John Bolton deems Trump's lack of 'philosophy', and coherent policy, 'disconcerting to US allies'
08/07/2025
UK-France: The tide of realpolitik rises as the sea of rhetoric fades on both sides of the Channel
UK
07/07/2025
Texas deadly floods: A state 'can't deal with this scale of disaster' without federal resources
Americas
07/07/2025
White House visit: 'For Netanyahu the issue is mostly about domestic politics, not Israeli security'
Middle East
07/07/2025
Deadly floods killed dozens in Texas
Americas
07/07/2025
'Netanyahu wants to perpetuate status quo: No agreement, no political framework, no Gaza withdrawal'
Middle East
06/07/2025
Elon Musk launches 'American Party' to challenge GOP lawmakers in 2026
Americas
06/07/2025
Colombia Senator's shooting: Police capture leader accused of coordinating the attack
Americas
06/07/2025
Texas flood: Rescuers search for girls missing from riverside summer camps
Americas
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
US airports end shoe removal requirement for security screening
The Transportation Security Administration will no longer require travelers to remove their shoes during security checks at US airports, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced on Tuesday, ending an unpopular policy. TSA had been requiring most US air travelers to remove their shoes during screening for nearly two decades. The new policy began nationwide implementation on Tuesday. "We expect this change will drastically decrease passenger wait times at our TSA checkpoints, leading to a more pleasant and efficient passenger experience," Noem said in a statement. TSA began making passengers remove their shoes to screen for explosives in August 2006. The policy was implemented nearly five years after the 9/11 attacks and when Richard Reid, who is known as the "shoe bomber," used matches in an attempt to ignite explosive devices hidden in his shoes on a flight from Paris to Miami. More than 1 billion passengers flew through US airports in fiscal 2023 on over 10 million flights, according to the US Department of Transportation. "We are very confident that we can continue to provide hospitality to folks and for American travelers and for those visiting our country, while maintaining the same standard of security for passengers and for our homeland," Noem said at a news conference at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in Arlington, Virginia. Noem highlighted advancements in security technology and processes as reasons for the removal of the policy but noted that some individuals may be asked to remove their shoes "if we think there's additional layers of screening that is necessary." In 2013, TSA launched the PreCheck Trusted Traveler program, whose members are not required to remove their shoes. Children under 12 and adults 75 years or older are exempt from removing their shoes. Noem did not think the new policy would degrade the PreCheck program. "I believe PreCheck will still be something that many travelers will want to utilise, because when they have TSA PreCheck, they won't have to take off their belt or their coat or remove things out of their bag such as laptops or compliant liquids," Noem said. In a statement, the Department of Homeland Security said other aspects of TSA's security process would remain unchanged for most other travelers. "For example, passengers (must) still clear identity verification, Secure Flight vetting, and other processes," the department said.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Supreme Court ruling opens door for Trump mass firings of government employees
The US Supreme Court cleared the way on Tuesday for President Donald Trump to begin carrying out mass firings of federal workers. The court, in an unsigned order, lifted a block imposed by a lower court on Trump's plans to potentially lay off tens of thousands of government employees. US District Court Judge Susan Illston had paused the planned sweeping layoffs in May on the grounds that the moves required a green light from Congress. A coalition of labor unions, non-profit groups and others had sued the Trump administration arguing that it had exceeded its authority by ordering mass firings and agency reforms without congressional approval. After returning to the White House in January, Trump directed federal agencies to prepare sweeping workforce reduction plans as part of wider efforts by the then- Elon Musk -headed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to downsize the government. In a February 11 executive order, the Republican president called for a "critical transformation of the Federal bureaucracy" and directed agencies to cull workers not designated essential. The Supreme Court said "the Government is likely to succeed on its argument that the Executive Order and Memorandum are lawful." But the justices said they were not taking a position at this point on the legality of specific agency reorganization plans, which will continue to be the subject of legal battles. "The plans themselves are not before this Court, at this stage, and we thus have no occasion to consider whether they can and will be carried out consistent with the constraints of law," said Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of three liberals on the top court. "I join the Court's stay because it leaves the District Court free to consider those questions," Sotomayor said. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, an appointee of former Democratic president Joe Biden, lodged the sole dissent among the nine justices on the court. "For some reason, this Court sees fit to step in now and release the President's wrecking ball at the outset of this litigation," Jackson said. "Under our Constitution, Congress has the power to establish administrative agencies and detail their functions. "Thus, over the past century, Presidents who have attempted to reorganize the Federal Government have first obtained authorization from Congress to do so. "While Presidents possess some discretion to reduce federal employment, they may not fundamentally restructure the Federal Government all on their own." Trump has moved to fire tens of thousands of government employees and slash programs -- targeting diversity initiatives and eliminating the US humanitarian aid agency USAID and various other departments.
France 24
5 hours ago
- France 24
El Salvador says US has jurisdiction over detained migrants
The assertion clashes with the Trump administration's claims that it has no authority to bring back the migrants jailed in El Salvador's maximum security CECOT prison as they are no longer in US custody. Lawyers for Venezuelans held in the prison submitted the statements as evidence in a US court on Monday in another case challenging President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. Responding to questions from a UN working group on enforced disappearances, El Salvador said its actions were limited to making prison facilities available for people detained within the scope of the justice system and law enforcement activities of another state. "In this context, the jurisdiction and legal responsibility for these persons lie exclusively with the competent foreign authorities," it said. In mid-March, Trump sent 238 Venezuelans and 23 Salvadorans from the United States to the CECOT prison in El Salvador. The Trump administration invoked an obscure wartime law to justify the removal of the Venezuelans, accusing them of being members of the Tren de Aragua gang. The deportations sparked protests after the US government refused to bring back a Salvadoran man, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who had been wrongly deported. The United States claimed lack of jurisdiction until Abrego Garcia was returned in June and arrested for human trafficking, a crime he denies. His lawyers claim he was tortured in prison in El Salvador. El Salvador has agreed to imprison expelled migrants in exchange for six million dollars, according to the White House. The US Supreme Court urged the government to respect due process because migrants have the right to challenge expulsions.
