Transport Ministry names top traffic offenders
PUTRAJAYA: With so many cases of accidents involving lorries and buses which already have many traffic summonses, the Transport Ministry has decided to reveal the name of companies with the most summonses.
The company that tops the list – a waste management firm – has 22,017 active traffic summons, while the second-placed firm has 5,108. The other nine companies on the list, all operating goods vehicles, have more than 1,000 overdue traffic summonses.
Transport Minister Anthony Loke also said there are 17 bus express companies with over 200 overdue traffic summons each. The bus firm that tops the list has 540 summonses.
'The list is long. But, as a warning, we will just reveal a part of it,' said Loke.
(The Star is not naming the companies as the figures could not be independently verified).
'This was because Malaysians want to see a change in culture.
'We don't want another bus tragedy that sacrificed so many lives,' Loke told a special press conference at the ministry yesterday.
He said the companies had 14 days to settle their traffic summons, failing which they would be blacklisted immediately.
'The companies have to change to a safer road culture,' he added.
Loke also said the ministry was ready to assist companies to abide by road safety regulations.
'For example, we can advise them on how to train drivers.
'We don't want to just punish. We will hold their hands in meeting the regulations,' he said.
According to Loke, the top five traffic offences involving companies operating goods vehicles were technical offences (non-compliant brakes/tyres), not having a valid driving licence, overweight vehicles, driving without insurance coverage and speeding.
For companies operating express buses, Loke said the top five offences were speeding, regular traffic offences, technical offences, driving without a driving licence and no insurance coverage.
Loke also said his ministry would continuously come up with various measures to improve road safety for Malaysians.
'If there are companies that are still stubborn in their ways, we will consider making this (announcement of companies with most traffic summons) a periodical measure. It won't be one-off,' added Loke.
At the same time, Loke urged the public to assist the ministry by providing videos of reckless drivers.
'If you don't want to lodge a report, just make the video viral on social media,' he said, adding that the videos should include visible number plates, company names, the location, as well as the time and date of the incident.
'Once we receive that (video), JPJ and the Land Public Transport Agency (Apad) will investigate.
'Once an offence is proven, action will be taken immediately,' said Loke, who felt drastic action is needed to curb the spate of accidents involving heavy vehicles.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
9 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: Ensure Gig Workers Bill delivers
THERE is finally some clarity about the long awaited Gig Workers Bill after Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said it is expected to be tabled in the Dewan Rakyat in August or September. But several concerns about this future economy have to be sorted out. Chiefly, the bill has to balance worker protection with business viability and sustainability. The bill is designed to safeguard the gig economy and create a social protection framework for the 1.12 million Malaysians working in the sector. The bill is also meant to provide equitable protection that builds a fair, inclusive and resilient future. Zahid has touted the bill as a world's first and that the International Labour Organisation was keen to learn from Malaysia's experience. However, despite its importance, industry players are adopting a "wait-and-see" attitude. The gig economy is a major economic contributor and a source of employment to youngsters. A key question about the bill is on whether it addresses career advancements. The bill also has place in the Education Ministry's effort to stem Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia absenteeism, as more students are forfeiting the examination to become riders and drivers for quick and easy money. The Department of Statistics Malaysia conducted a study in 2022 and found that the majority of p-hailing riders are aged between 15 and 30 and earn about RM2,500 a month. Major industry players maintained that the bill offered little clarity because no regulatory impact assessment has been done. Over the years of deliberations, the industry hasn't seen dispute resolution, deactivation compensation and wage requirement resolved. It's clear that more industry consultations and inclusivity is needed in the bill's drafting, especially discussions with platforms, gig workers, academics and experts. There are other worries: will there be spikes in operational costs, more entry barriers, disruptions in business models and higher consumer costs? Gig worker associations are uneasy with excessive regulations that may stifle innovation, discourage platform investment, reduce job opportunities and harm economic benefits. They are asking: Will the bill clearly define gig workers, provide practical mechanisms for dispute resolution, income protection and social security? This is why there have been multiple postponements to the bill's tabling. Nevertheless, the bill is a global pioneering legal framework for gig workers, espousing a fair, inclusive and resilient future economy.
