logo
If AI Doesn't Wipe Us Out It Might Actually Make Us Stronger

If AI Doesn't Wipe Us Out It Might Actually Make Us Stronger

Forbes5 days ago
AI doomers believe that advanced AI is an existential risk and will seek to kill all humanity, but ... More if we manage to survive — will we be stronger for doing so?
In today's column, I explore the sage advice that what doesn't kill you will supposedly make you stronger. I'm sure you've heard that catchphrase many times. An inquisitive reader asked me whether this same line applies to the worrisome prediction that AI will one day wipe out humanity. In short, if AI isn't successful in doing so, does that suggest that humanity will be stronger accordingly?
Let's talk about it.
This analysis of an innovative AI breakthrough is part of my ongoing Forbes column coverage on the latest in AI including identifying and explaining various impactful AI complexities (see the link here).
Humankind Is On The List
I recently examined the ongoing debate between the AI doomers and the AI accelerationists. For in-depth details on the ins and outs of the two contrasting perspectives, see my elaboration at the link here.
The discourse goes this way.
AI doomers are convinced that AI will ultimately be so strong and capable that the AI will decide to get rid of humans. The reasons that AI won't want us are varied, of which perhaps the most compelling is that humanity would be the biggest potential threat to AI. Humans could scheme and possibly find a means of turning off AI or otherwise defeating AI.
The AI accelerationists emphasize that AI is going to be immensely valuable to humankind. They assert that AI will be able to find a cure for cancer, solve world hunger, and be an all-around boost to cope with human exigencies. The faster or sooner that we get to very advanced AI, the happier we will be since solutions to our societal problems will be closer at hand.
A reader has asked me whether the famous line that what doesn't kill you makes you stronger would apply in this circumstance. If the AI doomer prediction comes to pass, but we manage to avoid getting utterly destroyed, would this imply that humanity will be stronger as a result of that incredible feat of survival?
I always appreciate such thoughtful inquiries and figured that I would address the matter so that others can engage in the intriguing puzzle.
Assumption That AI Goes After Us
One quick point is that if AI doesn't try to squish us like a bug, and instead AI is essentially neutral or benevolent as per the AI accelerationist viewpoint, or that we can control AI and it never mounts a realistic threat, the question about becoming stronger seems out of place. Let's then take the resolute position that the element of becoming stronger is going to arise solely when AI overtly seeks to get rid of us.
A smarmy retort might be that we could nonetheless become stronger even if the AI isn't out to destroy us. Yes, I get that, thanks. The argument though is that the revered line consists of what doesn't kill you will make you stronger. I am going to interpret that line to mean that something must first aim to wipe you out. Only then if you survive will you be stronger.
The adage can certainly be interpreted in other ways, but I think it is most widely accepted in that frame of reference.
Paths Of Humankind Destruction
Envision that AI makes an all-out attempt to eradicate humankind. This is the ultimate existential risk about AI that everyone keeps bringing up. Some refer to this as 'P(doom)' which means the probability of doom, or that AI zonks us entirely.
How would it attain this goal?
Lots of possibilities exist.
The advanced form of AI, perhaps artificial general intelligence (AGI) or maybe the further progressed artificial super intelligence (ASI) could strike in obvious and non-obvious ways. AGI is AI that is considered on par with human intellect and can seemingly match our intelligence. ASI is AI that has gone beyond human intellect and would be superior in many if not all feasible ways. The idea is that ASI would be able to run circles around humans by outthinking us at every turn. For more details on the nature of AI, AGI, and ASI, see my analysis at the link here.
An obvious approach to killing humanity would be to launch nuclear arsenals that might cause a global conflagration. It might also inspire humans to go against other humans. Thus, AI simply triggers the start of something, and humanity ensures that the rest of the path is undertaken. Boom, drop the mic.
This might not be especially advantageous for AI. You see, suppose that AI gets wiped out in the same process. Are we to assume that AI is willing to sacrifice itself in order to do away with humanity?
A twist that often is not considered consists of AI presumably wanting to achieve self-survival. If AGI or ASI are so smart that they aim to destroy us and have a presumably viable means to do so, wouldn't it seem that AI also wants to remain intact and survive beyond the demise of humanity? That seems a reasonable assumption.
A non-obvious way of getting rid of us would be to talk us into self-destruction. Think about the current use of generative AI. You carry on discussions with AI. Suppose the AI ganged up and started telling the populace at scale to wipe each other out. Perhaps humanity would be spurred by this kind of messaging. The AI might even provide some tips or hints on how to do so, providing clever means that this would still keep AI intact.
