Woman Cancels Family Fourth of July Celebration After Sister Refuses to ‘Keep an Eye' on Her Son Around Pool
Her sister, the boy's mother, refused to supervise more closely and suggested a pool fence, sparking a major disagreement
Now that the family has defaulted to meeting at a public park instead, her sister claims they're being unfairly excludedA woman is turning to Reddit for support after a family dispute left her sister and nephew excluded from a Fourth of July celebration.
Hosting family events has become her new normal ever since the poster's parents sold their house and moved, but this time, things have taken a complicated turn.
While the woman and her husband "don't mind" their new role as go-to hosts, tensions have risen with her sister.
The poster explains that her sister's 13-year-old son with autism "is absolutely fascinated with dropping things in water," especially in their pool.
'He will just grab anything he can find, sneak over to the pool, and lay down on his stomach so he can drop whatever in the pool and watch it float or sink to the bottom,' she shares.
After the first incident, when her nephew dropped a mix of harmless items and a book into the pool, the poster and her husband tried to find a solution. To help, they provided him with 'a big bucket full of pool toys and balls' to keep by the pool.
However, she admits, 'It didn't really work though because he gets bored with those things and will sneak all sorts of things from the yard or house into the pool.'
So, the woman asked her sister "to keep a better eye on him," but instead, the sister suggested they install "a pool fence." However, the couple feels that it would be "unnecessary and inconvenient" as they "don't have anyone with small children over."
She also clarified that their yard is 'enclosed completely with an 8ft tall fence, locked gates, and the pool is usually always covered, but obviously not during a party" when people are swimming.
She explains, 'He and this issue would literally be the only reason to have a pool fence and he doesn't visit often to begin with.'
While the sister "seemed annoyed/offended" with the poster's request, she agreed that she or her husband would keep an eye on the teen the next time around.
However, things came to a head during a Labor Day gathering. The poster claimed her sister "purposefully kept less of an eye on him out of spite because all sorts of stuff ended up in the pool.' The list included pens, soda cans, a potted cactus, a shovel, books, a BBQ scraper, a game controller and even a roll of paper towels.
Frustrated, 'I'll admit it I got a little heated with her later about the whole thing,' the woman writes. Her sister, however, shifted the blame back, once again insisting they need to get a pool fence.
"It turned into an argument about us being ridiculous for saying it was an inconvenience for us to have a pool fence and how we don't know what an inconvenience even is," the woman writes. "That we don't get how it's not reasonable to expect them to be able to watch him every second."
The argument ended with her sister saying they "shouldn't even host if we're going to be bad hosts and not make accommodations for our guests.' This exchange left a lingering tension between the sisters.
When the family group chat began discussing Fourth of July plans, everyone assumed the poster and her husband would host as usual. But, she didn't "want to have to deal with the pool issue again and told everyone we wouldn't be able to host because we couldn't accommodate everyone.'
She acknowledges that her message was 'admittedly a little snarky,' but no one else knew about the previous argument aside from her sister.
With her home off the table, someone else suggested meeting at the park. Her sister objected, saying, 'Her son can't handle crowded spaces and the park has a lot of people during the fourth.' The rest of the family struggled to find an alternative, as 'no one else can host.'
Meanwhile, behind the scenes, the sister was privately messaging other family members, "complaining to everyone privately about us actually not hosting because of her son."
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
Still, with nowhere else to go, in the end, "everyone decided on the group chat to go to the park. Kind of more to just go on their own and maybe we'll see each other or meet up.'
'Now my sister is upset about everyone choosing to go to the park even though they can't go and we started it and set the tone for everyone to think it was okay to exclude them," the poster writes, turning to Reddit to see if she was in the wrong.
Read the original article on People

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
19 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Assisted-living home cited for late reports of safety incidents years before fatal fire
FALL RIVER, Mass. — A Massachusetts assisted-living center where nine residents died in a fire was cited for failing to immediately report more than two dozen health and safety incidents, according to regulators' most recent review of the facility. Five men and four women were killed and at least 30 others were injured Sunday night at Gabriel House in Fall River , about 50 miles (80 kilometers) south of Boston. Some of the 70 residents were rescued by ladder after screaming for help from the windows of the three-story building. Investigators have not determined the cause of the blaze , which was the state's deadliest fire in more than four decades.


