Please, Sir Keir, racing is being battered and we NEED your help before it's too late
MATT CHAPMAN Please, Sir Keir, racing is being battered and we NEED your help before it's too late
SIR KEIR, are you listening? Do you know what is going on? Has anyone talked to you?
Tax nightmares. Affordability checks. Labour peer frustrations.
1
Racing is booming at the moment with punters returning to tracks - but huge headwinds in the shape of harsh taxation lie in wait
Credit: PA
It appears racing is being battered in every direction. Who is listening? It remains hard to know.
I've written before and I'll write it again.
Considering horse racing is loved by the King and Queen downwards, it's quite extraordinary that it seems anyone who is part of the sport seemingly finds it impossible to get the ear of the Prime Minister.
But while everyone is shouting from the rooftops about the current mayhem and possible nightmares around the corner, whether those in charge of Government have any idea what is happening behind the scenes is just a guessing game.
We know Sir Keir Starmer and his wife, Victoria, like horse racing.
Remember the day after the General Election? Victoria was having a day out at the Eclipse at Sandown.
Not so long ago Sir Keir was also at Doncaster for the St Leger to watch Jan Brueghel land his victory for Aidan O'Brien.
And yet, there is every chance the Labour Government is on the verge of lumping a huge taxation on the Sport of Kings that could be the beginning of the end.
For those of you who don't know, that's because there is a current Treasury proposal to harmonise remote gambling tax rates, which could result in a raise to the rate on sports betting (including horseracing) from 15 per cent to 21 per cent.
It all comes at a time when racing attendances are up - although no doubt partly due to good weather - allowing the sport to remain as the second most watched in the country.
Above all that, though, horse racing already contributes over £4billion to the national economy and supports in the region of 85,000 jobs.
Why would you even contemplate wrecking that?
All this is going on at the same time Lord Allen continues to sit on the bench while he decides whether he wants to become BHA chairman.
Many in racing think he is sent from God to make everything all right, although as of yet I've seen nothing on paper to back that up.
That all said, everyone knows the governance needs a massive change.
We really only hear one side of the Lord Allen 'will he join or won't he join' saga.
But I'm led to believe he's put forward a proposal which basically says accept it or I walk.
I am also led to believe he wants a hefty salary for whoever he makes CEO in place of Brant Dunshea.
I can't back this up. It's just the word on the street.
If Lord Allen is the Messiah, though, you would have thought he'd have already been talking to Sir Keir and messages would be coming back to racing about the tax issue.
It's been silent as far as I am aware.
So Sir Keir. The question is simple.
Do you hear us? Do you know what is going on?
FREE BETS - GET THE BEST SIGN UP DEALS AND RACING OFFERS
Commercial content notice: Taking one of the offers featured in this article may result in a payment to The Sun. You should be aware brands pay fees to appear in the highest placements on the page. 18+. T&Cs apply. gambleaware.org.