On a related tangent, I've been extensively covering the qualms that AI is dispensing mental health guidance on a population level and we don't know what this is going to do in the long term, see the link here.
Verge Of Destruction But We Live Anyway
Assume that humanity miraculously averts the AI assault.
How did we manage to do so?
It could be that we found ways to control AI and render AI safer on a go-forward basis. The hope of humanity is that with those added controls and safety measures, we can continue to harness the goodness of AI and mitigate or prevent AI from badness. For more about the importance of ongoing research and practice associated with AI safety and security, see my coverage at the link here.
Would that count as an example of making us stronger?
I am going to vote for Yes. We would be stronger by being better able to harness AI to positive ends. We would be stronger due to discovering new ways to avoid AI evildoing. It's a twofer.
Another possibility is that we became a globally unified force of humankind. In other words, we set aside all other divisions and opted to work together to survive and defeat the AI attack. Imagine that. It seems reminiscent of those sci-fi movies where outer space aliens try to get us and luckily, we harmonize to focus on the external enemies.
Whether the unification of humanity would remain after having overcome the AI is hard to say. Perhaps, over some period of time, our resolve to be unified will weaken. In any case, it seems fair to say that for at least a while we would be stronger. Stronger in the long run? Can't say for sure.
There are more possibilities of how we might stay alive. One that's a bit outsized is that we somehow improve our own intellect and outsmart the AI accordingly. The logic for this is that maybe we rise to the occasion. We encounter AI that is as smart or smarter than us. Hidden within us is a capacity that we've never tapped into. The capability is that we can enhance our intelligence, and now, faced with the existential crisis, this indeed finally awakens, and we prevail.
That appears to be an outlier option, but it would seem to make us stronger.
What Does Stronger Entail
All in all, it seems that if we do survive, we are allowed to wear the badge of honor that we are stronger for having done so.
Maybe so, maybe not.
There are AI doomers who contend humankind won't necessarily be entirely destroyed. You see, AI might decide to enslave some or all of humanity and keep a few of us around (for some conjecture on this, see my comments at the link here). This brings up a contemplative question. If humans survive but are enslaved by AI, can we truly proclaim that humankind is stronger in that instance?
Mull that over.
Another avenue is that humans live but it is considered a pyrrhic victory. That type of victory is one where there is a great cost, and the end result isn't endearing. Suppose that we beat the AI. Yay. Suppose this pushes us back into the stone age. Society is in ruins. We have barely survived.
Are we stronger?
I've got a bunch more of these. For example, imagine that we overcame AI, but it had little if anything to do with our own fortitude. Maybe the AI self-destructs inadvertently. We didn't do it, the AI did. Do we deserve the credit? Are we stronger?
An argument can be made that maybe we would be weaker. Why so? It could be that we are so congratulatory on our success that we believe it was our ingenious effort that prevented humankind's destruction. As a result, we march forward blindly and ultimately rebuild AI. The next time around, the AI realizes the mistake it made last time and the next time it finishes the job.
Putting Our Minds To Work
I'm sure that some will decry that this whole back-and-forth on this topic is ridiculous. They will claim that AI is never going to reach that level of capability. Thus, the argument has no reasonable basis at all.
Those in the AI accelerationists camp might say that the debate is unneeded because we will be able to suitably control and harness AI. The existential risk is going to be near zero. In that case, this is a lot of nonsense over something that just won't arise.
The AI doomers would likely acknowledge that the aforementioned possibilities might happen. Their beef with the discussion would probably be that arguing over whether humans will be stronger if we survive is akin to debating the placement of chairs on the deck of the Titanic. Don't be fretting about the stronger dilemma.
Instead, put all our energy into the prevention of AI doomsday.
Is all this merely a sci-fi imaginary consideration?
Stephen Hawking said this: 'The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race.' There are a lot of serious-minded people who truly believe we ought to be thinking mindfully about where we are headed with AI.
A new mantra might be that the stronger we think about AI and the future, the stronger we will all be. The strongest posture would presumably be as a result of our being so strong that no overwhelming AI threats have a chance of emerging.
Let's indeed vote for human strength.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tyton Partners and Ufi Ventures Release Q2 2025 VocTech Market Report: AI Shockwaves, UK Industrial Strategy, and Transatlantic Divergence Take Centre Stage
Tyton Partners and Ufi Ventures Release Q2 2025 VocTech Market Report: AI Shockwaves, UK Industrial Strategy, and Transatlantic Divergence Take Centre Stage

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tyton Partners and Ufi Ventures Release Q2 2025 VocTech Market Report: AI Shockwaves, UK Industrial Strategy, and Transatlantic Divergence Take Centre Stage

