Nick Smith MP on treatment of veterans and government plans
These events offered a chance to reflect on all those who have served, to remember those who made the ultimate sacrifice for our freedom, to reinforce the lessons of the Second World War and to remind ourselves how important the Armed Forces are to our country.
Our Labour Government further demonstrated our commitment to supporting our veterans and our Armed Forces Community this week through the announcement of our new VALOUR project.
We have 3,052 veterans in Blaenau Gwent & Rhymney and I know that many will be unhappy with the way they have been ignored and disrespected over the last 14 years. The way veterans have been treated is extremely poor and that must change.
Through £50m of funding, our aim is to have VALOUR-recognised support centres in every part of the UK, working with health, employment and housing charities as well as service providers and local government to provide tailored local support for veterans.
New Regional Field Officers will work with these organisations to share best practice and guidance.
This represents a major milestone in delivering our manifesto promise to fully implement the Armed Forces Covenant. Our veterans served with valour and now our VALOUR support network will help ensure we repay them.
Last month saw another very successful outing of our Everyone Deserves an Easter campaign.
Alongside Gerald Jones MP, I helped put together this project which saw 75 hampers containing all the ingredients for a roast dinner, as well as Easter treats, delivered to families across Blaenau Gwent & Rhymney, including 10 delivered to the Hospice of the Valleys.
This project wouldn't be possible without the help of the Ebbw Vale Institute pantry team, the Caerphilly Cares team and the volunteers who came to help pack on the day. Thank you to everyone who lent a hand.
Nick Smith is MP for Blaenau Gwent and Rhymney.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Nearly £1 in every £10 of Universal Credit was wrongly paid last year with an eye-watering £5.2bn lost to fraud as Labour faces demands to get a grip
Nearly £1 in every £10 spent on Universal Credit last year was wrongly paid, official figures have revealed. The Department of Work and Pensions admitted £6.35billion was overpaid in Universal Credit in 2024-25. This was almost 10 per cent of the £65.3billion of total expenditure on Universal Credit in the last financial year. The amount that was wrongly paid in Universal Credit included an eye-watering £5.2billion in overpayments due to fraud. The main cause of fraud overpayments was an under-declaration of income by claimants of Universal Credit, which is paid to those on low incomes or who are out of work. The second largest source of fraud was claimants failing to declare living with a partner, while the third largest fraud reason was an under-declaration of financial assets. The Labour Government is being urged to 'crack down ruthlessly' on those who defraud taxpayers, with the level of fraud and error in the benefits system branded 'a national scandal'. The Department of Work and Pensions admitted £6.35billion was overpaid in Universal Credit in 2024-25. This was almost 10 per cent of the £65.3billion of total expenditure Shimeon Lee, policy analyst of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'The level of fraud and error in the benefits system, particularly Universal Credit, is a national scandal, yet time and again DWP fails to address it. 'The benefits bill would be soaring out of control even if every penny went to the right recipient. 'It is more vital than ever that the Government is cracking down ruthlessly on those that defraud taxpayers while ensuring internal processes are rigorous enough to minimise mistaken payments.' Sir Keir Starmer recently saw his attempt to cut Britain's ballooning benefits bill derailed by a major rebellion among Labour MPs. The Prime Minister was forced to scrap most of his planned welfare changes in the face of a huge Labour revolt. He ditched Labour's proposed restrictions to Personal Independence Payment (PIP), which is the main disability payment in England, until after a review. A humilated Sir Keir was instead left to push through slimmed-down legislation in the House of Commons, now only referred to as the Universal Credit Bill. As part of the Bill, the basic Universal Credit standard allowance will rise at least in line with inflation until 2029-30. But the health part of the benefit will be reduced for new claimants after April 2026, unless they had a severe or terminal condition, and the rate will be frozen until 2030. The Covid pandemic saw a huge increase in fraud and error in benefit payments, as the then Tory government scrambled to protect Britons' incomes as they shut down large parts of the UK economy during lockdown. The latest statistics published by the Department for Work and Pensions showed a total of £9.5billion was overpaid in benefits in 2024-25, at a rate of 3.3 per cent. This compared with £9.7billion and 3.6 per cent in 2023-24. Meanwhile, £1.2billion was underpaid in benefits in 2024-25 at a rate of 0.4 per cent, which was unchanged from 2023-24. In 2024-25, the Universal Credit overpayment rate decreased to 9.7 per cent (£6.35billion) from 12.4 per cent (£6.41billion) in 2023-24. Overpayments due to fraud decreased to 8 per cent (£5.2billion) in 2024-25, from 10.8 per cent (£5.62billion) in 2023-24. The Department for Work and Pensions said these decreasse were 'statistically significant'. Fraud due to under-declaration of income was measured at 2.2 per cent in 2024-5, compared with 2.6 per cent in 2023-24. Fraud due to claimants failing to declare living with a partner was measured at 1.7 per cent in 2024-5, compared with 1.5 per cent in 2023-24. And fraud due to under-declaration of financial assets was measured at 1.3 per cent in 2024-5, compared with 1.9 per cent in 2023-24. Some £610million (0.9 per cent) of Universal Credit was wrongly paid in 2024-25 due to claimant error, compared with £410million (0.8 per cent) in 2023-24. And £540million (0.8 per cent) of Universal Credit was wrongly paid in 2024-25 due to official error, compared with £390million (0.7 per cent) in 2023-24. The proportion of claims overpaid was 21 in 100 claims in 2024-25, compared with 23 in 100 claims in 2023-24. The proportion of claims underpaid increased to 2 in 100 claims in 2024-25, from 1 in 100 claims in 2023-24.
