Why Novo Nordisk Stock Imploded This Week
Novo Nordisk shares dropped after slashing full-year sales guidance, primarily due to weakening sales of its blockbuster GLP-1 drugs, Ozempic and Wegovy.
Competition from "compounders" marketing tailored versions of GLP-1 treatments is putting pressure on drug sales.
Despite short-term challenges, Novo stock trades at one of its lowest P/E ratios in the last 30 years.
10 stocks we like better than Novo Nordisk ›
Shares of Novo Nordisk (NYSE: NVO) are falling this week, down 33% as of 3:27 p.m. ET on Friday. The drop comes as the S&P 500 lost 2.4%, and the Nasdaq-100 lost 2.2%. The Danish pharmaceutical giant's stock was hit after it released disappointing earnings showing that sales of its blockbuster GLP-1 drugs remain weaker than hoped.
Novo Nordisk disappoints
Novo Nordisk was forced to cut guidance for its top-line sales, driven primarily by lagging sales of its GLP-1 drugs, Ozempic and Wegovy. The company says it now expects full-year sales growth of 8% to 14%, down significantly from its earlier range of 13% to 21%. Its guidance for operating profit was cut as well, from between 16% and 24% to between 10% and 16%.
Wegovy and Ozempic have been absolute blockbusters for the company, propelling Novo to the most valuable company in Europe before competition from "compounders" -- companies that market their own tailor-made versions using its active ingredients -- impacted sales.
Is this a buying opportunity?
I think Novo does have significant issues it must overcome, but I think these fears are overblown. For long-term investors, this seems like a great time to buy in. The company's stock is trading at one of its lowest price-to-earnings ratios (P/E) in nearly 30 years and the lowest in at least five years. This seems like an opportunity to me.
Should you invest $1,000 in Novo Nordisk right now?
Before you buy stock in Novo Nordisk, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Novo Nordisk wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $625,254!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,090,257!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,036% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025
Johnny Rice has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Novo Nordisk. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Why Novo Nordisk Stock Imploded This Week was originally published by The Motley Fool
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Palantir Expands AI Reach With New Military and Nuclear Projects
July 31 - Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ:PLTR) continues to expand its role in artificial intelligence solutions for both government and commercial clients, building momentum ahead of its August 4, 2025 earnings release. Analysts expect positive results, with recent estimates showing multiple upward revisions. The company's Warp Speed platform gained traction during the second quarter after a new partnership with BlueForge Alliance to launch Warp Speed for Warships. This initiative, funded by the U.S. Navy's Maritime Industrial Base Program, supports faster warship production and broader fleet modernization. The program aligns with White House efforts to strengthen U.S. shipbuilding capacity against global competitors. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with FRA:HE9. Palantir's Maven Smart Systems also received a boost as the U.S. Department of Defense increased the spending ceiling to $1.3 billion through 2029, up from $480 million in June. The system now supports more than 20,000 military personnel across operational networks. Moreover, Palantir has collaborated with Accenture Federal Services in the civilian sector to design AI-based tools to aid the federal agencies in the area of supply chain, finance, and integration of data. Individually, the company is also seeking business avenues in the nuclear sector in partnership with the Nuclear Company to implement an AI system in enhancing predictability of the construction of reactors. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Drugmakers are pouring billions of dollars into new US manufacturing. It still won't achieve all of Trump's tariff goals
Ever since President Donald Trump started promising to slap tariffs on pharmaceutical imports, drugmakers have unveiled a flurry of commitments to build or expand US manufacturing operations in the coming years. AstraZeneca is investing $50 billion to expand its drug manufacturing in the US. Johnson & Johnson is pouring $55 billion into domestic production and research. And Eli Lilly said it will spend $27 billion to build four new manufacturing plants here. In total, the planned investments exceed $250 billion, according to two industry analysts. Trump is wielding the threat of tariffs to get drugmakers to increase their domestic production, which he says will strengthen national security. He's also pushing pharmaceutical companies to reduce their prices, one of his longstanding goals. But the pharma companies' moves are not expected to decrease the United States' reliance on foreign sources for key pharmaceutical ingredients and drugs, experts say. Nor are they likely to result in lower costs for American consumers. Still, the White House regularly touts the steady drumbeat of commitments as proof Trump's strategy is working. 'Another win for American manufacturing. @AstraZeneca's $50 billion pledge to expand U.S. manufacturing and R&D shows our tariff strategy at work,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick posted on X in late July. 'The investment will bring high-paying jobs to Virginia, Indiana, Texas, and across the country while hardening our supply chains. Reshoring pharma production is one of our top priorities.' But it's just not that simple. Complex supply chain The pharmaceutical industry is a global web, with ingredients and finished drugs being manufactured in a multitude of locations around the world. The economics of brand name and generic drug manufacturing vary widely, and the price that the US consumer ultimately pays is determined by multiple players and factors. Both American and foreign drugmakers already produce many medications in the US and have been investing in their operations here for years. The prospect of tariffs certainly has prompted some brand-name manufacturers to shift more production to the US. However, some of the investments were already in the works before Trump took office, and other commitments may never be fulfilled, analysts say. Johnson & Johnson's $55 billion investment announcement in March, for instance, included the building of a North Carolina facility that was originally unveiled in October. 