RFK Jr. Confronted With Surgeon General Pick's Lack of Cred
Trump announced Wednesday that he would nominate Dr. Casey Means as America's top doctor, replacing Fox News contributor Dr. Janette Nesheiwat, whose nomination got pulled due to questions over her medical credentials. But the same questions over medical credentials that plagued Nesheiwat have come for Means, too.
Though she received a Stanford education, Means dropped out of her residency at age 30 and has an inactive medical license. When quizzed directly by Fox News' Bret Baier on the fact the she doesn't currently hold a medical license, Kennedy listed Means' apparent achievements that to his mind are key to undertaking the role, claiming she was at the 'top of her medical class' and 'won every award that she could win' during her residency.
'Casey Means, we felt, was the best person to really bring the vision of MAHA to the American public,' Kennedy told Special Report on Thursday. 'She has this unique capacity to articulate it. She's written a book that really mobilized, galvanized the movement,' Kennedy added, referencing Good Energy: The Surprising Connection Between Metabolism and Limitless Health, the book she wrote with her influencer brother, Calley.
Means, also a wellness influencer, grew her following by advocating for alternative approaches combining science and spirituality over traditional medicine. She and her brother were the brains behind Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again movement.
Kennedy said Means walked away from traditional medicine because she felt that she was just 'billing new procedures' instead of actually curing patients.
'We actually have to figure out new approaches to medicine, and that's the kind of leadership that she's going to bring to our country,' he said.
MAGAworld, led by firebrand Laura Loomer, branded Means a 'Marxist tree-hugger.' Kennedy's own former running mate, Nicole Shanahan, said Means' nomination was 'strange' and 'doesn't make any sense.'
Trump, for his part, pointed the finger at Kennedy when faced with questions over Means' credentials.
'Bobby thought she was fantastic,' he told reporters. 'Bobby really thought she was great. I don't know her. I listened to the recommendation of Bobby. I met her yesterday, and once before, she's a very outstanding person, a great academic, actually. So I think she'll be great.'
In the wide-ranging Fox News interview, Kennedy was flanked by Food and Drug Administration chief Marty Makary, Medicare and Medicaid administrator Mehmet Oz, and National Institutes of Health director Jay Bhattacharya.
The health officials rehashed dubious claims that the COVID-19 pandemic was 'lab-generated,' food products are 'loaded with chemicals that's gonna poison your children,' and the U.S. is the 'sickest country in the world.'
'You got sitting here four people who were all canceled during COVID,' Kennedy said. 'The entire leadership of this agency is renegades who are, you know, who are juggernauts against convention, and are trying to look for truth, no matter what the cost.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
5 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
John T. Shaw: Philanthropy leader fights fear and envisions a better world
One need not be a cultural anthropologist to appreciate that the most powerful force now driving American life is not hope, or optimism, or confidence. It is fear. This fear has been ignited by President Donald Trump and has been fueled by his combative administration and the complicit Republican majority in Congress. It's been inadvertently fanned by a dispirited, seemingly hapless, Democratic Party and the capitulation of critical institutions such as law firms, corporations and universities that are more focused on self-preservation than honoring their historic missions. The Merriam-Webster dictionary provides these antonyms for fear: audacity, nerve and guts. Michelle Morales, president of Woods Fund Chicago, possesses these qualities in abundance. And others as well, such as resolve and determination. 'I have been dismayed at the amount of fear and by the silence of institutions that have bent to the will of this administration,' she told me in a recent interview. 'It's been scary to see how many people have changed, or stayed quiet, or realigned their work. We need to push back, even if there are ramifications for pushing back.' Morales' philanthropic statesmanship is based on courage, resilience and her vision of a 'reimagined world' rooted in racial and economic justice and basic humanity. The child of parents from Puerto Rico, Morales was born in Yonkers, New York, and grew up as a self-described 'military brat.' She attended DePaul University as an undergraduate, fell in love with Chicago and has lived here since. She has been a teacher, community organizer and executive director of the Illinois chapter of the Mikva Challenge, which promotes youth civic participation and leadership. Morales assumed the presidency of Woods Fund Chicago in 2019. It is a private foundation with assets of more than $65 million. Many of its grants support community organizing for racial and economic justice and public policy advocacy. Morales may run a relatively small foundation, but she has a strong, forceful and authoritative voice. She is an outsized force. Inside Philanthropy, a respected journal that covers the sector, published a story in June about the quiescence of philanthropy to Trump's attacks on civil society. 