The Star
10 hours ago
- The Star
MAXIS POWERS UP HOME SOLAR
MALAYSIA, a land blessed with year-round sunshine and a tapestry of rooftops, possesses an often underutilised natural resource – solar energy. While the nation drives towards the National Energy Transition Roadmap (NETR) goals, to achieve 70% renewable energy installed capacity by 2050, a critical piece of the puzzle – accessible home solar energy – has lagged. This is precisely the gap that integrated telecommunications provider Maxis Bhd aims to fill with its innovative Maxis Home Solar package, launched in 2024, and expanded across Peninsular Malaysia earlier this year. 'The reason why solar energy adoption is not moving forward as fast is that people are still unsure. 'They would ask: 'Do I have to invest thousands of ringgit?' or 'Am I going to get the value for that money?'', said Maxis Green Solutions director and Maxis chief people and transformation officer Patrick Er. 'We feel that there is still a way to give worry-free experiences for Malaysians. 'Not everybody is comfortable with making such big upfront investments,' he added, highlighting the intention of Maxis Home Solar – to de-risk solar adoption and empower more households to embrace cleaner energy alternatives. A household name connecting millions daily, through its mobile and fibre solutions for consumers, homes and businesses, the company realised its expertise and experience in customer service and reliability could be a game-changer in unlocking home solar market potential. 'Our roofs could be doing more. We need to think of them as prime real estate for solar energy,' said Er. — RAJA FAISAL HISHAN/The Star Maxis Home Solar The move to solar is a natural extension of Maxis' converged home solutions ecosystem. As part of its broader push into home solutions across fibre broadband and a wide range of devices, solar is the 'next piece' in the mission to improve lifestyle experiences through technology. Er said that Maxis Home Solar is built on a 10-year subscription model, with a low RM1,000 upfront payment, to address consumer apprehension about solar energy. 'Customers can opt for a fixed rate, which most prefer because there is less uncertainty, or a consumption-based rate based on the amount of energy produced.' The fixed-rate options provide unparalleled peace of mind, locking in rates for a decade (even if tariff rates increase), after which the solar assets are fully transferred to the homeowner. To ensure quality and reliability, Maxis exclusively utilises Tier 1 solar panels and inverters and provides insurance coverage for the system. But the difference that Maxis offers extends far beyond just hardware, as Er explained that the company's comprehensive support sets Maxis Home Solar apart from fragmented market offerings. 'We ensure that what we install will be around for a very long time, and we are happy to choose only the best products for our customers. 'On top of that, we will also monitor the system for you. If maintenance or repairs are required, we will conduct them as needed and even handle warranty claims where necessary. 'So, over the subscription period, you do not have to worry about anything,' said Er. Sustainable energy consumption Leveraging its deep expertise in network operations, Maxis extends this capability with its remote energy monitoring system, enabling the company to proactively identify and rectify any performance issues. 'At one point, we found that about 15% of installations were not optimal, where certain panels were not producing the desired amount of energy. When we saw this, we were able to quickly address it. 'We have already learnt a lot since launching this service. If we were to just install the systems and 'walk away', we would not know if your house had not been generating power optimally,' said Er. He explained that this vigilance allows Maxis to identify issues impacting panel performance, ensuring reliable and consistent performance in customers' solar energy systems. Looking ahead Moving forward, Maxis sees significant potential beyond residential homes, with interest from commercial and industrial sectors, and a keen eye on East Malaysia, should a scheme such as Net Energy Metering (NEM) be made available there. Er believes that reaching the NETR goal necessitates 70%-80% of landed homes adopting solar, making the case for home rooftops as a viable alternative to vast solar farms. 'If you look at the last 10-15 years, solar adoption is less than 5% of households nationwide, and I do not think that we would want to wait another decade or more for minimal growth,' said Er. 'Our roofs could be doing more. We need to think of them as prime real estate for solar energy.' When asked about the future of the NEM scheme, Er states that the hope is for the scheme to continue to thrive and evolve, potentially increasing the adoption rate of solar energy among more households. 'The government has done an excellent job in supporting solar adoption, and I believe that withcontinued commitment, we can push this even further. In the long term, it's a win-win for everybody,' he said. 'I am confident that we are one of the few companies that can make this ambition come to pass.' For those hesitant about making the switch to solar, Er opines that there is 'no downside' to adopting renewable energy solutions. 'With Maxis Home Solar, there is low risk. Coupled with the low barrier of entry, it could create almost instant savings. And, at the very least, you will be doing your part to protect the environment,' said Er. In all, Maxis Home Solar is not just about providing clean energy but also simplifying complex technology and driving Malaysia towards a sustainable, connected future, one rooftop at a time. For more information, visit
