Delhi High Court to hear pleas against Centre's nod to release Udaipur Files film on July 30
The Court was also informed that an application has been made by the producers of the film to the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) for re-certification of the movie, and it is likely to be considered shortly.
A bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela listed the pleas for hearing on Wednesday (July 30, 2025) after a request for adjournment was made on behalf of one of the petitioners.
The two petitions were listed before the High Court in pursuance to the Supreme Court's direction to the petitioners to approach the high court against the Centre's decision of giving nod for the film's release.
The petitions have been filed by Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind president Maulana Arshad Madani and Mohd Javed, who is an accused in the Kanhaiya Lal murder case.
The apex court, on July 25, had said that film-makers' appeal against the High Court order staying the film's release was infructuous for they had accepted the July 21 Centre nod for the film's release, subject to six cuts in its scenes and modifications in the disclaimer.
Udaipur-based tailor Kanhaiya Lal was murdered in June 2022 allegedly by Mohammad Riyaz and Mohammad Ghous.
The assailants later released a video claiming that the murder was in reaction to the tailor allegedly sharing a social media post in support of former BJP member Nupur Sharma following her controversial comments on Prophet Mohammed.
The case was probed by the NIA and the accused were booked under the stringent Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, besides provisions under the IPC.
The trial is pending before the special NIA court in Jaipur.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
27 minutes ago
- Hans India
HC dismisses election petition against Congress MP
Bengaluru: The High Court has dismissed the election petition filed against Davanagere Congress MP Dr. Prabha Mallikarjun, who was accused of electoral malpractice for allegedly distributing 'guarantee cards' to lure voters during the Lok Sabha polls. The petition, filed by BJP's defeated candidate G.S. Gayathri Siddeshwar, sought to nullify Dr. Prabha Mallikarjun's election on grounds of inducement and violation of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. However, Justice M.I. Arun, who presided over the single-judge bench, rejected the petition, holding that the allegations do not amount to a corrupt practice under the law. The court cited a previous ruling related to a similar case against Minister Zameer Ahmed Khan and reiterated that the Congress party's 'guarantee schemes' were part of its official election manifesto. The judge observed that election manifestos reflect a party's policy decisions and not the personal promises of individual candidates. Hence, such guarantees cannot be construed as bribes or inducements under Section 123(1)(A)(B) of the Representation of the People Act.
Hans India
27 minutes ago
- Hans India
Dual nativity row hits medical admissions in Puducherry UT again
Puducherry: The contentious issue of dual nativity has once again marred the medical admission process in Puducherry, with allegations surfacing over irregularities in the draft merit list released by the Centralised Admission Committee (CENTAC) for MBBS and other NEET-based courses under the government quota. The Pondicherry State Students and Parents Welfare Association has raised an alarm over suspected misuse of nativity claims, with its president V. Balasubramanian revealing that at least two students were found to be listed in both Puducherry's CENTAC merit list and the Tamil Nadu Health Department's list. This duplication, he said, points to potential fraud in the declaration of nativity, a critical factor in admissions under the Union Territory's government quota. In a formal petition addressed to the Lieutenant Governor, Chief Minister and senior officials of the UT administration, the association has demanded an immediate probe and intervention. It has urged authorities to prevent candidates from other states from cornering seats meant exclusively for Puducherry natives. The association has also sought a thorough cross-verification of applicants' NEET scores, rank numbers, and personal details against the merit lists released in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Karnataka, and Kerala. Balasubramanian expressed concern that multiple similar cases may have gone undetected due to insufficient scrutiny. Despite clear provisions in Puducherry's admission guidelines — which disqualify any student claiming nativity in more than one state during the same academic year — the issue continues to recur annually. The rules also mandate a parental declaration affirming the legitimacy of the nativity claim, but activists allege that enforcement remains weak. Last year, eight students were disqualified on dual nativity grounds. However, the association criticised CENTAC and the Puducherry Health Department for not implementing the rules effectively. Balasubramanian alleged that the departments have failed to take proactive steps to detect and deter fraudulent claims. Drawing attention to recent action taken by Tamil Nadu authorities, who disqualified over 23 students for submitting fake documents under the NRI and other quota categories, the association urged the Puducherry government to adopt similar strict punitive measures. It also called for action against students, parents, and intermediaries involved in procuring bogus nativity certificates. With the admissions process underway, the association has warned that failure to address the issue promptly could deny deserving local candidates their rightful opportunity to pursue medical education.
