Bradford city centre regeneration projects wins regional Yorkshire awards
Bradford Live beat other projects including two from Bradford in the same category: Darley Street Market, and Shipley Sustainable Community Hub, the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) said.It also faced non-Bradford projects including the refurbishment of Hull's Maritime Museum and Leeds City College's Mabgate Campus.The Bradford projects were funded by West Yorkshire Combined Authority's Transforming Cities Fund and run by construction firm Balfour Beatty.The work to re-open Bradford Interchange after a year-long closure, carried out by the construction firm, was shortlisted and highly commended in the Integration and Collaborative Working Award.
The awards celebrate the built environment and construction industry and are organised annually by Leeds Beckett University's School of Built Environment, Engineering and Computing.
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
10 hours ago
- Reuters
Construction Insurance Risk Education (CIRE) Seeks National Education Provider to Expand Verified Learning Nationwide
OLYMPIA, WA, July 25, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- Construction Insurance Risk Education (CIRE), opens new tab, a leading provider of innovative training at the intersection of construction and insurance, has announced it is actively seeking a National Education Provider to deliver its educational platform across all 50 U.S. states. Founded during the COVID-19 pandemic by an insurance veteran, Treacy Duerfeldt, CIRE was born out of a frustration with traditional, outdated educational models. 'After taking the same insurance courses for nearly 30 years, reading PDFs and answering repetitive questions every two years, I realized the industry wasn't helping professionals grow, it was just checking boxes,' said Duerfeldt. 'CIRE is here to change that.' The company's mission is clear: offer engaging, story-driven education that brings construction professionals and insurance agents together in a shared language. 'One of the biggest reasons for uncovered claims or overpriced premiums is a fundamental lack of mutual understanding,' Duerfeldt added. 'CIRE's model doesn't just inform, it unites.' CIRE's platform already includes over 24 hours of polished and accredited video-based material, featuring dynamic instruction, scenario-based quizzes, and segmentation designed for better retention and real-time learning verification. 'We interrupt the passive experience,' said Duerfeldt. 'Our quizzes don't just follow the lesson; they are integrated within it to ensure knowledge is actually being absorbed.' Through a previous regional education provider, CIRE has already operated successfully in 30 states. That partnership allowed the platform to earn certification even in rigorous jurisdictions like California and Florida. But now, with growing national demand and strong endorsements from industry leaders, the time has come to scale. 'We have validated our content through regulators and real users,' Duerfeldt said. 'The next step is to find a platform partner who shares our passion for verified learning and has the infrastructure to operate nationwide.' The ideal national education provider, according to Duerfeldt, will have experience working with state insurance regulators and be prepared to manage course availability, administrative compliance, and distribution logistics. CIRE will continue to provide all core content and will lead community-based live sessions, advanced seminars for alumni, and ongoing curriculum updates. CIRE is particularly seeking a provider with the capability and the commitment to recertify its program across all 50 states. 'We are not looking for someone to coast,' said Duerfeldt. 'We are looking for a platform provider who's invested in the mission of bridging the gap between construction and insurance through real education, not just checking a box.' The company's philosophy of 'verified learning' underpins every aspect of its offering. 'We don't hand out certificates just for showing up. We want learners to actually know what they are doing,' he emphasized. 'That's how we shift the culture, lower risk, and ultimately improve outcomes for the entire construction ecosystem.' CIRE's offerings span a wide array of construction-specific topics, including cyber liability, general liability, workers' comp, automobile insurance, builders' risk, bonding, and coverage planning, each designed to be both accessible to contractors and technically robust for agents. With its innovative format, proven course content, and industry endorsements already in place, CIRE's next chapter hinges on the right partner. 'Our curriculum is ready. Our mission is clear. Now we need a provider who's ready to help us bring real education to the people building America, and the people protecting them.' About Construction Insurance Risk Education (CIRE) Founded by insurance veteran Treacy Duerfeldt, Construction Insurance Risk Education (CIRE) delivers innovative, verified learning programs that bridge the gap between construction and insurance. Based in Olympia, Washington, CIRE offers accredited, story-driven courses designed to transform industry understanding nationwide. For more information, visit: opens new tab Media Contact Treacy Duerfeldt treacy2@ ### SOURCE: Construction Insurance Risk Education (CIRE) Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire See release on EZ Newswire
The Guardian
13 hours ago
- The Guardian
Nationwide building society's members deserve real votes
