has had a negative impact on rural businesses. According to one submitted by Julie Henry from the Wellsboro Area Chamber of Commerce, the change to a Saturday opening day has resulted in profits decreasing in excess of 65% for rural businesses.
Some lawmakers are moving to reinstate the traditional start date. House Bill 70, sponsored by state Rep. Brian Smith (R-Jefferson), would return the opening day to the Monday after Thanksgiving. State Sen. Lisa Boscola (D-Northampton) backs similar legislation in the Senate.
Rep. Smith said a majority of the fellow hunters he's come across want opening day to return to its traditional Monday slot, but added the impact goes deeper than just the sport.
'We're here to make decisions that affect everyone, and this decision affected everyone, not just hunters,' Rep. Smith said.
In his co-sponsorship memo, Rep. Smith said it 'is not an issue of wildlife management, it is purely cultural and economic, and thus the legislature must propose a permanent solution.'
The measure did not receive a vote in committee in the previous session and Rep. Smith said it's a matter of wait-and-see if it will receive a vote in the coming weeks and months.
State Rep. Eric Davanzo (R-Westmoreland) said he made peace with the Saturday move for the first two years, but noticed the woods were empty last year on opening day, while the community he was in held a parade.
'If we put this on a Saturday to prioritize participation, we picked the wrong Saturday,' Davanzo said. 'We picked the absolute worst day to do this.'
Davanzo also noted Penn State hosted a football game that day, which likely resulted in people choosing to attend the game instead of the start of the rifle deer season.
State Rep. Jim Haddock (D-Luzerne) described himself as a 'traditionalist,' who originally didn't like the move to Saturday, but said it has positively impacted hunting. He argues hunters were 'rejuvenated' as a result and thinks it works better for hunters who typically work on Mondays.
A spokesperson for the Game Commission told the Capital-Star a deer hunter survey is conducted once every three years to measure participation on opening day. In 2016, when it was on a Monday, 80% of all deer hunters reported hunting the opening day. Three years later, the first year opening day was held on a Saturday, 73% reported going out on the opening day. In 2022, that number jumped back up to 79%.
Mike Kriner, a lobbyist representing the Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen and Conservationists, said his organization opposes the legislative effort to move opening day back to Monday. He said its members believe the Game Commission is best suited to make those decisions, not the General Assembly.
Kriner noted from 2013 through 2018, hunting license sales in Pennsylvania decreased by over 10%. Sales increased in the first year after the change to Saturday and remained flat afterwards. He noted that he was 'not directly attributing' the change alone to the issue.
In 2013-14, the Game Commission reported there were 953,027 general hunting licenses issued in the state. By 2018/19, that number dropped to 855,546 for that year. In 2023-24, the latest numbers available, the figure was at 853,440, per data submitted by the Game Commission.
The most recent annual financial report from the Game Commission shows revenues for the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2024 were $241,201,445, which was a 46.2% decrease from the prior year. Revenues from gas and oil lease royalties were down $220,949,115, which correlates with the worldwide decrease per unit of energy prices. Sales of adult nonresident hunting licenses were up $187,464 from the previous year, however revenue from adult resident hunting licenses fell $249,295 this year.
Every type of hunting licenses, contributed roughly 17% of the revenue in the fiscal year ending in June 30, 2024.
At the most recent Game Commission meeting, they voted to keep Saturday as the opening day of deer hunting season in Pennsylvania. They will meet in April for final approval.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Estranged United Conservative MLAs aim to create new party to challenge Premier Smith
Estranged United Conservative MLAs aim to create new party to challenge Premier Smith

Hamilton Spectator

time8 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Estranged United Conservative MLAs aim to create new party to challenge Premier Smith