'Many funders have opted for silence,' the article says. But it then describes several leaders, including Morales, who have stepped forward, spoken up and refused to be submissive. 'Early on in philanthropy, in the first months of the Trump administration, there was quite a bit of silence,' Morales said. 'It's been heartening to see more and more foundations speak out in the last few months, but the initial silence was scary. It's important for foundations to take a stand and come out from under the radar.' She credits the community's rallying to a Unite in Advance campaign that was launched in April by John Palfrey, president of the MacArthur Foundation; Tonya Allen, president of the McKnight Foundation; and Deepak Bhargava, president of the Freedom Together Foundation. They urged the philanthropic community to aggressively defend cherished values. 'We know the risk of standing up to a hostile government. But complacency is complicity. Foundations must lead — not just with grants but with guts,' their organizing essay declared. Morales argues that this is a deeply consequential moment. She has pushed WFC to go far beyond its traditional annual payout of 5% of assets for current programs. Its expanded financial commitment began in 2020 in response to the pandemic and has accelerated this year, reaching 15%. 'If COVID was the rainy day, this is the monsoon,' Morales said. She is a passionate advocate for robust diversity, equity and inclusion programs, a commitment WFC has long embraced. Morales was encouraged, but skeptical, when many corporations and universities rushed out statements supportive of diversity, equity and inclusion in the aftermath of George Floyd's murder by a Minneapolis police officer. She has been disappointed, but not surprised, that many have retreated, given opposition from the Trump administration. 'I am concerned about the pulling back. DEI, racial justice work, is not illegal. It's not unconstitutional. Structural racism is still very real in this country,' she said. Morales is gearing up for a protracted battle with the administration. But she is also determined to strive for what she calls a reimagined world with strong and effective social programs and commitments to racial and economic justice. And while seeking this better world, she insists that philanthropy must continue to support initiatives that improve the daily lives of those who are struggling. 'As cheesy as it may sound, I have to hold out hope. I believe that the work I'm doing is not only planting seeds but also creating the conditions for the reimagined world I believe in. We may not get there in my lifetime, but I'm going to keep working for it,' she said. 'If I allow cynicism to creep in, I'm done for. I won't have the energy or the passion or the joy for the work. But I won't lie. It's hard to bear witness to the amount of suffering that is occurring.'
Chicago Tribune
5 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Dr. Cory Franklin: Why the US is better than Europe at preventing heat deaths
When it comes to reporting on the comparative health of nations, there is ample bias in the national and international press about American shortcomings. Some of it is justified — disproportionate numbers of obesity and firearm deaths are usually cited by medical and nonmedical sources, as well as the relatively high infant mortality. But no less important are environmental deaths, specifically those related to hot and cold weather, which are rarely cited. The U.S. figures are far more impressive than those of the rest of the industrialized world, and it is inarguable that this country does a much better job of preventing heat and cold deaths than Europe does. First, heat deaths: Comparisons of heat deaths between countries are limited because numbers vary according to how heat deaths are defined, the differences in weather and patient characteristics in various countries, and the sources of the data. The numbers here are a compendium from several sources including Lancet, Nature and several public health and weather websites; mileage may vary. Taking all this into account, the difference in annual heat deaths between Europe and the U.S. is surprising: In the 21st century, European heat deaths on average range from 60 to 200 per 1 million people annually, while American heat deaths average about three to eight per million annually. This means, conservatively, each year, perhaps 20 times as many people die of the heat in Europe as in the U.S. A graphic example: During the recent European heat wave that began in May, one country, Spain, experienced 1,180 deaths in only two months. The data from deaths due to cold weather are even more sobering. Even with a warming Earth, cold continues to kill more people than heat in most parts of the world where there is any kind of cold winter. In Europe, there are 300 to 500 deaths per million due to cold annually in the past three decades, while in the U.S., the