EU must take lead role on pharma, and patient access, says Czech minister
In an interview with Euractiv, Matoušková urged the EU to move from passive coordination to proactive support, particularly when it comes to ensuring equitable access to innovative medicines and building the Union's strategic autonomy in healthcare.
Matoušková, who took office in February this year, believes the COVID-19 pandemic and the EU's fragmented response exposed structural weaknesses that Brussels now has an opportunity to address. 'We have the brains, but we lack coordination – and that is the role of the European Union,' she said.
She argues that the EU level is the only viable arena to tackle the uneven and delayed access to new medicines that persists across member states.
'Some smaller states do not introduce medicines, even though the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has approved them, as quickly as others. If we really want a patient-focused approach, this has to change,' she said.
The Czech deputy minister voiced strong support for the pharmaceutical package currently negotiated by EU institutions in the trilogues. However, she underlined that success will depend on finding the right balance between patient access, price and industry incentives. 'The compromise is crucial,' she said.
She noted that the Commission's proposal rightly aims to increase access to medicines in all member states, but that this will require cooperation from industry. 'They need to understand what we are trying to achieve: speed of rollout and availability,' Matoušková said.
Innovation vouchers
One of her concerns is the growing trend of pharmaceutical companies threatening to pull out of Europe in response to proposed changes in market exclusivity rules. 'The USA invests significantly more – three times more than the EU, I believe. But it's not just about money. It's about how fast we bring medicines to market and how long the data and market protection lasts,' she said.
Matoušková acknowledged the financial pressures innovators face and expressed support for maintaining incentives that allow for returns on investment.
To bridge the interests of both patients and industry, she supported 'a system of innovation vouchers' as a complementary tool to support faster development and approval of new drugs, while maintaining investment appeal.
She also addressed the broader relationship between innovation and generics, noting, 'I think generics will always be here. But we need to push for innovation, that is what we need to protect.'
Matoušková also sees digital health as an area where EU leadership is urgently needed.
While the European Health Data Space regulation has opened a promising debate, the deputy minister warns that implementation is lagging in some areas. 'We would like to have shared medical documentation, but we are missing regional data networks. We do not have enough infrastructure to make it work,' said Matoušková.
She believes the EU should step in with funding and coordination. 'The EU should provide the legal framework, the conditions, and the funding. The EU should be the roof over the whole structure,' she said.
Cross-border cooperation
Her ambition is also to see greater EU involvement in cross-border emergency services. 'Why do we need bilateral treaties for cross-border emergency care? We could define it at the EU level,' she said.
In the longer term, Matoušková urges Brussels to invest in services that reflect demographic changes and make a difference on the ground, such as palliative care and home-based support for older people. 'Personally, I am not a fan of building more facilities. Care should move closer to patients, into the field, into their homes,' she said.
She would also welcome more EU guidance on workforce reform, including a broader debate on prescription rights for qualified non-physician personnel, adding that, 'We have very erudite non-physician professionals in Czechia, but they haven't been granted the appropriate competences.'
Her message to EU policymakers is clear: health policy must be treated as a strategic investment. 'We should see the EU not as a repressive body, but as a source of change – an institution that supports innovation. Not as a dictator, but as a partner that helps address our needs,' she said.
