Cheeky, stylish Suzuki Swift selling like hot cakes for a reason
Image: Motorpress
Cheeky and stylish. Check. Fuel efficient. Check. Modern tech and comfort. Check. Affordability. Check.
It's kinda easy to realize why the Suzuki Swift is now one of the fastest selling vehicles in South Africa.
It's affordable, it's affordable, it's affordable, it's massively fuel efficient, it looks good and it's a little cheeky, with the daring LED lights and cute little curves.
When you're not in a painful rush, the Suzuki Swift is an enjoyable little drive with all the bells and whistles, albeit on the low end of the market.
I drove the car for about a week and for the most part it was a pleasant drive, except when I found myself having to put my foot quite hard on steep inclines.
With a 1.2 litre three-cylinder petrol engine (60kW/83hp) with a 5-speed manual or CVT transmission, offering fuel efficiency (claimed at 4.4l/100km), it's not exactly a beast on the busy bustling streets of Johannesburg, but it is super fuel efficient and that will come in handy in these Trump tariffs era.
The car is not perfect by any means, but for the price, you get a lot of bang for your buck. The car simply does everything it is supposed to, albeit, quite rudimentarily.
I drove the GL CVT version - which is priced at about R265,500.
New Suzuki Swift
Image: Motorpress
One peeve I noticed is that the car does not come with an automated central locking system, so it's quite annoying that you need to remember to manually lock the doors at every turn by pressing the button or else a sgebenga my easily gain access through the car doors.
It took me quite a while to recognize this, which is quite dangerous in itself, but I was driving near my local McDonald's when I thought let me spoil myself with a burger and chips combo.
Between myself and the McD staff, we dropped a straw and rather than letting bygones be, I opted to save the environment. I opened the door and rescue the thing.
But as I drove off, I noticed the doors didn't lock themselves as I accelerated beyond the 40km/h mark, which is a quite standard feature in most cars.
So I pressed the button and 'cling', they sealed shut.
I own an older model of the same car myself, two versions prior, so I do know the feeling. I supposed I was a bit disappointed that between 2017 and 2025, Suzuki is still insisting on motorists manually looking their doors.
Anyway, the rest of the car is as you'd expect, decent legroom for a smallish hatchback, but the seats are quite comfortable for smaller sized folk.
The car is perfect as a starter pack for a university student or an even as a first car for young professionals.
There's cool features like Apple Car Play and Android Auto, easy Bluetooth configuration and decent sound for when you're feeling jolly stuck in Joburg traffic on the N1 or the M1 highway.
With the Suzuki Swift, the Japanese carmaker continues to make a compelling argument among the best budget buys for 2025.
New Suzuki Swift.
Image: Motorpress
Fuel
With a 42 litre fuel tank - that will cost you about R940 for a full tank in today's market, and when we drove the car, the average fuel consumption was around the 5 to 5.3 litre mark, so there's quite a lot of kilometres per litre there, almost 1:1 between the Rand and the Kilometre.
It might not have the street cred of a VW Polo Vivo nor the swanky feel of a VW Polo Life, or the niftiness and aggression of a KIA Picanto, but it's pricing makes it a competitive and compelling car to consider.
It's nor wonder, this little man is smashing all sorts of sales records. Suzuki Swift 1.2 GL manual: R219,900
Suzuki Swift 1.2 GL+ manual: R239,900
Suzuki Swift 1.2 GL+ CVT: R259,900
Suzuki Swift 1.2 GLX manual: R264,900
Suzuki Swift 1.2 GLX CVT: R284,900
Pricing includes a two-year/30,000km service plan and five-year/200,000km promotional warranty.
