logo
Legal action against MBIE over flexible working

Legal action against MBIE over flexible working

The Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment recently introduced a new flexible work policy intended to align with the government's directive to restrict flexible work arrangements for public service workers, including reducing days working from home.
That directive is also subject to legal action by the Public Service Association (PSA) and the union has filed proceedings with the Employment Relations Authority (ERA).
"Cracking down on flexible work is the wrong approach from employers in 2025," PSA national secretary Fleur Fitzsimons said.
The union originally raised objections to MBIE's flexible work guidance last month, but attempts to resolve the dispute through mediation had failed, she said.
"MBIE hasn't been willing to back down, leaving the PSA with no choice but to take this step to protect the rights of MBIE staff included in existing agreements."
The ministry could not just change existing agreements, which were protected under the collective agreement, she said.
"The collective agreement binds MBIE to supporting flexible work, so its new policy is simply unlawful.
"We are seeking a determination from the ERA that MBIE is violating the 'flexible by default' approach which forms part of its collective agreement with members."
The PSA hoped the authority would allow the MBIE case to be joined to the broader case against the Public Service Commission. MBIE response
MBIE's chief people officer Jennifer Nathan said consistent with the Public Service Commission's Flexible Working (work from home) guidance for the public service received last year, MBIE had updated its flexible working policy in line with government expectations.
"Conversations with the Public Service Association regarding the updated policy have been ongoing, including attending mediation with the PSA on 8 July. To date the parties have been unable to reach an agreement on resolving the PSA's concerns.
"MBIE does not accept the PSA view that the review and refresh of the flexible working policy and procedures is a breach of the Collective Agreement."
MBIE was notified yesterday that the union intend to file legal proceedings and was awaiting more information, she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Legal action against MBIE over flexible working
Legal action against MBIE over flexible working

Otago Daily Times

time5 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Legal action against MBIE over flexible working

The Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment recently introduced a new flexible work policy intended to align with the government's directive to restrict flexible work arrangements for public service workers, including reducing days working from home. That directive is also subject to legal action by the Public Service Association (PSA) and the union has filed proceedings with the Employment Relations Authority (ERA). "Cracking down on flexible work is the wrong approach from employers in 2025," PSA national secretary Fleur Fitzsimons said. The union originally raised objections to MBIE's flexible work guidance last month, but attempts to resolve the dispute through mediation had failed, she said. "MBIE hasn't been willing to back down, leaving the PSA with no choice but to take this step to protect the rights of MBIE staff included in existing agreements." The ministry could not just change existing agreements, which were protected under the collective agreement, she said. "The collective agreement binds MBIE to supporting flexible work, so its new policy is simply unlawful. "We are seeking a determination from the ERA that MBIE is violating the 'flexible by default' approach which forms part of its collective agreement with members." The PSA hoped the authority would allow the MBIE case to be joined to the broader case against the Public Service Commission. MBIE response MBIE's chief people officer Jennifer Nathan said consistent with the Public Service Commission's Flexible Working (work from home) guidance for the public service received last year, MBIE had updated its flexible working policy in line with government expectations. "Conversations with the Public Service Association regarding the updated policy have been ongoing, including attending mediation with the PSA on 8 July. To date the parties have been unable to reach an agreement on resolving the PSA's concerns. "MBIE does not accept the PSA view that the review and refresh of the flexible working policy and procedures is a breach of the Collective Agreement." MBIE was notified yesterday that the union intend to file legal proceedings and was awaiting more information, she said.

Tiny number of new pay equity claims expected – but first is ‘very close'
Tiny number of new pay equity claims expected – but first is ‘very close'

NZ Herald

time5 days ago

  • NZ Herald

Tiny number of new pay equity claims expected – but first is ‘very close'

