Speaker proposes tapping Rainy Day Fund for extra pay for teachers in hard-to-fill positions
Nevada Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager is proposing the state tap into the Rainy Day Fund to provide additional pay for public school district teachers in hard-to-fill positions, citing the success similar funding provided two years ago had on the Clark County School District.
The Las Vegas Democrat is also proposing a mechanism to provide charter schools with dedicated funding for broader teacher and support staff raises, making good on a commitment to try and extend to them what they were denied by the Legislature two years ago.
The policy proposal to provide an additional $5,000 per year in pay for district teachers at low-income schools and in critical areas was well received by the Assembly Ways and Means Committee during a hearing Thursday. As was the proposal to establish a mechanism for broader teacher and support staff raises at charter schools.
But the proposed funding mechanism included within the bill — taking $90 million out of the state's fully funded $1.3 billion Rainy Day Fund — may be a sticking point.
Yeager acknowledged it's 'a serious request' that will raise concern and discontent.
'I do think it's accurate to say that it is already rainy and has been raining when it comes to filling hard-to-fill positions,' he continued. 'If we're being honest with ourselves, things are only likely to get worse when it comes to education and education funding given what's happening at the federal level at the moment. So, I believe this is a good use of the funds.'
Democratic Assemblymember Daniele Monroe-Moreno, who chairs the Ways and Means Committee, in the meeting said she was 'not in agreement' with the funding component of Yeager's bill but said she would work to find an appropriate source of funding.
'I don't think we have an answer for that today,' she added.
Monroe-Moreno, who is also chair of the Nevada State Democratic Party, did not elaborate, but Democrats this entire legislative session have warned that an economic downturn and budget cuts at the federal level may force the state to tap the Rainy Day Fund in order to maintain important services.
Yeager's proposal, Assembly Bill 398, would provide up to $90 million in differential pay across two years for public school district teachers in positions deemed hard to fill. To qualify for the differential pay, teachers would have to work at a Title-1 school with a high vacancy rate, defined as 10% at the elementary level, 12% at the middle school level, and 15% at the high school level. Or they would have to work in an area that has been deemed to have a 'critical labor shortage' — English language arts, math, science, or special education.
The Clark County Education Association and CCSD dedicated similar differential pay using an infusion of funding approved by the 2023 Legislature. According to Clark County Education Association Executive Director John Vellardita, who presented the bill alongside Yeager, the results were a resounding success.
Vellardita said Title-1 schools that qualified for the differential pay in 2023 saw a 53% reduction in vacancies, from 1,346 vacancies in May 2024 to 633 in January 2025. Special education positions saw an 84% reduction, from 310 vacancies in August 2024 to 50 in March 2025.
That progress toward getting a qualified teacher in every classroom needs sustained investments, he added. 'It has made a difference. We're asking for this to continue.'
CCEA Vice President Matt Nighswonger said during support testimony that the additional funding helps with teacher retention by incentivizing them to stay in positions that need the most experienced teachers.
'Teachers often view these positions as a stepping stone to a different school or a one-year teaching assignment to demonstrate they are a quality teacher,' he said. 'Once they have demonstrated their prowess, they move on to a school in the suburban ring or to subjects that are not as demanding to teach.'
AB398 funding for educators would be available for all 17 Nevada school districts. But Yeager acknowledged that charter school teachers and education support professionals at both charter and district schools would not be eligible for the hard-to-fill position pay.
'Were our financial situation better, I might have made a different decision,' he said. 'A future legislature can always decide to include them, but I didn't believe it would be fiscally responsible for me to include them now. I don't want to spread the funding too thin so that it doesn't work and achieve the objective of actually filling these hard-to-fill positions.'
The Nevada State Education Association, whose affiliate units include teachers in non-Clark counties and support staff in CCSD, opposes the bill on the grounds it excludes education support personnel who are just as hands-on and vital to student success. Teamsters Local 14, which represents bus drivers and some other support staff within CCSD, similarly opposed the bill.
The Charter School Association of Nevada, Nevada Association of School Boards and Nevada Association of School Superintendents, as well as Clark and Washoe school districts, support the legislation.
Support from the charter school community was due to a conceptual amendment establishing a statewide fund that charter schools could tap to help with raises for their teachers and support staff. Yeager said the idea is to create a system similar to 2023's Senate Bill 231, which provided $250 million in funding for teachers and support staff at public school districts.
The budget committee last week approved an education budget that makes permanent those SB231 raises.
Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo's recommended budget had charter school raises being similarly baked into the education budget, but Democrats rejected that recommendation, saying charter school raises needed to be handled separately. That prompted Lombardo to publicly threaten to veto the education budget.
'I've been clear and consistent on this,' Lombardo said in a statement issued last week. 'I will not sign an education budget that does not include equal pay for public charter school teachers and make teacher pay raises, including those for charter school teachers, permanent.'
