
Oxford study linking vaccines to lower dementia risk needs more evidence, say Singapore doctors
Released in June, the study analysed health data from nearly 437,000 individuals in the United States. It found that those who received either the shingles vaccine or the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine – both of which contain the AS01 adjuvant – had a lower risk of developing dementia within 18 months.
Specifically, the RSV vaccine, Arexvy, was associated with a 29 per cent reduction in risk, while the shingles vaccine, Shingrix, was linked to an 18 per cent reduction.
Researchers believe the AS01 adjuvant, a substance used to enhance immune response, may be the key factor behind this potential benefit.
'It gives us a possible explanation that the secret recipe may lie in the adjuvant,' said Dr Philip Yap, a senior consultant in geriatric medicine at Khoo Teck Puat Hospital.
'The adjuvant is actually given in these recombinant vaccines to boost its efficacy,' he said. 'When you give an adjuvant, the vaccine is supposed to elicit a stronger immune response, like a booster.'
EVIDENCE STILL 'TOO WEAK'
Despite these encouraging findings, Dr Yap and other dementia specialists in Singapore stressed that the results should be interpreted cautiously.
Dr Chong Yao Feng, a consultant in the neurology division at the National University Hospital, said that while the study was 'well done', it was epidemiological in nature – based on observational data rather than randomised controlled trials.
'The nature of epidemiological studies is that they demonstrate associations but not causations, unlike randomised controlled trials.'
He expressed concerns about how the study would be interpreted and whether it could influence actions by individual patients or by health authorities.
"We cannot repurpose shingles or RSV vaccines for dementia prevention on the basis of this study alone," Dr Chong said. "Neither should individual patients sign up for these vaccinations with the belief that their risk of dementia is reduced. The current evidence is too weak for such actions to be taken."
Others said that longer-term studies are necessary before drawing firm conclusions, particularly since the effects of introducing these vaccines into the immune system need to be carefully examined.
Dr Zhao Yi Jing, a neurologist at Mount Elizabeth Hospital, said the 18-month window observed in the study is too short to assess long-term effects on a condition like dementia, which often takes decades to develop.
The pathological process of dementia can begin 10 to 20 years before clinical symptoms appear. The study does not provide enough evidence to show that the vaccines can prevent dementia or slow its progression in patients, she said.
Still, Dr Zhao acknowledged that the idea is not without precedent. Other vaccines have been used to treat other diseases, such as the hepatitis vaccine being used to prevent liver cancer.
'It's still too early to tell, but it's not like it hasn't happened before. But when you do that, there are a lot of ethical regulatory considerations,' she added.
Khoo Teck Puat Hospital's Dr Yap, who also chairs social service agency Dementia Singapore, echoed her sentiments.
"It is really too premature, it's still too early. There are positive signals that warrant further investigation. So these positive signals shouldn't be ignored, but neither should we take them to be confirmatory," he said.
'We need more studies to understand whether future studies can replicate the same findings. So the more studies we have, that means the evidence becomes stronger and more robust.'
Dr Yap warned that while an enhanced immune response might help clear amyloid plaques – proteins implicated in Alzheimer's disease – it could also provoke chronic inflammation.
'You want to remove the bad amyloid, the toxic substances. But at the same time, you do not want damage to the good cells,' he said.
PREVENTING DEMENTIA
Beyond vaccines, doctors highlighted well-established methods for lowering dementia risk. These include regular exercise, mental stimulation and a balanced diet. Preserving hearing and vision is also increasingly recognised as important.
'It has been shown that hearing loss increases the risk of dementia by up to two times,' said Dr Yap, advising people to consider hearing aids and 'not neglect things' that can be easily addressed.
He also advised those with poor vision due to cataracts to get it treated – "quite a simple, low-risk surgery" – instead of living with the problem.
Sleep and alcohol consumption are also risk factors. Poor sleep can disrupt the brain's glymphatic system, which is crucial for clearing toxic substances like amyloid plaques, said Dr Yap.
Mount Elizabeth's Dr Zhao added that high alcohol consumption can trigger a general inflammatory response in the body and direct neurotoxicity.
'I have seen patients where through chronic alcoholism, their brain has gone through significant shrinkage compared to other people of their age who don't drink a lot of alcohol,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Independent Singapore
6 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Woman warns against new scam involving polyclinic bills
SINGAPORE: A woman took to social media in a public service advisory of sorts, warning others after she received a sketchy text message. 'BEWARE! New kind of scam, was shocked when I saw this message because I didn't see any doctors in polyclinic/hospital recently. Checked with healthhub app, no outstanding bills,' she wrote in a post on the COMPLAINT SINGAPORE Facebook page on Friday (Jul 11). She added a screenshot of two such messages, one dated Jun 13 and the other from that day itself. The messages, which are exactly the same, read: 'Your NHGP (National Healthcare Group Polyclinics) bill is ready in the HealthHub app (Bill Number: # 0A25108372 #). Please make your payment if you have not done so. Thank you.' FB screengrab/ COMPLAINT SINGAPORE The messages had come from a sender called ACCOLADE. When a commenter wrote that this should raise suspicions, the post author answered that she had first thought it was the name of an agency. The commenter then wrote that when his friends receive text messages regarding hospital appointments, these have 'Singhealth' as the sender. Other commenters, however, expressed doubts that this is a scam. 'Usually if it's a scam, they give you a link to con you to click and pay, right?' one asked. 'How is it a scam? Probably an error, I guess someone is using your phone, no?' another commented. 'I am @ CGH now. The backend servers have broken down – self-service kiosks are not working, and payment services are having disruptions. This is not a scam, just IT-related issues across NHGP & SingHealth, it seems,' a third wrote. The post author pointed to the bill number included in the SMS and added that someone who is not alert may automatically make a payment. Another commenter wrote that they've received the same SMS. A quick search reveals that the post author is likely correct in assuming this is a scam. Sometime ago, Singapore General Hospital issued the following advisory : 'Spot Scam at SGH . A link can contain the words 'SGH,' 'SingHealth,' or 'HealthHub' and still be fake. Do not get lured to fake 'SGH' pages! You may get a message about promotions or payment for a medical bill. The link in the message takes you to a fake SGH, SingHealth, or HealthHub login page where you'll get scammed out of your money,' it reads. In a Jun 19 social media post, SGH also explained that it had been alerted by members of the public regarding possible scam calls, wherein the caller requested confirmation of appointments or outstanding medical bills and also sought personal information. The hospital urged people to ignore these calls and never give out personal information, including their name, identification number, contact details, credit card details, or OTP. /TISG Read also: TikTok scammer: Man, 76, loses S$55,500 to 'good-looking' woman who reached out to him


CNA
16 hours ago
- CNA
CNA938 Rewind - What's an acceptable use of AI in universities?
