Trump Struggles to Contain Furor over Epstein as House Lawmakers Seek Subpoenas
Three House Republicans supported a measure introduced by Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pennsylvania) to demand the Justice Department release the files. Under House rules, the full committee – led by Trump ally Rep. James Comer (R-Kentucky) – must now issue the subpoenas.
'Subpoenas will be issued in the near future,' an Oversight spokesman said on Wednesday evening.
The Oversight panel also voted to subpoena all communications about Epstein between then-President Joe Biden and his administration; as well as to subpoena a long list of other prominent figures from Democratic and Republican administrations including Bill and Hillary Clinton; former FBI director James B. Comey; former attorneys general Merrick Garland, William P. Barr, Jeff Sessions, Loretta E. Lynch, Eric Holder and Alberto Gonzales; as well as former special counsel Robert S. Mueller III.
It's unclear why lawmakers felt those officials would be instrumental to hear from, though the federal probe into Epstein spans two decades and several presidential administrations. Republicans believe Bill Clinton may be mentioned in the Epstein files and appear to be attempting to expose correspondence between the former president, attorneys and law enforcement officials who may have had knowledge of the case.
The cracks starting to emerge in the GOP coalition signaled the firestorm over Epstein has far from abated, and may intensify as Republicans hear from voters at home during their five-week August recess. After a unanimous vote on Tuesday, Comer also issued a subpoena for Epstein's former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, a convicted sex offender who is in prison, for her testimony next month in Florida.
The furor may be further fanned by a new report in the Wall Street Journal that describes how Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy informed the president in May that his name appeared 'multiple times' in the files, along with those of 'many people' who socialized with Epstein. The officials said the files included 'unverified hearsay' about these people and would not be released because they contained child pornography and victims' information.
Last week, Trump said that Bondi told him his name wasn't in the files. Being named in what is likely voluminous files is not evidence of wrongdoing.
'I don't necessarily think that's a surprise. He's never denied knowing Epstein,' said Rep. Kevin Hern (R-Oklahoma), who had not yet read the Journal article.
Asked if the meeting reported by the Journal took place, White House spokesperson Steven Cheung said: 'The fact is that the president kicked him [Epstein] out of his club for being a creep. This is nothing more than a continuation of the fake news stories concocted by the Democrats and the liberal media.'
Laura Loomer, an influential pro-Trump blogger who has been calling for more disclosures in the Epstein case, blamed Trump's opponents for exploiting his past association with Epstein.
'You can't just go accusing everybody who knew Jeffrey Epstein or took a photo with him of being a pedophile,' she said. 'It's absolutely absurd for people to be implying or insinuating for one second that Donald Trump is somehow implicated in some kind of a sex scandal.'
Before heading home to their districts, House Republicans were still figuring out how to position themselves on a topic that places them squarely between Trump and their most vocal constituents.
The Wednesday action in the House Oversight subcommittee on federal law enforcement was supported by three Republicans: Nancy Mace (South Carolina), Scott Perry (Pennsylvania) and Brian Jack (Georgia).
Ten GOP lawmakers have signed a bipartisan petition to circumvent House leadership and send a measure to the floor to release the files; that won't happen until September, however.
Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Kentucky), who is leading the petition effort with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-California), said everyone should be prepared to see names they may recognize in the files, if they're released. Massie said he expected the backlash to the administration's refusal to release the files 'grow over the August recess.'
'I mean, I think that's a thing about the files that everybody needs to understand is there are probably lots of names in there who haven't done anything criminal,' Massie told reporters. 'There's a reluctance to release these files because of the embarrassment of just having your name in the news in these files.'
He added: 'And I always presumed that there were at least some of Trump's friends, you know, named in this.'
Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Florida) cast doubt on the Journal's report, suggesting the Biden administration would have released Epstein documents to incriminate Trump if the president was named in them. 'So if he was on that list, you mean to tell me that DOJ wouldn't have put it out? Nobody buys that,' he said.
