Noem wants ‘Alligator Alcatraz' detention centers near airport runways across US to boost migrant deportation ‘efficiency'
The Florida facility is serving as a model for state-run detention centers, and 'the locations we're looking at are right by airport runways that will help give us an efficiency that we've never had before,' Noem told CBS News.
Noem told the network she has appealed directly to state officials, and 'most of them are interested.'
She added: 'Many of them have facilities that may be empty or underutilized.'
The administration has reportedly sought out facilities in Arizona, Nebraska and Louisiana, which currently houses the only Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center on a tarmac. The Alexandria Staging Facility sits across from the Alexandria International Airport, which has emerged as the nation's deportation capital under the Trump administration.
For more than a decade, ICE — which operates under Homeland Security — has turned to corporate shipping and logistics companies for inspiration for rounding up and deporting immigrants. Shortly after he was tapped to lead the agency in March, ICE's acting director, Todd Lyons, bluntly compared the movement of people to packages.
'We need to get better at treating this like a business, where this mass deportation operation is something like you would see and say, like, Amazon trying to get your Prime delivery within 24 hours,' Lyons told a law enforcement conference in Phoenix in April.
'So, trying to figure out how to do that with human beings,' he said.
Lyons later expanded on his remarks about treating immigrants like packages in an interview with Boston 25 News that same month.
'The key part that got left out of that statement was, I said, they deal with boxes, we deal with human beings, which is totally different,' he said.
ICE 'should be run like a corporation,' he told the outlet.
'We need to be better about removing those individuals who have been lawfully ordered out of the country in a safe, efficient manner,' Lyons continued. 'We can't trade innovation and efficiency for how we treat the people in our custody.'
In a statement to The Independent, Homeland Security assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin said the agency is 'working at turbo speed on cost-effective and innovative ways to deliver on the American people's mandate for mass deportations of criminal illegal aliens.'
'With the opening of Alligator Alcatraz, we expanded facilities and bed space in just days,' she added. 'We look forward to partnering with other states to open other similar facilities to house some the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens.'
Named Alligator Alcatraz by state and federal officials, a 3,000-bed detention center opened in south Florida last month within the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport, roughly 43 miles from Miami in the middle of the Everglades.
A federal lawsuit accuses the facility of blocking detainees from legal counsel and forcing people into 'overcrowded, unsanitary, and harsh conditions' with inadequate food, flood-prone cells, and 'excessive use of force' from guards that sent at least one man to a hospital.
It's also unclear who is actually running the facility and who wants to take responsibility for it. Government lawyers could not immediately answer in court whether the federal government or Florida is responsible.
In court filings, immigration officials claimed that the facility is operating through the federal 287(g) program, which allows local and state law enforcement agencies to enforce federal immigration law. ICE has inked nearly 800 such agreements covering 40 states.
'We need to get to the bottom of the interplay between the federal and state authorities on who's running this thing,' Florida District Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz II said during a recent court hearing in a lawsuit against the facility.
The makeshift facility is expected to cost roughly $450 million within its first year, at roughly $245 per inmate bed per night, according to DHS. ICE spent roughly $187 per adult detainee per day in 2023.
Still, Noem claims that the Alligator Alcatraz model is 'much better' than ICE's current arrangement with local jails and for-profit prison companies, which operate a vast majority of the nation's detention centers.
Funding for Alligator Alcatraz largely comes from FEMA's Shelter and Services Program.
The incoming wave of state-run detention centers is expected to tap into $45 billion in new funding for ICE as part of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' The bill also allocates $30 billion for an aggressive recruitment campaign to hire another 10,000 ICE agents.
Altogether, the bill earmarks more than $170 billion for immigration enforcement — a boon to for-profit contractors and cash-strapped states looking to tap into billions of taxpayer dollars.
Putting those new facilities near airports and runways will help ICE cut costs by 'facilitating quick turnarounds,' Noem told CBS.
'They're all strategically designed to make sure that people are in beds for less days,' Noem said. 'It can be much more efficient once they get their hearings, due process, paperwork.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
29 minutes ago
- Fox News
Jack Smith was 'racing against the clock' to get cases against Trump to a jury: Sen Tom Cotton
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., explains why he requested a special investigation into Jack Smith's actions to bring charges against President Donald Trump prior to the 2024 election on 'Hannity.'
