logo
It was meant to be sleepy Cumberland Local Council meeting. Then SCREAMING began and a woman burst into tears

It was meant to be sleepy Cumberland Local Council meeting. Then SCREAMING began and a woman burst into tears

Daily Mail​a day ago
A fiery screaming match erupted between councillors at a Cumberland Council meeting in Sydney 's west after one local politician told another to 'shut up' - leaving a resident in tears.
The heated clash broke out on Wednesday night as independent councillor Ahmed Ouf was speaking in support of a motion regarding next year's Easter celebrations.
Following apparent interjections from the other side of the chamber by Labor councillor Diane Colman, Mr Ouf snapped.
'Shut up when I'm talking, OK,' he fumed.
'I beg your pardon, Councillor,' Mayor Ola Hamed interjected, as tensions escalated.
'When I'm talking, this is my time, not your time,' Cr Ouf told Cr Colman.
'When I talk, you shut up, OK?'
Cr Colman interrupted: 'Oh, point of order, Mayor, point of order!'
Cr Ouf stood his ground.
'Why is she talking while I'm talking? Why is she taking from my time?' he said.
Cr Colman fired back: 'How dare you!'
Cr Ouf replied: 'You just keep your mouth shut while I'm talking. I never, ever spoke when you were talking or having time.'
The comment sparked an explosive outburst from Cr Colman, who rose from her seat.
'You cannot speak to me like that,' she screamed from across the room.
'You show respect, you show respect,' Cr Ouf yelled back.
Cr Colman snapped back: 'You show me some respect.
'How dare you speak to me like that. How dare you.'
The screaming match during Wednesday night's council meeting has since gone viral online
The blazing row continued for seven minutes until the mayor called a brief adjournment.
The fiery scenes unfolded in front of a packed public gallery, where a distraught woman had to be consoled afterwards, according to Libertarian Councillor Steve Christou.
'It put everyone who was there in an unhealthy and unsafe environment,' he told Daily Mail Australia.
'I felt sorry for the council staff, who shouldn't have to work under these conditions or put up with this...
'I also felt for the crowd, as we had a full public gallery there that night.
'One woman was crying because she felt unsafe.'
He added that Cr Ouf apologised afterwards and claimed that Cr Colman often interrupted while other councillors had the floor.
'I've previously raised concerns about this behaviour,' he said.
Cr Colman stood by her actions, claiming she is also frequently interrupted and bullied by other councillors in the chamber.
'He (Cr Ouf) told me to shut up four times,' she said.
'Enough is enough. It's time that councils stop the bullying and misogyny that goes on.'
She confirmed Cr Ouf later apologised.
'The matter is closed,' Cr Colman said.
Councillor Ouf told the Daily Mail that his comments had nothing to do with gender and reiterated calls for councillors not to be interrupted.
'I wished it hadn't happened,' he said.
'This is my first term and I have never interrupted or harassed another councillor.
'I was speaking about an important matter and I was interrupted, which shouldn't have been allowed.'
Labor councillor Glenn Elmore chose not to weigh in on the stoush but confirmed it wasn't an isolated incident.
'This type of behavior occurs during every council meeting and the authorities do nothing to prevent it happening again,' he told the Daily Mail.
'I have spoken to the deputy general manager and was told council staff have taken all action to prevent this behaviour occurring but it continues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Derbyshire council continues to face losses over leisure centre
Derbyshire council continues to face losses over leisure centre

BBC News

time3 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Derbyshire council continues to face losses over leisure centre

