
Police used drone to surveil thousands at Chch's Electric Ave festival
The drone operated as an 'eye in the sky', hovering at a fixed point a few hundred metres away from the festival.
A live feed was sent to police on the ground and – thanks to a powerful camera lens – officers were able to zoom in on the crowd, monitoring any potential criminal activity.
The public were not warned in advance. News of its use is only being revealed now through an Official Information Act (OIA) request, sent by 1News to police, seeking details of the deployment.
In response to the OIA request, police have released footage its officers recorded on the day, including several examples of revellers being apprehended by security and police. In one of the clips, security guards can be seen pinning a man to the ground, and throwing him out of the event.
ADVERTISEMENT
Further surveillance continued at night, with police using the thermal capabilities on the camera to track where people were.
Police have said it was primarily used to track potential disorder and assaults. However emails and documents obtained through the OIA show they were also keeping an eye on 'fence jumpers', as well as potential drug activity, with the drone team 'monitoring the sale and supply of controlled drugs'.
The deployment was carried out without a warrant, because one is not needed at large gatherings. Police instead relied on public filming rules.
It initially caused concern for the festival organiser, Callam Mitchell, who emailed police flagging that attendees had not been warned about the drone, the emails show.
Electric Ave festival organiser Callam Mitchell. (Source: 1News)
'We can't agree to it for privacy reasons, but we nonetheless respect and appreciate it will be happening,' he said.
'In future years we will need to make sure it is included in our terms and conditions prior to tickets going on sale.'
ADVERTISEMENT
However, Mitchell has since had a change of heart after seeing how the drone operated at the event, and described it as a 'great thing' in an interview with 1News.
'Don't view a drone in the sky as big brother watching,' he said.
'They're not there to pick on the end user having a good time and partying with their mates, they're there to make sure everyone's safe.'
That was echoed by inspector Darren Russell at Police National Headquarters, who described drones as a 'game changing' tool for police.
Police inspector Darren Russell. (Source: 1News)
'We don't do that in a secretive way, it's really clear where we're launching from and landing to, and certainly people will be aware that we are using them', he said.
Most of the time the drone was only streaming the video back to officers on the ground. Footage was only recorded and kept if police suspected an offence may be about to take place.
ADVERTISEMENT
'It's very hard for police to be everywhere, so it does enable our teams on the ground to be able to respond directly to anything that may be occurring,' Russell said.
'Likely to become more commonplace'
Emails obtained through the OIA indicate police are planning to expand their use of drones into even more scenarios – including protests.
An email sent by Sergeant Dave Robertson, of the Canterbury Alcohol Harm Reduction Unit, shows just how quickly police are adopting the tool.
'As the technology improves, and Police resources in that regard grow, it is likely to become more commonplace,' Sgt Robertson said in January.
'We are hopeful that the practical use of drones at events may lead to a reduction in the number of Police staff we need to roster/commit to large scale public events.'
Sgt Robertson also confirmed that drones can be used in several other settings, including 'protest activity, gang events, or outdoor concerts / festivals'.
ADVERTISEMENT
Two other examples of where drones were had been used in Canterbury were redacted under the OIA.
Police can also use drones to surveil people's property but this typically requires a specific warrant, known as a Surveillance Device Warrant.
However, they are regularly being used at short notice, and without a warrant, to help police in dangerous high-risk situations according to Inspector Russell.
He provided a demonstration of a smaller tactical drone being used inside a house, showing off its ability to fly in through a window and film under beds, inside closets and enter every room of the property.
This smaller tactical drone was primarily used to respond to high-risk offending, such as someone wielding a gun or in a hostage situation.
'The public seem to accept that and would expect us to use these tools where they are available to us, because it is about keeping them safe,' Inspector Russell said.
'We've got to be careful'
ADVERTISEMENT
The use of the drone at Electric Avenue didn't cause too much worry for citizen's rights expert Thomas Beagle, but concern is being raised about where the technology might go in future.
Beagle, of the New Zealand Council for Civil Liberties, believes 'the cat's out of the bag' to some extent on surveillance of this kind, as people are already used to security cameras.
New Zealand Council of Civil Liberties chairperson Thomas Beagle. (Source: 1News)
He said there wasn't a 'strong negative' about the drone filming from one fixed point at the festival in this way, and the rules police were following were reasonable.
But he felt it added to the feeling of 'being watched'.
'What I don't like about it is it's partly just increasing the idea that there's always cameras watching us, we're always being watched and tracked and monitored, and it's just another brick in that wall I guess, of that surveillance society,' he said.
The issue was not what police were doing with drones today, but what they would do in future, he said.
ADVERTISEMENT
'The problem is that a surveillance society comes on us step by step, it's not like we're just going to implement it one day and there it is,' he said.
It raised the question of what would happen if the Government changed and wanted to start 'suppressing things', he said – pointing out this had happened overseas.