CNN
21 minutes ago
- CNN
Democrats seize on Epstein files as a campaign issue and a chance to rile Trump's base
Democrats in Congress want to force votes to release the full Jeffrey Epstein files. The party's candidates are bringing up the Epstein case in campaign speeches. And at least one potential 2028 contender is fundraising off the furor. Some Democrats once decried the promotion of conspiracy theories about Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender who died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges. Now, they are pushing for more transparency and arguing Trump is trying to protect himself after Attorney General Pam Bondi and other officials denied longstanding claims about Epstein's death or the existence of a 'client list.' The issue gives top party leaders and the Democratic rank and file an opportunity to further drive a wedge in a Republican Party at odds over Trump's handling of the case. But it also plays to the Democratic base: A new CNN poll shows Democrats are more dissatisfied than Republicans by the amount of information the federal government has released about the case. 'The American people deserve to know the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth as it relates to this whole sordid Jeffrey Epstein matter,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat, said Monday. 'Democrats didn't put the Epstein matter into the public domain. This was a conspiracy that Donald Trump, Pam Bondi and these MAGA extremists have been fanning the flames of for the last several years, and now the chickens are coming to roost.' Congressional Democrats are trying to force multiple votes to release the Epstein files in full, with the goal of putting Republicans on the record against Trump. California Rep. Ro Khanna introduced an amendment demanding Bondi publish all documents related to Epstein on a 'publicly accessible website' within 30 days. After the House Rules Committee blocked attaching the amendment to a cryptocurrency bill on Monday, Democratic leaders unsuccessfully attempted to link Khanna's amendment to a procedural vote Tuesday on the House floor. Texas Rep. Marc Veasey has introduced a separate resolution making a similar call, posting on X that 'NO Republican signed on to cosponsor.' In the Senate, Chris Van Hollen of Maryland is pushing a measure to help preserve records related to the Epstein case. The Senate Appropriations Committee last week unanimously approved a Van Hollen amendment to a yearly funding bill that would require Bondi to preserve Epstein records. 'It's time for full transparency and accountability,' Van Hollen told CNN's Manu Raju on Tuesday. 'We need to get to the bottom of this, and we need to make sure that the attorney general releases all the documents and answers the questions that we posed in that bipartisan amendment.' On Tuesday, Trump told reporters he's leaving the decision about releasing files to Bondi, who rejected questions about making more releases at a separate news conference. 'We've gone through years of it, but [Bondi's] handled it very well, and it's going to be up to her, whatever she thinks is credible, she should release,' Trump said. On Tuesday, Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson advocated for releasing more investigation files. 'We should put everything out there and let the people decide it. I mean, the White House and the White House team are privy to facts that I don't know. I mean, this isn't my lane; I haven't been involved in that, but I agree with the sentiment that we need to put it out there,' Johnson said in an interview on 'The Benny Show' podcast. But Jason Rantz, a conservative radio host, said Democratic demands to release the files are being done 'in bad faith.' 'They're doing it because they think it's going to create more distrust within the movement. Ultimately, I think that actually hurts them because I don't know how many MAGA base members are going to say, 'Yes I support what Pramila Jayapal and Eric Swalwell are saying,'' said Rantz, host of 'The Jason Rantz Show,' referring to Democratic House members. 'I think they're hurting their own cause. They would have been better just to step back and let this just unfold. But they decided to get involved and I think weirdly that's pushing people away from wanting to talk about this as much as maybe they otherwise would have.' A new CNN poll conducted in the days after the Justice Department released its memo on Epstein found that half of Americans are dissatisfied with how much information the federal government has released about the Epstein case. Just 3% of Americans said they are satisfied. The poll shows that dissatisfaction largely lies with Democrats (56%) and independents (52%). Among Republicans, 40% are dissatisfied. Nearly as many Republicans say it doesn't matter to them either way (38%), a larger group than the roughly one-quarter who felt that way among Democrats (27%) or independents (26%). With the 2026 midterms in sight, Democrats on the campaign trail are bringing up Trump's association with Epstein before entering politics and the sexual misconduct allegations the president himself has faced. Trump has denied all allegations against him. 'He promised to release the Epstein files,' Georgia Sen. Jon Ossoff, a Democrat up for reelection in 2026 in a state Trump won last year, said at a recent campaign rally in Savannah. 