Last week, the Herald asked Workplace Relations Minister Brooke van Velden for an update on the number of claims brought or likely to be brought under her new regime. Van Velden's office said the matter was better handled by the agencies responsible for the claims, and forwarded the Herald's query to them. When asked whether she was happy with the way the new regime was working, van Velden said it was 'early days to see how it will roll out in practice'. 'I do believe we got the law correct,' she said. Health NZ Te Whatu Ora's funding and investment director, Jason Power, told the Herald it purchased 'services from a large number of third-party providers but we are not the employer of the workforces that deliver these contracted services'. 'We are not aware of any new pay equity claims across the third-party providers we purchase services from,' Power said. The Ministry of Education's hautū (leader), Anna Welanyk, told the Herald 'no new pay equity claims have been raised since the amendments were made to the Equal Pay Act'. She said the ministry 'has ongoing obligations under the amended Equal Pay Act to respond to and investigate new pay equity claim/s that are raised, once it's been determined the claim meets the required thresholds applying to new claims. Our responsibility to respond to new claims continues under the amended Equal Pay Act.' PSA not intending to use new law The Herald also spoke to the unions responsible for the workforces likely to take claims. Public Service Association (PSA) national secretary Fleur Fitzsimons, who ran as a Labour candidate at the last election, told the Herald the union 'had no intention to file any claims under the new amended Equal Pay Act'. Fitzsimons said the union had 'no confidence women will get equal pay through that legislation'. 'It guts the heart of pay equity. It undermines the ability for women to even be heard,' she said. She said that in some cases, the legislation barred claims from being lodged. This was the case with care and support workers' claim. That claim, which was fought in the courts and sparked the creation of the old pay equity scheme, expired at the end of 2023. In some cases, these workers are now earning the minimum wage. The new regime prevents settled claims being revisited for 10 years after they were initially settled. This means if a pay equity settlement is eroded as a result of male-dominated workforces' wages rising faster, it cannot be litigated until 10 years after the settlement. 'There isn't any ability for those women to even advance a claim under the current legislation – it's not a choice we've made, the legislation itself bans the claim,' Fitzsimons said. She said in the case of other workforces such as probation officers, library assistants, and administration and clerical workers, the union would not be taking pay equity claims but is 'seeking improvements to their pay through collective bargaining'. Nurses' union to take claims soon The New Zealand Nurses Organisation (NZNO) is taking a different approach. It had 12 claims that it took or was a party to – covering 13,200 members – extinguished by the law change. NZNO chief executive Paul Goulter told the Herald 'we decided pretty much immediately after the announcement the issue was too important for us not to pursue any chance at all of continuing pay equity claims'. 'Our members are very strongly in support of us doing that,' he said. Goulter said the Government's changes were 'intended in our view to rule out advancing pay equity claims under the guise of making it easier and more transparent'. He said employers in the funded sector, the private employers who deliver mainly government-funded services, were also keen to have pay equity established because it would help to grow the workforce. He said the union was 'very close' to lodging claims relating to Plunket and hospice workers. Goulter also raised concerns with the 10-year rule. He noted a large claim relating to nurses employed by Health NZ could not be reopened until 2033. It covered 35,000-40,000 nurses. Education union analysing law's effects Education sector union NZEI Te Riu Roa is still delving into how the new regime will function. Because it was passed in mere hours under urgency, without consultation or a select committee, unions had very little time to come to grips with the way the new regime works. NZEI's national secretary Stephanie Mills said her union was still 'analysing' the new regime. 'We've asked the ministry a number of questions about how they would interpret the new act in relation to a claim or claims,' she said. Mills said many of the things her union is looking at include 'technical' problems, such as the new regime's changing of the threshold for raising a claim to one of 'merit'. The old system allowed claims to be raised if they were 'arguable'. What that means in practice is still not clear to NZEI. Asked whether the union would take a claim in future, Mills said NZEI wanted to 'keep looking'. 'We do want to do the best by members. In the end we'll have to make a call about whether we do or don't [lodge a claim]. 'In the meantime we'll be making the argument that the legislation does need to change and does need to be fixed,' she said.

Ministry for Culture and Heritage confirms 80 percent cut in senior historian roles
Ministry for Culture and Heritage confirms 80 percent cut in senior historian roles

RNZ News

time5 days ago

  • RNZ News

Ministry for Culture and Heritage confirms 80 percent cut in senior historian roles

Secretary Leauanae Laulu Mac Leauanae. Photo: Ministry for Culture and Heritage / supplied The Ministry for Culture and Heritage / Manatū Taonga is going ahead with cutting the jobs of most of its historians. The disestablishment of four out of five senior historian jobs has been confirmed, among a total of 30 or so job cuts proposed last month to save money after the ministry's funding was reduced in Budget 2025. The proposal has been amended, to cut about 26 roles in all. One senior historian role is being retained. Also, two others will stay on till the end of the school year, "recognising that the ministry has made commitments to schools" and that this would "allow for the completion of the already scheduled programming and exploration of alternatives for the future of the education programme". Websites on New Zealand history the ministry runs also won a partial reprieve. Secretary Leauanae Laulu Mac Leauanae said he changed the proposals to ensure Te Ara online encyclopedia was still accessible and to complete the work on a Dawn Raids history, as well as "finding a way forward" for Te Tai Whakaea Treaty Settlement Stories. "I have... heard your strong feedback on the importance of our heritage content and production team and the taonga they have created and added to over the past three decades," he told staff in a confidential 'decision' document released to them on Thursday. "I agreed that Te Ara Taonga, Taonga Tūturu, Treaty settlements and Matariki are critical ministry outputs that must continue to operate with as little disruption as possible." It looked "like a slower version of shutting down websites", said a staffer who RNZ agreed not to name. The PSA union called it "cultural vandalism". "What we should be doing is employing even more historians because there's a lot of work to be done in preserving our culture," said national secretary Fleur Fitzsimons, calling them "senseless cuts". Fleur Fitzsimons. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone "We're concerned that the Te Ara encyclopedia won't be able to be maintained." Te Ara was established in 2001. The pressure remained on at the ministry, the document made clear. Leauanae calculated it needed to find $3m in savings this year. "To enable Manatū Taonga to adjust to our new financial position, I have made decisions to disestablish a number of positions. Decisions in this document confirm our functional shift away from content creation and programme delivery. "My preferred option will be the transfer of products or programmes, but alternatives may include the decommissioning or stopping of these programmes as a last resort." The reduced budget left the ministry unable to keep specialised positions in digital production and editing. As for cutting historians, "feedback received was not in support of removing any historian roles noting the uniqueness of the positions and their importance in maintaining and developing the taonga". But it was not feasible to keep them all on. However, a U-turn was made on proposal to cut the role of solicitor, which would now be retained. "Feedback was clear that demands on the legal team will only increase with the impacts of the Regulatory Standards Bill on our legislative modernisation work programme" among other things. The aim was to have the new structure in place by the middle of September. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store