Minister's failure to consider Taliban threat leads to judge overturning refusal to permit Afghan man to bring his family here
Taliban
posed to an Afghan man's widowed mother and family when refusing his application for family reunification in Ireland, the
High Court
has ruled.
The man said his family is hostile to the Taliban and a significant part of his case was they are in 'extreme danger' from the political and militant group following its 2021 takeover of power, Mr Justice Anthony Barr noted in a decision quashing the Minister's refusal.
The man said his grandfather had served with the armed forces of the previous regime and that the Taliban had in 2015 abducted his father, who is presumed dead. He said his mother faced 'extreme difficulties' looking after his siblings given the Taliban's prejudicial attitude towards women.
The fact the man has subsidiary protection here was another significant factor not properly considered, the judge held.
READ MORE
On those grounds, the judge overturned the refusal and directed the man's application for family reunification visas for his mother and five siblings, aged from nine to 20 years, be reconsidered in line with the court's findings.
The man came here 10 years ago aged 17 and is working as a chef and restaurant manager. He was refused refugee status but obtained subsidiary protection effective from 2019.
He was previously refused family reunification in 2020 and again in 2021. His judicial review challenge concerned a refusal decision of September 2023.
That refusal cited 'reasonable concerns' his family members would be reliant on social welfare payments if permitted to come here. Factors relating to the rights of the State were weightier than those relating to the family's rights, it said.
[
'Too many people' not entitled to International Protection applying in Ireland, Minister for Justice says
Opens in new window
]
The refusal was 'not disproportionate' given the State's right to control the entry, presence, and exit of foreign nationals, subject to international agreements, and to ensure the economic wellbeing of the country, it also said.
In his recently published judgment, Mr Justice Barr said it was agreed the man did not meet the financial threshold to sponsor his family coming here because his €500 weekly income is below the €960 weekly level required.
[
Deportation orders triple as Ireland enforces a 'firmer approach to migration'
Opens in new window
]
The man instead argued his case came within 'exceptional' circumstances, normally humanitarian, under which decision-makers have discretion to grant family reunification.
While having subsidiary protection status was not in itself an exceptional circumstance obliging the granting of a visa, it was a 'material factor' to be weighed in the balance in considering whether there were exceptional circumstances in this case, the judge said.
The Minister, he held, failed to take the holding of that status into consideration and, on that basis, the court was setting aside the refusal.
He also struck down the refusal on foot of a second main argument that the Minister failed to have any, or any adequate regard, to the severe humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan following the Taliban takeover and particularly failed to have regard to the 'hazardous circumstances' of the man's family given their connection to the previous regime.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
6 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Iran asks Taliban for ‘kill list' leaked in MoD data blunder in plot to hunt down MI6 spies
IRAN has reportedly asked the Taliban to hand over a bombshell list of MI6 spies and British special forces accidentally leaked by the UK government. Fresh fears are brewing that the data breach could now become a tool for international espionage and terror. 9 Iran has reportedly asked the Taliban (pictured) to hand over a 'kill list' of Brit spies and special forces accidentally leaked by the UK government Credit: AP 9 Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks during a meeting in Tehran, 2022 Credit: Reuters 9 Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps has 'formally requested' the Taliban share the list, with MI6 intelligence assets set to take priority Credit: Reuters 9 The astounding list, accidentally leaked by a British soldier in 2022, exposes more than 100 British officials and up to 25,000 Afghans Credit: The Times The shocking move was revealed last night amid claims Tehran is coordinating with Taliban warlords to get their hands on the so-called "kill list". The vast and highly sensitive database exposes more than 100 British officials and up to 25,000 Afghans who worked alongside UK forces. Whitehall insiders are said to be "deeply concerned" by reports that Iran has set up a formal committee to hunt down British intelligence assets using the leaked file. One senior Iranian official told The Telegraph that the Revolutionary Guard Corps had "formally requested" the Taliban share the list, adding that "MI6 intelligence assets will take priority". The explosive revelation threatens to turn a scandalous British blunder into a deadly geopolitical weapon. For two years, the government fought tooth and nail to suppress news of the breach with a super-injunction. But now it's spiralling into an international crisis. Iran's interest in the leak comes as Tehran scrambles for leverage ahead of