IOL Motoring
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Motorist issues warning after family is tailed on N4, N12
In a message that is being circulated on social media, a motorist shared the frightening experience of being tailed by a vehicle flashing its lights while travelling with their family from Middelburg to Benoni last night at 19:00. The message states how just after the Middelburg Toll Plaza, a vehicle behind them started flashing its lights repeatedly. 'I moved over to let it pass, but it continued flashing and even switched on its hazard lights, as though trying to force us to stop,' the message reads. The motorist sensed that something was wrong, and writes how they chose to ignore the signals and kept driving. 'The vehicle persistently followed us, even taking the same slip road toward Johannesburg. I was left with no doubt that we were being targeted — likely for hijacking or robbery.' The motorist sped up to create distance and turned around heading back to Middelburg at the next off-ramp. 'We exited at the mall off-ramp and stopped at McDonald's in Witbank. As we pulled in, we saw that a red Audi, which had been apparently following us, also passed by. After we stopped, we checked our car — everything was perfectly fine.' According to the motorist, they later spoke to traffic officers based at the toll gate, who confirmed knowing of two vehicles, a red Audi and a Toyota Avanza, which were operating in the area targeting motorists at the toll gate. 'Alhamdulillah, we are safe, but this was clearly an attempted setup. I urge all travelers, especially those with families, to be extremely cautious on the N12 at night. 'Do not stop if you are being signaled by unknown vehicles and get to a public place that is well lit and busy. May Allah protect us all from harm and grant safety to every traveler,' the message concluded. The message is being sent on various WhatsApp groups, and was shared by Pitstop Towing on the Traffic and Accidents Update group. The identity of the motorist who originally shared the message is unknown to the Middelburg Observer, which is attempting to make contact with the individual. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Daily Maverick
2 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Ballots and burnouts: Our fragile democracy lacks direction and is swerving off the road
The rain was coming down hard — and so was I. Wipers squealed uselessly across the Mazda Rustler's windscreen as the car veered right, as it always did when I braked. Only this time, I wasn't sober enough to correct it. My knuckles clenched the wheel. My breath fogged the glass. Somewhere behind me, the neon lights of a Grange party still pulsed in my head. I was 20, drunk on whisky and bravado, speeding down Commercial Road with a girl in the passenger seat and a heart still thumping from the cold barrel of a gun pressed against it just an hour earlier. Red robot. I slammed the brakes. The Rustler screamed — tyres hissing, chassis groaning — and leapt the centre island like a wounded animal. It spun once, then twice, and smashed nose-first into a green electrical box outside McDonald's. The bonnet erupted in smoke. My forehead cracked the dash. Somewhere, the girl screamed. I stumbled out barefoot onto the wet pavement. The air smelled like burnt rubber, oil and something inside me I couldn't name – panic, maybe. Or shame. A crowd gathered. Blue lights sliced the mist. I reeked of liquor. 'Have yuuu bien drienkieng?' the officer barked in that heavy Afrikaans growl. I nodded. He twisted my arm behind my back. The cuffs clicked shut. That was the night I learned what it feels like to be behind the wheel without vision, without clarity, without control. You think you're getting somewhere — until you're spinning out, jackknifed on the pavement, smoke rising from everything you built. Years later, watching South Africa's democracy swerve down familiar roads, I realise I wasn't just drunk that night — I was rehearsing something much bigger. We're all behind the wheel now — and we're all at risk. A dazed nation behind the wheel We are a country barrelling forward with no seatbelt, no working brakes, and no map. Intoxicated by slogans. Distracted by factions. Driving harder – not wiser. Last year's national election delivered a chaos of choices — over 50 political parties, from Afrikaans revivalists to Marxist revolutionaries, from throne-and-tradition parties calling for the return of the amakhosi, to spreadsheet technocrats promising dashboards and delivery. The result? A 'unity' government stitched together with nervous smiles and ideological glue. Now another skid mark on the road — Floyd Shivambu, all but ousted from the MK party after being removed as secretary-general, is reportedly preparing to launch the Mayibuye Movement. We keep changing drivers — but the car keeps swerving into the same ditch. I trained the election officers In 2009, I worked in the Independent Electoral Commission's engine room as an Electoral Project Coordinator and Provincial Electoral Trainer. I trained hundreds of presiding officers and area managers — most of them school principals, the very people who opened their classrooms as polling stations. There was structure. Protocol. Civic dignity. Even then, the ballot was crowded. But this year felt different. The fragmentation wasn't a sign of flourishing freedom — it was a symptom of fracture. South Africa now has over 300 registered political parties — yet fewer than 10 have national traction. We're not voting for progress. We're voting ourselves into paralysis. The curse of constant change At its best, democracy delivers leaders with conviction, vision, and staying power. Ours has delivered musical chairs in council chambers. Coalitions without cohesion. Tenders without delivery. When I worked as an auditor at the Auditor-General's office, one control weakness showed up again and again — like a cracked windscreen: leadership instability. Even after I left in 2017, the pattern only worsened. By 2021, more than 60% of municipalities had acting CFOs or municipal managers — a staggering sign of churn. Leadership turnover was so high that institutional memory evaporated. People weren't leading — they were placeholders in a revolving door. As of the 2023-24 financial year, municipal finance units had a 19% vacancy rate. One in five municipalities