Traffic cops launch daytime drunk driving crackdown
According to the traffic police, this initiative aims to reinforce road safety awareness and curb the growing trend of alcohol consumption during daytime, especially among drivers of two-wheelers, four-wheelers, and transport vehicles. Contrary to the common perception that drunk driving primarily occurs at night, recent data and incidents have indicated that a significant number of accidents are linked to daytime intoxication.
"These checks are being conducted at accident-prone and hotspot locations across the city," stated V Chandra Kumar, Assistant Commissioner of Police, South East Zone. "These checks were organised strategically at locations without causing traffic congestion, ensuring a smooth and uninterrupted flow of traffic."
Offenders found driving in an intoxicated condition will be booked under relevant sections of the Motor Vehicles Act and produced before the Hon'ble Courts, facing substantial fines, imprisonment, and temporary or permanent suspension of their driving licences.
Hyderabad Traffic Police reiterates that drunk driving constitutes a serious offence and endangers not only the life of the offender but also the lives of innocent road users.
Regular checks will continue both during the day and night to ensure public safety.
Police have requested commuters to refrain from driving under the influence of alcohol and to cooperate with Hyderabad Traffic Police.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
In motor accidents, claims not restricted to third party in Supreme Court
Motor vehicle insurance protects a policyholder against claims made by a third party for damages due to the policyholder's actions, but what about a claim against injury/death of policyholder in an accident? Holding that family members of such a policyholder can also claim compensation, the Supreme Court has referred the issue to a larger bench given contradictory prior judgments on the matter. While hearing the compensation plea of a minor girl who lost both parents in a car accident, the SC said section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act could be invoked for such a claim, as it is a special provision which overrides not only the rest of the Act but also any other law in force. The minor had been awarded payout by the insurance company for the death of her mother but not for her father as he was himself the insured party. The insurance company held that the petitioner, legal heir of deceased vehicle owner, cannot at the same time be the liability holder and recipient of compensation. The bench said: '… Section 163A is not restricted to third party claim; without any requirement of establishing negligence, if death or permanent disability is caused by reason of motor accident'. 'It would override Sections 147 & 149 along with other provisions of the Act and the law regulating insurance as also the terms of the policy. This according to us is the intention of incorporating the non-obstante clause under Section 163A providing for no-fault liability claims '.
Hindustan Times
10 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Merc belonging to bizman runs over sweeper near Chowpatty, driver arrested
MUMBAI: A sweeper sleeping on a footpath near Girgaum Chowpatty was run over by a Mercedes E 200 owned by a leading industrialist who manufactures and distributes food products and edible oil. According to the Gamdevi police, the chauffeur, who was allegedly driving at the time, did not notice the man asleep in front of a shop, and fled from the spot after the accident. It was only after checking CCTV footage that the vehicle was identified, traced and the accused was arrested. Dharavi resident and BMC worker Jadish lost his life when a Mercedes car hit him while he was sleeping near the Oriental Club in Mumbai.(HT Photo) On Friday morning, the police were informed that a man sleeping near the BMC's Babulnath Chowki—just outside the Oriental Club gate near Girgaon Chowpatty—was lying motionless. The gate is common to the club and Noor Mansion, where the industrialist stays. 'The call was from Sanjay Gohil, a contractor of the club,' said a police officer. 'When the man was rushed to Nair Hospital in Mumbai Central, the doctors informed us that he was dead due to shock and haemorrhage after suffering multiple fractures in his ribs.' The police then began their investigation and went through the CCTV footage of the locality. 'By then, the club staff and the society workers identified the man as Jagdish, who lived in Dharavi and worked with Parvati Kaliyan (39), a BMC sweeper,' said the police officer. 'Parvati has a job in D Ward for the last 25 years, and farmed out work to the deceased right from then. Originally from Uttar Pradesh, he was well known in Bhuleshwar, as he would sweep the area with Parvati.' The police officer said that after checking the CCTV footage, they found that a Mercedes that was going towards the club/Noor Mansion gate had run over him while taking a turn. 'We identified the car registration number from the footage and contacted its owner,' said the police. 'He claimed that the vehicle was being driven by their chauffeur Kamlesh Tripathi Jha (39) at the time. Jha stays in a slum pocket near the Mahalaxmi temple.' The officer said that offences had been registered against Jha under Sections 106 (1) (causing death by negligence) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and 134 (duty of driver in case of accident and injury to a person) of the Motor Vehicles Act. 'He was arrested and was later granted bail by the court,' he added. Parvati said that Jagdish had worked with her for the last 25 years. 'He was like a brother to me,' she said. 'I carried out his last rites, as we don't know where his family lives in Uttar Pradesh, nor do we have any phone numbers. He used to drink and sleep on the footpath. Jaggu was well known in Bhuleshwar.' The police said they had seized the Mercedes involved in the incident.
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
In motor accidents, claims not restricted to third party, says SC
New Delhi: Motor vehicle insurance protects a policyholder against claims made by a third party for damages due to the policyholder's actions, but what about the claim against injury/death of the policyholder themselves in a road accident? Holding that family members of such a policyholder can also claim compensation, Supreme Court has referred the issue to a larger bench since there are contradictory verdicts of the apex court on the matter. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now While hearing the compensation plea of a minor girl who lost both her parents in a car accident in which her father was on the driving seat, a bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and K Vinod Chandran said section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act could be invoked for such a claim, as it is a special provision which overrides not only all the provisions of the Act but also any other law in force for the time being. In this case, the minor was awarded compensation by the insurance company for the death of her mother but not for her father as he was himself the insured party. The bench said: "... a claim under section 163A, as per the words employed in the provision, according to us covers every claim and is not restricted to a third party claim; without any requirement of establishing the negligence, if death or permanent disability is caused by reason of the motor accident. This would also take in the liability with respect to the death of an owner or a driver who stepped into the shoes of the owner, if the claim is made under section 163A dehors the statutory liability under section 147 or the contractual liability as reduced to writing in an insurance policy". The insurance company, however, took the stand that the petitioner, having succeeded to the estate of the owner of the vehicle who died in the accident cannot at the same time be the person who has the liability and is the recipient of the compensation. "It would override the provisions under sections 147 & 149 along with the other provisions of the Act and the law regulating insurance as also the terms of the policy confining the claim with respect to an owner-driver to a fixed sum. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now This according to us is the intention of incorporating the non-obstante clause under Section 163A providing for no-fault liability claims, the compensation for which is restricted to the structured formula under the IInd Schedule. It is a beneficial piece of legislation brought in, keeping in mind the enhanced chances of an accident, resulting from the prevalence of vehicles in the overcrowded roads of today. It was a social security scheme, brought about considering the need for a more comprehensive scheme of 'no-fault' liability for reasons of the ever-increasing instances of motor vehicle accidents and the difficulty in proving rash and negligent driving," the bench said.