nuclear negotiations with the West. The Iranian official added: "On the Iranian side, there are also efforts to find the list, with a special committee assigned for it. Defence chiefs braced for £1BILLION compensation bill over Afghan data leak scandal "There have been discussions on cooperation between Tehran and Kabul on this issue as it can help both countries for negotiations with the West." While the data may not explicitly label MI6 agents or special forces, intelligence insiders admit the codes used could still allow foreign actors to identify and target UK operatives. The MoD warned : "It's a longstanding policy of successive governments to not comment on intelligence matters but this once again underlines how serious the original data breach was and why the previous government have serious questions to answer about how this was ever allowed to happen." The Taliban claims it got hold of the list back in 2022. Experts remain sceptical, pointing out that such claims are tailor-made for propaganda. But the chilling reality is that targeted assassinations of Afghans linked to Western forces are already being reported on the ground. Since the breach became public, there has been a wave of killings reportedly linked to the leak. According to the Daily Mail, one man was shot four times in the chest last month, a woman was beaten in the street after her husband, a former interpreter for British troops, went into hiding in Iran. And another former Afghan soldier told how his brother was executed in retaliation for his ties to UK special forces. He said: "If or when the Taliban have this list, then killings will increase – and it will be Britain's fault." The leak — a spreadsheet containing full personal data of 18,714 Afghan applicants to the UK's resettlement programme — was mistakenly emailed in full by a British soldier in February 2022. Instead of a trimmed list of 150 names, Afghan contacts were sent the entire file, exposing names, phone numbers, locations, and even family details. It also included sensitive data on more than 100 British officials — MI6 agents, SAS soldiers, MPs, and even a Royal Marine Major General — who had endorsed the Afghan applications. 9 The Taliban claims it got hold of the list back in 2022 Credit: AFP 9 Whitehall insiders are deeply concerned Iran has set up a formal committee to hunt down British intelligence assets using the leaked file Credit: The Times 9 Defence Secretary John Healey making a statement to MPs in the House of Commons Credit: PA The blunder was swiftly buried by a super-injunction in 2023. And for nearly two years, the public was kept in the dark, Parliament couldn't be told and journalists were gagged. But in July, the wall of secrecy finally cracked. The government abandoned the first super-injunction, revealing a £7billion rescue mission to relocate thousands of Afghans via secret flights and unmarked planes under Operation Rubific. Some 4,500 were quietly flown into Stansted and housed in MoD accommodation. Defence Secretary John Healey later admitted to Parliament that the list "contained names and contact details of applicants – and in some instances, information relating to the applicants' family members." "In a small number of cases, the names of Members of Parliament, senior military officers and government officials were noted as supporting the application," he added. And yet, the government still hasn't come clean. Lawyers for the Ministry of Defence returned to the High Court just last week to defend a second injunction — despite the core details already being read into the parliamentary record. Mr Justice Chamberlain, presiding over the case, promised to "scrutinise very carefully" any attempt to hold more of the hearing in secret. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer slammed the former Conservative government's use of the courts to cover up the disaster. He said "serious questions" remain over how the data was lost — and why the public and Parliament were gagged. Healey, meanwhile, insisted the government acted to protect lives, not to hide embarrassment. His predecessor, Sir Ben Wallace, backed that view, saying he made "no apology" for trying to prevent reprisals. But with Iran now reportedly circling, and Taliban hit squads allegedly targeting refugees linked to the UK, the once-secret blunder is now a full-blown security nightmare. 9 Afghan scandal is the latest evidence public are lied to and ignored by consecutive governments, pictured fall of Kabul in 2021 Credit: Getty Images - Getty
Irish Examiner
a day ago
- Irish Examiner
Government looking to simplify process to improve access to housing schemes