lacked a permanent Chief Financial Officer. At those with disclaimed audit opinions, CFOs averaged just 39 months in office. No staying power. No accountability. No traction. You can't drive straight when someone new grabs the wheel every few kilometres. And you can't deliver clean audits with a finance team that's understaffed, underqualified and under siege. Loot first, plan never Insecure leaders aren't just ineffective — they're dangerous. When leaders don't believe they'll last, they don't plan for the next decade. They loot for the next weekend. We see it in rushed appointments. Inflated procurement. A feverish obsession with 'eating' before the next reshuffle. Public office becomes less of a calling — and more of a countdown. A democracy with no traction doesn't crawl — it slides. And then it crashes. Kigali was different In October last year, I landed in Rwanda en route to Kenya. Even at the airport, I felt it. The floors gleamed. The lights worked. Staff moved with purpose. There was no fear — only focus. Yes, Rwanda has flaws. Authoritarianism must never be romanticised. Civic space is tight. Dissent is risky. But Kigali has achieved what our metros have not: clean governance, functional infrastructure, digitised services and national coherence. They've done more with less. We have more media freedom. More mineral wealth. More civil society. But far less traction. What kind of democracy do we want? South Africa doesn't need more parties. It needs more purpose. If democracy is to survive here, it must be reimagined — not copied from the West, not just shouted through loudhailers. We need a democracy driven by direction, not just defended by default. Here's what that looks like: Vision-led coalitions — not stitched-together survival pacts. Electoral reform — with thresholds and constituency-based candidates. Longer-term mandates — built on delivery, not popularity. Technocratic support — that reinforces, not replaces, political will. Civic education — that teaches power, responsibility and constitutional literacy. Even America — democracy's supposed gold standard — is now cracking. Trump's return, institutional gridlock and mass polarisation prove one thing: liberal democracy slows collapse — but rarely drives renewal. If that's true for the US, what hope do we have — a nation still weighed down by inequality, broken institutions and a leadership culture built on loyalty over competence? Sona: the president in the passenger seat President Cyril Ramaphosa's latest State of the Nation Address laid bare this dysfunction. Behind the gloss of unity stood a driver propped up by passengers with different destinations. A coalition government with no shared GPS cannot drive straight. It jerks, stalls and veers under the strain. Ramaphosa, hemmed in by factional warfare and surrounded by ministers entangled in scandal, increasingly relies on commissions of inquiry to do the work leadership should. But commissions are like substitute drivers — they steer the headlines, not the country. Graveyards of good intentions Shivambu's split from MK isn't just a subplot. It's a symptom. A democracy without vision produces factions, not futures. And when ambition replaces clarity, the people bleed — in potholes, broken classrooms, understocked clinics. South Africans are tired. Tired of manifestos with no memory. Tired of leaders with no compass. Tired of being asked to vote with hope — and rewarded with heartbreak. The final bend That night in Pietermaritzburg, after the crash, I sat slumped on the curb, the rain mixing with the sweat on my face. I remember thinking: How did I get here? I had no map. No plan. Just a tank full of ego, a broken suspension and enough alcohol to believe I'd make it. That's where we are as a country — behind the wheel, dazed, swerving between ideology and improvisation. The warning lights are flashing. The tar is slick. And unless we sober up — politically, morally, strategically — we will just crash again.
TimesLIVE
5 days ago
- TimesLIVE
NHTSA nominee seeks tight regulation of autonomous car technologies
US President Donald Trump's nominee to head the nation's auto safety regulator will argue on Wednesday that the agency must actively oversee self-driving vehicle technology, a potential sign of a tougher approach than some critics expected. Jonathan Morrison, chief counsel of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in the first Trump administration, will testify to the US Senate that autonomous vehicles offer potential benefits but also unique risks. "The NHTSA cannot wait for problems to arise with such developing technologies, but must demonstrate strong leadership," Morrison said in written testimony seen by Reuters. The comments suggested the NHTSA will continue to closely scrutinise self-driving vehicles. Some critics of the technology had expressed alarm over NHTSA staff cuts this year under a cost-cutting campaign led by Elon Musk, who was a close adviser to Trump and is CEO of self-driving carmaker Tesla. The Musk-Trump alliance prompted some critics to speculate the NHTSA would go easy on self-driving vehicle developers. However, the relationship began to unravel in late May over Trump's spending plans, and the two are locked in a feud. The NHTSA said last month it was seeking information from Tesla about social media videos of robotaxis and self-driving cars Tesla was testing in Austin, Texas. The videos were alleged to show one vehicle using the wrong lane and another speeding. Since October, the NHTSA has been investigating 2.4-million Tesla vehicles with full self-driving technology after four reported collisions, including a 2023 fatal crash. "The technical and policy challenges surrounding thee new technologies must be addressed," Morrison's testimony said. "Failure to do so will result in products the public will not accept and the agency will not tolerate." Other companies in the self-driving sector also were subjects of NHTSA investigations, including Alphabet's Waymo, which last year faced reports its robotaxis may have broken traffic laws. Waymo in May recalled 1,200 self-driving vehicles and the investigation remains open. Regulatory scrutiny increased after 2023 when a pedestrian was seriously injured by a GM Cruise self-driving car. The first recorded death of a pedestrian related to self-driving technology was in 2018 in Tempe, Arizona.