"We've got to be careful about where we go, and we should be setting limits."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

1News
4 hours ago
- 1News
Australian escort wants to give evidence at Pauline Hanna inquest
Australian sex worker Madison Ashton has asked to give evidence at the inquest into the death of Auckland health manager Pauline Hanna. Hanna, who managed the roll-out of the Covid-19 vaccine as an executive director at Counties Manukau Health, died in her Remuera home on April 5, 2021. Her husband, former Auckland eye surgeon Philip Polkinghorne, was found not guilty of murdering her after an eight-week trial last year. The Crown argued Polkinghorne killed his wife after a possible violent struggle, while he may have been under the influence of methamphetamine. Pauline Hanna, Philip Polkinghorne and Madison Ashton. (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT The defence maintained Hanna died by suicide after many years of struggling with depression, compounded by work-related stress. Ashton – Polkinghorne's former lover – was called as a witness for the Crown but did not turn up during the trial. She told other media she decided not to give evidence at the trial due to being unhappy with the police's treatment of her. Ashton had since approached Coroner Tania Tetitaha's office, indicating she had evidence relevant to the circumstances of Hanna's death. This could now be revealed as the Coroner lifted a previous non-publication order. The next pre-inquest conference is set down for August.

1News
2 days ago
- 1News
Sex, drugs and tragedy on the eastern slopes: the Polkinghorne trial changed NZ
Veteran journalist Steve Braunias has covered many murder trials but none contained the privilege and depravity that captivated New Zealand during the eight-week Polkinghorne trial. Below is an exclusive extract from his new book, Polkinghorne, released today. His name was Polkinghorne. Polkinghorne, first introduced to the nation as 'a person of suspect', as he put it in his typically anxious and mangled English; Polkinghorne, whom the police quickly suspected of murder and then slowly, not altogether competently, went about investigating the amazing, very distracting, and apparently criminal extent of his sex life, finally arresting him for the murder of his wife Pauline sixteen months after he made a 111 call on the frantic morning of 5 April 2021, saying she had hanged herself in their strangely impersonal white complex above a beautiful shining lagoon on the mansioned eastern slopes of the Auckland isthmus; Polkinghorne, acquitted and let free to wander the Earth by a jury at the close of an epic, shockalicious eight-week murder trial like none before it in our island history — and surely none after it, unless some other surgeon or likewise high-earning urban professional, whose hobbies include hookers and methamphetamine, is accused of something so diabolical that it's of an even lower moral order than murder; Polkinghorne, that long, drawn-out, perky, improbable name, became a kind of household brand in the winter and spring of 2024, something everyone recognised and regarded with a mixture of rage, awe, wonder, fascination, scorn, distaste, zero sympathy and close to 100 per cent actual downright hatred; Polkinghorne, those three syllables thrown together almost at random, forming a name that will remain fixed as a garish icon in the psychic territories of the New Zealand mind, will achieve a sordid immortality but an immortality nonetheless, supernatural and haunting. Say his name three times into a mirror and you might see him suddenly appear behind you, small and enthusiastic, a blue-eyed voodoo doll, a demon of wealth and white privilege hopping up and down on his madly socked feet — Polkinghorne, Polkinghorne, Polkinghorne. The prosecution team including Auckland Crown Solicitor Alysha McClintock enter Polkinghorne's Remuera home during the trial. (Source: 1News) I got to quite like Dr Philip Polkinghorne. We chatted constantly in an upstairs courtroom at the High Court of Auckland during his murder trial that began in July and ended in September of 2024. I have interviewed people accused of murder quite a few times — including a Chinese guy who killed two men with a knife he had last used to divide a pizza — but had never just casually chatted with them in a courtroom, never during their trial. 'Morning, Phil,' I'd say when I came into courtroom 11 to take my seat at the press bench directly behind this tiny figure dressed in a limited range of tiny dark suits and an unlimited range of crazily patterned socks; he'd respond with a wink and a cheerful word. Friends knew him as Polk or Polky. It was an appealing diminutive but I refrained from using it. 'See you tomorrow, Phil,' I'd say when I left, and he'd affectionately place his hand on my arm. In between times we gossiped, joked, laughed, made small talk, sometimes made big talk; he always stood up when I came over for a yarn, made that kind of gentleman's polite gesture. It was all very collegial, although many times I thought I ought to feel I was in the presence of evil. Philip Polkinghorne in the Auckland High Court. (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT Most murder-accused are marooned throughout their trial in the dock. It must feel like one of the loneliest places in the world, and yet one of the most public. It's a glass box, with a little waist-high door that leads to the downstairs cells. It's a room of accusation, a purgatory, a bad place to find yourself ordered to sit inside for everyone to stare at and judge. Polkinghorne was not confined to this chamber of prejudice. He was landed gentry, owner of a block of real estate in the form of a row he had all to himself, behind his legal team in courtroom 11; the only times he appeared in the dock were at the beginning of the trial, to enter his plea, and at the very end, to hear the verdict. They were cameo appearances. Otherwise, he was part of the general courtroom population. Steve Braunias has written a book about the trial, in which Philip Polkinghorne was found not guilty of murdering his wife Pauline Hanna. (Source: Breakfast) But it was more than just the geography that made him so accessible and allowed our tête-à-têtes. It was a class thing. Finally, after years of reporting on murder trials of damaged colonised peoples, or of low-lifes and the financially illiterate, I was able to relate to someone accused of depriving someone else of their life. 