The White House has spent the last two weeks trying, with limited success, to get people – including many of Trump's most fervent supporters – to stop talking about the Epstein case. Trump has moved through a series of responses, urging supporters to focus on other issues and suggesting that continued interest in the Epstein case benefited Democrats. 'Their new SCAM is what we will forever call the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax, and my PAST supporters have bought into this 'bull—-,' hook, line, and sinker,' Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social last week.
But Republican anger seems only to have grown since Bondi announced that the case was effectively closed in a memo released less than two weeks ago, confirming that Epstein died by suicide and there was no 'client list' naming powerful people who may have abused teenage girls.
Trump had directed Bondi to ask the courts to unseal grand jury testimony. But on Wednesday, a Florida judge denied the Justice Department's request to unseal testimony from the investigation there into Epstein's activities between 2005 and 2007, citing secrecy rules. Justice is separately pursuing the release of testimony from New York, where Epstein was charged with sex trafficking in 2019 and where Maxwell was convicted in 2021.
Democrats are seeking to take advantage of the issue as they head home to meet with their constituents. They plan to argue that Trump's support for his administration's decision not to release the files earlier this month – and GOP lawmakers' leaving Washington without addressing the issue – means Republicans are protecting the rich and powerful at voters' expense.
'The reality is that it's all connected from the standpoint of Donald Trump. His administration and House Republicans have delivered nothing more than a government of the billionaires, by the billionaires, and for the billionaires,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York) said Wednesday. 'It's reasonable to conclude that Republicans are continuing to protect the lifestyles of the rich and shameless, even if that includes pedophiles.'
Several Democrats plan to continue forcing the matter on Capitol Hill. Democrats who sit on the House Appropriations Committee – which is responsible for crafting legislation to fund the government – are planning to introduce amendments related to Epstein if Republicans decide to keep the panel in town Thursday, according to two Democrats familiar with the plans who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss ongoing conversations. Appropriators may continue to meet while the House is in recess in hopes of hitting a government funding deadline of Sept. 30.
House Democrats' campaign arm echoed Jeffries, while sounding ready to pounce on the Epstein fallout while lawmakers are home.
'The so-called Republican moderates prioritized their billionaire donors by enacting the largest cut to Medicaid in American history to pay for tax breaks for the wealthy,' Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesman Justin Chermol said. 'Now they're protecting Donald Trump and billionaire elites by refusing to provide transparency into the Epstein files.'
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) sent the House home a day early because business had ground to a halt over the Epstein issue. He was responding to Republicans on the House Rules Committee who were uncomfortable taking repeated votes on language introduced by Democrats to release the files. His solution was to allow the panel to approve a nonbinding resolution asking for the files to be released within 30 days; that resolution doesn't have the force of law, however, and may never come up for a vote.
Johnson insisted Wednesday there was 'no daylight' between Republicans and Trump on the issue and said a vote in the House would be premature because the president had directed Bondi to seek permission from the courts to release grand jury material. (This was before the Florida judge's decision.)
'There's no point in passing a resolution to urge the administration to do something they are already doing, and so that's why we're going to let that process play out,' he said. 'This is not out of fear in any way. What we're trying to do is maximize the transparency. And we want every single person who's involved in any way in the Epstein evils to be called to swift justice.'
The speaker also argued that Republicans had a 'legal' and 'moral' responsibility to protect the names of Epstein's victims from surfacing in the media, and excoriated Democrats for playing politics on the issue.
'The way Democrats have tried to weaponize this issue is absolutely shameless, and I just want to say this: Democrats said nothing and did nothing, absolutely nothing about bringing transparency for the entire four years of the Biden presidency,' Johnson said.
Jeffries, alongside minority whip Katherine Clark (D-Massachusetts) and Democratic caucus chairman Pete Aguilar (D-California), argued that there's a connection between Epstein and other Republican policy priorities, including Trump's tax and immigration bill.
