
Chart Reveals True Cost of Trump's Tariffs
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Consumer inflation data has yet to reveal any major cost effects of President Donald Trump's trade policies, leading many to downgrade their predictions of a tariff-induced price spiral in the near future.
But a working paper, entitled "Tracking the Short-Run Price Impact of U.S. Tariffs," has charted those that the administration's trade policies have already affected. One of its authors told Newsweek that the impacts, though delayed for now, may begin to significantly impact household budgets later this year.
Newsweek reached out to the Commerce Department and the Council of Economic Advisers via email outside of regular hours for comment.
Why It Matters
The so far muted impact of tariffs on inflation and consumer spending has puzzled certain economists and led political commentators, notably talk show host Bill Maher, to recant their previous criticisms of the president's economic strategies.
Citing this fact, and the over $100 billion in tax revenue tariffs have accrued, the administration has declared these to be both harmless and a resounding success for the United States economy and its global trade leverage.
However, many experts still caution that the full effects of tariffs will be gradual rather than immediate. Due to a range of interrelated factors—inventory buffers, supply chain adjustments and amendments to announced or threatened duties—they argue that the costs to the American consumer will surface more clearly over time.
What To Know
The paper was authored by Alberto Cavallo of Harvard University, alongside Paola Llamas and Franco Vazquez of Universidad de San Andrés. As shown on the chart below, based on data from the four largest retailers in the U.S., the trio found that the price of imported goods has risen sharply since February. Domestic goods also saw an increase, albeit "more gradual and steady," which the authors said was due to the reliance of even U.S.-made products on imported components subject to new tariffs.
A chart showing how prices of imported and domestic goods have changed amid President Trump's tariff announcements, from the working paper entitled "Tracking the Short-Run Price Impact of U.S. Tariffs."
A chart showing how prices of imported and domestic goods have changed amid President Trump's tariff announcements, from the working paper entitled "Tracking the Short-Run Price Impact of U.S. Tariffs."
Albert Cavallo, Paola Llamas, Franco Vazquez
"We observed rapid price responses to trade war and tariff-related news, with average price increases of about 3 percent for imported products since February," said Alberto Cavallo, a professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School. "These increases were largely driven by goods from China, particularly in categories such as household goods, furniture, and electronics."
However, Cavallo told Newsweek that the retail price impacts have so far remained modest when compared with the actual size of the tariffs that were announced over this period. Despite confusing some, Cavallo said this is in line with trends observed during the U.S.-China trade war in 2018-2019, when "prices at the border rose quickly, but pass-through to retail prices was slow and uneven."
"A similar dynamic appears to be unfolding now," he said. "U.S. firms are experiencing higher import costs, as suggested by stable or rising import prices, but have not yet passed most of these increases on to consumers."
The researchers identified several reasons why higher import costs may not have yet translated into higher prices. These include retailers "front-running" or stocking up on inventory ahead of a scheduled tariff hike, the uncertainty surrounding the duration and level of the tariffs that have been subject to constant revision and negotiation, as well as the potentially disastrous "consumer backlash" companies could face if they immediately raised prices to mitigate higher import costs.
"The high level of uncertainty is likely leading firms to delay price adjustments. Overall, we expect the passthrough to retail prices to be gradual and uneven," Cavallo said, adding that firms are likely to pass on costs to consumers "gradually over time, which means that the inflation rate can be higher for several months."
What People Are Saying
White House economic adviser Stephen Miran, earlier this month on Fox News: "What we did is we looked at every category in the inflation index...and what we find is...that imported goods are actually getting cheaper."
Alberto Cavallo, Thomas S. Murphy Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School, told Newsweek: "As the graph shows, each time there was news suggesting rising trade tensions, prices tended to increase. When the news pointed to easing tensions (e.g., with the China pause), prices generally stabilized or declined. So I do expect announcements about trade deals to continue influencing prices. Whether that accelerates passthrough to consumers will depend on how high and how long-lasting the tariffs are expected to be."
What Happens Next
As Cavallo noted, trade deals recently signed and the prospect of a more fully-fledged agreement with China could lessen the overall impact of tariffs on imported goods prices.
However, alongside these negotiations, Trump has continued to threaten higher tariffs on countries such as Brazil, while also stating that the global baseline rate on countries unable to secure a deal could rise to between 15 and 20 percent.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Innovative Technologies Power Caterpillar's (CAT) Dividend Strength
Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE:CAT) is included among the . Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE:CAT) is an American company known for its expertise in construction, mining, and various types of engineering equipment. In the early 1900s, it introduced the first practical track-type tractor, also known as a crawler, which revolutionized the construction and earthmoving industry by providing better traction and easier handling on rough surfaces. Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE:CAT)'s widespread global footprint gives it a solid advantage as international infrastructure spending continues to rise. With growing demand for construction equipment around the world and potential benefits from shifting geopolitical dynamics, the company presents a compelling opportunity for investors interested in both income and long-term growth. Its efficient operations, consistent dividend increases, and strong global positioning make it a top pick for those seeking a reliable and forward-looking industrial investment. Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE:CAT) raised its quarterly dividend by 7% in June. This was the company's 31st consecutive year of dividend growth. It now pays a quarterly dividend of $1.51 per share for a dividend yield of 1.40%, as of July 28. While we acknowledge the potential of CAT as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None.