Yeager's AB398 provides a possible solution to charter school raises. Charter schools, likely collectively through their authorizing agency, the Nevada State Public Charter School Authority, would have to request the funds from the Interim Finance Committee, which makes financial decisions when the legislature is not in session. The schools would also have to match the funding, a requirement of 2023's SB 231.
The governor's office did not respond to the Nevada Current's request for comment on Yeager's proposal and whether it satisfies his requirement for equal pay for charter school teachers.
The current legislative session must end on June 2, leaving less than three weeks for lawmakers to pass a balanced budget that the governor will sign. In 2023, legislators failed to do so, which forced a 1-day special session.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
2 minutes ago
- The Hill
New York establishment Democrats mull over Mamdani charm offensive
New York Democrats cool to their party's Big Apple mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani are weighing their options as the 33-year-old progressive makes his own pitch to centrists that they should back him. The Democratic establishment has been looking for alternatives, but none really satisfy. Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo last week announced an independent run after losing the Democratic primary to Mamdani, but a number of Democrats who spoke to The Hill have doubts he can win. Some also haven't forgotten past Cuomo controversies. Incumbent Eric Adams is also running as an independent, but he has had a scandal-tarred career and his tilting toward MAGA and Trump World hasn't won him too many friends in the Democratic establishment. Political observers say there aren't enough moderates to go around for one — let alone two candidates — and if the establishment wants to prevail, either Adams or Cuomo should exit the race. 'You can't have multiple alternatives,' said Grant Reeher, the director of Syracuse University's Campbell Public Affairs Institute. 'I just don't see any way that Mamdani doesn't win unless one of these folks drops out.' 'If I was a Democratic strategist for the whole party in New York City, and I commanded authority, I would put Adams and Cuomo in a room, and I would say, 'You guys are going to flip a coin,'' he added. A HarrisX poll out earlier this month — before Cuomo announced his independent bid — showed Adams trailing with 13 percent of the vote and Mamdani leading with 26 percent, followed by Cuomo at 23 percent, and Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa at 22 percent. In a three-way race without Adams, the same poll revealed Cuomo would lead the field by 2 percentage points in front of Mamdani. Mamdani appears to recognize the potential danger to his candidacy if voters opposed to him rally around one independent choice. The left-wing candidate this past week sought to make inroads with business leaders and establishment Democrats, including during a trip to Washington where he met Democrats at an event with liberal star Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). On Friday, he met with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) in New York. Following the meeting, a spokesperson for Jeffries called the face-to-face 'constructive, candid and community-centered.' The spokesperson said Jeffries and Mamdani also discussed a 'variety of other important issues including public safety, rising antisemitism, gentrification' and the importance of 'taking back the House in 2026.' Mamdani also recently earned the endorsement of Rep. Ro Khanna (Calif.), another rising Democratic star. Some of Mamdani's efforts appeared to be helping him. 'He's already had those conversations, been in those meetings, and it doesn't seem that there is a wholesale public rebuke of him,' said Democratic strategist Basil Smikle, who served as executive director of the New York State Democratic Party. Smikle said that signals 'that a lot of those constituencies and voters are willing to hear more and are likely going to find a way to work with him.' Mamdani has impressed some Democrats who say the party needs fresh blood. 'He is campaigning like he isn't 94 years old,' said Democratic strategist Eddie Vale, who hails from New York. 'He is out hitting the streets and events and talking to tons of people. He is doing press interviews and podcasts and he is young and natively comfortable online for doing his own videos and social media.' By meeting with establishment operatives and backers, Mamdani has been chipping away at a part of the electorate that strategists say is critical to both Cuomo and Adams. The two independents are, 'for a number of moderate voters, the business community, the real estate community, a firewall against more progressive politics,' Smilke said. Some observers in the race differ over who is the stronger challenger to Mamdani. New-York based Republican strategist Susan Del Percio, who worked for Cuomo as a special adviser in 2014, holds the view it is Adams. 'Cuomo has lost once; he probably will lose again,' she said. 'The only one who really has a path when it comes down to Cuomo, Sliwa, and Adams is Adams,' Del Percio added. 'If he's willing to reinvent himself a bit in light of people being scared of Mamdani — it's almost Cuomo's argument, except I think that there's more that Adams can do now.' 'If you tell [Adams] now, 'You may actually be able to win,' he'll twist himself into a pretzel to do it,' Del Percio added. 'If you told him he had to be disciplined, and this is how you do it, and he has a real campaign, I think he could do it.' Other voices who think Cuomo could win more support point to Adams's unpopular tenure as mayor. While Adams was charged with corruption charges last year, a judge permanently dismissed them in April. The dismissal came weeks after the Trump administration asked prosecutors to drop the charges against Adams. Reeher said Adams has been tarnished with financial corruption and incompetency. 'Nobody's really making the argument that Andrew Cuomo is incompetent and doesn't know what he's doing,' he said. Cuomo faces his own hurdles. The former governor's time in Albany came to an end with 13 women accusing of him sexual assault and accusations that the state purposefully under-reported COVID-19 deaths in nursing homes. And his political opponents, particularly Mamdani, have not let him or the New York City electorate forget it. Some criticized Cuomo for reentering the race last week with an ad filmed on the Upper East Side, a sign to political observers that he has learned nothing about appealing to the issue that New Yorkers care most about — and the issue Mamdani won on in the Democratic primary — affordability. But there is still great worry about Mamdani in the party, strategists acknowledge. 'He can't be the future of the party,' one strategist said. 'He's only going to be fodder for Republicans.' Reeher agreed, saying 'If I put myself in the place of a Republican strategist, I'm wanting [Mamdani] to win.' 'I can imagine the advertisement would be … a list of some of the most extreme things that he has stood for … and I would say, 'This is what Democrats do when they're left to their own devices,'' he said.