Remember to gamble responsibly
A responsible gambler is someone who:
Establishes time and monetary limits before playing
Only gambles with money they can afford to lose
Never chases their losses
Doesn't gamble if they're upset, angry or depressed
Gamcare – www.gamcare.org.uk
Gamble Aware – www.gambleaware.org
Find our detailed guide on responsible gambling practices here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Keir Starmer accused of ignoring veterans for a year as Nuked Blood Scandal grows
Keir Starmer has been warned the Nuked Blood Scandal is growing out of control as veterans say he has ignored requests to meet them for a year The Prime Minister has been accused of ignoring the growing Nuked Blood Scandal since coming to office, with more than 50 veterans dying without justice on his watch. More than 2,000 survivors want the truth about a government programme of blood and urine testing of troops while they were being ordered to take part in nuclear weapons trials during the Cold War. The medical data that was gathered is now missing from their personnel files, denying them war pensions, compensation, and the truth about whether radiation left their families with a poisonous genetic legacy of cancers, blood disorders, miscarriages and birth defects. Keir Starmer was invited to meet campaigners and discuss their calls for a public inquiry within days of winning the general election last year, but his correspondence team did not even acknowledge the request. Since then his government has refused to tell Parliament about evidence it has now found of orders for the long-denied blood tests, serving government lawyers have been identified as having misled courts and judges, and his own officials have admitted scientists may have been conducting the experiments without medical supervision. Alan Owen, founder of nuclear veteran campaign group LABRATS, said: "This is the longest and worst scandal in British history. Long-denied allegations of using our own troops in radiation experiments are being proven with a growing pile of evidence, an expensive lawsuit, and a police complaint. But it seems we're not even on his to-do list." He added: "Either the PM is ignoring a problem that really needs his attention before it gets any worse, or someone is keeping this off his desk on purpose. Either way, we hear about another veteran dying every single week. These men have an average age of 87, a host of chronic health conditions, and they deserve better than this." The PM was tackled on the scandal by backbench Labour MP Emma Lewell in his first appearance at the Despatch Box after the election in July last year, and urged to hold an inquiry. Instead he promised her a meeting with Veterans Minister Al Carns. He has twice met with campaigners, but while he has ordered officials to review 1m pages of archive documents, he has refused all requests to say what he has found. The minister has ordered the release of a further 10,000 classified documents, thought to include at least 200,000 pages, but there is no date for their publication. Veteran Brian Unthank, 87, who has had 96 skin cancers, two bouts of bladder cancer and is now dealing with an "unusual" prostate cancer, said: "All I want is for Starmer to stand up, admit they got it wrong, apologise and find a way to sort it. But every promise we've ever had has been broken." Starmer was in Jeremy Corbyn's shadow cabinet in 2019 when he signed off on a manifesto pledge to pay survivors £50,000 compensation, but all mention of nuclear veterans was removed from Labour's latest version. Meanwhile nearly 4.8m people have seen a viral video about Labour's broken promises, with footage of deputy leader Angela Rayner, Defence Secretary John Healey and Armed Forces minister Luke Pollard all demanding, while in Opposition, that the Tories order payouts. The government has expanded the criteria for the nuclear test medal after the Mirror highlighted the story of Operation Bagpipes hero Pete Peters, but so far he is the only veteran to have benefited. The minister has been asked to expand it for hundreds more crews who were ordered to take part in sampling missions through the nuclear tests of other nations, but this week he refused to say when they would receive it. Colin Duncan, who was a RAF sergeant in 543 Squadron when planes were sent through the clouds of French hyrdogen bombs in 1974, is fighting for the medal to be granted to comrades who suffer the same horrific pattern of illnesses. "We thought the minister was considering new criteria, but I'm not surprised to hear he's doing nothing of the sort," said Colin, 86, of Chipping Sodbury. "There must be a couple of thousand veterans the MoD is ignoring." If more veterans qualify for the medal, they may also need to be included in long-term health studies which the government relies on to refuse war pensions, which could alter their findings. No10 was contacted for comment.