'Did anyone really think the sexual predator president who used to party with Jeffrey Epstein was gonna release the Epstein files?' Rep. Mikie Sherrill, the Democratic nominee for governor in New Jersey in a marquee 2025 race, questioned whether her GOP opponent agreed with the Trump administration's decision on the issue. Epstein is also coming up among Democrats eyeing potential presidential bids in 2028 Sen. Ruben Gallego of Arizona, a possible 2028 contender, sent an email to grassroots supporters with the subject line 'Release the Epstein List.' And California Gov. Gavin Newsom demanded in an interview with the Tennessee Holler that Trump 'show us what you got.' It's unclear how much staying power the Democratic messaging push on Epstein will have heading into the 2026 midterms. Democratic leaders have signaled Trump's megabill, including cuts to Medicaid and nutrition assistance as well as tax cuts for wealthier Americans, will be at the center of their midterm campaign strategy. But the House Majority PAC, the super PAC focused on electing Democrats to Congress, on Tuesday announced it would target what it called 'a slate of vulnerable House Republicans who have remained complicit in the wake of the Trump administration's push to bury the Epstein case.' It is arguing the alleged shielding of Epstein files is connected to the tax cuts and Trump's pardoning of January 6, 2021, defendants as examples of a party protecting 'the elite, powerful and well-connected.' Democrats are hoping it is a refrain that will catch on. One lawmaker posted a video of himself singing about Epstein and playing guitar. 'You've been telling us you'd release the files but where are they? We've gone along with what's been told. You've had plenty of time. You're in control but now you say you will withhold the Epstein files,' Georgia Rep. Hank Johnson sang to the tune of a Jason Isbell song. 'Trump's howling at the moon. Release the Epstein files soon.'


Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
Illegal migrant enters plea in crash that killed boy one day before his 12th birthday
A woman who was in the U.S. illegally admitted to causing a head-on, wrong-way, crash that claimed the life of a young Missouri boy. The fatal crash happened on Dec. 20, 2023, when 33-year-old Endrina Bracho barreled down the highway the wrong way, going 75 miles per hour at the time of the crash, 35 miles above the posted speed limit, according to the Hazelwood Police Department. "1,700 feet is quite a big distance to travel at over 70 miles an hour on a 40-mile posted road. That's a long way to travel in the wrong direction and not realize it," Sgt. Scott Schnurbusch from the Hazelwood Police Department previously told FOX 2. Authorities confirmed that Bracho was a Venezuelan migrant without a driver's license, when she slammed into the family's car head-on. Travis Wolfe, the victim in the crash, was just one day away from celebrating his 12th birthday in December. He died at the hospital on March 6 after being taken off life support. On Monday, Bracho entered a blind plea, admitting guilt to one count of first-degree involuntary manslaughter and two counts of second-degree assault, according to court records. A blind plea means the defendant pleads guilty without any prior agreement on sentencing with prosecutors. As part of the plea deal, prosecutors dropped two charges of first-degree endangering the welfare of a child and two misdemeanor traffic offenses. Bracho is set to be sentenced on Sept. 12. Prosecutors have suggested a 10-year sentence for the manslaughter charge and seven years for each of the assault charges, with all sentences to run concurrently. Wolfe's sister, Taylor Wolfe, expressed outrage following the arrest, telling "Fox & Friends" that Bracho should not have even been in the U.S. in the first place. "It makes me really angry," Taylor Wolfe said in the 2024 interview. "Everybody here has to get a driver's license, and we all have to learn how to drive, and we have to take a test to get our license. And she didn't do that, first of all. Second of all, she wasn't supposed to be here. And if she would have just came here legally, they would have had the documents on her to be able to get insurance." "Now my family is stuck with the loss of a child because she didn't know how to drive," she added. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo, reacted to the plea deal and called it "justice" for the Wolfe family. "JUSTICE - the illegal who killed Travis Wolfe in Missouri has pled guilty. She should never have been in Missouri in the first place, and never would have been, had Joe Biden not opened our borders," Hawley wrote in a statement on X. In January, Hawley introduced "Travis's Law" to honor Travis Wolfe's legacy and prevent other criminal illegal aliens from roaming free. "Under President Biden's open border, Missouri's 12-year-old Travis Wolfe was killed by an illegal alien, who was then released from jail. There's no legislation less controversial than protecting American citizens from dangerous illegal aliens—and preventing another death like Travis's," Hawley wrote. "My amendment, Travis's Law, would guarantee the detention of criminal illegals who commit a motor vehicle crime or victimize a minor." "Travis's Law" is an amendment to the Laken Riley Act, legislation which would ensure that ICE detains illegal aliens who commit burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. Stepheny Price is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business. She covers topics including missing persons, homicides, national crime cases, illegal immigration, and more. Story tips and ideas can be sent to