The Hill
2 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump backtracks on after-school funding after bipartisan push
Stakeholders and lawmakers are cheering after the Trump administration ended a pause on $6 billion in federal after-school and summer school funding following rare bipartisan pushback. Advocates and states have been on the edge of their seats since President Trump declined to release the money, which also funds adult education and English language efforts, on the typical July 1 schedule, causing some programs to shut down and leaving others hanging by a thread. It is unclear if the full $6 billion will be unfrozen, but Aaron Dworkin, CEO of the National Summer Learning Association, told The Hill he is 'delighted' and 'grateful for our leaders for making continued investment.' 'All our partners are in the middle of running their programs right now and so not being sure whether or not they'd have enough funding to get through the whole summer, especially for programs that are serving the most vulnerable and low-income kids, there was a lot of uncertainty and nervousness,' Dworkin added. The win came one day after 10 GOP senators wrote to Trump's administration decrying the funding pause, but also after weeks of pressure from those involved, including a lawsuit from 24 Democratic-led states filed last Monday. 'We've been meeting with members and staff all week, and they're hearing from their constituents. The constituents themselves who are benefiting from these programs, who are relying on these programs, have been calling their members of Congress to let them know just how much these programs mean to them,' said Jodi Grant, executive director of the Afterschool Alliance. Fears were mounting every day, advocates said, as programs struggled to stay afloat. 'For some programs, they're starting to close, or have been starting to close immediately. The vast majority, I think, have a Band-Aid' and will be OK after the pause, Grant said. The Trump administration had said it put the funds under review over concerns the money was going to a 'leftwing radical agenda.' A senior administration official said Friday the 'programmatic review is over for 21 st Century Community Learning Centers (21 st CCLC). Funds will be released to the states. Guardrails have been put in place to ensure these funds are not used in violation of Executive Orders.' The official did not clarify what those guardrails might be or the exact date the funding will be released. Risa Woods, a former teacher for English learners turned education consultant, saw her efforts to help school districts stall during the funding pause. 'I created my own educational consulting business so I could train teachers,' she said, and schools were lining up contracts with her services before the funding pause. 'School districts would email me and say, 'We'd really love you to come, but we don't have the funds. The funds have been frozen, and we'd love to maybe follow up with you later if they are released,'' Woods said. While Republicans have been either enthusiastic or mum about a wide range of Trump's education cuts, the after-school and summer programming appeared to be a step too far for at least 10 Senate Republicans. Sen. Shelley Moore Capito ( who led the GOP letter opposing the freeze, celebrated on X, saying the funds were released in 'direct response' to their opposition. In their letter, the Republican senators argued the funding in fact aligns with Trump's goal of putting education in state and local control, which means they might also object to any federal 'guardrails' on it. 'It's correct to think that the red states, but really every state, should want the fewest amount of restrictions on the dollars so that they could do what they want, and that that's consistent with the Trump administration's view of returning education to the states,' said Adam Kissel, visiting fellow in the Heritage Foundation's Center for Education Policy, 'So you just have to live with it if money is going to a blue state for blue state things and you don't like it, or conversely, if it's a blue administration, and money is going out to a red state to do red state things,' he added. While breathing a momentary sigh of relief, advocates acknowledge they have much work to do before next year, with Trump still target these and other education funds across multiple avenues. 'We remain deeply concerned that the administration is proposing $0 for 21st CCLC next year, instead collapsing it into a 'K-12 Simplified Funding Plan' with dramatically reduced support,' Grant said.
