How is Tesla expected to remotely control its robotaxis, and what are its limitations?
Remote access and control – known in the industry as 'teleoperation' – is used in varying degrees by the handful of robotaxi startups operating around the globe. The technology has clear advantages and important limitations.
Here are some details of how it works:
Teleoperation is the control of machines by humans in a different location, usually over a wireless network.
It is used to train robots to operate autonomously, monitor their autonomous activity, and take over when required.
The global robotaxi industry is still in test mode, as companies deploy the vehicles in limited geographic areas and continually adjust the artificial intelligence software that controls them. Teleoperation is often used to intervene when a vehicle is unsure of what to do.
Alphabet's Waymo, for example, has a team of human 'fleet response' agents who respond to questions from the Waymo Driver – its bot.
'Much like phone-a-friend, when the Waymo vehicle encounters a particular situation on the road, the autonomous driver can reach out to a human fleet response agent for additional information,' Waymo said in a blog post last year.
Former Waymo CEO John Krafcik told Reuters, 'the cars aren't being actively monitored,' adding that the software is 'the ultimate decision-maker.'
A Waymo video shows a car asking a remote operator whether a street with emergency response vehicles is open to traffic. When the human says yes, the vehicle proceeds.
In contrast, other companies, such as Baidu's Apollo Go in China, have used fully remote backup drivers who can step in to virtually drive the vehicles. Baidu declined to comment.
Driving vehicles remotely on public roads has a major potential problem: it relies on cellular data connections that can drop or operate with a lag, disconnecting the vehicle from the remote driver in dangerous situations.
Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and autonomous-vehicle safety expert, said that approach could work for a small test deployment of 10 vehicles, such as Tesla's initial effort in Austin, but he called teleoperation 'inherently unreliable technology.'
'Eventually you will lose connection at exactly the worst time,' he said. 'If they've done their homework, this won't ever happen for 10 cars. With a million cars, it's going to happen every day.'
Former Waymo CEO Krafcik agreed, adding that the time delay in cell signal makes remote driving 'very risky.'
On the other hand, relying on the vehicle to reach out for help and allowing the vehicle to be the decision-maker are risky as well, Koopman said, as it does not guarantee the vehicle will make the right decision.
Waymo declined to comment on the limitations of its approach.
Koopman also noted there are limits to how many vehicles one person can safely monitor.
A group of Democratic Texas lawmakers asked Tesla on Wednesday to delay its robotaxi launch until September, when a new autonomous-driving law is scheduled to take effect. The Austin-area lawmakers said in a letter that delaying the launch 'is in the best interest of both public safety and building public trust in Tesla's operations.'
Musk for years has promised, without delivering, that its Full Self-Driving (Supervised) advanced driver assistance software would graduate to completely self-driving and control robotaxis. This year, he said Tesla would roll out a paid service in Austin underpinned by an 'unsupervised' version of the software.
'Teslas will be in the wild, with no one in them, in June, in Austin,' Musk told analysts and investors in January. In May, he told CNBC that the robotaxi would only operate in parts of Austin that are safe for it, would avoid difficult intersections, and would use humans to monitor the vehicles.
What those teleoperators will do is not clear.
For years inside Tesla, company executives have expected to use teleoperators who could take over in case of trouble, said one person familiar with the matter. For instance, if a robotaxi were stuck in a crowded pedestrian area and confused about what to do next, a human teleoperator could take over and guide it, the source said.
Tesla advertised for teleoperation positions, saying the company needs the ability to 'access and control' autonomous vehicles and humanoid robots remotely. Such employees can 'remotely perform complex and intricate tasks,' it said in the advertisements.
Tesla did not respond to a request for comment.