[Edited by Vasiliki Angouridi, Brian Maguire]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
7 hours ago
- Euractiv
Germany's ‘butcher' minister told to push for greener diets
Government advisors in Germany are pushing for a shift in food policy to promote plant-based options and discourage excessive meat consumption Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Maria Simon Arboleas Euractiv Jul 23, 2025 16:14 3 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. A government advisory board has urged German Agriculture Minister Alois Rainer to encourage citizens to eat less meat and embrace veggie alternatives, including lab-grown meat. Following his appointment last spring, Rainer, a trained butcher, said that Germans were mature enough to decide for themselves what to put in their shopping baskets. Just a few months later, the board, known as the agri-food advisory board (WBAE), handed him a report advocating for a shift away from his cherished meat products. The WBAE concluded that there is room for 'more sustainable diets' and that reducing consumption of animal products is key. One of its proposals is to slash the 19% VAT on plant-based foods, which it calls "tax discrimination' compared to the 7% rate applied to comparable animal products classified as staples. It also recommends gradually increasing taxes on meat and dairy. 'In terms of GHG emissions, plant-based alternative products such as soy drinks generally have advantages per kg of product over the corresponding animal products' the report states, calling for a 'climate label' to cover both animal and plant-based foods. But Rainer may not be ready to stomach the recommendations. 'It's important to me not to pit one against the other,' said the minister, who has sought to reverse course from his Green predecessor Cem Özdemir. Aware of the sensitivity surrounding food policy, the WBAE has packaged its recommendations in a '3R strategy': citizens should 'Reduce' meat consumption, 'Remix' animal and plant-based components, or 'Replace' meat with plant-based alternatives. The board's push is nothing new to Rainer, as we knew from day one he would be treading a tightrope on food policy matters. The coalition agreement between Rainer's conservative Christian Democrats and the centre-left Social Democrats already includes a pledge to support 'alternative proteins'. The WBAE report specifies that this includes cell-based meat and precision fermentation, which is used to replicate proteins and enzymes found in foods such as eggs and milk without involving animals. The board also hopes that the EU will adopt more 'innovation-friendly' rules. The European Commission is currently considering whether to fast-track the approval of so-called novel foods, many of which have drawn criticism from several EU farm ministers. The report also references another ongoing debate in Brussels: whether traditional meat terms can be used for plant-based products. While the EU executive recently yielded to pressure to tighten labelling rules, the German board is advocating a 'regulatory chill.' Meanwhile, the German government's advisory body endorsed the Nutri-score labelling system and joined criticism of the NOVA classification for ultra-processed foods, warning that it could penalise some plant-based products unfairly. Jeremias Lin contributed reporting. (adm, de)
Euractiv
7 hours ago
- Euractiv
The Brief – Eurofighters leave Europe's soft power in tatters
'Among ourselves, we keep the law, but when we are operating in the jungle, we must also use the laws of the jungle.' Such was Robert Cooper's advice for the West – the close adviser to Tony Blair was quoted in Robert Kagan's 2003 book Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order. But it's advice that Europeans have failed to heed. Instead, they left the Americans to deal with the jungle, while they continued on their European way – adhering to international law and promoting soft power. Donald Trump's return marked a resurgence of power politics, and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is now exploiting this shift, exposing Europe's weakness. Since Turkey began EU accession negotiations in 2005, the masterminds of the Brussels bubble have been trying to convince us that taxpayers' money – just shy of €20 billion in the past two decades – could change the country. They hoped that by dangling the empty promise of EU membership, Turks would comply with international law and democratise internally. Instead, the sultan made himself indispensable by doubling down on power politics. Turkey has ploughed money into defence, putting an estimated $40–50 billion into the sector over the past two decades. He has imprisoned opponents, while the rule of law in Ankara has become little more than a midsummer night's dream. He blatantly disregards international norms, threatens Greece with war, and occupies Cypriot territory. He has entirely ignored EU calls to sanction Russia, while Brussels meekly swallowed Erdoğan's declaration that Hamas is a liberation group. Erdoğan has also enlisted his new Libyan ally, Khalifa Haftar, to apply migration pressure on the EU, advancing Turkish energy interests in the region by redrawing maritime boundaries – openly challenging EU sovereignty. The result? Europeans have accepted Turkey as part of their new defence architecture, and now Germany has approved the delivery of 40 Eurofighter Typhoon jets to Ankara. Naturally, Europe refuses to acknowledge its failure and continues to gaslight. Migration Commissioner Magnus Brunner claims that Russia is weaponising migrants arriving in Europe from