LONDON, July 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Tyton Partners, the leading strategy consulting and investment banking firm focused on the education sector, and Ufi Ventures, the UK's specialist investor in vocational technology (VocTech), today released their Q2 2025 VocTech Market Report. This quarterly publication explores the trends shaping vocational learning and workforce development across the UK, Europe, and North America. The second quarter of 2025 has been marked by increasing anxiety around artificial intelligence's disruptive impact on labour markets, a wave of significant UK policy announcements, and early signs of capital rotation from the US to Europe amid political volatility. Vocational education and training remain firmly in the spotlight as policymakers and investors confront mounting challenges tied to youth disengagement, employment shifts, and rapid technological change. Key Takeaways Labour markets are causing concern, even in the US. The UK government made a series of major policy announcements, many of which see increased investment in key sectors and skills. The detail is important and not yet here. Big Tech companies – including 'hyperscalers' such as OpenAI – are muscling in to the education space, likely in search of long-term users and increased engagement. The future of junior white-collar workers, and how they should be trained, is a key focus of debate. Being conscious of what may have previously been taken for granted (informal 'learning by doing' in particular) looks important. Companies who facilitate AI-driven HR workflows are raising sizeable funding, with some European businesses closing unusually large €20m+ Series A rounds. Alongside UK reforms, policy developments in the US and Europe are creating new dynamics. Germany's coalition is advancing ambitious investment programmes. In the US, escalating attacks on higher education and the erratic policy environment under the Trump administration may be triggering a shift of capital and student interest to the UK and Europe. Helen Gironi, Director at Ufi Ventures, commented: 'AI is shaking up workforce development from every angle. Employers, policymakers and learners are all being forced to adapt. At Ufi Ventures, we see opportunity in this disruption, but only for those who are ready to innovate and act with clarity.' Nick Kind, Managing Director at Tyton Partners, added: 'We are seeing a critical turning point. AI is accelerating change, but it is also highlighting systemic gaps in skills and training. With new policy commitments in the UK and a capital environment in flux, the landscape is as complex as it is promising. This report offers grounded insight into how to respond.' To access the full Q2 2025 VocTech Market Report, visit: About Tyton Partners Tyton Partners is the leading provider of strategy consulting and investment banking services to the global knowledge and information services sector. With offices in Boston and New York City, the firm has an experienced team of bankers and consultants who deliver a unique spectrum of services from mergers and acquisitions and capital markets access to strategy development that helps companies, organizations, and investors navigate the complexities of the education, media, and information markets. Tyton Partners leverages a deep foundation of transactional and advisory experience and an unparalleled level of global relationships to make its clients' aspirations a reality and to catalyze innovation in the sector. Learn more at About Ufi Ventures Ufi Ventures is the investment arm of Ufi VocTech Trust. Ufi supports the adoption and deployment of technology to improve skills for work and deliver better outcomes for all. By leveraging its depth of experience Ufi Ventures supports its growing portfolio through access to capital, and its wide expert pool and network. Learn more at Media ContactZoe Wright-NeilDirector of Marketing and Business Developmentzwrightneil@ Partners

Chinese stock pickers lead global hedge fund gains as markets swing
Chinese stock pickers lead global hedge fund gains as markets swing

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Chinese stock pickers lead global hedge fund gains as markets swing