A parish council is continuing to face financial losses due to a heritage and leisure centre, according to documents released under the Freedom of Information Act. Elmton with Creswell Parish Council has faced criticism for a "multitude of failures" in its governance due to the losses it has made on the heritage and leisure centre in centre operated at a loss of more than £230,000 last year and is on course to make losses of over £1m over the next three years, according to documents obtained by residents, which have been seen by the parish council said the overall deficit has reduced in real terms. The parish council took out loans of almost £3m from the government and Bolsover District Council to build the centre. But the cost of running the facility soon became a cause for concern and the council ordered an external investigation into its finances, which was published earlier this year. It said there were "large and systemic failure to follow basic legal obligations" that left councillors potentially liable to prosecution. A further investigation was then carried out by the National Association of Local Councils (NALC).It did not find any evidence that warranted prosecutions, but estimated the running the centre and repaying the loans were costing the council £10,400 per week. The centre's income was just over £100,000 in the last financial year, which is roughly the same as its salary costs alone, according to documents released to residents under the Freedom of Information Act, which have been seen by the BBC. The documents also show the council's total spending on the centre was £200,000 in the last financial year and it needed to subsidise the facility to the tune of £70,000 each financial quarter.A repayment plan is also now in place to keep the council from defaulting on its debts. The problems with the leisure centre led the council to increase its council tax precept by 323% over the last two years, taking its charge to a Band D home from £172.05 in 2023/24 to £557.09 in 2025/ say the council has no choice but to increase its share of council tax bills because the leisure centre's income does not cover its running costs. The charitable trust set up to run the centre will soon be dissolved after officers concluded it was not "able to carry out the functions it was set up to perform". Day-to-day running is expected to be taken over by Bolsover District Council, which is expected to make a number of structural changes in an effort to bring down costs. There are currently no discussions between the two councils on offloading the centre to a third party operator, after NALC warned the move could incur costs for the parish elsewhere. A spokesperson for Bolsover District Council said: "Bolsover District Council and Elmton with Creswell Parish Council are currently discussing detail around day-to-day management of the Heritage and Wellbeing Centre. "The prime intention is to sustain facility access to the general public, with operating costs being met by the Parish Council." The chair of a local residents' group, Cris Carr, said that there is increasing anger among residents that they are being asked to "pay more and more with no meaningful way to challenge what's happening".He added: "The latest report suggests costs are continuing to spiral, and many now fear another rise in the precept is inevitable — even as living costs bite hard."Residents are struggling to understand how a Parish Council — traditionally responsible for Christmas lights and hanging baskets — could commit an entire village to millions of pounds in future liabilities without any form of democratic safeguard or community consent."Yet not a single Parish Councillor believes they've done anything wrong." The parish council said in a statement it "understands and shares residents' concerns" and is addressing them through "greater transparency, financial discipline, and community engagement"."For Quarter 1 of the 2025/26 financial year, the Heritage and Wellbeing Centre received a subsidy of £70,253.12, coming in under the budgeted figure of £80,485.00", it said."This marks the second year running in which the overall deficit has reduced in real terms, as part of the Council's active work to bring costs down."Our focus is on bringing down the precept and reducing the impact on council tax bills."

A large pro-Palestine protest has won legal right to march across Harbour Bridge. How will the shutdown affect Sydney?
A large pro-Palestine protest has won legal right to march across Harbour Bridge. How will the shutdown affect Sydney?

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

A large pro-Palestine protest has won legal right to march across Harbour Bridge. How will the shutdown affect Sydney?

A pro-Palestine protest that plans to march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge will go ahead with legal protection after its organisers won a supreme court challenge. The court heard up to 50,000 people were expected to attend – the same number of people who marched across the bridge for World Pride in 2023. New South Wales police sought powers to move on protesters and expressed serious concerns about the disruption a large protest on the bridge would have on the city. But Justice Belinda Rigg said disruption and inconvenience alone were not enough to stifle the right to political protest and noted 'significant support for the march'. Here are some answers to questions you may have about the march, including its planned route, transport disruptions and potential risks. The ruling means protesters will have immunity from being charged under the Summary Offences Act. This includes protection from offences like 'obstructing traffic' – crucial in this particular protest. However, police will still have access to a range of other powers to stem what the court described as 'antisocial behaviour' or other types of offending. This includes showing prohibited symbols. David Mejia-Canales, a senior lawyer at the Human Rights Law Centre, said the authorisation 'doesn't give people the ability to engage in all types and all forms of activism'. 'It's really important for people who do attend that they follow the directions of organisers and marshals.' There is no authority to ban protest or deem it unlawful in NSW. This is because, while there is no express right to protest in the state, it is covered in common law and by the Australian constitution, which the high court has found implies the right to freedom of political communication. The protest will begin at 1pm on Sunday at Lang Park in Sydney's CBD. Protesters will then march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge into north Sydney. Early plans shared with protesters stated the march would end at the US consulate, but this may change. The protest is expected to last several hours. The bridge will be closed to traffic from about 11.30am. Police hope it will reopen to traffic from about 4pm. They have advised people to avoid the CBD and travel in the city unless necessary. Yes, but NSW police will comply with the court's decision and say they are working with protest organisers to address issues and concerns. A significant police presence will be in the city, including officers brought in from across the suburbs. The force has said it will also use specialist resources, including the public order and riot squad and mounted police. Police have advised the public to expect significant disruptions in and around the CBD. A counter protest against antisemitism, organised by the Christian-led group Never Again is Now, will not be granted legal protection because, according to the supreme court, 'notice was served less than seven days before the proposed assembly'. The group had been planning to protest outside the Sydney harbour tunnel, close to the pro-Palestinian march. Rigg said police would have the legal power to direct this group to move on or, if necessary, arrest demonstrators for non-compliance. These powers will not extend to those marching in the pro-Palestine demonstration. The state government is yet to respond to the supreme court decision. Earlier this week, Chris Minns opposed the protest, saying: 'We cannot allow Sydney to descend into chaos.' But several NSW Labor MPs defied their premier, vowing to attend the march. Labor's Stephen Lawrence, Anthony D'Adam, Lynda Voltz, Cameron Murphy and Sarah Kaine were among 15 NSW politicians who signed an open letter on Thursday evening calling on the government to facilitate 'a safe and orderly event' on Sunday. The state opposition leader, Mark Speakman, said while he respected the freedom to protest, including with rallies and marches, 'allowing the takeover of the Harbour Bridge for a protest in the middle of the day sets the wrong precedent for the future'.