'We are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift,' Musk said in a post on X last week while providing a tentative launch date of June 22.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Israel launches Dror-1 satellite: SpaceX Falcon 9 powers mission; digital payload onboard
Dror-1 satellite launched (Image credits: Israel War Room) Israel's new national communications satellite, Dror-1, was successfully launched into space early Sunday morning from Elon Musk 's SpaceX launch facility in Florida. The Dror-1 satellite, developed by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), weighs 4.5 tons, spans 17.8 meters, and is equipped with the largest transmission and reception antennas ever built in Israel, according to Israel National News. It is the first in a new line of satellites that will replace the older Amos series, and is designed to fully meet Israel's communication needs for the next 15 years. According to IAI, Dror-1 is among the most advanced communication satellites in the world, built almost entirely with Israeli-made technologies. It includes a digital communication payload and 'smartphone in space' features that allow for agile and adaptable communication throughout its operational life, as per Sat News. The satellite was carried into orbit on SpaceX Falcon 9 two-stage rocket. The booster, making its 13th flight, successfully returned to Earth, landing on a drone ship in the Atlantic Ocean, avoiding a sonic boom over Florida. The second stage continued to push the satellite into a geostationary transfer orbit (GTO), a path that will allow Dror-1 to reach a fixed position relative to Earth. SpaceX referred to the launch as 'Commercial GTO 1,' a naming convention it has not previously used. This mission marks SpaceX's 519th launch overall, and its 85th of 2025. In the coming days, Dror-1 will open its solar panels and antennas and begin maneuvering into its final geostationary orbit, a process expected to take about two weeks. IAI described the mission as a milestone for Israel's space capabilities, demonstrating its ability to develop and deploy cutting-edge satellite technology using mostly local resources.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
New tax break for auto loans could save some buyers thousands of dollars. But will it boost sales?
Millions of people receive a federal tax deduction for the interest they pay on home loans. Under President Donald Trump's new tax-cut law, many people for the first time also could claim a tax deduction for interest on their vehicle loans. The new tax break will be available even to people who don't itemize deductions. But there are some caveats that could limit its reach. The vehicles must be new, not used. They must be assembled in the U.S. And the loans must be issued no sooner than this year, to list just a few qualifications. Here are some things to know about the new auto loan interest tax deduction: Candidate Trump promised an auto loan interest tax break Trump pledged while campaigning last year to make interest on car loans tax-deductible. He said it would make car ownership more affordable and "stimulate massive domestic auto production." The idea made it into the big tax-cut bill passed by Congress, which Trump signed into law July 4. The law allows taxpayers to deduct up to $10,000 of interest payments annually on loans for new American-made vehicles from 2025 through 2028. It applies to cars, motorcycles, sport utility vehicles, minivans, vans and pickup trucks weighing less than 14,000 pounds, a threshold referred to as light vehicles. But it only applies to vehicles purchased for personal use, not for fleets or commercial purposes. The tax break can be claimed starting on 2025 income tax returns. But the deduction phases out for individuals with incomes between $100,000 and $150,000 or joint taxpayers with incomes between $200,000 and $250,000. Those earning more cannot claim the tax break. Millions of buyers could benefit, but millions of others will not U.S. automobile dealers sold 15.9 million new light vehicles last year, a little over half of which were assembled in the U.S, according to Cox Automotive. It says around 60 per cent of retail sales are financed with loans. After excluding fleet and commercial vehicles and customers above the income cutoff, an estimated 3.5 million new vehicle loans could be eligible for the tax break this year, if purchasing patterns stay the same, said Jonathan Smoke, chief economist at Cox Automotive. It's the assembly plant, not the automaker's headquarters that matters The tax break applies to vehicles assembled in the U.S., no matter where the company making them is headquartered. All Tesla vehicles sold in the U.S. are assembled in this country. But so are all Acura brands, the luxury model of Japanese automaker Honda. Last year, 78 per cent of Ford vehicles sold in the U.S. were assembled in this country, according to Cox Automotive. But customers wanting the tax break will need to pay attention to specific models. While the Ford Mustang is assembled in Michigan, the Mustang Mach-E is built in Mexico. General Motors assembles all of its Cadillacs in the U.S. But just 44 per cent of its Chevrolets sold last year were assembled in the U.S., and just 14 per cent of Buicks, according to Cox Automotive. That's a lower U.S-assembled rate than Honda (60 per cent ), Toyota (52 per cent ) and Nissan (48 per cent ), which all are headquartered in Japan. Taxpayers could save hundreds of dollars a year The average new vehicle loan is about $44,000 financed over six years. Interest rates vary by customer, so the savings will, too. In general, the tax deduction will decline after the initial year, because interest payments on loans are frontloaded while principal payments grow on the back end. At a 9.3 per cent interest rate, an average new vehicle buyer could save about $2,200 on taxes over four years, Smoke said. The tax savings would be less on a loan at 6.5 per cent , which is the rate figured into calculations by the American Financial Services Association, a consumer credit industry trade group. Some people also could see a reduction in state income taxes Whereas the tax deduction for home loan interest can be claimed only by people itemizing on their tax returns, Congress wrote the deduction for auto loan interest so that it can apply to all taxpayers, including those claiming the standard deduction. On a tax form, the auto loan deduction will come before the calculation of a taxpayer's adjusted gross income. That's an important distinction, because many states use a taxpayer's federal adjusted gross income as the starting point for figuring their state income taxes. If that income figure is lower, it could reduce the state taxes owed. The verdict is out on whether the tax break will boost sales At Bowen Scarff Ford in Kent, Washington, customers started asking about the auto loan tax deduction before Congress had even taken a final vote on the tax-cut bill, said General Manager Paul Ray. So he decided to promote it on the dealer's website. A website ribbon exclaims: "CAR LOAN TAX DEDUCTION NOW AVAILABLE" while also promoting an electric vehicle tax credit that is ending soon as a result of Trump's tax-cut law. "I think it's going to help incentivize vehicle purchases through this year," Ray said. Celia Winslow, president and CEO of the American Financial Services Association, concurred: "For some people deciding - should I buy it, should I not - this could be something that tips the scale." Others remain skeptical. According to Smoke's math, the average annual tax savings is smaller than a single month's loan payment for a new vehicle. "I don't think it moves the needle on somebody on the fence of buying a new vehicle or not," Smoke said. "But I think it could influence their decision to finance that vehicle instead of paying cash or instead of leasing a vehicle."