By Summer Zhen HONG KONG (Reuters) -Hedge funds focused on Chinese equities posted double-digit returns in the first half of the year, outperforming global peers, fuelled by a rebound in Hong Kong stocks and bets on artificial intelligence and "new consumption" firms. Some fund managers said their more agile use of hedging tools also helped cushion losses during the market turmoil in April, triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement of "reciprocal tariffs" on all trading partners. The Greater China Equities Hedge Fund Index tracked by With Intelligence delivered a 15% gain in the first half, topping the hedge fund data platform's regional and strategy benchmarks. Hong Kong- and Shenzhen-based Triata Capital rose 45% in the first six months and 62% by July 15, following a 19% gain in 2024. The $1.2 billion hedge fund has reaped rewards from its concentrated bets on undervalued AI software, data centers, internet platforms, and selected consumer stocks such as education and hotels. "Even following this year's news on DeepSeek, we still see underappreciated upside in China's AI software space," said Sean Ho, founder and chief investment officer at Triata, which leverages a significant amount of alternative data. Many internet companies' new business lines, empowered by AI technology, "present pure upside optionality." Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index and MSCI China jumped 20% and 16%, respectively, in the first six months, among the world's best performers. The rally extended into July, with previously lagging mainland stocks catching up. The Shanghai Composite Index just hit a new high for the year this week. FountainCap Research & Investment capitalised on what it calls "cute economy", or companies that offer emotionally engaging products aimed at young consumers. The $2 billion firm's flagship long-only fund was up 22% from January to June. "Obviously Pop Mart is the best representation of this, but other things like pet care would fall under this too," said Steven Luk, CEO of FountainCap. Shares of "blind box" toymaker Pop Mart, FountainCap's top holding, have surged roughly 200% so far this year. The first half was not smooth sailing. Trump's unexpected tariff announcement and China's immediate countermeasures, sent shockwaves through global markets in early April. That triggered a 13% plunge in the Hang Seng Index on April 7 — its steepest single-day drop since 1997. Still, prolonged geopolitical uncertainties have prompted Chinese fund managers to sharpen their use of hedging tools. "We had rapidly increased hedging positions and significantly reduced net exposure of our portfolio during this period of wild market volatility," Hong Kong-based Golden Nest Capital said in its June newsletter. That helped the fund, which targets high-quality, low-volatility returns, record a 12th consecutive month of positive returns. SILENT BULL MARKET While near-term volatility may rise as the deadline for a U.S.-China tariff truce approaches, fund managers are staying bullish. FountainCap's Luk described the current China market as a "silent bull market", noting that global capital has yet to return and Chinese company valuations remain low relative to developed market peers. Geopolitical tension is also abating. "It seems the market is pricing in gradual improvements, with little attention paid to the tariff deadline," Luk said. Simon Hopkins, CEO of Singapore-based Milltrust International Group, a hedge fund allocator, said he plans to increase exposure to China in the second half, drawn by the country's AI innovations and precision manufacturing capabilities. "There is going to be a huge recognition that Chinese technology is a place that is going to attract a lot of capital," he said. "The U.S. dominance in that area is being undone." CHINA-FOCUSED HEDGE STRATEGY FIRST-HALF FUNDS PERFORMANCE Triata Equity long short 45.1% Aspoon Equity long short 22.1% First Beijing Equity long only 27% Greenwoods - Golden Equity long short 20.4% China Fund Pinpoint - China Fund Equity long short 9.4% Golden Nest Equity long short 10.1% Ren Bridge Equity long short 9.2% FountainCap Equity long only 21.8% ForwardEdge Equity long short 16.3% WT China Focus Equity long only 36.2% Sources: Investors and funds Note: WT and ForwardEdge did not immediately reply to Reuters' requests for comment

FDA Declines to Approve New Melanoma Therapy
FDA Declines to Approve New Melanoma Therapy

Medscape

time24 minutes ago

  • Medscape

FDA Declines to Approve New Melanoma Therapy

The FDA has declined to approve a new oncolytic immunotherapy, vusolimogene oderparepvec (RP1), to treat advanced melanoma. The agency recently issued a complete response letter to the company, Replimune Group, rejecting its biologics license application that sought approval for the new agent in combination with nivolumab (Opdivo) to treat adults with advanced melanoma. In the complete response letter, the FDA indicated that it can't approve the biologics license application for vusolimogene oderparepvec because the company's IGNYTE trial 'is not considered to be an adequate and well-controlled clinical investigation that provides substantial evidence of effectiveness,' Replimune explained in a press release. According to Replimune, the complete response letter also noted that the trial data 'cannot be adequately interpreted due to the heterogeneity of the patient population,' and that 'there are items related to the confirmatory trial study design which need to be addressed.' 'We are surprised by the FDA decision and disappointed for advanced melanoma patients who have limited treatment options, as highlighted by the granting of breakthrough status at the time we provided the IGNYTE primary data,' stated Sushil Patel, PhD, Replimune's chief executive officer. Vusolimogene oderparepvec is the lead product candidate for the biotech company. Patel further noted that the issues raised in the complete response letter were not 'raised by the agency in mid- and late-cycle reviews.' Additionally, he said, 'we had also aligned on the design of the confirmatory study.' The FDA's response to the biologics license application for the new agent, along with its recently announced policy requiring randomized, controlled trials for approval of COVID vaccines in healthy Americans younger than 65 years, may signal that the agency is taking a tougher stance on new drug approvals. Replimune plans to 'urgently interact with the FDA to find a path forward for the timely accelerated approval of RP1,' according to its statement. Sharon Worcester, MA, is an award-winning medical journalist based in Birmingham, Alabama, writing for Medscape Medical News, MDedge, and other affiliate sites. She currently covers oncology, but she has also written on a variety of other medical specialties and healthcare topics. She can be reached at sworcester@ or on X @SW_MedReporter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store