'Oh yes, I know who you are,' he said when I first introduced myself. He could read. He stood up, we shook hands, he said, 'Philip Polkinghorne.' It was all very formal, like men meeting at a function or a conference, and it was easy to assume a connection. We were men of a pension demographic — I was 64, he was 71 years old — and we shared the same cultural references as everyone in the white New Zealand middle class. Polkinghorne was found not guilty of murdering his wife Pauline Hanna. (Source: Supplied) The point of my conversational ingratiations was to size him up. He was not of great size. One day when we were talking, I was trying to describe one of the witnesses: someone from his former eye clinic's executive team. I couldn't remember his name. 'Bit taller than you,' I said. ADVERTISEMENT 'Everyone's taller than me,' he said, and put on a hapless expression; he presented himself as Charlie Chaplin, little comical tramp. The terrible thing about the trial was that it was so wildly entertaining. It ripped up the deep puritanical contract that New Zealanders signed up to when white settlers went about establishing the new colony. It liberated the country from shame. Polkinghorne was shameless. He was a sex machine in miniature. He maintained a furiously busy roster of sex workers, but it wasn't as though he wasn't getting it at home; in his only police interview, he casually revealed that he and his wife of 24 years had sex every day. The trial heard about group sex and professional orgies. A detective at the trial recited the synopses of the videos he watched on Polkinghorne's phone. 'She performed a sex act on him', etc. There was a balance sheet of Polkinghorne's sex spend, when a forensic accountant totted up the sums he gave to prostitutes. It echoed the self-service robot voice at supermarkets: Do you wish to print a receipt? The figure was wonderfully exact and certainly very generous: $296,646.23. (Source: Supplied) Extracted from Polkinghorne: Inside the trial of the century, by Steve Braunias (Allen & Unwin Aotearoa New Zealand, RRP $37.99). Available today, July 15.

1News
2 days ago
- 1News
Fines issued, vehicles impounded after Auckland boy racer 'invasion'
Hundreds of anti-social car users were pursued across Auckland by law enforcement last night, with police issuing numerous fines and ordering multiple vehicles off the road on Saturday night. Dubbed the "Auckland invasion" by boy racers, the event attracted drivers from Northland and Hamilton to the supercity. 1News spent several hours following the group to locations across Auckland, including Manukau, Onehunga, Westgate, Penrose, and Drury. Police staff, including the Eagle helicopter, were deployed to each spot and at Westgate, attendees were seen letting off fireworks at an intersection. Police said more than 2500 breath tests were taken at checkpoints set up, with more than 15 drivers recording excess breath alcohol. ADVERTISEMENT A further 70 infringements were issued, 71 vehicles were sent for inspection, 33 green and six pink stickers were issued, and five vehicles were impounded. Inspector Regan James said despite the large number of road users present there was no significant disruption to the public. "Dozens of police units worked hard to disrupt the approximately 200 vehicles participating in the event. We saw some illegal behaviour, including performing burnouts and other driving offences, but our staff did well to monitor and disrupt the group's plans." He said police intervention was "strong and quick from the jump". "We were able to break up convoys and monitor behaviour effectively. We are all too familiar with the havoc this behaviour wreaks in our communities and have been very clear – we have no tolerance for it, I think that was made very clear by our response this weekend." Boy racers do skids at Mangatāwhiri. (Source: 1News) Drivers 1News spoke to said they felt the Government had not provided them with legal ways to "express their hobby". ADVERTISEMENT "Maybe if the Government provide us with some legal skid pad, then we could just go there and do them legally," one driver said. "It's a fun hobby, but it's not worth it at the moment," another said. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said at a media conference this morning that boy racers' "days are coming to an end". "You've actually got to be a safe driver. You can't just end up causing inconvenience and pain and suffering for your fellow Kiwi citizens." He said the Government had legislation before the House soon that aimed to crackdown on antisocial road use. "We've got some pretty tough penalties coming that way around your cars." A lower threshold for vehicle destruction is on the cards for boy racers, as well as expanded road closure powers for police and increased fines for excessive noise. (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT The Government announced a suite of stronger measures in May, including a lower threshold for vehicle destruction and increased police powers. A presumptive sentence of vehicle destruction or forfeiture would be enacted for those who flee police, street racers, intimidating convoys and owners who fail to identify offending drivers. This would ensure courts order the vehicle destroyed or forfeited unless it would be "manifestly unjust, or cause extreme hardship to the offender or undue hardship to any other person". The existing road closure power for police would also be expanded to include all public and private areas accessible to the public by vehicle. An offence for failing to comply with a direction to leave or not enter a closed area would be established, with an associated penalty of a $1000 fine. The infringement fee for making excessive noise from or within a vehicle would also rise from $50 to $300.