number of deaths from cold is in the range of 10 per million. So a conservative estimate would be that for every person who dies as a result of cold weather in the U.S., at least 30 die in Europe. When deaths from heat and cold are combined, Europe has close to 50 times as many deaths as the U.S. — as many as 250,000 to 500,000 more deaths every year. Over a decade, this means several million more people die from heat and cold in Europe than die in the U.S. from those causes. A comparison of the annual numbers shows that the difference in environmental deaths easily surpasses the much more widely reported firearm death comparison. The U.S. has nearly 50,000 firearm deaths annually, and Europe has under 10,000, so the difference in firearm deaths, roughly 40,000, is about 1/10th the difference in environmental deaths. Why is there such a difference in environmental deaths between the U.S. and Europe? The consensus among experts regarding heat deaths is the ubiquity of air conditioning in the U.S. and the relative paucity in Europe. (The majority of deaths in Spain during the May-June heat wave were in the north of the country, where air conditioning is uncommon compared with in the south.) Besides providing comfort, air conditioning saves lives — often many — especially if air conditioning could be made more available in the Global South, where there are even more deaths due to hot weather. Despite the consensus, some environmentalists want to limit air conditioning, citing increased electricity use and carbon dioxide production, which will aggravate greenhouse gas emissions. (In 2022, Spain was one of the countries that put restrictions on air conditioning.) The response to climate change must involve a combination of mitigation, such as reducing levels of heat-trapping greenhouse gases and adaptation — that is, adapting to the consequences of a warming environment. According to Hannah Ritchie, deputy editor of the Our World in Data website, air conditioning currently accounts for about 7% of global electricity use and 3% of carbon dioxide emissions — not negligible but certainly not exorbitant considering how many lives cooling technology saves. While worldwide air conditioning use is expected to increase in the next decade, so is the efficiency of air conditioning units. Air conditioning represents one of the most effective and lifesaving methods of adaptation to a changing climate. The reasons for increased cold weather deaths in Europe relative to the U.S. are harder to divine, but likely include the ubiquity of older homes with poorer insulation throughout Europe. Outside of Scandinavia, there may be less preparedness and an aging population more vulnerable to cold weather snaps on the European continent. Human-made efforts to reduce greenhouse gases are essential, but human-made efforts to adapt to weather extremes would have lifesaving consequences more immediately. Dr. Cory Franklin is a retired intensive care physician and the author of 'The COVID Diaries 2020-2024: Anatomy of a Contagion as it Happened.'
Boston Globe
5 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Today in History: Army airplane crashes into Empire State Building
Advertisement In 1914, World War I began as Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia. In 1945, an Army B-25 crashed into the 79th floor of New York's Empire State Building, the world's tallest structure at the time, killing 14 people. In 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson announced he was increasing the number of American troops in South Vietnam from 75,000 to 125,000. In 1976, an earthquake devastated northern China, killing at least 242,000 people, according to an official estimate. In 1984, the Los Angeles Summer Olympics officially opened; 14 Eastern Bloc countries, led by the Soviet Union, boycotted the Games. In 1995, a jury in Union, South Carolina, rejected the death penalty for Susan Smith, sentencing her to life in prison for drowning her two young sons (Smith will be eligible for parole in November 2024). Advertisement In 1996, 8,000 year-old human skeletal remains (later referred to as Kennewick Man) were discovered in a bank of the Columbia River in Kennewick, Washington. In 2004, the Irish Republican Army formally announced an end to its armed campaign against British rule in Northern Ireland. In 2015, it was announced that Jonathan Pollard, the former U.S. Naval intelligence analyst who had spent nearly three decades in prison for spying for Israel, had been granted parole. Also that year, a four-game suspension of Patriots quarterback Tom Brady for his role in using underinflated footballs during the AFC championship game was upheld by NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell. In 2018, Pope Francis accepted the resignation of U.S. Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, the emeritus archbishop of Washington, D.C., following allegations of sexual abuse, including one involving an 11-year-old boy. Both died in April of 2025. In 2019, a gunman opened fire at a popular garlic festival in Gilroy, California, killing three people, including a six-year-old boy and a 13-year-old girl, and wounding 17 others before taking his own life.
