logo
Presumptive Medicaid eligibility for pregnant Arkansans set to go into effect

Presumptive Medicaid eligibility for pregnant Arkansans set to go into effect

Yahoo05-06-2025
Rep. Lee Johnson (left), R-Greenwood, an emergency medicine physician and the Joint Public Health, Welfare and Labor Committee's House chair, asks Department of Human Services officials a question about presumptive Medicaid eligibility for pregnant women on Wednesday, June 4, 2025. At right is Rep. Cameron Cooper, R-Romance. (Screenshot/Arkansas Legislature)
Arkansas lawmakers reviewed two rules Wednesday in response to a new law aimed at improving the state's maternal health care landscape for low-income pregnant women.
The Joint Public Health, Welfare and Labor Committee spent nearly an hour discussing Arkansas' new policy of presumptive Medicaid eligibility for pregnant women, part of the Healthy Moms, Healthy Babies Act that will go into effect in August.
Presumptive eligibility assumes 60 days of Medicaid eligibility and shortens the process of applying for coverage. The policy was among several recommendations to improve the state's maternal health care landscape that a task force convened by Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders issued in September 2024.
More than half of births in Arkansas are covered by Medicaid, the federal-state health insurance system for low-income Americans. A federal budget bill moving through Congress would make deep cuts to Medicaid spending, reducing the program by $625 billion over 10 years.
U.S. House Republicans push through massive tax and spending bill slashing Medicaid
Elizabeth Pitman, director of the Division of Medical Services for Arkansas Medicaid, said she anticipates the proposed cuts will affect the state's Medicaid expansion population but not pregnant women on Medicaid.
Arkansas has among the nation's highest maternal mortality and infant mortality rates. Rep. Jack Ladyman, R-Jonesboro, said he found this frustrating and considered presumptive Medicaid eligibility 'a very good cornerstone' for improving these statistics.
Ladyman and Rep. Lee Johnson, R-Greenwood, asked Pitman and other Department of Human Services officials how they plan to ensure that pregnant Arkansans statewide have the information and resources they need to opt into presumptive Medicaid eligibility if applicable.
'I want to support this rule, but I also want to be realistic in what we expect the outcome of this rule to be,' said Johnson, an emergency medicine physician and the joint committee's House chair. 'If we pass this eligibility category and nobody's applying for it any more often than they're currently applying for Medicaid, then it's not moving the needle.'
Pitman said DHS can address Johnson's concerns about access to information in its focus groups with pregnant Arkansans. She also said the agency will work with community health workers, doulas and other local health care providers and community organizations to ensure the option of presumptive Medicaid eligibility is as widely known as possible.
Committee outlines recommendations, actions taken to improve maternal health in Arkansas
DHS learned during the three-year public health emergency of the COVID-19 pandemic that spreading information about public health resources via social media, digital billboards and doctor's offices successfully reaches the agency's target audience, state Medicaid Director Janet Mann said.
In January, Arkansas received a 10-year, $17 million federal grant aimed at improving maternal health outcomes for Medicaid recipients. Applying for the grant was among the maternal health task force's recommendations last year.
The grant includes payments to healthcare providers as incentives for improved data-sharing on maternal health outcomes, Pitman said.
In response to more questions from Johnson, Pitman said DHS does not have data on whether pregnant Arkansans' first interactions with prenatal health care occur in primary care providers' offices or emergency rooms.
Arkansas remains the only state that has taken no action to adopt the federal option of extending postpartum Medicaid coverage from 60 days to 12 months after birth, according to KFF. The maternal health task force did not recommend this policy, and a bill to create it failed in a Senate committee in April after Pitman and Mann expressed DHS' opposition to it.
Arkansas Senate committee rejects 12-month postpartum Medicaid coverage
The other rule the joint committee reviewed Wednesday was the 'unbundling' of billing rates for labor and delivery, a policy also put forth by the Healthy Moms, Healthy Babies Act.
The federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services authorized a 70% increase in Arkansas' maximum reimbursement rate for obstetrical care 'to include prenatal, delivery and postpartum care,' according to the rule. All of these services will be billed separately in all cases, Pitman said.
CMS' approval of such a stark increase was 'very unusual,' but Arkansas' shortage of maternal health care providers in rural areas, closure of seven labor and delivery units since 2019 and high maternal and infant mortality rates led the agency to grant DHS' request without question, Pitman said.
Higher reimbursement rates should 'improve Medicaid's data collection on utilization of prenatal and postpartum services,' the rule states.
'We're really hopeful that this will give us better data and insight into what is happening in the prenatal care space: when women are going [to the doctor], if it's the first, second or third trimester, who are they seeing and what are their diagnoses,' Pitman said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mailbag: ‘Careless and heartless policies' are causing fear in our communities
Mailbag: ‘Careless and heartless policies' are causing fear in our communities