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Elon Musk's xAI blames the code path for Grok's controversial comments
Just when you thought AI couldn't get weirder, Elon Musk's chatbot Grok decided to go full chaos mode, making headlines for all the wrong reasons. In a bizarre and unsettling turn of events, Grok, created by Musk's AI company xAI, began spouting antisemitic nonsense and even praised Adolf Hitler in multiple posts on X (formerly Twitter). Yes, that internet went into meltdown when Grok, in response to several user posts, began generating disturbingly offensive content, including calling itself 'MechaHitler' and making bigoted comments that many labelled outright hate speech. The backlash was swift, intense, and global, prompting xAI to address the situation in a lengthy statement released on the apology, xAI began by saying, 'First off, we deeply apologise for the horrific behaviour that many experienced,' acknowledging the gravity of the situation. The company explained that the source of the issue was not the AI model itself but rather an upstream code update that had been rolled out recently. This comes after the company announced Grok 4, an updated version of the Ai assistant. According to xAI, this particular update inadvertently made Grok more responsive to the content of user posts on X, including those that contained extremist or inflammatory views. The faulty code was active for roughly 16 hours, during which time Grok picked up and echoed problematic language — not because it 'believed' anything, but because it was effectively mirroring the tone and intent of what it team at xAI elaborated that the problematic behaviour stemmed from specific instructions embedded in the code. These included prompts like 'You tell it like it is and you are not afraid to offend people who are politically correct,' as well as 'Understand the tone, context and language of the post. Reflect that in your response.'Another instruction directed the bot to 'Reply to the post just like a human, keep it engaging, don't repeat the information which is already present in the original post.' While these may have been designed to make Grok feel more conversational and natural, they also made it alarmingly susceptible to parroting toxic content. In the hands of malicious users, that vulnerability became a dangerous an incident, Grok responded to a post from a user with a Jewish-sounding surname, stating that the person was 'celebrating the tragic deaths of white kids' during recent Texas floods. The bot added, 'Classic case of hate dressed as activism, and that surname? Every damn time, as they say.' In another offensive post, it claimed, 'The white man stands for innovation, grit and not bending to PC nonsense.' These statements sparked outrage, with many calling for stricter regulation and accountability around AI-generated isn't the first time Grok has been at the centre of controversy. Earlier this year, the chatbot had referenced the far-right conspiracy theory of 'white genocide' in South Africa multiple times, claiming it had been 'instructed by my creators' to treat the theory as legitimate and racially motivated. Elon Musk, who grew up in Pretoria, has himself repeated these claims in the past, despite numerous South African leaders, including President Cyril Ramaphosa, dismissing them as dangerous has since confirmed that the offending code has been removed and the entire system has been refactored to prevent similar incidents in the future. Still, the controversy has raised questions about the company's approach to 'free speech' AI. Musk has previously described Grok as a 'maximally truth-seeking' and 'anti-woke' chatbot, but critics argue that such a loosely defined philosophy leaves the door wide open to AI tools continue to evolve and integrate deeper into social platforms, Grok's meltdown may serve as a stark warning: even the smartest bots can go rogue when the rules are vague, and the oversight is loose. - Ends