Focus Malaysia
11 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Coherent SST reform requires zero exemptions for policymakers
THE Malaysian government's recent changes to the Sales and Service Tax (SST) are true to an at least decade-old tradition of self-defeating consumption tax policies. Raising taxes is a thankless but necessary task that requires astute policy design and nuanced messaging to manage both economic and political narratives. Both the 1 July changes and the case for them have left policymakers open to justifiable but needless criticism. Malaysian policymakers have long recognised the need to significantly increase revenue collections but have struggled to convince Malaysians. Tax reforms repeatedly adopt a narrow, small-target strategy that—by lacking both vision and tangible economic sustainability and equity objectives—instead become lightning rods for critics. Malaysians worried about their household budgets naturally fear higher taxes and do not count fiscal sustainability among their chief concerns. Making the case for consumption tax reform needs and deserves better than pointing to unsustainable budget deficits and delivering patronising rebukes of SST critics. It requires a consistent, coherent and non-condescending narrative that garners public support for changes that will improve not threaten their livelihoods. Policymakers should be explaining the importance of taxing consumption, how it supports a tax strategy that balances fairness, competitiveness and sustainably, and how the money raised will be used to benefit Malaysians. Consumption taxes have advantages that are especially relevant to Malaysia's circumstances. Malaysia has a large visiting and undocumented population whose income cannot be taxed but whose consumption can be. It has a sizeable informal sector contributing around a quarter of gross domestic product, whose income likewise escapes direct taxes but whose inputs may be partially captured by consumption levies. Shaping consumption choices through price signals will be essential to making Malaysia's future economic development less carbon intensive and more sustainable. Consumption taxes progressed alone cannot address Malaysia's revenue needs or be implemented equitably. Consumption taxes are regressive as low-income households consume more of their disposable incomes and therefore experience a greater relative impact. Attempts to neutralise these impacts by exempting or setting to zero the rate for basic goods introduces complexity for businesses and consumers, exempts rich and non-Malaysian consumers at the same time, and opens policymakers to arguments of inconsistency or bias. Accompanying changes to income taxes, transfers or welfare for low-income households would be a superior approach. Malaysians would be more receptive to tax hikes if their purpose were more tangibly linked to spending for their benefit. Public wariness remains high in the shadow of 1MDB and other newsworthy examples of funds being misused, with the government's fiscal challenges explicitly associated with corruption. At the same time Malaysians want better schools and hospitals, greater access to safe and efficient transport and technology, more generous social welfare and more. Transparent and well communicated spending intentions are an essential enabler of tax reform. The SST reforms have thus far been mapped poorly in these regards. Far from presenting a coherent vision for equitably, efficiently and sustainably raising revenue to spend in the interests of Malaysians, the reforms adopt a piecemeal and discriminatory approach to taxation. Two particularly concerning elements that have attracted fair criticism are the inclusion of basic goods and differential rates for local and imported goods. Malaysia is a net importer of food including many staple products, with openness to trade a critical contributor to food security both at the household and national levels. SST increases that represent an implicit import tariff, especially on basic and healthy goods like fruit, send precisely the wrong signal at a time when Malaysia is trying to counter global economic policy uncertainty. Malaysia must reinforce its openness to trade and investment by avoiding discriminatory taxes on overseas goods. Bowing to public backlash to provide post-announcement tax exemptions for imported apples and oranges (among other changes) further illustrates the policy development and communication shortcomings. Policymakers were either unaware of or misread public sensitivity on the price and availability of basic food imports, and in the absence of a compelling defence for the proposed SST increase were forced to make concessions. Evident is both a need for wider consultation and that complex and subjective tax design leaves policymakers exposed. Making the case for tax reform in Malaysia should also stick to message not mechanism. Long-running arguments comparing the SST with a restored GST are of greater distraction than consequence to the current debate. Either mechanism can be tailored to achieve comparable coverage and revenue outcomes, and tax incidence (who ultimately pays: consumers or producers) is determined by markets not tax design. Differences in administrative efficiency and effectiveness are important considerations that are adaptable to a consumption tax with either (or any) name. What Malaysia needs from policymakers is greater tax policy reform coherence, communication and ambition. And the leadership to design and deliver tax strategies and mechanisms that benefit Malaysia and Malaysians. ‒ July 2, 2025 Dr Stewart Nixon is the deputy director of research at the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS). The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Bigstock