Libya, completely ignoring Turkey's role in the region. Brunner is either blinded by Brussels' Russiamania or is desperately searching for a convenient scapegoat to divert attention from Europe's failure with Turkey. When the Ottoman Empire blocked Europe from Asian markets, Europeans turned to new frontiers with Columbus. Today, they have nowhere to turn – except to bow to the Sultan. Roundup The EU's second-highest court ruled Wednesday that the Commission broke its own staff appointment rules when von der Leyen delegated cabinet interviews to her right-hand man, Björn Seibert. The decision comes amid scrutiny over von der Leyen's management style. Blue jeans and speed machines – Brussels announced Wednesday it will combine two retaliatory packages on US exports, a €21 billion docket on soybeans, motorbikes and jeans and a €72 billion list on aircraft, cars and electrical equipment. The lists would enter effect on 7 August, and seek to strengthen the bloc's position before Trump's 30% tariff threat on EU exports takes effect on the first of next month. Cutting (green) red tape – The EU called for 'feedback on the simplification of future environmental legislation' on Tuesday, in an effort to ease the administrative burden on EU companies. The Commission suggests scrapping the substances of concern in products database. Across Europe Several sources told Reuters Wednesday that the Trump administration preferred to pay for the destruction of over €10 million in still-usable contraceptives rather than sell to NGOs. The contraceptives, currently in Belgium, will be shipped to France and incinerated at an expected cost of $160,000. Premium pills – A survey from the Radboud University Medical Centre found that Dutch citizens are willing to accept higher public spending on a medicine if it provides significant health benefits – though they also noted that companies should reinvest at least 50% of their profits in research and keep prices socially acceptable. The Tusk Shuffle – Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk announced a cabinet reshuffle Tuesday following a presidential election defeat for his party, removing key ministers and consolidating key portfolios. But many Poles believe the move will do little to improve the government's image.
Euractiv
9 hours ago
- Euractiv
Germany: ‘Time has come' for EU to threaten US with trade bazooka
Germany has urged the European Commission to threaten to use its much-vaunted 'trade bazooka' on the US, marking a sharp escalation of the EU-US trade war and a stunning reversal of Berlin's previous call for a 'quick and simple' deal with Washington. The comments come just days before Donald Trump's threatened 30% tariff on EU goods is set to enter into force on 1 August, which would triple the current baseline 10% levy faced by European exporters and upend the €1.6 trillion transatlantic trade relationship. 'As we are now in the final phase of negotiations, the right time has come from the perspective of the German government for the Commission to consider the use of this anti-coercion instrument (ACI),' a senior German government official said on Wednesday. 'I believe, seven days before the end of the negotiations, one should also show what one can do,' the official added. The ACI – the EU's most powerful trade weapon – would legally empower the Commission, which oversees EU trade policy, to impose a wide range of retaliatory measures on the US, including investment restrictions, the withdrawal of intellectual property protections, and tariffs on goods as well as services. The bloc has already pledged to retaliate on €93 billion worth of US goods, which Brussels said on Wednesday would enter into force on 7 August if no negotiated deal is reached. The Commission has also said it is preparing retaliatory measures targeting US services, but has not yet presented any list to member states for consideration. The EU ran a €50 billion net trade surplus with the US last year, with a €198 billion surplus in goods and a €148 billion deficit in services, according to EU data. In addition to the current 10% baseline, Trump has imposed a 50% tariff on steel and aluminium and a 25% duty on cars and car parts since returning to the White House in January. The auto tariff has severely exacerbated the woes of Germany's flagship auto sector, which is already reeling from weak demand and increasingly fierce Chinese competition. In remarks that were widely interpreted as suggesting that Berlin could accept the 10% baseline in exchange for auto tariff exemptions, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said earlier in July that Brussels should seek to clinch a 'quick and simple' rather than 'lengthy and complicated' deal with Washington. The German official's remarks also follow multiple reports suggesting that Germany has become increasingly sympathetic to France's repeated calls for Brussels to take a tougher line on Washington if no deal is agreed. The Financial Times reported earlier on Wednesday that Berlin had 'joined forces' with Paris in calling for the activation of the ACI, whose use is still opposed by a majority of the bloc's 27 member states. Triggering the instrument requires the support of a 'qualified majority' of EU countries, or 15 countries representing at least 65% of the bloc's population. The German official, however, downplayed any differences between Germany and France's negotiating positions. 'There was never a disagreement about the harshness of the response among the main partners of the EU, including between Germany and France,' the official said. 'It was always a question of timing.' (mm)