'The Epstein case has helped their own base see what's going on: that this is a con job and that they were never the center of the work that they are going to do here,' Clark said.
Democrats out on the campaign trail are listening.
Alissa Ellman, a Democrat challenging Republican Rep. Claudia Tenney, is holding coffees in her Upstate New York district and holding town halls to discuss what she says has been a top concern of voters: Epstein.
And in a Wisconsin swing district, Democrat Rebecca Cooke has been hammering GOP Rep. Derrick Van Orden as complicit in failing to prosecute 'elite and powerful pedophiles.'
'This isn't about a list, it's about criminal prosecution to the full extent of the law,' Cooke said. 'Every patriot in this country knows what real justice looks like, and Republicans in Congress will pay a price for protecting these criminals and rewarding these same people with massive tax breaks.'
The aggressive Democratic rhetoric is a departure from Democrats' typical refusal to engage in pushing back on or even entertaining conspiracy theories from the MAGA base. Several House Democrats began daring Trump to release the Epstein files on social media this month.
Rep. Jimmy Gomez (California) was one of the first Democratic lawmakers to demand the administration release the Epstein files because he noticed the matter trending online in right-wing circles. Other liberal lawmakers began pushing the issue, and the leadership listened as Democrats sought more forceful ways to respond to Trump.
'He said he was going to drain the swamp, and then he became the swamp,' Gomez said of Trump.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
an hour ago
- The Mainichi
US and China to talk in Stockholm on trade with eye on Trump-Xi summit later this year
WASHINGTON (AP) -- When top U.S. and Chinese officials meet in Stockholm, they are almost certain to agree to at least leaving tariffs at the current levels while working toward a meeting between their presidents later this year for a more lasting trade deal between the world's two largest economies, analysts say. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng are set to hold talks for the third time this year -- this round in the Swedish capital, nearly four months after President Donald Trump upset global trade with his sweeping tariff proposal, including an import tax that shot up to 145% on Chinese goods. "We have the confines of a deal with China," Trump said Friday before leaving for Scotland. Bessent told MSNBC on Wednesday that the two countries after talks in Geneva and London have reached a "status quo," with the U.S. taxing imported goods from China at 30% and China responding with a 10% tariff, on top of tariffs prior to the start of Trump's second term. "Now we can move on to discussing other matters in terms of bringing the economic relationship into balance," Bessent said. He was referring to the U.S. running a $295.5 billion trade deficit last year. The U.S. seeks an agreement that would enable it to export more to China and shift the Chinese economy more toward domestic consumer spending. The Chinese embassy in Washington said Beijing hopes "there will be more consensus and cooperation and less misperception" coming out of the talks. With an eye on a possible leaders' summit, Stockholm could provide some answers as to the timeline and viability of that particular goal ahead of a possible meeting between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. "The meeting will be important in starting to set the stage for a fall meeting between Trump and Xi," said Wendy Cutler, a former U.S. trade negotiator and now vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute. "Beijing will likely insist on detailed preparations before they agree to a leaders' meeting." In Stockholm, the two sides are likely to focus on commercial announcements to be made at a leaders' summit as well as agreements to address "major irritants," such as China's industrial overcapacity and its lack of control over chemicals used to make fentanyl, also to be announced when Xi and Trump should meet, Cutler said. Sean Stein, president of the U.S.