CNN
29 minutes ago
- CNN
‘How much does it cost for fascism?': Tensions erupt at Nebraska GOP congressman's town hall
Rep. Mike Flood faced a barrage of criticism at a packed town hall in Lincoln, Nebraska, Monday evening as constituents repeatedly confronted him over his support for President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' immigration policy and what they described as threats to democracy. It didn't take long for the audience gathered for the meeting at the University of Nebraska to erupt in chants of 'tax the rich,' while the Republican congressman attempted to defend his decision to vote for the the president's massive agenda. 'I truly believe that this bill will allow America to experience growth, that it will allow our communities to thrive, that it will spark our economy, that it will help farmers and ranchers, that it will take care of the vulnerable. And more than anything, I truly believe this bill protects Medicaid for the future,' Flood said, speaking over outbursts from the crowd. Flood, one of few members of his party to hold in-person events during spring's congressional recess as the GOP looked to avoid blowback from the president's DOGE initiative, heeded the National Republican Congressional Committee's updated guidance to focus this August district work period on selling Trump's agenda. 'With the One Big Beautiful Bill signed into law just a few weeks ago, this is a critical opportunity to continue to define how this legislation will help every voter and push back on Democrat fearmongering,' the memo from the NRCC, the House GOP's campaign arm, stated. But as he did earlier this year, Flood met a largely hostile crowd. The congressman was pressed on everything from the president's sweeping tax and spending cuts legislation to veterans' issues, Medicaid funding and the war in Gaza during a wide-ranging question-and-answer period – all against a backdrop of near-constant heckling, chants and booing from the audience. Still, the he maintained his position on the president's domestic agenda package. 'Is every bill perfect? No, but I supported this bill,' he told the crowd. In one tense back-and-forth in Nebraska, an audience member confronted Flood about government spending and authoritarianism. 'My question is fiscal,' the attendee began, referencing reports that the makeshift immigration detention facility in Florida dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz' is expected to cost $450 million to operate for a single year. 'How much does it cost for fascism? How much do the taxpayers have to pay for a fascist country?' the attendee asked, as the crowd erupted in applause. Flood responded, 'Americans went to the polls in November, and they had a choice between a Democratic candidate that had an open border, no enforcement, fentanyl, drugs, human trafficking, and they had a choice between that and a candidate that said close the border, get illegal immigrants out of our country, stop the fentanyl, stop the human trafficking, stop the drugs, stop the crime, stop the violence. That's what Americans voted for.' 'Americans voted for a border that is secure, and I support the president enforcing our immigration laws, which, by the way, were written by Congress.' The audience appeared to grow increasingly agitated, with continued shouts hurled at the congressman. Another member from the audience accused Flood of staying silent in the face of what they called a 'fascist machine,' referring to the conservative blueprint Project 2025. 'You said in Seward that you were not a fascist,' the person said. 'But your complicity says otherwise.' 'Fascists don't hold town halls with open question-and-answer series,' he responded. The audience again booed. Despite his efforts to present the recently passed budget bill – which one constituent called 'the big, ugly bill' – as a solution for Medicaid funding and rural hospitals, audience members attacked Flood over cuts to SNAP benefits, veterans' programs and health care access. Veterans in the audience criticized him for backing a law they said threatens benefits for those who served. 'How can you stand a bill that erodes the very services that people like me, my family, and younger vets rely on?' one Marine Corps veteran asked. Flood said he had personally met with the VA secretary and promised improvements to the system but offered no specifics. The Nebraska lawmaker also fielded a question on the Jeffrey Epstein files – a topic that has consumed Capitol Hill in recent weeks but yielded limited exchanges so far in the early public town halls during lawmakers' break from Washington. Read aloud by an aide at the event, the written question posed: 'Why are you covering up the Epstein files?' It was met with raucous applause from the audience. Flood responded: 'Let's be very clear – at the next pro forma session of the Congress, you will find my name as a sponsor on a resolution from the House Rules Committee to release the Epstein files to protect the victims and not re-victimize them again.' He added that he supports Congress' subpoena of Epstein's former associate Ghislaine Maxwell for a deposition, and declard: 'I am for the release of those records.' The topic also arose at a Democrat's town hall Monday night in Benton Harbor, Michigan, where Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin made a case against presidential pardon power. Asked by an audience member if she thinks the presidential pardon power should be limited, Slotkin called it 'a quirk of history that does not make sense in America for either party, for any reason.' 'To me, it is just a strange thing that the president of the United States has a few extra chits in their pocket to give away,' she continued, adding that she doesn't think people who are wrongly imprisoned should be in jail. As pressure grows on the Trump administration to release more information related to the Epstein case, the president hasn't ruled out a pardon for Maxwell, who met recently with a top Justice Department official and also was transferred to a lower security prison camp from where she was previously being held. Asked last week if clemency was on the table in exchange for Maxwell's testimony, Trump said, 'I'm allowed to do it, but nobody's asked me to do it. I know nothing about it. I don't know anything about the case, but I know I have the right to do it.' Slotkin expressed wariness that Trump is talking about pardon for Maxwell 'in year one of his presidency, not the end of his presidency, which is what you typically see.' 