EDMONTON - Two sitting Alberta legislature members kicked out of Premier Danielle Smith's governing United Conservative caucus seek to form a rival party to challenge her. And they plan to use a famous historical Alberta political name to do it. Peter Guthrie and Scott Sinclair announced Wednesday they aim to sign up enough signatures to resurrect the once-dominant Progressive Conservative Party. The PCs held power for more than four decades in Alberta before losing to the NDP in 2015 and then eventually merging with the rival Wildrose Party to form the current United Conservatives. Guthrie and Sinclair, both voted out of caucus earlier this year for challenging UCP policies, say Smith has lost her way, is catering to a narrow band of extremists and separatists, and that centrist conservatives need a place to park their vote. 'Can the UCP be salvaged in the end or are we seeing the decline of it now?' Guthrie said in an interview. 'We think that it's heading for its demise.' Announcing the plan on the Ryan Jespersen podcast Wednesday, Sinclair said the province's two-party system has become too divisive, and they want to galvanize support from Albertans who just want the 'meat and potatoes' of governing — like health care, highways and housing — handled. 'We believe we've woken a sleeping giant of people that don't feel like they have a home politically,' he said. Sinclair said Smith is morphing what was supposed to be a mainstream, big-tent party into a separatist one. The premier has repeatedly said she supports a sovereign Alberta within a united Canada, but her government also lowered the threshold for citizens to initiate referendum questions, including on seceding from Canada. Meanwhile, groups are planning to collect signatures for and against to force just such a vote. Guthrie told the Jespersen podcast that not only has Smith abandoned fiscal conservatism by hiking public spending on an expanding bureaucracy, she caters to separatist sentiment by saying different things to different audiences. Guthrie, a former Smith cabinet minister, estimates that one-third of the United Conservative caucus supports Alberta leaving Confederation. He's been vocal in criticizing the government's handling of a health-care contracting scandal, joining the New Democrats in calling for a public inquiry into allegations of corruption. The NDP won government in 2015 largely due to vote splitting between the Wildrose Party and the PCs in many ridings. Smith, asked about the new Guthrie-Sinclair party plan at a news conference in Calgary, reminded reporters about that. 'We saw that when the (conservative) movement splits, the NDP wins,' she said. Smith added that the UCP is enjoying popular support and is out-fundraising the NDP. 'We have two cultures that we brought together under a single umbrella, and we talk about the things that we can agree on, and we move forward with policies that get the consensus of the majority of the public,' she said. There is also a dispute over using the Progressive Conservative name. Smith said election rules prevent anyone from using the name of a legacy party of the UCP. But Elections Alberta spokesperson Michelle Gurney confirmed to The Canadian Press that the Progressive Conservative Association of Alberta name is only reserved. When a name is reserved, applicants have six months to fulfill the registration requirements or up to a year if they are granted extensions. Guthrie and Sinclair will need to gather roughly 8,800 signatures. They could also qualify to become registered if they hold three seats in the legislature — which would require another elected MLA to cross the floor. The PC name itself carries different meanings for different voters. The party of Ralph Klein and Peter Lougheed was accused of fiscal mismanagement and entitlement in its waning years. NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi quipped Wednesday that Guthrie and Sinclair are creating a 'party that says they're not corrupt by using the name of a previously corrupt party.' Nenshi added, 'As much fun as this to watch as the Opposition, it means that (Smith's) doing an even worse job of focusing on the things that Albertans really need because she's only focused on saving her own political skin.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 2, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

De Smith: Some at NFLPA thought collusion case was "waste of time"
De Smith: Some at NFLPA thought collusion case was "waste of time"

NBC Sports

time8 hours ago

  • NBC Sports

De Smith: Some at NFLPA thought collusion case was "waste of time"

The story of the collusion ruling is slowly dying on the vine, undoubtedly to the delight of the NFL and the NFL Players Association. It's dying because the people who cover the NFL aren't willing or able to advance the story. (It's unclear whether they're even trying.) Despite no new reporting, the story of last week received a mild jolt of adrenaline from former executive director DeMaurice Smith's upcoming book. Via Daniel Kaplan of Smith's book (Turf Wars) addresses the collusion case, which was filed when Smith was still in the job. 'There were people inside our building who thought it was a waste of time, but internally, our office had evidence of collusion, including hearing from multiple sources that the league and teams were discussing their avoidance of fully guaranteed contracts,' Smith writes. The NFLPA proved that the NFL encouraged teams to collude regarding guaranteed contracts, with clear evidence of internal communications aimed at getting teams to hold the line following the Deshaun Watson contract. And the ruling contains plenty of evidence of actual collusion, even if the arbitrator chose to ignore it. Still, the story goes nowhere if there are no developments. And there will be no developments if the people who receive paychecks to cover the NFL take steps to preserve those paychecks by tiptoeing around something that could piss off the league and/or the union.

Democrat calls Murkowski ‘cheap date' over whaling tax carve-out
Democrat calls Murkowski ‘cheap date' over whaling tax carve-out

The Hill

timea day ago

  • The Hill

Democrat calls Murkowski ‘cheap date' over whaling tax carve-out

Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) quipped that Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) was a 'cheap date' for voting for President Trump's giant tax and spending package, seemingly for a tax break for fishermen, during a House Rules Committee hearing on Tuesday. The comment came after Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) asked House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.) about a new tax break on whalers and fishermen. It was one of many Alaska-specific items that were added to the bill in the final weeks. 'Are you talking about allowing someone who uses a harpoon to deduct the cost of that harpoon? That's correct, that's included,' Smith responded. 'It's a business expense.' 'It's a new tax break,' Neguse interrupted. 'It's a business expense that was capped at 10,000 dollars and now they can deduct it,' Smith continued. 'Up to $50,000, right?' Neguse added, which Smith confirmed. 'Why was that added? I think we all know, right?' Neguse asked while smiling, seemingly referring to Murkowski, who was initially a 'no' on the bill but flipped after grueling last-minute negotiations. She sealed the deal as a crucial 50th vote for Republicans. 'You'd have to talk to the senators,' Smith responded. McGovern, a ranking member of the House Rules Committee, later interrupted Neguse to ask if that addition to the bill was 'all it took' for Republicans to get a 'yes' from Murkowski. 'Is that all it took?' McGovern asked Neguse. 'I'm not sure,' Neguse responded. 'Boy, she's a cheap date,' McGovern said before Neguse continued questioning Smith. The bill, which passed in the Senate on Tuesday and now heads to the House, allows a tax exemption for fishers from western Alaska villages and a separate provision that gives some whaling captains in the state the ability to deduct $50,000 of their expenses, a fivefold increase. Murkowski said on Tuesday that the process that led her to vote for the bill was 'agonizing,' noting that she hopes more will be done to improve the bill. She also said she 'struggled mightily' with the potential impact of cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) on vulnerable populations. 'This is probably the most difficult and agonizing legislative 24-hour period that I have encountered, and I've been here quite a while and you know I've got a few battle scars underneath me,' Murkowski told reporters.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store