'There's no one else quite like us,' goes the refrain at Nationwide as it champions the virtues of being a big building society rather than a big bank. 'We are the only major banking provider that doesn't have to answer to shareholders – we're built to put our members first.' It's true that Nationwide brings welcome biodiversity to the banking jungle. The organisation is owned by its 17 million members – its customers – and is five times bigger than the next largest building society. What's more, its members mostly seem happy with the service. Nationwide tends to come top of industry polls on that score. So we should be glad the society dodged the demutualisation craze of the 1990s that saw the likes of the Alliance & Leicester, Bradford & Bingley and Northern Rock convert to banks, with generally terrible results. The mutual movement could have faded into irrelevance if Nationwide had fallen to the carpetbaggers. Yet the boast about not being answerable to shareholders rings hollow when you see the limits of democracy, and thus boardroom accountability, at Nationwide. Exhibit A is the group's adventure into the world of big acquisitions – last year's £2.9bn purchase of Virgin Money. At a bank, shareholders would have had to approve the deal because the balance sheet was being increased by a third. By contrast, Nationwide's members weren't given a vote on a transaction that plainly has the potential to come back to bite them if it goes wrong. The explanation was coherent only in a legal sense: the 1986 Building Societies Act didn't require a vote, and Nationwide would fall foul of the City takeover code if it inserted conditions that were not required by law. Come on, though, that is hardly satisfactory: there is a clear gap in regulations that were drawn up at a time when it wasn't imagined that building societies would buy banks. Exhibit B is the flashpoint for Friday's annual meeting – the 43% increase in chief executive Debbie Crosbie's maximum pay package to a mighty £7m. The society's argument is that, after the Virgin deal, Nationwide is bigger and needs to mind the 'competitive gap' on pay with NatWest and Lloyds Banking Group. 'This is not about personal greed,' the pay committee chair, Tracey Graham, told the meeting. 'It's about equity with people who do similar jobs elsewhere.' What did the members make of that argument? It's hard to say precisely. The poll on the remuneration report was merely advisory. Again, apparently, the rules don't require a binding vote and Nationwide didn't choose to have one. As it happens, 95% of votes were cast in favour – but the fact the board can ignore any rebellion is hardly an encouragement to turn out. In similar fashion, any member wanting to put themselves forward for election to the board – a not uncommon feature at building societies a generation ago – now has to have 250 nominations. Wannabe volunteer James Sherwin-Smith failed at that hurdle but may have been stymied by data protection rules, signature requirements and so on. It does not look as though Nationwide tried to assist him through the thicket. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Kevin Parry, the chair, offered no hint that any of these signs of a governance deficit cause him any difficulty. He addressed questions at the meeting openly but 'them's the rules' was the gist of his responses. For now, he can probably afford to be sanguine. Nationwide is performing well financially and it's too soon to tell if Crosbie's bet on Virgin Money will succeed or flop. It may also be only a small minority who would prefer Nationwide's 'fairer share' payments to be used instead to sharpen savings and lending rates. In good financial weather, you can even get away with portraying your bank rivals as oily fat cats in your TV adverts as your own chief executive is handed a potential £7m package. In trickier circumstances, however, it is not hard to see how life could become awkward. It is surely indefensible that shareholders in a bank get a binding vote on big takeovers and boardroom pay but members of Nationwide do not. That is a bad spin on the 'we're different' shtick. If the members are truly the owners, the governance needs an overhaul. It would be best done outside a crisis. If the rules for building societies are the problem, lobby to change them.
BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
Plans to axe six West Yorkshire school bus routes moves ahead
Plans to axe six school bus routes in West Yorkshire have been confirmed, prompting criticism from councillors. West Yorkshire Combined Authority said last week it was considering cutting three buses in Bradford, one in Calderdale and two in Leeds from September each case, the authority said there were either alternate public transport services available, or that most children would be able to walk or cycle to a meeting on Thursday, members of the Combined Authority voted to approve the cuts but said they would "engage with affected schools to plan for proposed changes to services". The proposals came after a review of the school routes the authority subsidises, with West Yorkshire mayor Tracy Brabin stating: "As we look to improve transport across West Yorkshire, we want to ensure services are equitable for all."Leeds Lib Dem councillor Stewart Golton said: "The primary driver behind this is presented as it being an issue of equity – that some parts are getting more than others."I believe instead of negotiating down, we should try to life everyone up to an equal benefit."According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, Brabin said the planned franchised bus service – the Weaver Network - would improve buses across the board when it is introduced in 2027 and "connect young people to places they have never been connected to before". The services facing the axe include: B50 Eldwick to Beckfoot SchoolB99 Bradford city centre to Appleton AcademyS64 Baildon to Titus Salt School or S66 Baildon Primary to Titus Salt SchoolC6 Crossley Heath GrammarS62 Cockburn SchoolSM25 Ilkley to St Mary's MenstonThe WYCA has previously said it currently has arrangements in place for 328 buses carrying up to 20,000 pupils per day at a cost of £18.99m a year, of which 45% is funded by the combined remaining costs are funded by income from fares, council's across West Yorkshire and schools. 'Attacking choice' Tim Taylor, director of transport services, said Leeds and Bradford currently received higher subsidies for school buses than areas like Lamb, a Conservative councillor representing Wetherby, described the cuts as "an attack on choice".Pointing out that the authority had said some families would be able to walk and cycle to school if the routes were cut, he said: "If walking and cycling was the best option for children they'd already be doing it."It is not for this authority to make that decision for them."Ms Brabin acknowledged the changes could prove "stressful" but said the WYCA would work with schools between now and September 2026 to mitigate the changes. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