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Surrogacy racket accused sent to 5-day police custody
The Hyderabad police on Friday took Dr Athaluri Namratha (65), the owner of Universal Srushti Fertility Centre at Secunderabad, and the prime accused in the fake surrogacy racket into five-day custody for further questioning, officials familiar with the development said. Surrogacy racket accused sent to 5-day police custody Namratha, who was arrested along with seven others, by Gopalapuram police on July 27, were remanded to judicial custody by a Nampally criminal court on the same day. On Thursday, the court granted custody of the accused to the police for questioning for five days, starting Friday. After conducting the mandatory medical examination at Gandhi Hospital, the police shifted Namratha to the office of the deputy commissioner of police (north zone) in the afternoon. 'I did not commit any crime. It was a fabricated case based on false allegations made by an army guy. I shall disclose all the details shortly,' Namratha told reporters at Gandhi Hospital. However, investigations by the police revealed that this was not the first time that Namratha indulged in the business of illegal child trafficking and fake surrogacy. 'She is a habitual offender with several cases pending against her in different police stations across Telangana and Andhra Pradesh,' said the remand report submitted by the Hyderabad police before the court. HT has seen the report. Namratha was booked for cheating the patients with fake IVF procedure cases in 2010 and 2013 in Visakhapatnam and Guntur respectively. Between 2020 and 2023, she was booked in nine other cases, including five in Gopalapuram police station in Secunderabad and four in Visakhapatnam. 'She was charged with kidnapping (IPC Section 363), trafficking of persons (Section 370), forgery for the purpose of cheating (Section 468) and pretending fake documents to be genuine (Section 471). In two cases registered in the Maharanipeta police station in Visakhapatnam, she was also charged under Section 81 and 87 of Juvenile Justice Act, which deals with the sale and purchase of children,' the report said. The remand report explained in detail the modus operandi adopted by Namratha in the latest instance of buying a new born male child from an Assam couple and selling them to a Rajasthani couple, claiming that he was born through surrogacy at Visakhapatnam. The couple, who have been in Hyderabad since 2024, had approached Namratha at her Universal Srushti Fertility Centre, seeking the birth of a baby through IVF method. After conducting tests on the mother, Namratha told her that the IVF method would not work out for her and she could obtain a child through surrogacy. The couple were told that the doctors will use their sperm and eggs for surrogacy. The baby would be handed over after DNA confirmation by arranging a woman from the clinic and charged over ₹30 lakh from their service. However, the doctor used different sperm and eggs for surrogacy. After a woman conceived, she was shifted to Visakhapatnam where the woman delivered a baby boy in June this year. Later, the baby was handed over to the couple who left for Rajasthan. When the couple asked the doctor to conduct the DNA tests for the child, Namratha resisted first and later took the samples from husband for a DNA test. When there was no response from the fertility centre for several days, the couple got the tests conducted at a DNA forensic lab in Vasant Kunj in Delhi, whose reports indicated that the baby was not biologically connected to the father. When the couple tried to contact Namratha with the genuine DNA reports, she blocked their mobile numbers and started avoiding them over the phone. On June 23, 2025, the couple visited the clinic at Secunderabad and met Namratha 'Namratha admitted her mistake in handing over the wrong surrogacy child to the parents on pretext of fabricated IVF and surrogacy process. She deliberately cheated the couple by collecting huge amounts from the couple,' the remand report said. The report also pointed out that an anaesthetist from Gandhi Hospital was found to be hand in glove with Namratha in conducting the fertility tests at her centre. 'The anaesthetist Nargula Sadanandam, who was aware of the illegal operations at Universal Srushti Fertility Centre and was knowingly administering anaesthesia to patients who were undergoing tests. He was also among the arrested,' the report said. Namratha also engaged agents in Visakhapatnam, Hyderabad and Vijayawada, who would lure financially vulnerable women to act as surrogate donors, offering them money and introducing them to her. One of the agents Dhanasri Santoshi, a housewife, was also arrested along with Namratha. The police said Mohammed Ali Adik and Nasreen Begum, the child's biological parents are currently imprisoned in Chanchalguda jail. Their biological child, who was offered to the Rajasthani couple, was shifted to Sisu Vihar, belonging to the Telangana state women and child welfare department. A case has been registered against Namratha, the biological parents and others under sections 61 (criminal conspiracy), 316 (criminal breach of trust), 335 (making a false document), 336 (forgery), and 340 (forged document or electronic record and using it as genuine) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), and sections 38, 39 and 40 of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021.