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
It was meant to be sleepy Cumberland Local Council meeting. Then SCREAMING began and a woman burst into tears
A fiery screaming match erupted between councillors at a Cumberland Council meeting in Sydney 's west after one local politician told another to 'shut up' - leaving a resident in tears. The heated clash broke out on Wednesday night as independent councillor Ahmed Ouf was speaking in support of a motion regarding next year's Easter celebrations. Following apparent interjections from the other side of the chamber by Labor councillor Diane Colman, Mr Ouf snapped. 'Shut up when I'm talking, OK,' he fumed. 'I beg your pardon, Councillor,' Mayor Ola Hamed interjected, as tensions escalated. 'When I'm talking, this is my time, not your time,' Cr Ouf told Cr Colman. 'When I talk, you shut up, OK?' Cr Colman interrupted: 'Oh, point of order, Mayor, point of order!' Cr Ouf stood his ground. 'Why is she talking while I'm talking? Why is she taking from my time?' he said. Cr Colman fired back: 'How dare you!' Cr Ouf replied: 'You just keep your mouth shut while I'm talking. I never, ever spoke when you were talking or having time.' The comment sparked an explosive outburst from Cr Colman, who rose from her seat. 'You cannot speak to me like that,' she screamed from across the room. 'You show respect, you show respect,' Cr Ouf yelled back. Cr Colman snapped back: 'You show me some respect. 'How dare you speak to me like that. How dare you.' The screaming match during Wednesday night's council meeting has since gone viral online The blazing row continued for seven minutes until the mayor called a brief adjournment. The fiery scenes unfolded in front of a packed public gallery, where a distraught woman had to be consoled afterwards, according to Libertarian Councillor Steve Christou. 'It put everyone who was there in an unhealthy and unsafe environment,' he told Daily Mail Australia. 'I felt sorry for the council staff, who shouldn't have to work under these conditions or put up with this... 'I also felt for the crowd, as we had a full public gallery there that night. 'One woman was crying because she felt unsafe.' He added that Cr Ouf apologised afterwards and claimed that Cr Colman often interrupted while other councillors had the floor. 'I've previously raised concerns about this behaviour,' he said. Cr Colman stood by her actions, claiming she is also frequently interrupted and bullied by other councillors in the chamber. 'He (Cr Ouf) told me to shut up four times,' she said. 'Enough is enough. It's time that councils stop the bullying and misogyny that goes on.' She confirmed Cr Ouf later apologised. 'The matter is closed,' Cr Colman said. Councillor Ouf told the Daily Mail that his comments had nothing to do with gender and reiterated calls for councillors not to be interrupted. 'I wished it hadn't happened,' he said. 'This is my first term and I have never interrupted or harassed another councillor. 'I was speaking about an important matter and I was interrupted, which shouldn't have been allowed.' Labor councillor Glenn Elmore chose not to weigh in on the stoush but confirmed it wasn't an isolated incident. 'This type of behavior occurs during every council meeting and the authorities do nothing to prevent it happening again,' he told the Daily Mail. 'I have spoken to the deputy general manager and was told council staff have taken all action to prevent this behaviour occurring but it continues.