'They are just reiterating it because they're probably trying to make sure that the president is aware that they have manufacturing here and that they are listening to him,' Evan Seigerman, senior biopharma analyst at BMO Capital Markets, said of pharmaceutical companies. 'They're playing ball. It's all about the deal with President Trump.' Generic drugmakers, however, are not making the same types of commitments – largely because they can't afford to, as their profit margins are much thinner. While certain generic medicines are made in the United States, including sterile injectable drugs, oral liquid medications and controlled substances, the majority of drugs in pill or capsule form are produced abroad, primarily in India. But two generic drug manufacturers have announced domestic investments in recent months, according to the Association for Accessible Medicines, a trade group for the generic and biosimilar drug industries. Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA said it would invest $1 billion by 2030 to expand its manufacturing and research and development capabilities in several US locations, while Amphastar Pharmaceuticals said it would quadruple its production in the next three to five years. They both manufacture sterile injectable drugs, among other products. Other companies are more hesitant. 'We're not sure the market will support it if we build it,' said John Murphy III, the industry association's CEO, noting that reimbursements are so low that companies may not get returns on their investments. Much of the national security concerns center on generic drugs, which account for more than 90% of US prescriptions and are also critical to medicine administered in hospitals and doctors' offices. A sizeable share of the supply chain for certain generic medications comes from abroad and could be disrupted during geopolitical crises, a risk that's been repeatedly flagged by a bipartisan group of senators. Blanket tariffs, however, won't spur more domestic manufacturing of these drugs, said Erin Fox, associate chief pharmacy officer at the University of Utah Health. 'It's highly, highly unlikely we will see generic production expand in the US without significant incentives for these companies,' she said. 'If we do move production on some drugs to the US because we want to be sure from a national security standpoint, that's fine, but that's going to cost money.' Just what tariffs the pharmaceutical industry will face – and on which products from which countries – remain to be seen. The Trump administration is in the midst of negotiating various trade deals and has yet to release the findings of its investigation into national security implications of drug imports, which is expected to set the stage for tariffs on the industry. In late July, Trump unveiled the framework of a deal with the European Union, which calls for a 15% tariff on pharmaceutical imports – though some generic drugs could be exempt. Trump had been signaling in recent weeks that he would soon announce drug tariffs of up to 200%, but that he would give drugmakers a year or so to expand their domestic production before the full amount kicks in. That would be enough time for some companies to expand existing operations, though building new facilities could take three to five years, experts said. Even so, it's difficult for the manufacturers to make significant longer-term investment decisions amid the uncertainty of both the tariffs and future presidential administrations. Cost considerations Increasing their domestic manufacturing will help brand name drug companies escape tariffs, though they may have to pay some levies if they import pharmaceutical ingredients from other countries. Still, making more drugs in the US doesn't mean that the products will be any cheaper for patients, experts say. For one thing, the cost of production is typically higher in the US, said Stephen Farrelly, ING's global health care sector lead. Plus, the prices that consumers pay are largely governed by the nation's complex health system, which includes manufacturers, insurers and pharmacy benefit managers, known as PBMs. So whether Americans get a break on the high cost of their prescriptions will also depend on whether the president can achieve his other initiatives, including bringing US prices more in line with those in Europe and reforming the PBM industry, he said. While brand name manufacturers have more wiggle room to absorb some of the increased expenses, many experts believe they will pass along at least some of the added burden to consumers – who could eventually feel it in their out-of-pocket cost at the pharmacy counter or in their monthly insurance premiums. As for generic medicine, shifting more manufacturing to the US would entail higher production costs, which these companies could not afford to cover. Tariffs would be more likely to prompt these drugmakers to pull out of the US market, exacerbating shortages. 'At a time when the administration is clearly looking to still keep the cost down, we don't see a wholesale redistribution of generic capacity towards the US anytime soon,' Farrelly said. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
iRhythm Technologies Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: Beats Expectations
iRhythm Technologies (NASDAQ:IRTC) Second Quarter 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: US$186.7m (up 26% from 2Q 2024). Net loss: US$14.2m (loss narrowed by 29% from 2Q 2024). US$0.44 loss per share (improved from US$0.65 loss in 2Q 2024). We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period iRhythm Technologies Revenues and Earnings Beat Expectations Revenue exceeded analyst estimates by 7.3%. Earnings per share (EPS) also surpassed analyst estimates by 16%. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 14% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 8.2% growth forecast for the Medical Equipment industry in the US. Performance of the American Medical Equipment industry. The company's shares are up 23% from a week ago. Risk Analysis It's still necessary to consider the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with iRhythm Technologies, and understanding this should be part of your investment process. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