Daily Mail
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour's tax raids on wealthy 'already backfiring' as Reeves prepares to come back for more: CGT revenue drops as Goldman Sachs boss warns London's status as global financial hub is at risk
Labour has been warned that tax raids on the wealthy are already 'backfiring' amid signs that Rachel Reeves is preparing to come back for more. Analysts have pointed to figures showing capital gains tax receipts dipping in the first half of the year, despite the Chancellor hiking rates. Meanwhile, the boss of Goldman Sachs has raised concerns that further efforts to bring in revenue could fuel an exodus, with London 's status as a financial hub 'fragile'. Ms Reeves is desperately hunting for options to increase taxes as she faces an estimated £30billion black hole in the public finances at the Autumn Budget. The tax burden is already set to hit a new high as a proportion of GDP after the last Budget imposed a £41billion increase - the biggest on record for a single package. Labour has ruled out increasing income tax, employee national insurance or VAT. The Chancellor again refused to rule out a wealth tax yesterday, with backbenchers floating a percentage charge on assets to raise billions of pounds a year. However, Shaun Moore, tax and financial planning expert at investment firm Quilter, warned such moves could actually cause more harm to revenues after a crackdown on 'non doms'. At the Budget last year Ms Reeves increased the lower rate of CGT from 10 per cent to 18 per cent and the higher rate from 20 per cent to 24 per cent. But in the first six months of this year the tax raked in £11.8 billion, compared to £13.5billion during the same period in 2024. The receipts for 2024-25 were around £200million lower than the Treasury's OBR watchdog had anticipated. The body has forecast that revenues will surge in 2025-26. 'The government's decision to slash capital gains tax allowances and hike rates has backfired,' Mr Moore said. 'The policy may have been designed to raise revenue, but it's instead prompted behavioural shifts that have dented the tax take.' He added: 'While taxing the wealthiest may sound politically appealing, the CGT experience shows that people will change behaviour or adjust their financial plans to mitigate the tax bills.' Goldman Sachs chairman and chief executive David Solomon told Sky News presenter Wilfred Frost's The Master Investor Podcast that talent in the financial industry was 'much more mobile' than 25 years ago. 'London continues to be an important financial centre. But because of Brexit, because of the way the world's evolving, the talent that was more centred here is more mobile,' Mr Solomon said. 'We as a firm have many more people on the continent. Policy matters, incentives matter. 'I'm encouraged by some of what the current government is talking about in terms of supporting business and trying to support a more growth oriented agenda. 'But if you don't set a policy that keeps talent here, that encourages capital formation here, I think over time you risk that.' Mr Solomon cautioned that the status of the City of London was 'fragile' and could 'fray' if not treated with care. The public sector borrowed £20.7billion last month, far higher than the £17.6billion analysts had pencilled in 'Incentives matter if you create tax policy or incentives that push people away, you harm your economy,' he said. 'If you go back, you know, ten years ago, I think we probably had 80 people in Paris. 'You know, we have 400 people in Paris now... And so in Goldman Sachs today, if you're in Europe, you can live in London, you can live in Paris, you can live in Germany, in Frankfurt or Munich, you can live in Italy, you can live in Switzerland. 'And we've got, you know, real offices. You just have to recognise talent is more mobile.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Cabinet ministers pressure Keir Starmer to recognise Palestine
It comes as a delayed UN conference on Gaza and recognising Palestine as a state, co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia, is set to take place in New York later this month. According to the Guardian, the Prime Minister is understood to have been urged by a number of senior ministers in different cabinet meetings over recent months that the UK should take a leading role in issuing recognition. READ MORE: Gillian Martin: Scotland has clean water, Labour have dirty politics The Labour Government has previously said it plans to formally acknowledge Palestine as part of a peace process, but only in conjunction with other western countries and "at the point of maximum impact", without elaborating on what that means. The Guardian reports "a growing sense of desperation and horror inside the Labour cabinet in recent weeks", particularly on Israel's killing of starving Palestinian civilians and its attacks on humanitarian agencies. One cabinet minister told the paper: 'We say that recognising Palestinian statehood is a really important symbol that you can only do once. But if not now, then when?' And in a Commons intervention on [[Gaza]] on Tuesday, Health Secretary Wes Streeting called for the recognition of [[Palestine]] "while there's still a state of [[Palestine]] left to recognise". He said: "I sincerely hope that the international community can come together, as the foreign secretary has been driving towards, to make sure that we see an end of this war but also that we recognise the state of Palestine while there is a state of Palestine left to recognise.' READ MORE: SNP call on Labour backbenchers to push for end to two-child cap The Labour Government has faced increasing pressure to recognise Palestine as a state by its own MPs, while the SNP have urged ministers to "stop the excuses" and heed the words of European allies. The comments came as French President Emmanuel Macron visited the UK earlier this month, where he said that recognising the state of Palestine was "the only path to peace".