Chicago Tribune
2 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Andy Shaw: Why neophyte mayors need steady hands on the wheel
Public school teachers and state lawmakers fill important roles in a civil society, but those jobs hardly prepare their occupants for the daunting challenges and complexities of running a big city with millions of residents, tens of thousands of public employees and multibillion-dollar budgets. That sobering reality helps explain why Brandon Johnson, a relatively unknown teacher who broke out of a large pack to win Chicago's 2023 mayor's race, has stumbled badly enough in two-plus rocky years atop the City Hall food chain to tank in recent polls. And it's a cautionary tale that certainly can't be lost on wunderkind Zohran Mamdani, the 33-year-old New York state assemblyman who is favored to become New York City's next mayor. Mamdani won the Democratic nomination on a wave of youthful energy, grassroots excitement, social media savvy and the same kinds of progressive promises Johnson made during his campaign. But Mamdani has a chance to avoid many of the pitfalls that have bedeviled Johnson by choosing and co-existing comfortably with at least one veteran of NYC government to help him navigate the turbulent waters of Big Apple politics. This is crucial because leading a movement is world's apart from running a sprawling big city government. It's one thing to rail against the system from the outside and another to manage it from the inside. Mamdani may have idealism, charisma and social media followers, but he needs someone who understands city budgets, contracts, union negotiations, how bond markets react to fiscal instability and why slogans don't pave roads or staff homeless shelters. Johnson, to his credit, tapped Rich Guidice, a veteran of the Richard M. Daley administration, to be his first chief of staff. But that inconvenient marriage lasted only a few months, and none of Guidice's successors or Johnson's other top aides have been able to help him avoid two-plus years of unaffordable promises unkept, divisive City Council battles waged and media relations unnecessarily made fraught. Mamdani, apparently cognizant of the perils of inexperience, has forged a somewhat surprising political alliance and personal friendship with a former competitor-turned-ally in the mayor's race: city comptroller and former Brooklyn Councilman Brad Lander, and that could make all the difference. If Mamdani wins the general election in November, he would be smart to ask Lander to serve as his deputy mayor, NYC's equivalent of a chief of staff, to run the city's day-to-day operations while Mamdani focuses on the big picture. Lander has spent decades watching NYC's political theater play out from the front row. He's seen and participated in enough real-world policymaking to know that ideology needs structure — not just passion. As comptroller, he's no fiscal hawk, but he knows how to balance ambition with arithmetic, not smoke and mirrors. If he were to become deputy mayor, he would occupy the perfect power post to help translate Mamdani's passion and energy into sustainable and actionable governance. This is where the comparison with Johnson becomes instructive and sobering. Johnson was also a movement candidate, propelled into office by energized unions, frustrated progressives, and backlash from decades of police intemperance and economic inequality. But once he got the keys to City Hall's fifth floor, he couldn't keep a seasoned driver. After Guidice left a few months into the new administration, Johnson surrounded himself with loyal progressives — teachers, organizers and activists — who lacked valuable management experience. Admirable idealism? Maybe. Wise politics? Absolutely not. Chicago's finances remain wobbly. Public safety is still a top concern, the schools face a fiscal cliff, the transit system is hemorrhaging riders and credibility, and the shortage of affordable housing has reached crisis proportions. Johnson isn't a bad guy — he's smart and articulate, and he genuinely believes in his mission — but he was, at least initially, clearly in over his head. And without a seasoned deputy like a Lander or a Guidice, or even a former campaign rival with stellar big-city management chops such as Paul Vallas, no one on Johnson's leadership team has enough experience or stature to keep him on task and message. Competence trumps charisma. A city is not a college campus where you can endlessly debate systems of oppression. It's a living organism that needs to be fed, housed, policed, cleaned and financed. That takes pros. Not poets. Mamdani seems to understand that. Maybe it's because he's watched other progressive leaders get swallowed up by the system or their own inexperience. Maybe it's because he listens to the quiet voices that tell him values and vision aren't enough. Or maybe he's just smart enough to know what he doesn't know. That's leadership. It doesn't mean a Mamdani administration would avoid every pitfall. Big cities are hard to run, even for seasoned leaders. Every decision will anger someone. Every budget line item has a built-in opposition group. Every stumble would be amplified by right-wing media eager to paint him as 'another woke disaster.' But unlike Johnson, Mamdani would be giving himself a fighting chance if he elevates and keeps someone who knows where the wires are buried. Lander isn't flashy, and he doesn't inspire rally chants. But he understands the machinery of government in a way activists rarely do. Lander is the kind of steady hand Johnson hired but couldn't hold on to. Mamdani might be a progressive determined not to let his agenda die under a pile of rookie mistakes and fiscal naiveté. Maybe there's a lesson here for the next wave of liberal mayors and the movements that support them: Passion helps get you elected, but experience and competence enable you to do the job well. And if you're smart, you make room for both. Johnson has 19 months until the next Chicago election, and if he has even a slim chance of righting the ship and changing the narrative enough to be a viable candidate — something predecessor Lori Lightfoot was unable to do — he would be wise to quickly find and hire a Lander-type clone here in Chicago.