Educators face the uphill task of detecting the use of AI in academic work – and even research literature, with a recent case involving a white-text prompt concealed in a recently published academic paper. Andrea Heng and Susan Ng examine where the lines are drawn in the sand with Simon Chesterman, David Marshall Professor of Law and Vice Provost of Educational Innovation at NUS.


CNA
20 hours ago
- CNA
Oxford study linking vaccines to lower dementia risk needs more evidence, say Singapore doctors
SINGAPORE: A recent Oxford study suggesting that certain vaccines may help reduce the risk of dementia has drawn interest from medical professionals in Singapore, but they said the findings are still too preliminary to influence clinical practice. Released in June, the study analysed health data from nearly 437,000 individuals in the United States. It found that those who received either the shingles vaccine or the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine – both of which contain the AS01 adjuvant – had a lower risk of developing dementia within 18 months. Specifically, the RSV vaccine, Arexvy, was associated with a 29 per cent reduction in risk, while the shingles vaccine, Shingrix, was linked to an 18 per cent reduction. Researchers believe the AS01 adjuvant, a substance used to enhance immune response, may be the key factor behind this potential benefit. 'It gives us a possible explanation that the secret recipe may lie in the adjuvant,' said Dr Philip Yap, a senior consultant in geriatric medicine at Khoo Teck Puat Hospital. 'The adjuvant is actually given in these recombinant vaccines to boost its efficacy,' he said. 'When you give an adjuvant, the vaccine is supposed to elicit a stronger immune response, like a booster.' EVIDENCE STILL 'TOO WEAK' Despite these encouraging findings, Dr Yap and other dementia specialists in Singapore stressed that the results should be interpreted cautiously. Dr Chong Yao Feng, a consultant in the neurology division at the National University Hospital, said that while the study was 'well done', it was epidemiological in nature – based on observational data rather than randomised controlled trials. 'The nature of epidemiological studies is that they demonstrate associations but not causations, unlike randomised controlled trials.' He expressed concerns about how the study would be interpreted and whether it could influence actions by individual patients or by health authorities. "We cannot repurpose shingles or RSV vaccines for dementia prevention on the basis of this study alone," Dr Chong said. "Neither should individual patients sign up for these vaccinations with the belief that their risk of dementia is reduced. The current evidence is too weak for such actions to be taken." Others said that longer-term studies are necessary before drawing firm conclusions, particularly since the effects of introducing these vaccines into the immune system need to be carefully examined. Dr Zhao Yi Jing, a neurologist at Mount Elizabeth Hospital, said the 18-month window observed in the study is too short to assess long-term effects on a condition like dementia, which often takes decades to develop. The pathological process of dementia can begin 10 to 20 years before clinical symptoms appear. The study does not provide enough evidence to show that the vaccines can prevent dementia or slow its progression in patients, she said. Still, Dr Zhao acknowledged that the idea is not without precedent. Other vaccines have been used to treat other diseases, such as the hepatitis vaccine being used to prevent liver cancer. 'It's still too early to tell, but it's not like it hasn't happened before. But when you do that, there are a lot of ethical regulatory considerations,' she added. Khoo Teck Puat Hospital's Dr Yap, who also chairs social service agency Dementia Singapore, echoed her sentiments. "It is really too premature, it's still too early. There are positive signals that warrant further investigation. So these positive signals shouldn't be ignored, but neither should we take them to be confirmatory," he said. 'We need more studies to understand whether future studies can replicate the same findings. So the more studies we have, that means the evidence becomes stronger and more robust.' Dr Yap warned that while an enhanced immune response might help clear amyloid plaques – proteins implicated in Alzheimer's disease – it could also provoke chronic inflammation. 'You want to remove the bad amyloid, the toxic substances. But at the same time, you do not want damage to the good cells,' he said. PREVENTING DEMENTIA Beyond vaccines, doctors highlighted well-established methods for lowering dementia risk. These include regular exercise, mental stimulation and a balanced diet. Preserving hearing and vision is also increasingly recognised as important. 'It has been shown that hearing loss increases the risk of dementia by up to two times,' said Dr Yap, advising people to consider hearing aids and 'not neglect things' that can be easily addressed. He also advised those with poor vision due to cataracts to get it treated – "quite a simple, low-risk surgery" – instead of living with the problem. Sleep and alcohol consumption are also risk factors. Poor sleep can disrupt the brain's glymphatic system, which is crucial for clearing toxic substances like amyloid plaques, said Dr Yap. Mount Elizabeth's Dr Zhao added that high alcohol consumption can trigger a general inflammatory response in the body and direct neurotoxicity. 'I have seen patients where through chronic alcoholism, their brain has gone through significant shrinkage compared to other people of their age who don't drink a lot of alcohol,' she said.