-China Business Council, said Stockholm could be the first real opportunity for the two governments to address structural reform issues including market access in China for U.S. companies. What businesses will be seeking coming out of Stockholm would largely be "the atmosphere" -- how the two sides characterize the discussions. They will also look for clues about a possible leaders' summit because any real deal will hinge on the two presidents meeting each other, he said. Fentanyl-related tariffs are likely a focus for China In Stockholm, Beijing will likely demand the removal of the 20% fentanyl-related tariff that Trump imposed earlier this year, said Sun Yun, director of the China program at the Washington-based Stimson Center. This round of the U.S.-China trade dispute began with fentanyl, when Trump in February imposed a 10% tariff on Chinese goods, citing that China failed to curb the outflow of the chemicals used to make the drug. The following month, Trump added another 10% tax for the same reason. Beijing retaliated with extra duties on some U.S. goods, including coal, liquefied natural gas, and farm products such as beef, chicken, pork and soy. In Geneva, both sides climbed down from three-digit tariffs rolled out following Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs in April, but the U.S. kept the 20% "fentanyl" tariffs, in addition to the 10% baseline rate -- to which China responded by keeping the same 10% rate on U.S. products. These across-the-board duties were unchanged when the two sides met in London a month later to negotiate over non-tariff measures such as export controls on critical products. The Chinese government has long protested that American politicians blame China for the fentanyl crisis in the U.S. but argued the root problem lies with the U.S. itself. Washington says Beijing is not doing enough to regulate precursor chemicals that flow out of China into the hands of drug dealers. In July, China placed two fentanyl ingredients under enhanced control, a move seen as in response to U.S. pressure and signaling goodwill. Gabriel Wildau, managing director at the consultancy Teneo, said he doesn't expect any tariff to go away in Stockholm but that tariff relief could be part of a final trade deal. "It's possible that Trump would cancel the 20% tariff that he has explicitly linked with fentanyl, but I would expect the final tariff level on China to be at least as high as the 15-20% rate contained in the recent deals with Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam," Wildau said. US wants China to dump less, buy less oil from Russia and Iran China's industrial overcapacity is as much a headache for the United States as it is for the European Union. Even Beijing has acknowledged the problem but suggested it might be difficult to address. America's trade imbalance with China has decreased from a peak of $418 billion in 2018, according to the Census Bureau. But China has found new markets for its goods and as the world's dominant manufacturer ran a global trade surplus approaching $1 trillion last year -- somewhat larger than the size of the U.S. overall trade deficit in 2024. And China's emergence as a manufacturer of electric vehicles and other emerging technologies has suddenly made it more of a financial and geopolitical threat for those same industries based in the U.S., Europe, Japan and South Korea. "Some enterprises, especially manufacturing enterprises, feel more deeply that China's manufacturing capabilities are too strong, and Chinese people are too hardworking. Factories run 24 hours a day," Chinese Premier Li Qiang said on Thursday when hosting European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Beijing. "Some people think this will cause some new problems in the balance of supply and demand in world production." "We see this problem too," Li said. Bessent also said the Stockholm talks could address Chinese purchases of Russian and Iranian oil. However, Wildau of Teneo said China could demand some U.S. security concessions in exchange, such as a reduced U.S. military presence in East Asia and scaled-back diplomatic support for Taiwan and the Philippines. This would likely face political pushback in Washington. The Stockholm talks will be "geared towards building a trade agreement based around Chinese purchase commitments and pledges of investment in the U.S. in exchange for partial relief from U.S. tariffs and export controls," Wildau said. He doubts there will be a grand deal. Instead, he predicts "a more limited agreement based around fentanyl." "That," he said, "is probably the preferred outcome for China hawks in the Trump administration, who worry that an overeager Trump might offer too much to Xi."
