
House endorses Ayotte's bail reform bill
The House of Representatives voted 205-170 to approve the measure after it rejected attempts by Democratic critics to water it down.
"Today the House brought us one step closer to shutting the revolving door for violent criminals," Ayotte said in a statement after the vote.
The House took four votes on the measure, none by a recorded roll call, however. All four were by division under which the votes of individual legislators were not identified.
The proportions of the vote roughly matched the ratio of Democrats and Republicans in the chamber Thursday.
The House debated the measure as many law-enforcement professionals supporting the cause sat in the gallery.
House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee Chairman Terry Roy, R-Deerfield, said last year lawmakers made changes to a 2018 bail reform law, but Ayotte and GOP legislative leaders wanted to go further.
"The bill last year was a good bill; it wasn't a Republican bill," Roy said. "We don't have to compromise; it is now a Republican majority, and we are going to pass a Republican bail bill. We don't have to be ashamed of that."
The most significant change would lower the standard of proof that prosecutors need to convince a judge that someone accused of a violent crime is dangerous enough to be held without bail.
The current standard is "clear and convincing evidence" while this year's bill, which has Ayotte's backing, would lower it to "probable cause."
Ayotte said higher standards have proven difficult for prosecutors to achieve in court.
"You are really requiring them to hold a mini-trial to reach that kind of standard, which isn't fair," said Ayotte, a former attorney general.
"Probable cause is a recognized standard that is used when someone in law enforcement seeks a warrant to search someone's private property. It is known and well understood in the criminal justice system."
Critics: violent crime down
Rep. Buzz Scherr, D-Portsmouth, was one of the chief architects of the 2018 law as an appellate law expert and professor at the University of New Hampshire School of Law.
Since then, Scherr said, the number of serious violent and property crimes has dropped from 19,000 in 2017 to just over 13,000 in 2024.
"Despite the rhetoric, the bail reform law is working," Scherr said. "We don't need to fix bail reform."
House Majority Leader Jason Osborne, R-Auburn, said during her campaign for governor, Ayotte had made the issue a top priority, and the entire GOP leadership team backed that decision.
"Upholding law and order and finishing our work to fix New Hampshire's bail system were a key part of the mandate which voters handed us when they sent a Republican trifecta to represent them in Concord," Osborne said.
Court administrators have maintained the bill could increase taxpayer costs since it will likely lead to detaining more accused offenders in county jails while awaiting trials.
Ayotte said the correctional system "has the capacity" to jail more offenders if that's necessary.
"Twenty-five to 30 percent of all people charged with crimes have their charges dismissed or are found not guilty," Scherr said.
"We will be jailing pre-trial people who have not been found guilty and some of whom will never be found guilty."
The legislation also would do away with three magistrates whose positions were created as part of a 2024 bail reform law.
These magistrates are charged with conducting initial bail matters on nights or weekends when full-time judges are not working.
Court officials said the three magistrates were named to five-year terms, and it would be appropriate for any change in law to phase them out of that judicial post over time.
+++
What's Next: The bill now heads to the State Senate.
Prospects: Excellent. Senate Republican leaders have already endorsed the measure.
klandrigan@unionleader.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

an hour ago
Senate confirms former Fox News host Pirro as top federal prosecutor for the nation's capital
WASHINGTON -- The Senate has confirmed former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro as the top federal prosecutor for the nation's capital, filling the post after President Donald Trump withdrew his controversial first pick, conservative activist Ed Martin Jr. Pirro, a former county prosecutor and elected judge, was confirmed 50-45. Before becoming the acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia in May, she co-hosted the Fox News show 'The Five' on weekday evenings, where she frequently interviewed Trump. Trump yanked Martin's nomination after a key Republican senator said he could not support him due to Martin's outspoken support for rioters who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Martin now serves as the Justice Department's pardon attorney. In 2021, voting technology company Smartmatic USA sued Fox News, Pirro and others for spreading false claims that the company helped 'steal' the 2020 presidential election from Trump. The company's libel suit, filed in a New York state court, sought $2.7 billion from the defendants. Last month, Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee voted unanimously to send Pirro's nomination to the Senate floor after Democrats walked out to protest Emil Bove's nomination to become a federal appeals court judge. Pirro, a 1975 graduate of Albany Law School, has significantly more courtroom experience than Martin, who had never served as a prosecutor or tried a case before taking office in January. She was elected as a judge in New York's Westchester County Court in 1990 before serving three terms as the county's elected district attorney. In the final minutes of his first term as president, Trump issued a pardon to Pirro's ex-husband, Albert Pirro, who was convicted in 2000 on conspiracy and tax evasion charges.