The National
7 hours ago
- The National
How David Lammy went from human rights lawyer to genocide apologist
You would be forgiven for thinking that I'm quoting a frustrated political commentator – someone who has witnessed the deconstruction of international law by the Labour Government over the last year, and who is exasperated by their inertia. You'd be wrong. These are the words of Foreign Secretary, David Lammy, as he addressed the Bingham Centre for International Law in July 2023. During this speech, he said: 'There should be no power beyond or above the law. The law applies equally to all people.' READ MORE: Palestine Action gets green light for ban challenge He lamented that too many international crimes go unpunished, that too many dictators escape justice, and promised "wholeheartedly" to strengthen protections for humanitarian access and put the UK at the forefront of international legal debates. Well, he's certainly put the UK at the forefront of debates on international law. At best, because of his continued apology for Israel's war crimes. At worst, because of his active role in enabling these crimes. How does a human rights lawyer go from 'standing up for human rights and challenging impunity' to 'I am a steadfast supporter of Israel's security' after the state with which he so steadfastly stands has been accused of genocide, has murdered over 60,000 humans, and has gaslit many into thinking that it is the calling out of these atrocities which is the crime. Is he playing a geopolitical long game? The deep pockets of the Israeli lobby? Genuine callousness? As I write this, we have seen the bloodiest day in Gaza in 20 months. And yet, nothing from the UK Labour Government to suggest that this is a Cabinet which has 'international law fundamentally in its DNA', as Lammy once stated. When lawyers talk broadly about the UK breaching their obligations under international humanitarian law, they are usually referring to Geneva Conventions Common Article 1. This states that all High Contracting Parties undertake to respect and ensure respect for the convention in all circumstances. This means that states must act to prevent breaches of international law in every situation of armed conflict. However, the UK – along with two others – interprets this as meaning that they only have an obligation to uphold international humanitarian law when breaches occur in their own territory. The other states are Israel and the US. As well as Common Article 1, the ICJ confirmed that all states must act to prevent a genocide as soon as they are aware of a serious risk – mirroring the Genocide Convention – and reiterated by credible findings of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza. However, during the Al-Haq case, Labour confirmed that the reason that they are not acting to prevent a genocide is because they have found no credible evidence to suggest a genocide is ongoing. The Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits transferring a population within occupied territory and Article 59 demands that occupying states allow unimpeded humanitarian aid for all civilians, while Additional Protocol I prohibits the starvation of civilians as a method of warfare. Yet, repeatedly Labour MPs and the UK Government have excused Israel's siege and failed to prevent the mass forced displacement of Palestinians. The latest announcement to airdrop aid into Gaza is simply a self-congratulatory distraction. READ MORE: SNP to press ahead with Palestine recognition vote The UK should have immediately and unequivocally suspended all Israeli trade arrangements, as they are prohibited from assisting situations created by breaches of international law, as per the ICJ and the ILC Articles on State Responsibility. Instead, Lammy and the Labour Government have sent a trade envoy to Israel, brag about their crucial trade partnerships, and still support Israel militarily. All of these obligations apply to the UK Labour Government. All of them are being breached. In January 2024, Lammy said that '…the rule of law requires compliance by the state with its obligations in international law, just as in national law. Labour agrees.' However, in July 2025, when speaking of Israel – a state accused of genocide –Lammy said he 'treasures the many connections between our peoples'. Despite their legal obligations and public and parliamentary outrage, the UK Labour Government could not be further from the vision that Lammy established in 2023. When Lammy gave his speech, there were echoes of Tony Benn's anti-war speech from 1998. Lammy ended his address by quoting the Preamble of the Charter of the United Nations, as Benn had. Lammy spoke of the responsibility of governments to make the right decisions to protect people, as Benn had. He warned against the mistakes that led to the Second World War, as Benn had. He praised the legacy of Britain in pursuing the international rules-based order in the 1940s, mirroring Benn's calls for continued progression towards peace. Lammy's transition from Benn-to-barely-able-to-muster-up-a-sentence-without 'Israel's right to defend herself' is not just due to the grip of the Israeli lobby, but can be likened to a child who hasn't done their homework and is hoping that the teacher doesn't ask them a question in class. As though if his tone drips with enough condescension people will be distracted from the words coming out of his mouth. Lammy has spent a year trying to convince us that the mass atrocities being committed against Palestinian civilians is normal. He has gone from forging a 'foreign policy underpinned by a fundamental belief in the rule of law' to facing claims that he is perpetuating Israeli war crimes. David Lammy has reduced himself from an eminent human rights lawyer to a genocide apologist. The support for Israel's genocide will be this Labour Government's legacy, just as the illegal Iraq war was the legacy of the 1997 Labour government. David Lammy will always be the Foreign Secretary who forgot about international law because he was too busy trying to sound clever. The Foreign Secretary that condemned the Palestinian people to genocide because he liked the sound of a speech more than he liked the idea of implementing it. Lara Bird-Leakey is a senior policy researcher for foreign affairs in Westminster for the SNP group