Yomiuri Shimbun
an hour ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
US-EU Deal Sets a 15% Tariff on Most Goods and Averts the Threat of a Trade War with a Global Shock
EDINBURGH, Scotland (AP) — The United States and the European Union agreed on Sunday to a trade framework setting a 15% tariff on most goods, staving off — at least for now — far higher imports on both sides that might have sent shock waves through economies around the globe. The sweeping announcement came after President Donald Trump and European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen met briefly at Trump's Turnberry golf course in Scotland. Their private sit-down culminated months of bargaining, with the White House deadline Friday nearing for imposing punishing tariffs on the EU's 27 member countries. 'It was a very interesting negotiation. I think it's going to be great for both parties,' Trump said. The agreement, he said, was 'a good deal for everybody' and 'a giant deal with lots of countries.' Von der Leyen said the deal 'will bring stability, it will bring predictability, that's very important for our businesses on both sides of the Atlantic.' Many facets will require more work As with other, recent tariff agreements that Trump announced with countries including Japan and the United Kingdom, some major details remain pending in this one. Trump said the EU had agreed to buy some $750 billion worth of U.S. energy and invest $600 billion more than it already is in America — as well as make a major military equipment purchase. He said tariffs 'for automobiles and everything else will be a straight across tariff of 15%' and meant that U.S. exporters 'have the opening up of all of the European countries.' Von der Leyen said the 15% tariffs were 'across the board, all inclusive' and that 'indeed, basically the European market is open.' At a later news conference away from Turnberry, she said the $750 billion in additional U.S. energy purchases was actually over the next three years — and would help ease the dependence on natural gas from Russia among the bloc's countries. 'When the European Union and the United States work together as partners, the benefits are tangible,' Von der Leyen said, noting that the agreement 'stabilized on a single, 15% tariff rate for the vast majority of EU exports' including cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals. '15% is a clear ceiling,' she said. But von der Leyen also clarified that such a rate wouldn't apply to everything, saying that both sides agreed on 'zero for zero tariffs on a number of strategic products,' like all aircraft and component parts, certain chemicals, certain generic drugs, semiconductor equipment, some agricultural products, natural resources and critical raw materials. It is unclear if alcohol will be included in that list. 'And we will keep working to add more products to this list,' she said, while also stressing that the 'framework means the figures we have just explained to the public, but, of course, details have to be sorted out. And that will happen over the next weeks.' Further EU approval needed In the meantime, there will be work to do on other fronts. Von der Leyen had a mandate to negotiate because the European Commission handles trade for member countries. But the Commission must now present the deal to member states and EU lawmakers, who will ultimately decide whether or not to approve it. Before their meeting began, Trump pledged to change what he characterized as 'a very one-sided transaction, very unfair to the United States.' 'I think both sides want to see fairness,' the Republican president told reporters. Von der Leyen said the U.S. and EU combined have the world's largest trade volume, encompassing hundreds of millions of people and trillions of dollars and added that Trump was 'known as a tough negotiator and dealmaker.' 'But fair,' Trump said. Trump has spent months threatening most of the world with large tariffs in hopes of shrinking major U.S. trade deficits with many key trading partners. More recently, he had hinted that any deal with the EU would have to 'buy down' a tariff rate of 30% that had been set to take effect. But during his comments before the agreement was announced, the president was asked if he'd be willing to accept tariff rates lower than 15%, and he said 'no.' First golf, then trade talk Their meeting came after Trump played golf for the second straight day at Turnberry, this time with a group that included sons Eric and Donald Jr. In addition to negotiating deals, Trump's five-day visit to Scotland is built around golf and promoting properties bearing his name. A small group of demonstrators at the course waved American flags and raised a sign criticizing British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who plans his own Turnberry meeting with Trump on Monday. Other voices could be heard cheering and chanting 'Trump! Trump!' as he played nearby. On Tuesday, Trump will be in Aberdeen, in northeastern Scotland, where his family has another golf course and is opening a third next month. The president and his sons plan to help cut the ribbon on the new course. The U.S. and EU seemed close to a deal earlier this month, but Trump instead threatened the 30% tariff rate. The deadline for the Trump administration to begin imposing tariffs has shifted in recent weeks but is now firm and coming Friday, the administration insists. 'No extensions, no more grace periods. Aug. 1, the tariffs are set, they'll go into place, Customs will start collecting the money and off we go,' U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told 'Fox News Sunday' before the EU deal was announced. He added, however, that even after that 'people can still talk to President Trump. I mean, he's always willing to listen.' Without an agreement, the EU said it was prepared to retaliate with tariffs on hundreds of American products, ranging from beef and auto parts to beer and Boeing airplanes. If Trump eventually followed through on his threat of tariffs against Europe, meanwhile, it could have made everything from French cheese and Italian leather goods to German electronics and Spanish pharmaceuticals more expensive in the United States. 'I think it's great that we made a deal today, instead of playing games and maybe not making a deal at all,' Trump said. 'I think it's the biggest deal ever made.'