Wong criticises Israel's conduct in Gaza in closed-door meeting with Israeli ambassador
Wong criticises Israel's conduct in Gaza in closed-door meeting with Israeli ambassador

The Guardian

time4 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Wong criticises Israel's conduct in Gaza in closed-door meeting with Israeli ambassador

In a private meeting with Israel's ambassador to Australia, the foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, criticised Israel's conduct in Gaza and called for it to urgently comply with international law and increase the supply of food to Palestinians. Wong's Thursday meeting with Amir Maimon was requested by the Israeli embassy, according to federal government sources, and took place inside Wong's office at Parliament House in Canberra. The meeting was held days after Australia joined 27 other countries in condemning Israel for denying humanitarian aid to Palestinians. At the time, Wong said the decision to sign the statement reflected the 'concern' and 'distress' Australians felt from seeing the images of starving Palestinians in Gaza. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The Thursday discussion followed another meeting between Maimon and lower-level foreign affairs officials in Canberra earlier in the week, as reported by the Nine Newspapers. Australian sources said Wong repeated her public criticism of Israel's conduct in Gaza during the meeting with Maimon. This included a request for Israel to comply with international law and ensure enough food was being provided to Palestinians. Wong's office declined to comment on the meeting, and the Israeli embassy has been contacted for comment. Before both meetings took place, the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, accused Israel of 'clearly' breaching international law and said Benjamin Netanyahu's government was 'losing support' internationally. After those comments, Wong said: 'It is forbidden to withhold aid from civilians, that is not consistent with international law, but actually, just as importantly, it's morally the wrong thing to do.' Earlier in the week, a select group of journalists attended a briefing at the Israeli embassy where Israel's deputy ambassador, Amir Meron, reportedly said: 'We don't recognise any famine or any starvation in the Gaza Strip.' In response, Albanese said that statement was 'beyond comprehension' and raised concerns about Israel restricting journalists from visiting the war-torn Palestinian territory. Dozens of Palestinians have died of hunger in recent weeks in a crisis attributed by the UN and other humanitarian organisations to Israel's blockade of almost all aid into the territory. Two Israeli-based rights groups this week declared that Israel was committing genocide in Gaza, with reports citing evidence including the weaponisation of hunger. B'tselem described an 'official and openly declared policy' of mass starvation. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion On Wednesday, Australia joined 14 other countries in describing the recognition of Palestine as 'an essential step towards the two-state solution', linking progress on statehood to the upcoming United Nations general assembly meeting in September. But Albanese also criticised calls for further actions against Israel as 'slogans' as he faced intensifying pressure from his MPs, Labor members and the Greens to reconsider his position on the war and humanitarian crisis in Gaza. He has so far stopped short of matching his UK counterpart Keir Starmer's promise to recognise the state of Palestine in September unless Israel abides by a ceasefire and commits to a two-state solution. 'What I've said is that it's not the timeline, that's not what we're looking at. What we're looking at is the circumstances where recognition will advance the objective of the creation of two states,' Albanese said on Wednesday, a day before Wong met Maimon.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store