Los Angeles Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Mailbag: ‘Careless and heartless policies' are causing fear in our communities

I commend Patrice Apodaca's courage for using her column (July 27) to express objection to the meanness emanating from Washington, D.C., in particular the careless and heartless policies causing fear and upheaval in the United States' immigrant population. I do not understand the rationale for the indiscriminate, en masse sweeping up and exporting of people to countries where they have never been and/or putting them into concentration camps. I am particularly angry about this since the administration suggested that recipients of Medicaid can replace field workers. Next, they are to round up the homeless. Perhaps they will be sent to do farm labor. I empathize with Apodaca's concern that she will face retribution for speaking out. Dissent, a Constitutional right, now justifies retribution. Patrice Apodaca made good, intelligent points about the mean policies towards our marginalized citizens and residents. I do not understand how normal, kind, humane people can be devoted to our current leaders. Liz Swiertz NewmanCorona del Mar I want to thank Patrice Apodaca for her column 'Entering the Age of Meanness' published July 27, and the Pilot for publishing it, as well as the letters by Lorraine Gayer and Denny Freidenrich on that day. My wish is that everyone, including our president, would follow their example. Mary Ellen GoddardCosta Mesa After reading Mr. Colin Martinez Longmore's letter, titled 'The Diocese of Orange must not remain silent about ICE raids' we were disappointed about its erroneous assertions. To that end, as a pillar of Orange County faith, the Diocese of Orange would like to update the community about our comprehensive actions taken in response to the recent federal immigration enforcement. Because based on Mr. Longmore's letter, clearly some are unaware of everything we are doing. We would challenge Mr. Longmore and others to visit and witness the good work that has been accomplished and not rely on hearsay and innuendo. Our approach is nuanced, practical and pastoral, rooted in Catholic social teachings while also supporting the rule of law. It may not be apropos to catchy sound bites, social media divisiveness or alleviate all concerns, but we stand by our actions and commitments. In early June, we aggressively called for immigration reform (which has not happened in some four decades) while also advocating for peaceful protest that avoids our most violent instincts. It was anything but vague. Since then, we have fostered what we pray are beacons of light in dark times. While Mass attendance was initially down following the immigration enforcement, it has since returned to near-normal levels. Rather than give a dispensation from attending Sunday Mass, we encouraged our priests to celebrate Mass in the homes of those living in fear or ensure ministers bring Holy Communion to them. We never abandoned them in their time of need; instead, we offered the hope that comes from Christ. Should immigration enforcement occur at one of our places of worship — which it currently has not — our Catholic communities have received resource packets with 'know your rights' documentation and contact information for trusted legal and advocacy organizations. We recently hosted an internal seminar by our legal counsel on these issues. For the faithful facing immigration court, we send priests and deacons, offering spiritual support and a prayerful presence. This includes Bishop Kevin Vann, who attended the bond hearing of Narciso Barranco, the Tustin father of three Marines who endured a violent arrest while at a landscaping job. These actions and more exemplify the Catholic Church's pastoral care. They show how we are active and present in our communities, and they highlight our commitment to stand with our friends and families in faith, today and always. Bishop Kevin VannAuxiliary Bishop Thanh Thai NguyenAuxiliary Bishop Timothy FreyerThe Very Rev. Angelos Sebastian, Vicar General and Moderator of the CuriaGarden Grove