Japan Today
an hour ago
- Japan Today
State of play in Trump's tariffs, threats and delays
US President Donald Trump is set to raise tariffs on dozens of trading partners come August 1, if they do not reach deals with Washington By Beiyi SEOW Dozens of economies including India, Canada and Mexico face threats of higher tariffs Friday if they fail to strike deals with Washington. Here is a summary of duties President Donald Trump has introduced in his second term as he pressures allies and competitors alike to reshape US trade relationships. Global tariffs US "reciprocal" tariffs -- imposed under legally contentious emergency powers -- are due to jump from 10 percent to various steeper levels for a list of dozens of economies come August 1, including South Korea, India and Taiwan. The hikes were to take effect July 9 but Trump postponed them days before imposition, marking a second delay since their shock unveiling in April. A 10 percent "baseline" levy on most partners, which Trump imposed in April, remains in place. He has also issued letters dictating tariff rates above 10 percent for individual countries, including Brazil, which has a trade deficit with the United States and was not on the initial list of higher "reciprocal" rates. Several economies -- the European Union, Britain, Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines -- have struck initial tariff deals with Washington, while China managed to temporarily lower tit-for-tat duties. Certain products like pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and lumber are excluded from Trump's "reciprocal" tariffs, but may face separate action under different authorities. This has been the case for steel, aluminum, and soon copper. Gold and silver, alongside energy commodities, are also exempted. Excluded too are Mexico and Canada, hit with a different set of tariffs, and countries like Russia and North Korea as they already face sanctions. Canada, Mexico Canadian and Mexican products were hit by 25 percent US tariffs shortly after Trump returned to office, with a lower rate for Canadian energy. Trump targeted both neighbors over illegal immigration and fentanyl trafficking, also invoking emergency powers. But trade negotiations have been bumpy. This month, Trump said Canadian goods will face a higher 35 percent duty from August 1, and Mexican goods will see a 30 percent level. Products entering the United States under the USMCA North American free trade pact, covering large swaths of goods, are expected to remain exempt -- with Canadian energy resources and potash, used as fertilizer, to still face lower rates. China focus Trump has also taken special aim at China. The world's two biggest economies engaged in an escalating tariffs war this year before their temporary pullback. The countries imposed triple-digit duties on each other at one point, a level described as a trade embargo. After high level talks, Washington lowered its levies on Chinese goods to 30 percent and Beijing slashed its own to 10 percent. This pause is set to expire August 12, and officials will meet for further talks on Monday and Tuesday in the Swedish capital Stockholm. The US level is higher as it includes a 20 percent tariff over China's alleged role in the global fentanyl trade. Beyond expansive tariffs on Chinese products, Trump ordered the closure of a duty-free exemption for low-value parcels from the country. This adds to the cost of importing items like clothing and small electronics. Autos, metals Trump has targeted individual business sectors too, under more conventional national security grounds, imposing a 25 percent levy on steel and aluminum imports which he later doubled to 50 percent. The president has unveiled plans for a 50 percent tariff on copper imports starting August 1 as well and rolled out a 25 percent tariff on imported autos, although those entering under the USMCA can qualify for a lower rate. Trump's auto tariffs impact vehicle parts too, but new rules ensure automakers paying vehicle tariffs will not also be charged for certain other duties. He has ongoing investigations into imports of lumber, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and critical minerals that could trigger further duties. Legal challenges Several legal challenges have been filed against the tariffs Trump invoked citing emergencies. The US Court of International Trade ruled in May that the president had overstepped his authority, but a federal appeals court has allowed the duties to remain while it considers the case. If these tariffs are ultimately ruled illegal, companies could possibly seek reimbursements. © 2025 AFP