The Government is considering a simplification drive for a slew of housing schemes, as part of its updated Housing for All plan. Multiple Government sources said that housing minister James Browne would be looking to streamline and improve access to schemes, particularly those that assist more vulnerable people. '[Minister Browne] will be looking at how schemes can be improved,' one source said. However, they added Mr Browne did not intend to 'drastically change' existing schemes. They added that ahead of the plan being published, other efforts were being made to ensure there were efficiencies within the system, which included the abolition of the four-stage approval process for social housing developments. Multiple sources pointed to the large number of housing schemes in place at present, with up to 45 available for people to access. One pointed to the fact that many schemes can overlap. Another senior source highlighted the large number of schemes in place, adding that some are 'more beneficial than others'. 'Where amalgamation is possible, it should be looked at,' they said. In the previous Government, there were a number of new schemes introduced to assist people in accessing housing, as well as schemes for direct use by builders and developers. These include the Croí Conaithe Cities scheme, which provides developers with funding to bridge the viability gap for the building of apartments, as well as the Secure Tenancy Affordable Rental investment scheme (STAR) which was targeted to help build cost-rental accommodation. Croí Conaithe was introduced to help bring vacant and derelict properties back into use as family homes and rental residential units by providing grants. For homebuyers, the First Home scheme was introduced, which would see the State provide funds to assist people to buy their home, but take an equity stake in the property. Proposals to streamline schemes come amid calls by some homelessness prevention charities for the Government to reform schemes like the Housing Assistance Payment (Hap). Last month, the Simon Communities of Ireland's latest Locked Out of the Market report for June found there were no properties available in Cork City that families accessing Hap would be able to rent due to being too expensive. Across the country, there were just 32 properties available to rent for anyone accessing the higher discretionary rate of Hap. In particular, there have been calls for Hap limits to keep pace with inflation. It is expected that the plan will be published in September, after being delayed until after the Government unveiled its revised National Development Plan – which is providing significant funding to the Department of Housing. In total, there has been €35.9bn allocated to the department for the next five years. One senior source said the funding was a 'step' in the right direction, but there would need to be 'a lot of changes' over the years ahead. While a formal update to the previous Government's housing plan is yet to be agreed, Mr Browne has made multiple policy changes since taking up office. This includes the formal adoption of the new National Planning Framework, which sets out the Government's housing targets up to 2030. This target calls for 303,000 houses to be built between now and 2030, meaning an average of 50,500 houses must be built each year.
RTÉ News
a day ago
- RTÉ News
NI minister to appeal High Court ruling on A5 upgrade
Stormont's Infrastructure minister is to appeal the decision of a Belfast court to overturn permission for Northern Ireland's biggest roads project. In June, Belfast's High Court found in favour of landowners who had opposed the redevelopment of the A5 road through Tyrone and Derry. The judge said there was insufficient evidence that the project complied with Stormont's own legally binding climate change legislation. Stormont's Climate Change Act of 2022 puts an onus on Stormont departments to ensure Northern Ireland meets its emissions targets and carbon budgets on the way to net zero by 2050. Mr Justice McAlinden said he had seen insufficient evidence that the building and operation of the new A5 fitted with this legal requirement. The £1.2 billion upgrade is an important link for the wider northwest, including Donegal, and is being supported with €600m of Irish Government money. In July, Infrastructure Minister Liz Kimmins flagged her intention to appeal but needed the support of her Executive colleagues. Today she said she had secured executive approval, and the case could now proceed to Northern Ireland's Court of Appeal. "I have instructed legal counsel to submit an appeal, and that will be done imminently ahead of the deadline for appeal, which is Friday 8 August," she said. She added: "So that is be it currently being finalised. I think it's fair to say that the officials and myself and my team have been working night and day to ensure that we are submitting a very robust appeal, whilst also looking at all of the other options, and we continue to work through that in parallel to the appeal that we will be lodging." The High Court decision to quash permission for the project was greeted with dismay by supporters. They had campaigned vociferously on behalf of the new road, citing safety concerns on what is an existing single carriageway that carries a large volume of business and farm traffic. The huge upgrade is a flagship project of the Northern Ireland Executive. Since the scheme to build a dual carriageway was first proposed, more than 50 people have been killed along the road. It has been dubbed the most dangerous road in Ireland. Landowners have successfully challenged the project three times, predominately on environmental grounds. They are opposed to the impact on farms and homes and say the existing road could be improved rather than building a new one. The land vested runs to more than 3,000 acres and affects more than 300 farms. Niall McKenna of the A5 Enough is Enough group said the news of the appeal comes as as a relief to the families of victims of this road and will be very much supported by them. In a statement, he said that "enough people have died on the A5. It is high time the courts stopped future lives being lost on this cruel road."