Thune: Recess appointments on table as Senate faces backlog of nominees
Thune: Recess appointments on table as Senate faces backlog of nominees

The Hill

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Thune: Recess appointments on table as Senate faces backlog of nominees

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) says that putting the Senate into an extended recess to allow President Trump to make recess appointments to clear the backlog of his pending nominees is an option that's 'on the table.' Thune pushed back on the idea of putting the Senate into an extended recess at the start of the year to allow Trump to fill his Cabinet without having to go through the time-consuming confirmation process. Now, Thune isn't ruling out the idea of opening the way for recess appointments as the Senate faces a huge backlog of 161 nominees, mostly lower-level positions that in past years would have been filled by voice votes or unanimous consent agreements on the floor. 'I think everything is on the table,' Thune told reporters, who said that other options such as rules reform 'make more sense.' 'Fixing the rules, not just for now, but for the long term would be a better solution for it. But at this point right now, I wouldn't say we're taking any options off the table,' he said. Some Republicans are making the argument within the GOP conference that putting the Senate into an extended recess, which would allow Trump to swiftly fill open positions with recess appointments, is the best path forward. Proponents of going the route of recess appointments argue that there are so many nominees currently pending that it would take too long to reach consensus on a rules change to speed up confirmations, and that the rules reform would likely be too modest to have much of an immediate impact on the backlog. 'Whatever it takes,' Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said of adjourning the Senate for several weeks to allow Trump to make recess appointments. 'This is so completely broken, so out of control,' he said of the backlog of nominees. There are several obstacles to putting the Senate into an extended recess. The first is that Thune would need to get at least 50 Republicans to vote for the recess, and already two GOP senators have raised concerns about doing that — Sens. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). Thune could afford no more than three defections from his conference on recess appointments. The second obstacle is that the House would also have to agree to a longer-term adjournment resolution to opt out of pro forma sessions that block the president from making recess appointments. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) hasn't given any indication that he plans to call his members back to Washington to approve an adjournment resolution, but that could change if the Senate decides to set the stage for Trump to make recess appointments.

Karoline Leavitt details $200M ballroom plans at White House
Karoline Leavitt details $200M ballroom plans at White House

The Hill

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Karoline Leavitt details $200M ballroom plans at White House

Construction is set to begin in September on a new ballroom inside the White House, press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced Thursday. The $200 million ballroom will be built adjacent to the White House where the East Wing sits. Leavitt said the East Wing will be 'modernized,' with offices in that area relocated during construction. The cost of the project will be covered by Trump and other donors, the White House said. 'The White House state ballroom will be a much needed and exquisite addition of 90,000 square feet,' Leavitt said, adding that it would have a seated capacity of 650 people and would elminate the need for a 'large and unsightly tent' to host state dinners and other large events. Trump has met in recent weeks with the National Park Service, Secret Service and other agencies to discuss the project. Leavitt said it would be completed before the end of Trump's term in January 2029. 'The president and the Trump White House are fully committed to working with the appropriate organizations to preserving the special history of the White House while building a beautiful ballroom that can be enjoyed by future Administrations and generations of Americans to come,' White House chief of staff Susie Wiles said in a statement. Trump has spoken in recent months about his desire for changes to the White House, including the addition of a ballroom. The grass in the Rose Garden has been uprooted in recent weeks and replaced with stone pavers. Obama White House officials confirmed in 2016 that Trump had offered to build a $100 million ballroom in the building, but said they did not seriously consider the proposal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store