'Look, I thought it was controversial with President Biden, too. It was controversial with everyone that Obama or Clinton or Bush did. So to me, it's just this weird kind of literally get out of jail free card that I just think muddies the waters,' she said. 'When you have a president who has a deep, deep problem with corruption, it just can be taken to such a dangerous degree that he's letting out pedophiles and criminals, violent people because he's paying back favors to others. I just can't support that,' she continued. The Michigan senator, who delivered what she called her 'economic war plan for America' and argued against the massive domestic policy bill that Trump signed into law July 4, addressed another issue that looms large for lawmakers when they return to DC in a matter of weeks: government funding. As Democrats weigh how to approach negotiations with Republicans to keep the government funded past the September 30 deadline, Slotkin, who did not vote for the GOP-led bill to avert a shutdown earlier this year, said she would not be open to any proposal without a commitment by Republicans to restore some of the health care-related funding they have voted to slash. 'For me, for my vote, for my willingness to join in that negotiation, you're going to have to restore something of Americans' health care in order to get me back on that team,' she said.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rwanda reached deal with US to take in up to 250 migrants, government says
By Daphne Psaledakis WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The United States and Rwanda have agreed for the African country to accept up to 250 migrants deported from the U.S., the spokesperson for the Rwandan government and an official told Reuters, as President Donald Trump's administration takes a hardline approach toward immigration. The agreement, first reported by Reuters, was signed by U.S. and Rwandan officials in Kigali in June, said the Rwandan official, speaking on condition of anonymity, adding that Washington had already sent an initial list of 10 people to be vetted. "Rwanda has agreed with the United States to accept up to 250 migrants, in part because nearly every Rwandan family has experienced the hardships of displacement, and our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation," said the spokesperson for the Rwandan government, Yolande Makolo. "Under the agreement, Rwanda has the ability to approve each individual proposed for resettlement. Those approved will be provided with workforce training, healthcare, and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade." The White House and State Department had no immediate comment. The Department of Homeland Security referred questions to the State Department. President Donald Trump aims to deport millions of immigrants in the U.S. illegally and his administration has sought to ramp up removals to third countries, including sending convicted criminals to South Sudan and Eswatini, formerly known as Swaziland. Rwanda has in recent years positioned itself as a destination country for migrants that Western countries would like to remove, despite concerns by rights groups that Kigali does not respect basic human rights. In May, the foreign minister said Rwanda was in the early stages of talks to receive immigrants deported from the United States. The Trump administration argues that third-country deportations help swiftly remove some migrants, including those with criminal convictions. Immigration hardliners see third-country removals as a way to deal with offenders who cannot easily be deported and could pose a threat to the public. Opponents have criticized the deportations as dangerous and cruel, since people could be sent to countries where they could face violence, have no ties and do not speak the language. US TO PROVIDE GRANT TO RWANDA Rwanda will be paid by the United States in the form of a grant, the official said, adding that the grant letter was finalized in July. The official declined to say how much the grant was for. The U.S. and Rwanda could extend the agreement beyond 250 people by mutual consent, the official said, adding that those deported to Rwanda do not have to stay in the country and can leave anytime they choose. Kigali will only accept those whose prison terms are complete or who have no criminal case against them, as there is no agreement with Washington that would allow people to serve out their U.S. sentence in Rwanda, the official said. No child sex offenders will be accepted. The Trump administration has pressed other countries to take migrants. It deported more than 200 Venezuelans accused of being gang members to El Salvador in March, where they were jailed until they were released in a prisoner swap last month. The Supreme Court in June allowed the Trump administration to deport migrants to third countries without giving them a chance to show they could be harmed. But the legality of the removals is being contested in a federal lawsuit in Boston, a case that could potentially wind its way back to the conservative-leaning high court. Western and regional leaders have praised President Paul Kagame for transforming Rwanda from the ruins of the 1994 genocide that killed more than 1 million people into a thriving economy. Rights groups have accused him of abuses and of supporting rebels in neighboring Democratic Republic of Congo, accusations that he denies. Rwanda has also engaged in peace talks led by the Trump administration to bring an end to fighting in eastern Congo. The two African nations signed a U.S.-brokered peace agreement in Washington in June, raising hopes for an end to fighting that has killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands more this year. The agreement to accept migrants deported from the U.S. is not the first such agreement Rwanda has reached. Kigali signed an agreement with Britain in 2022 to take in thousands of asylum seekers, a deal that was scrapped last year by then newly-elected Prime Minister Keir Starmer. No one was sent to Rwanda under the plan because of years of legal challenges.