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Sydney Sweeney's voter registration revealed amid American Eagle's ‘good jeans' ad backlash
Her jeans are red. Actress Sydney Sweeney's voter registration has come to light amid the woke backlash surrounding her controversial American Eagle denim campaign. The 27-year-old 'Euphoria' actress has been registered with the Republican Party of Florida in Monroe County since June 2024, according to public voter records viewed by The Post. 4 Sydney Sweeney in American Eagle jeans. American Eagle The starlet's party affiliation was first reported by Buzzfeed News Saturday, after a viral post on X that read: 'was about to make a whole youtube video exploring sydney sweeney's choices not defending her but going through her career context and i just found out this lady is an actual registered member of the republican party as of 2024.' 4 The 'White Lotus' starlet is a registered Republican voter in Florida. Getty Images for Armani beauty The post was part of a fierce firestorm ignited by lefty critics over the provocative ad featuring the blonde-haired, blue-eyed 'White Lotus' starlet — with some even comparing it to 'Nazi propaganda' that's promoting racism and eugenics. In one video released as part of the marketing campaign, Sweeney explains that genes are passed down from parents to offspring 'often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color,' before proclaiming, 'my jeans are blue.' A narrator then chimes in, 'Sydney Sweeney, has great jeans.' 4 Illustration of the Republican and Democratic party logos. eMIL' – In another ad, the actress approaches a billboard with her likeness and the phrase, 'Sydney Sweeney has great genes,' which she alters to cross out 'genes' and write 'jeans.' American Eagle shot back at critics Friday, defending its denim campaign and the 'Anyone But You' star. ''Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' is and always was about the jeans,' the company said in a statement. 'Her jeans. Her story.' 'We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way,' the statement said. 'Great jeans look good on everyone.' 4 The ad sparked debate over 'Nazi propaganda,' racism and eugenics. American Eagle Even the White House jumped into the fray, with President Trump's communications director, Steven Cheung, coming to Sweeney's defense in a post late Tuesday that called the left-wing blowback 'cancel culture run amok.' While Sweeney herself has yet to respond to the public reaction, this is now the second time the Emmy nominee has ruffled feathers in liberal circles. Sweeney faced sharp criticism in 2022 after her family threw a 60th birthday party for her mother, where revelers wore red caps that played on the MAGA slogan – 'Make Sixty Great Again' — and 'Blue Lives Matter' shirts. She said at the time the family hoedown was misinterpreted as an 'absurd' political statement. Sweeney's reps didn't immediately return requests for comment.


New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
McCloskeys win back AR-15 rifle 5 years after Black Lives Matter protest confrontation
The St. Louis couple who went viral in 2020 for wielding guns as Black Lives Matter protesters marched outside their property have regained possession of their semiautomatic rifle. After a years long and complex legal struggle to reclaim their weapons after they were seized by authorities more than five years ago, police have returned the AR-15 to St. Louis lawyers Mark and Patricia McCloskey. Advertisement 'It only took 3 lawsuits, 2 trips to the Court of Appeals and 1,847 days, but I got my AR15 back!' Mark McCloskey posted to his X account on Friday, along with several photos of him carrying the gun. 'We defended our home, were persecuted by the left, smeared by the press, and threatened with death, but we never backed down.' In a separate X post, Mark McCloskey also shared a video of himself retrieving the rifle from a police station. 'That gun may have only been worth $1,500 or something, and it cost me a lot of time and a lot of effort to get it back, but you have to do that,' Mark McCloskey told Fox News Digital, adding he owns other weapons. 'You have to let them know that you will never back down, you'll never give up.' Advertisement 3 Mark McCloskey was given his AR-15 back FOX News He said he expects their pistol, wielded by Patricia McCloskey during the confrontation, to be returned by next week. The AR-15 ended up in the possession of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, while the pistol wound up in the possession of the St. Louis Sheriff's Department, he added. 'Each and every one of us owns a personal responsibility for our freedom and our democratic republic,' Mark McCloskey said. Advertisement In June 2020, a video of the gun-toting McCloskeys took the internet by storm after a swarm of Black Lives Matter protesters broke down an iron gate and ignored a 'No Trespassing' sign on their private street. 3 The couple went viral in 2020 for wielding guns as Black Lives Matter protesters marched outside their property. UPI 3 Their weapons were seized by authorities five years ago. UPI The couple, who said they felt threatened, armed themselves before heading outside to ward off the crowd, which was on its way to the former mayor's home. No one was hurt. Advertisement After the incident, the McCloskeys's were were seized by law enforcement, and they were charged with unlawful use of a weapon by St. Louis' former Democratic prosecutor, Kim Gardner. Shortly after that, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt moved to dismiss charges brought by Gardner. In 2021, the McCloskeys pleaded guilty to misdemeanor fourth-degree assault and second-degree harassment but later were granted a pardon by former Missouri Gov. Mike Parson. Last month, a Missouri appeals court confirmed the expungement of the McCloskeys' misdemeanor convictions, which, under state law, means it is as though the incident never happened, Mark McCloskey said. 'If you've been wronged, if you've been overreached by the leftist government — you can't give up,' Mark McCloskey told Fox News Digital. 'You can't let them get an inch.' The St. Louis Sheriff's Office and the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.