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Gorman-Rupp's (GRC) Long Dividend History Makes it a Worthy Buy in August
The Gorman-Rupp Company (NYSE:GRC) is included among the 10 Best Dividend Stocks to Buy in August. A close up of a pump system, its gears spinning as it powers up a water management system. The Gorman-Rupp Company (NYSE:GRC) is an American company that focuses on the design, production, and sale of a broad selection of pumps and related equipment used across multiple industries and applications. The Gorman-Rupp Company (NYSE:GRC) recently reported its earnings for the second quarter of 2025, with revenues coming in at $179 million, up 5.62% from the same period last year. The revenue also beat analysts' estimates by $4.45 million. The company posted record net income of $15.8 million for the second quarter, equal to $0.60 per share, up from $8.3 million or $0.32 per share in the same period of 2024. It also reported a 15.7% year-over-year increase in new orders, totaling a record $188.0 million—an increase of $25.5 million from the prior year. The Gorman-Rupp Company (NYSE:GRC) also demonstrated a strong cash position. Its operating cash flow for the first six months came in at $48.9 million, up from $33.4 million during the same period last year. The growth in operating cash flow during the first half of 2025 was mainly driven by higher net income and a boost in accrued expenses. The Gorman-Rupp Company (NYSE:GRC) currently offers a quarterly dividend of $0.185 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.78%, as of July 28. The company has been rewarding shareholders with growing dividends for the past 52 years. While we acknowledge the potential of GRC as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None.

Business Insider
a few seconds ago
- Business Insider
A congressional stock trading ban just got closer to becoming law
A bill to ban politicians from trading stocks in office moved one step closer to a vote — but only after an hour of intense argument and insults between Republicans. The Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee passed the bill on an 8-7 vote. All Democrats voted for it, while every Republican voted against it except one: Josh Hawley of Missouri, who sponsored the bill. The legislation is broadly similar to a bill that passed the same committee last summer, but never received a Senate floor vote. This version would ban members of members of Congress, the president, and the vice president from buying stocks immediately upon enactment, and would block them from selling stocks beginning 90 days after that. It would then require lawmakers to divest entirely from their stock holdings at the beginning of their next term, and it would require the president and vice President to do so beginning in 2029 — after President Donald Trump's current term. It also would not allow for blind trusts, which sets it apart from other similar bills. "I think we have to accept that the American people think that all of us, Democrats and Republicans, are using our positions and our access to enrich ourselves," Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan said during the hearing. "People don't believe that we are here for the right reasons. We have a problem." It is unclear when or if the bill would become law — the next step would be a Senate vote. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has said that he believes current disclosure laws are sufficient, while House Speaker Mike Johnson has expressed cautious support for a ban. Trump has said that he would sign a congressional stock trading ban into law. The bill ultimately passed despite the furious objections of several GOP senators on the committee — and tense intraparty debate. Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who was the CEO of a plastics manufacturing company before he was elected to the Senate, argued that the stock divestiture requirements would discourage businesspeople from seeking federal office. "We make it very unattractive for people to step up to the plate," Johnson said. "This piece of legislation, really, it's legislative demagoguery." Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, the chairman of the committee, said that existing laws banning insider trading and requiring stock trade disclosures were sufficient, calling Hawley's bill a "solution looking for publicity." Another key issue was how the bill would apply to the president and vice president — it would block them from buying and selling stocks, but wouldn't force them to divest any holdings during their current terms. Trump owns individual stocks, while Vance divested from his individual stock holdings during his Senate tenure. Paul argued that the bill would "protect Donald Trump" by not requiring divestiture before 2029, arguing that provision demonstrated that the bill was "crummy." Meanwhile, Sen. Rick Scott of Florida said the bill was an attack on Vance and Trump. "Trump has gone through unbelievable hell," Scott told reporters after the hearing, referring to his indictments and impeachments. He said the bill would "allow the Democrats to go after the President of the United States." Much of the hearing was taken up by Hawley sparring with fellow Republicans on the committee. After Scott raised a question about a provision of the bill applying to illiquid assets, Hawley snapped back at him, pointing out that he supported last year's bill. "It's the same one you voted for last year," Hawley said. At one point, during a tense exchange with Sen. James Lankford of Oklahoma over the bill's elimination of blind trusts, Hawley made a passing reference to Scott's wealth. "I practice what I preach. I don't have individual stocks, I don't trade in stocks," Hawley said as Scott sat beside him. "I'm not a billionaire, unlike others on this committee." Scott, worth hundreds of millions of dollars, is one of the wealthiest members of Congress. Minutes later, he said it was "disgusting" to criticize lawmakers for their wealth. "I don't know when in this country it became a negative to make money," Scott said as he described his modest upbringing. "This idea that we're going to attack people because they make money is wrong. It's absolutely wrong."